[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[SicsoT]

Я мoгy пpoдaть ббp 5000 мoнeт. Пo кaкoй цeнe вoзьмeтe?

[ninjacoins]

Everyone offering Boolberry are new accounts. Sorry i would only be interested in purchasing via escrow or through an exchange if they will be available soon.

[gigabyted]

Im buying all the coins you want to sell at 2k sats, will be thru escrow...

[gigabyted]

Я мoгy пpoдaть ббp 5000 мoнeт. Пo кaкoй цeнe вoзьмeтe?

Я мoгy кyпить вaш 5000 bbr зa 0.1 BTC (2 тыc. Caт)

[oldcoinguru]

So, what do you want to do?

All of the aliased addresses on Boolberry's chain will be gone, do you want to import that feature? It has kind of half baked tying an alias to a block.

Do you want to import the dev tax?

The peculiarities around Boolberry's scaling "solution"?

or just relaunch a new cryptonote fork and do the swap, and [1]start developing more from there

There are still bunches of things a cryptonote coin can do that others are not doing, to make it stand out

I've laid out above what we're doing.. A cryptonote 2.0 codebase with all of Boolberry's features)) Make no mistake, the new codebase isn't just another Cryptonote fork. Our improvements are beyond anything happening in this space right now and we will be relaunching the project with these features. So I'm not quite sure what you mean by "start development after the swap" because we're already well on our way. Maybe you can clarify this statement?

W.r.t BBR's aliasing, it's great and we've already imported that system into the codebase, in addition to domain aliasing. The former has benefits since its hardcoded, it doesn't have an attack vector like DNS leak has with domain aliasing. Nonetheless, we've also integrated domain aliasing to please both arguments. The community is small enough right now that if aliases are lost during the swap they should be able to remake them afterwards without conflicts. As stated, we still need to iron out the details w.r.t swap and we might be able to salvage them. We have a dev that is working specifically on the swap details. As the plan matures we'll let everyone know how we are going to proceed along with the pros and cons.

The 1% mining tax has proven to be ineffective in sustaining ongoing development. We should be able to establish enough funds for ongoing development when we proceed with the swap. If the community is open to an ongoing dev tax on top of that then that would be up to everyone here. My main goal moving forward with funding is to make sure this project never gets put into the situation it was in before i.e. lack of development, funding, mismanagement of funds etc.

Boolberry's pruning solution makes sense. We have the team in place to review proposals and provide concrete feedback. If someone can propose a better solution than we'll look into it.

We have a very clear vision of where we are going with this and rockstar team to get us there. I'm 100% confident this project will reestablish its position as the benchmark CN project. As stated, in the future we will do a full project reveal to highlight what we're doing along with respective white papers to support our claims.

How do you remake the aliases after a swap?  The aliases were gained from mining blocks.  I have about fifty aliases.  How do I get those back after a swap?

[b4h4mu7]

How do you remake the aliases after a swap?  The aliases were gained from mining blocks.  I have about fifty aliases.  How do I get those back after a swap?

Hi oldcoinguru. I should of been more clear there. If we end up swapping to a new chain, users would need to remake their aliases from mining. At the moment there are approx. 530 aliases.

http://mining.blue/munin/BoolBerryStats/BoolBerryStats/aliases.html

Something might be able to be done with the genesis block preserving aliasing but we'll have to do some research into this area. If I remember correctly, zoidberg reserved his on the BBR genesis block. I'll update everyone when we make progress on this front.

[byteball3r]

Interesting that it is still around and semi-active. Has anyone been able to withdraw from poloniex this year since the delisting? I have 100,000 something XBB left there. Edit: Wow it isn't even listed in balances any more.

[b4h4mu7]

Interesting that it is still around and semi-active. Has anyone been able to withdraw from poloniex this year since the delisting? I have 100,000 something XBB left there. Edit: Wow it isn't even listed in balances any more.

A few in the community were able to withdraw from them. The last withdrawal I know about in the community was a couple of months ago after waiting 3 months for support response. Try opening up a ticket and posting on their bitcointalk thread.

Poloniex Thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=420836.0

[mis255]

Interesting that it is still around and semi-active. Has anyone been able to withdraw from poloniex this year since the delisting? I have 100,000 something XBB left there. Edit: Wow it isn't even listed in balances any more.

its not listed in balance because its either 'pending' or 'awaiting response' (check to see if the bbr balance is reserved in 'history').

[cryptohunter]

I know a couple of new adjustments have been made lately...

Is the latest bbr windows wallet the link on the bbr website?

I am going to try again to get polo to release my tokens but this time I can't use the bittrex wallet address so I need to get a wallet running on my local machine.

cheers.

[kaleomancer]

[Wanted to Buy] I'd like to get some BoolBerry,  I will use escrow of course.   PM me your offer.  Thank you!

