Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 08:43:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 [129] 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 ... 486 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1210696 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
maxcan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 04:22:28 AM
 #2561

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

the "hard true" is that saying that kind of thing is tactless and makes everyone in this thread look bad.

posting such drivel on other coins' threads just casts a bad image on whatever you're promoting.

This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

well you can't stop people from writing it really.

the devs and PR team have been good about staying out of the board politics, so there shouldn't be any problem.
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 26, 2014, 05:28:08 AM
 #2562


Whats there Scratchpad details as not on the getting started?
tifozi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 501


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 05:30:01 AM
 #2563

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

the "hard true" is that saying that kind of thing is tactless and makes everyone in this thread look bad.

posting such drivel on other coins' threads just casts a bad image on whatever you're promoting.

This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

well you can't stop people from writing it really.

the devs and PR team have been good about staying out of the board politics, so there shouldn't be any problem.

I understand that. Thanks for the comments. Looks like Dr. Zoidberg deleted his latest comment here in this thread which was quite inflammatory. There are quite a lot of us that respect real developers and do not want this type of fanboyism trickling to the main coin threads. We cannot stop it, but only express our dissatisfaction and hope it appeals to some of these outright trolling.

I think our voices have been heard and we can get back to main discussion here. Thanks again.
clintar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 06:20:41 AM
 #2564

where I can get boolberry logo in high resolution?
checkout boolberry source in the resources folder.
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/master/resources
enerbyte
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 501


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 06:30:18 AM
 #2565

where I can get boolberry logo in high resolution?
checkout boolberry source in the resources folder.
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/master/resources
thank you very much! Wink
otila
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 07:53:25 AM
 #2566

I'm trying to compile on Ubuntu 12.04 and it fails with the following errors:
Code:
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’

Read README.md , at least the first line starting with "Dependencies".
clintar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 08:01:54 AM
 #2567

To get pool started and get some blocks found, I'm dropping fee at http://cncoin.farm to 0%.

Happy mining!
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 09:37:19 AM
 #2568

where I can get boolberry logo in high resolution?

we have it in repo in resources folder.





crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 09:44:26 AM
 #2569

OpenCL miner
Merged all updates from the main branch.
Source - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Windows x64 binaries  - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl/releases

Fixed previous binary release too (it was compressed with 7zip instead of zip).

Thank you Mikhail!

crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 09:47:25 AM
 #2570

I'm trying to compile on Ubuntu 12.04 and it fails with the following errors:

Code:
[ 21%] [ 22%] [ 23%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o
Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
Building C object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/tree-hash.c.o
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o] Error 1
Linking C static library libminiupnpc.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
[ 23%] Built target upnpc-static
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/crypto-tests.dir/all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make: *** [build-release] Error 2

Any ideas?  Intel platform. 

Thanks

what gcc version do you have?

crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 10:03:58 AM
 #2571

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

the "hard true" is that saying that kind of thing is tactless and makes everyone in this thread look bad.

posting such drivel on other coins' threads just casts a bad image on whatever you're promoting.

This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

well you can't stop people from writing it really.

the devs and PR team have been good about staying out of the board politics, so there shouldn't be any problem.

I understand that. Thanks for the comments. Looks like Dr. Zoidberg deleted his latest comment here in this thread which was quite inflammatory. There are quite a lot of us that respect real developers and do not want this type of fanboyism trickling to the main coin threads. We cannot stop it, but only express our dissatisfaction and hope it appeals to some of these outright trolling.

I think our voices have been heard and we can get back to main discussion here. Thanks again.

what you mean? i can't remember that i deleted my posts in last weeks...

maxcan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 10:25:11 AM
 #2572

what you mean? i can't remember that i deleted my posts in last weeks...
i believe he means that nekomata deleted his post (won't say what was in it though)  Cheesy
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 02:56:38 PM
 #2573

Output like this
Code:
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.052013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.054013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] device index must me between 0 and 4294967295
actually means selected OpenCL platform has 0 GPU devices. It happens if you installed CPU only OpenCL drivers from Intel or AMD. It should be gone after you select nvidia platform. Anyway don't change device_index - it doesn't make any sense. So if you tried everything - reboot.

Tried - without restarting (10min for restart....) all combinations with device_index 0,1,2 and platform_index 0,1,2
Same result

PC is i5-2500, 1 750Ti card, win7 x64, 8GB ram drivers 337.88

Hey mbk.

I have 2 rigs. One AMD and one Nvidia.

When I run the miner it picks up only the first card on each machine and gives me the CL_INVALID_VALUE for the other cards. Is there a way to fix this? Also I read about -threads to assign the number of gpus but is there a way to only mine with cards 1,2, and 3 instead of 0,1,2,3?

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
jperkins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 03:20:18 PM
 #2574

I'm trying to compile on Ubuntu 12.04 and it fails with the following errors:

Code:
[ 21%] [ 22%] [ 23%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o
Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
Building C object src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/tree-hash.c.o
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/wild_keccak.cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
cc1plus: error: -Werror=maybe-uninitialized: no option -Wmaybe-uninitialized
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++11’
make[3]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/crypto/crypto.cpp.o] Error 1
Linking C static library libminiupnpc.a
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
[ 23%] Built target upnpc-static
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/crypto-tests.dir/all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/crypto.dir/all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/johndoe/boolberry/build/release'
make: *** [build-release] Error 2

Any ideas?  Intel platform. 

