✪✪✪ VIRTUAL COIN ✪✪✪ | P2P VIRTUAL MONEY | VC | X11 | ReLaunch: Date Feb 2017 ✪✪

[billotronic]

boooo!

my github : https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin now builds on *nix

Added a pull request

Thank you sir

I might get to toying with the explorer... tomorrow is another day

[1715238019]

1715238019

[1715238019]

1715238019

[1715238019]

1715238019

[1715238019]

1715238019

[1715238019]

1715238019

[1715238019]

1715238019

[Kestrel71]

Hopefully this dev is as enthusiastic as some of the members of this community, coin may actually have a good chance if he does get motivated a bit more.

[trademark]

Hopefully this dev is as enthusiastic as some of the members of this community, coin may actually have a good chance if he does get motivated a bit more.

I agree. With all the bs going on with most altcoins. Something tells me I should be mining VC again.  Dev just needs a shot of adrenaline! 

[spicelord]

If you guys want me to host a giveaway or promotion of some kind for voting or what have you I can. I have a couple thousand coins I could part with.

[Iffy]

If you guys want me to host a giveaway or promotion of some kind for voting or what have you I can. I have a couple thousand coins I could part with.

That sounds great, the more noise we can make the better   I have been discussing with Ownski basics like marketing continuity so we do at least look organized I will ask him to contact you so you can get some stuff worked out between you.  Great to see the support.

[v.coinz]

boooo!

my github : https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin now builds on *nix

Added a pull request

Thank you sir

I might get to toying with the explorer... tomorrow is another day

Thanks Billo

Just to clarify, I do not control vcoin source on github. I had requested in the past...

"

Hi linked67, that is my github ID, but if you don't mind updating vcoin code, then I won't need it.

their is an update for checkpoint.cpp file. I have posted it in thread.

I don't want to be rude but i have uploaded it on github because it was more easy to install it on my server after this. It's your job to register on github and upload/update your code.

Github is free.

"


so can't help much unless I was provided access or auther keep it updated.



back to https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin
I reviewed it, it needs to update checkpoint.cpp & some other files. I will upload changed files that you can replace it on github.

Thanks again.

[v.coinz]

Please update github with these updated source files.
https://mega.co.nz/#!DdBSDJSb!t0V6y5_SasEu1Hn0GQbuxdpriKAmFLz7EY3-iQtXNRs


Also comment out following code in main, as some Linux OS have issues & end up causing forking, but MAC OS or Windows OS builds should NOT be commented out.

Code:

else {
if (nBits != GetNextWorkRequired(pindexPrev, this))
return state.DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work"));
}

[billotronic]

boooo!

my github : https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin now builds on *nix

Added a pull request

Thank you sir

I might get to toying with the explorer... tomorrow is another day

Thanks Billo

Just to clarify, I do not control vcoin source on github. I had requested in the past...

"

Hi linked67, that is my github ID, but if you don't mind updating vcoin code, then I won't need it.

their is an update for checkpoint.cpp file. I have posted it in thread.

I don't want to be rude but i have uploaded it on github because it was more easy to install it on my server after this. It's your job to register on github and upload/update your code.

Github is free.

"


so can't help much unless I was provided access or auther keep it updated.



back to https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin
I reviewed it, it needs to update checkpoint.cpp & some other files. I will upload changed files that you can replace it on github.

Thanks again.

ahh well that explains that then.

We can do this either way, I can easily transfer my repo to you or I can keep it updated if you get me the goods.

[v.coinz]

boooo!

my github : https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin now builds on *nix

Added a pull request

Thank you sir

I might get to toying with the explorer... tomorrow is another day

Thanks Billo

Just to clarify, I do not control vcoin source on github. I had requested in the past...

"

Hi linked67, that is my github ID, but if you don't mind updating vcoin code, then I won't need it.

their is an update for checkpoint.cpp file. I have posted it in thread.

I don't want to be rude but i have uploaded it on github because it was more easy to install it on my server after this. It's your job to register on github and upload/update your code.

Github is free.

"


so can't help much unless I was provided access or auther keep it updated.



back to https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin
I reviewed it, it needs to update checkpoint.cpp & some other files. I will upload changed files that you can replace it on github.

