Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 06:18:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore XPM GPU Miner discussion  (Read 142055 times)
Atma-n
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 01:42:19 PM
 #921

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?
I think core2duo too slow. I use -ss 2 -t 8 for 2*280x on core2duo
but Athlone 2 270x handle 6*280x

I know core 2 duo too slow, so I ask Claymore for optimize it because I have 10 x grid [core2duo, 4G RAM, 5 X 270) Sad

Ok, I will add -ss 3 option.

What is the actual difference between -ss 0-2? I just use default and have never thought about it. Do I miss out on prime-power?
primer10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 02:16:08 PM
 #922

All this is really bad for the coin itself (but who cares actually) as it will certainly be the reason why it will never get the success bitcoin has.
(full acceptance of a 10% fee coins will hopefully never happened... for that matter any fiat currency "driven by corrupt bankers" (lol) is still better)
How does it differ from paying "10% fee" for bitcoin ASICs?

the difference is that for energy bound coins (sha256, scrypt, etc), the rich get richer.
technology bound coins (primes, like xpm and ric), the clever get richer.
primeGPU
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 02:49:02 PM
 #923

All this is really bad for the coin itself (but who cares actually) as it will certainly be the reason why it will never get the success bitcoin has.
(full acceptance of a 10% fee coins will hopefully never happened... for that matter any fiat currency "driven by corrupt bankers" (lol) is still better)
How does it differ from paying "10% fee" for bitcoin ASICs?
the difference is that for energy bound coins (sha256, scrypt, etc), the rich get richer.
technology bound coins (primes, like xpm and ric), the clever get richer.
Sure, developing an ASIC is a no-brainer, no technology reqiured at all.
primer10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 03:19:30 PM
 #924

All this is really bad for the coin itself (but who cares actually) as it will certainly be the reason why it will never get the success bitcoin has.
(full acceptance of a 10% fee coins will hopefully never happened... for that matter any fiat currency "driven by corrupt bankers" (lol) is still better)
How does it differ from paying "10% fee" for bitcoin ASICs?
the difference is that for energy bound coins (sha256, scrypt, etc), the rich get richer.
technology bound coins (primes, like xpm and ric), the clever get richer.
Sure, developing an ASIC is a no-brainer, no technology reqiured at all.

Was it the phrasing that confuses you? or because you are too busy with the next update? pool or speed?
user2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 03:24:27 PM
 #925

All this is really bad for the coin itself (but who cares actually) as it will certainly be the reason why it will never get the success bitcoin has.
(full acceptance of a 10% fee coins will hopefully never happened... for that matter any fiat currency "driven by corrupt bankers" (lol) is still better)
How does it differ from paying "10% fee" for bitcoin ASICs?

the difference is that for energy bound coins (sha256, scrypt, etc), the rich get richer.
technology bound coins (primes, like xpm and ric), the clever get richer.


I for one am ready to agree. Cause I just got 1 XPM richer which means I'm clever I guess Smiley

▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒
ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service  (( changenow.io ))
Whitepaper  ▓  Telegram  ▓  Twitter  ▓  Facebook  ▓  Medium  ▓  Reddit  ▓  Bounty Thread
XPM-guru
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 06:42:36 PM
 #926

Claymore, tell us, why are u supporting ypool? It obvious that ypool is stealing from us. Why not making your own pool?
kaleruka
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 06:53:15 PM
 #927

couse he steeling too)
user2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 92
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 08, 2014, 09:05:22 PM
 #928

Claymore, tell us, why are u supporting ypool? It obvious that ypool is stealing from us. Why not making your own pool?

Yeah, Claymore, make your own pool so the guys stopped crying about ypool. And started crying foul that Claymore's pool is stealing from them. At least that would be something new.

▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒
ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service  (( changenow.io ))
Whitepaper  ▓  Telegram  ▓  Twitter  ▓  Facebook  ▓  Medium  ▓  Reddit  ▓  Bounty Thread
mirny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 11:14:33 PM
 #929


At what speed do you run your cards (especially 280x)?

280X 1175/750 -ss 2 -t 8

hello, can I ask how did you do that?
I can set gpu engine to 1100mhz and memclock to 950mhz
or 1000/850, so maximum what i can do is 150mhz difference between engine/memclock,
when I try e.g. 1100/800, memclock will set to default.
you've got difference 425mhz
what kind of tuning SW, are you using, did you flash a bios or something, to allow this difference?


I use MSIAfterburner300Beta19, it is very large intervals settings.

 

thank you, msi afterburner did not work for me, but sapphire trixx did

This is my signature...
WINNIE_POOL
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 09, 2014, 12:36:02 AM
 #930

I have 10 x grid Core 2 duo + 5 cards 795 or 5 cards 270x.
With CPU core 2 duo speed for 5 cards is very slow.
But with Celeron G Generation 2, 3 is good speed for 6 cards.
Claymore, please review and optimize this case for next version.
Thanks very much.

What about "-ss 2" option? Is it not enough?

I'm using -ss 2, if <3 card it's ok but 5 cards slower, can I use other option?
I think core2duo too slow. I use -ss 2 -t 8 for 2*280x on core2duo
but Athlone 2 270x handle 6*280x

I know core 2 duo too slow, so I ask Claymore for optimize it because I have 10 x grid [core2duo, 4G RAM, 5 X 270) Sad

Ok, I will add -ss 3 option.

thanks, I'm waiting your new version Cheesy
seljak
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 09, 2014, 05:23:28 AM
 #931

Major improvement in invalid shares from v6 to v7. Got about 8% invalids in 100hours on v6. Down to 1% in v7.
nocheinfinita
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 09, 2014, 06:44:40 AM
 #932

I usually connect to 20+ nodes. Now that I'm running Claymore's solo miner, I have't seen the node count go above 9. It appears to me that the node issue is tied with this miner. Did this issue ever get resolved?
aikklond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 09, 2014, 07:54:02 AM
 #933

I usually connect to 20+ nodes. Now that I'm running Claymore's solo miner, I have't seen the node count go above 9. It appears to me that the node issue is tied with this miner. Did this issue ever get resolved?

My node count rises to 20+ (with the miner running) then steadily falls to 8 within 24 hours then never rises again...  Undecided
serpiente12
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10

If you dont like something change it


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 12:12:23 AM
 #934

annyone else having problems like "failed to conect retrying in 10 sec" etc in the new v7 pool?
SpeedDemon13 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
May 10, 2014, 12:49:11 AM
 #935

Hate to bring this up, but madMAx has release the XPM gpu miner as open source now: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=602292.0 .

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
smtn512
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 02:26:28 AM
Last edit: May 10, 2014, 03:57:18 AM by smtn512
 #936

Anyone else having trouble downloading v7 from mega.co? I must have tried a hundred times by now, always gets stuck right before its finished... Anywhere else its hosted? Still stuck with v5 for now...


Edit: never mind.... But sucky that it worked for me in IE but no other browser at all...
kaleruka
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 04:56:39 AM
 #937

when 8 version with 50% will be releaed?
Metastable7
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 06:08:05 AM
 #938

I hope version 8 it out shortly, I really don't want to go back to mining scrypt
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 08:02:20 AM
 #939

v8 will be released in a few hours, I'm testing it.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
primer10
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 09:09:25 AM
 #940

v8 will be released in a few hours, I'm testing it.

Looking into producing miner for Beeeeer? Beeeeer now has dev fee option as well.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!