Thanks

what gcc version do you have?



gcc -v  returns  gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu 4.8.1-2ubuntu1~12.04
mbk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 03:21:35 PM
 #2575

1. Try larger values for thread_delay in config file (ex. 2000). It's in milliseconds.
2. Set device_index to 1 and use 3 threads to mine.

Output like this
Code:
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.052013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.054013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] device index must me between 0 and 4294967295
actually means selected OpenCL platform has 0 GPU devices. It happens if you installed CPU only OpenCL drivers from Intel or AMD. It should be gone after you select nvidia platform. Anyway don't change device_index - it doesn't make any sense. So if you tried everything - reboot.

Tried - without restarting (10min for restart....) all combinations with device_index 0,1,2 and platform_index 0,1,2
Same result

PC is i5-2500, 1 750Ti card, win7 x64, 8GB ram drivers 337.88

Hey mbk.

I have 2 rigs. One AMD and one Nvidia.

When I run the miner it picks up only the first card on each machine and gives me the CL_INVALID_VALUE for the other cards. Is there a way to fix this? Also I read about -threads to assign the number of gpus but is there a way to only mine with cards 1,2, and 3 instead of 0,1,2,3?

Boolberry OpenCL solo miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Boolberry OpenCL stratum pool miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/cpuminer-multi-opencl
MBK's Boolberry pool - http://bbr.mbkpool.info
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 26, 2014, 03:44:51 PM
Last edit: July 26, 2014, 04:10:39 PM by antonio8
 #2576

1. Try larger values for thread_delay in config file (ex. 2000). It's in milliseconds.
2. Set device_index to 1 and use 3 threads to mine.

Output like this
Code:
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.052013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-21 12:56:01.054013 [miner 0][OCL 0/0] device index must me between 0 and 4294967295
actually means selected OpenCL platform has 0 GPU devices. It happens if you installed CPU only OpenCL drivers from Intel or AMD. It should be gone after you select nvidia platform. Anyway don't change device_index - it doesn't make any sense. So if you tried everything - reboot.

Tried - without restarting (10min for restart....) all combinations with device_index 0,1,2 and platform_index 0,1,2
Same result

PC is i5-2500, 1 750Ti card, win7 x64, 8GB ram drivers 337.88

Hey mbk.

I have 2 rigs. One AMD and one Nvidia.

When I run the miner it picks up only the first card on each machine and gives me the CL_INVALID_VALUE for the other cards. Is there a way to fix this? Also I read about -threads to assign the number of gpus but is there a way to only mine with cards 1,2, and 3 instead of 0,1,2,3?

I am not the best at this but do you mean make changes 1 and 2 in the "wild_keccak.cl and wild_keccak_multi.cl"?

Ok found it in appdata.

I get 2 cards now. Trying to get the third.

EDIT: Thanks mbk

Got them all going on the rig with the AMD cards. I am thinking I need this wallet on rig with Nvidia cards also. I was trying to mine from the Nvidia to the AMD rig. Maybe I need seperate wallets on each rig.

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
superplus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 26, 2014, 06:09:15 PM
 #2577

maybe it would be useful to say in the thread title something like "advanced CryptoNote" ?
i got the impression most people don't know that there are some serious things fixed in boolberry
would also consider to point out the lightweight design with less chain bloating
mbk
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 07:06:25 PM
 #2578

Changing wallets doesn't make any sense for the miner. You can use the same address for all your miners.
You can try to run 1 instance per GPU as described in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.msg7934170#msg7934170

1. Try larger values for thread_delay in config file (ex. 2000). It's in milliseconds.
2. Set device_index to 1 and use 3 threads to mine.



I am not the best at this but do you mean make changes 1 and 2 in the "wild_keccak.cl and wild_keccak_multi.cl"?

Ok found it in appdata.

I get 2 cards now. Trying to get the third.

EDIT: Thanks mbk

Got them all going on the rig with the AMD cards. I am thinking I need this wallet on rig with Nvidia cards also. I was trying to mine from the Nvidia to the AMD rig. Maybe I need seperate wallets on each rig.

Boolberry OpenCL solo miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/boolberry-opencl
Boolberry OpenCL stratum pool miner - https://github.com/mbkuperman/cpuminer-multi-opencl
MBK's Boolberry pool - http://bbr.mbkpool.info
33zer0w0lf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 26, 2014, 07:35:56 PM
 #2579

Extreme Pool
Zoidberg and I were doing some work on the pool backend, the pool was temporarily offline but is now back up.
http://boolberry.extremepool.org

http://www.extremepool.org (BCN) (MRO) (QCN) (XDN) (BBR) (AEON) (ORION) (DSH) (CRR) (INF8)
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 01:06:58 AM
 #2580

CPU pools appear to be taking way to long to get BBR. We need a GPU pool to stop all the heavy hitting GPU solo miners. This coin will stall till this happens imo.
Pages: « 1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 [129] 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 ... 486 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!