Thanks again.

ahh well that explains that then.

We can do this either way, I can easily transfer my repo to you or I can keep it updated if you get me the goods.

Thanks
ok, how about you keep the repo ownership, that way I can concentrate on other things of Virtual Coin. I want this coin to succeed like bitcoin, litecoin or doge coin. All of them have one thing common, many volunteers helped out with code improvement, promotion/marketing. It is not possible for one person to do all this. I have given it a good start with professional logo, X11 code & potential Virtual Coin name, so again I hope we all join & help out. Bitcoin is gaining ground, it is possible VC can ride that wave.

[apple_talk]

boooo!

my github : https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin now builds on *nix

Added a pull request

Thank you sir

I might get to toying with the explorer... tomorrow is another day

Thanks Billo

Just to clarify, I do not control vcoin source on github. I had requested in the past...

"

Hi linked67, that is my github ID, but if you don't mind updating vcoin code, then I won't need it.

their is an update for checkpoint.cpp file. I have posted it in thread.

I don't want to be rude but i have uploaded it on github because it was more easy to install it on my server after this. It's your job to register on github and upload/update your code.

Github is free.

"


so can't help much unless I was provided access or auther keep it updated.



back to https://github.com/billotronic/vcoin
I reviewed it, it needs to update checkpoint.cpp & some other files. I will upload changed files that you can replace it on github.

Thanks again.

ahh well that explains that then.

We can do this either way, I can easily transfer my repo to you or I can keep it updated if you get me the goods.

Thanks
ok, how about you keep the repo ownership, that way I can concentrate on other things of Virtual Coin. I want this coin to succeed like bitcoin, litecoin or doge coin. All of them have one thing common, many volunteers helped out with code improvement, promotion/marketing. It is not possible for one person to do all this. I have given it a good start with professional logo, X11 code & potential Virtual Coin name, so again I hope we all join & help out. Bitcoin is gaining ground, it is possible VC can ride that wave.

+1

[billotronic]

Please update github with these updated source files.
https://mega.co.nz/#!DdBSDJSb!t0V6y5_SasEu1Hn0GQbuxdpriKAmFLz7EY3-iQtXNRs


Also comment out following code in main, as some Linux OS have issues & end up causing forking, but MAC OS or Windows OS builds should NOT be commented out.

Code:

else {
if (nBits != GetNextWorkRequired(pindexPrev, this))
return state.DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work"));
}

Rightio.

One thing though, I am not a programmer so bare with me, there are two instances of that code in main.cpp, do they both need to be commented out? And wouldn't said commenting effect mac and win builds ?

[apple_talk]

Please update github with these updated source files.
https://mega.co.nz/#!DdBSDJSb!t0V6y5_SasEu1Hn0GQbuxdpriKAmFLz7EY3-iQtXNRs


Also comment out following code in main, as some Linux OS have issues & end up causing forking, but MAC OS or Windows OS builds should NOT be commented out.

Code:

else {
if (nBits != GetNextWorkRequired(pindexPrev, this))
return state.DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work"));
}

Rightio.

One thing though, I am not a programmer so bare with me, there are two instances of that code in main.cpp, do they both need to be commented out? And wouldn't said commenting effect mac and win builds ?

In your current code: line 2325-2329 needs to be commented (it is already commented out in your source), but if building Windows or MAC builds, comment needs to be removed. I hope it makes sense.

[billotronic]

Please update github with these updated source files.
https://mega.co.nz/#!DdBSDJSb!t0V6y5_SasEu1Hn0GQbuxdpriKAmFLz7EY3-iQtXNRs


Also comment out following code in main, as some Linux OS have issues & end up causing forking, but MAC OS or Windows OS builds should NOT be commented out.

Code:

else {
if (nBits != GetNextWorkRequired(pindexPrev, this))
return state.DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work"));
}

Rightio.

One thing though, I am not a programmer so bare with me, there are two instances of that code in main.cpp, do they both need to be commented out? And wouldn't said commenting effect mac and win builds ?