[soldat13]

where i can find a working BBR wallet or/and an exchange ? Thanks

[mmo4me.2016]

where i can find a working BBR wallet or/and an exchange ? Thanks

No offical exchange at this times, You can add node to wallet!
It can sync your wallet!
Thanks

[theneonirvana]

im glad to see people are still behind bbr,

Ive been informed the dreaded ram issue is coming in a upcoming release... so i have reopened my pool!


Join us at http://bbr.hash.group     @ 0.5% pool fee ( the lowest around )

Block explorer is coming as well, and daemon has been updated to newest source for transaction verification.

[skygonga]

Where is the BBR exchange, please.

[dwarf0]

Nowhere. Maybe you should go and make one?

[gigabyted]

Just a friendly reminder that im willing to by some BBR if you got some to sell...

Waiting for you!

[crypto_zoidberg]

.......
Over the last 5 months, I've funded this project without any support from investors. I've mostly compensated contributors in BBR(XBB) but also BTC as needed (due to the lack of liquidity from exchange delisting). I've only received a small amount of donations totaling around 300BBR and .1BTC. That said, the team has grown to 10 developers, 5 cryptographers, 2 graphics designers and other contributors working on the project in a private repository. Cryptozoidberg has been working with us in an advisory position due to his current development obligations. As his schedule permits he will eventually be able to join our efforts full time. Despite some of your feelings towards Cryptozoidberg, he is a great asset to this project and his knowledge of CN is deeper than anyone else on this forum. In that sense he is the Satoshi of CN.
........

Let me put little remark here:

1. I'm not involved in b4h4mu's project. They asked me just a few things, but I have an only misty idea about the project that they do. Hope it's gonna be something interesting.
2. I never claimed to join full time into it.

What I really promised is to get back to BBR, eventually and i still want to do that.

And i really appreciate all efforts of b4h4mu to put BBR to exchange.

Zoidberg

[oossaa]

I need AMS. I suggest exchanging 100 BBR per day for 5000 AMS v4 or v3  per day. Write to pm

[b4h4mu7]

.......
Over the last 5 months, I've funded this project without any support from investors. I've mostly compensated contributors in BBR(XBB) but also BTC as needed (due to the lack of liquidity from exchange delisting). I've only received a small amount of donations totaling around 300BBR and .1BTC. That said, the team has grown to 10 developers, 5 cryptographers, 2 graphics designers and other contributors working on the project in a private repository. Cryptozoidberg has been working with us in an advisory position due to his current development obligations. As his schedule permits he will eventually be able to join our efforts full time. Despite some of your feelings towards Cryptozoidberg, he is a great asset to this project and his knowledge of CN is deeper than anyone else on this forum. In that sense he is the Satoshi of CN.
........

Let me put little remark here:

1. I'm not involved in b4h4mu's project. They asked me just a few things, but I have an only misty idea about the project that they do. Hope it's gonna be something interesting.
2. I never claimed to join full time into it.

What I really promised is to get back to BBR, eventually and i still want to do that.

And i really appreciate all efforts of b4h4mu to put BBR to exchange.

Zoidberg

Let me also clarify the statements to the community here:

1. Zoidberg is correct, he hasn't made any commits to the new codebase. He's only been advising us with certain things, this is why I said he's been working with us in advisory position. We've been relying on our own scientists for algorithmic changes and peer review. That said, the team has definitely appreciated him making himself available for advice when we've needed it.

2. Zoidberg is also correct here. He showed interest in eventually joining an effort towards a renewed BBR, but he has obligations to some other project. This is fine with me, because we have a very capable team with their main obligation to this project. If he wants to contribute the door will always be open for him.

In the future, we'll be doing a full project reveal that will give everyone here clarity on what we've been working on and how we're proceeding. On Monday, we have a team meeting where we'll be finalizing the technical aspects of the transition to the new codebase. I've invited Zoidberg to the meeting, so he's more than welcome to join us.

When I originally made the update about the coinswap, we had an idea to either partner with an exchange or handle it through a team based effort. This method is centralized and would leave it open to some attack vectors, most notably exchange theft. Due to recent dealings with exchanges, most would be hard to trust with this task.

The new direction is to do a snapshot of BBR blockchain and import that into the new codebase. If this method is viable, the transition would be as simple as downloading the new client and importing wallet file. This idea is much more decentralized and removes potential attack vectors. It also has potential to save mined aliases but we will only be able to confirm this after the meeting. I know that's an issue for some here so we'll do our best to resolve that. The drawback is that the old BBR chain will continue to function, so there will be two chains. After the project reveal, we'll leave it up to community and general public on which chain they will support.

After the meeting on Monday we'll have complete clarity on this subject that we can share with the community.