In your current code: line 2325-2329 needs to be commented (it is already commented out in your source), but if building Windows or MAC builds, comment needs to be removed. I hope it makes sense.

ha yeah, thats what was kinda screwing with me as I thought it already was.

Ok, so let me see if I have this straight, if someone wanted to pull and build this source on win they would have to modify main.ccp?

[v.coinz]

Please update github with these updated source files.
https://mega.co.nz/#!DdBSDJSb!t0V6y5_SasEu1Hn0GQbuxdpriKAmFLz7EY3-iQtXNRs


Also comment out following code in main, as some Linux OS have issues & end up causing forking, but MAC OS or Windows OS builds should NOT be commented out.

Code:

else {
if (nBits != GetNextWorkRequired(pindexPrev, this))
return state.DoS(100, error("AcceptBlock() : incorrect proof of work"));
}

Rightio.

One thing though, I am not a programmer so bare with me, there are two instances of that code in main.cpp, do they both need to be commented out? And wouldn't said commenting effect mac and win builds ?

In your current code: line 2325-2329 needs to be commented (it is already commented out in your source), but if building Windows or MAC builds, comment needs to be removed. I hope it makes sense.

ha yeah, thats what was kinda screwing with me as I thought it already was.

Ok, so let me see if I have this straight, if someone wanted to pull and build this source on win they would have to modify main.ccp?

yes, so that's why I am building Windows build myself. For some reason as I mentioned some time back in this thread that some versions of Linux OS have a bug that caused it to fail & thus cause forking.

[billotronic]

ok, github "should" be current (ffs double check me though I am very new to this)

Tonight, if my head does not explode first, I will get back tackling the block explorer

[Kestrel71]

If people are interested I could make a few signatures that link to this thread like the one below for promotion of this coin on this or any forum.  Colours and wording can of course be changed, the one below is just an example.

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
◊◊◊◊◊  Virtual coin  VGW  X11  3 million total coins  NO PREMINE ◊◊◊◊◊
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔

Depending on what member level you are will also affect what you can have as a signature too.  I can make signatures depending on member level if needed.

[alvarorecoba]

If people are interested I could make a few signatures that link to this thread like the one below for promotion of this coin on this or any forum.  Colours and wording can of course be changed, the one below is just an example.

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
◊◊◊◊◊  Virtual coin  VGW  X11  3 million total coins  NO PREMINE ◊◊◊◊◊
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔

Depending on what member level you are will also affect what you can have as a signature too.  I can make signatures depending on member level if needed.

Nice 

[lobo13hf]

If people are interested I could make a few signatures that link to this thread like the one below for promotion of this coin on this or any forum.  Colours and wording can of course be changed, the one below is just an example.

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
◊◊◊◊◊  Virtual coin  VGW  X11  3 million total coins  NO PREMINE ◊◊◊◊◊
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔

Depending on what member level you are will also affect what you can have as a signature too.  I can make signatures depending on member level if needed.

at what level do i have to be to be able to use a sug like this one?

[Kestrel71]

If people are interested I could make a few signatures that link to this thread like the one below for promotion of this coin on this or any forum.  Colours and wording can of course be changed, the one below is just an example.

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
◊◊◊◊◊  Virtual coin  VGW  X11  3 million total coins  NO PREMINE ◊◊◊◊◊
▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔

Depending on what member level you are will also affect what you can have as a signature too.  I can make signatures depending on member level if needed.

at what level do i have to be to be able to use a sug like this one?

For a colourful signature like the one I made above you would need to be a full member or higher.  I can make a simple one for members whose rank is lower than that.

- Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 50 characters.
- Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 150 characters.
- Member: Unlimited length.
- Full: Color allowed.
- Sr. Member: Size allowed
- Hero: Background color allowed

I did not realise how restricted lower level members were until I found out the above information just now

[billotronic]

sooo struggling with the daemon and I have an issue


No matter what I do, my client keeps getting stuck @ 1611

Code:

{
    "version" : 90108,
    "protocolversion" : 70002,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 1611,
    "timeoffset" : 0,
    "connections" : 6,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 21.81917496,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1401983957,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00001000,
    "errors" : ""
}

I've tried deleting the blockchain and retrying but to no avail. Any ideas?