Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 03:14:22 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 486 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1210694 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
33zer0w0lf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2014, 06:16:02 AM
 #2601

i assume it's just something strange to do with nvidia, just putting it out there if it's of any use Smiley
possible, I don't have any NVidia to test with.

http://www.extremepool.org (BCN) (MRO) (QCN) (XDN) (BBR) (AEON) (ORION) (DSH) (CRR) (INF8)
33zer0w0lf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2014, 06:26:05 AM
 #2602

Extreme Pool

http://boolberry.extremepool.org

I forgot to mention that along with the 0% Fees I am currently offering,  if you are interested in an alias I will provide that, for free at this time, to those mining on my pool.
If you are not mining on the pool but are still interesting in an alias pm me.

Happy Mining!!





http://www.extremepool.org (BCN) (MRO) (QCN) (XDN) (BBR) (AEON) (ORION) (DSH) (CRR) (INF8)
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 06:26:32 AM
 #2603

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
33zer0w0lf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2014, 06:31:51 AM
 #2604

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
I am getting that on my own miners, I am looking into it now, seems to only effect the old http protocol, which was an issue with simpleminer in the beginning. 

http://www.extremepool.org (BCN) (MRO) (QCN) (XDN) (BBR) (AEON) (ORION) (DSH) (CRR) (INF8)
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 06:44:28 AM
 #2605

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
I am getting that on my own miners, I am looking into it now, seems to only effect the old http protocol, which was an issue with simpleminer in the beginning. 

Cheers , Will it work on 5555 ?
33zer0w0lf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2014, 06:52:15 AM
 #2606

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
I am getting that on my own miners, I am looking into it now, seems to only effect the old http protocol, which was an issue with simpleminer in the beginning. 

Cheers , Will it work on 5555 ?
no 5555 is a stratum (tcp) port, simpleminer is http

http://www.extremepool.org (BCN) (MRO) (QCN) (XDN) (BBR) (AEON) (ORION) (DSH) (CRR) (INF8)
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 06:58:32 AM
 #2607

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
I am getting that on my own miners, I am looking into it now, seems to only effect the old http protocol, which was an issue with simpleminer in the beginning. 

Cheers , Will it work on 5555 ?

nm tried it and doesn't
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 07:41:24 AM
 #2608

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
I am getting that on my own miners, I am looking into it now, seems to only effect the old http protocol, which was an issue with simpleminer in the beginning. 

Seems to get itself into a bit of a mess and completely fail to connect.

2014-Jul-27 19:37:31.973467 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:37:34.124470 GPU 1008209
2014-Jul-27 19:37:34.139470 GPU 1258199
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.290474 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.471475 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.641475 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.602521 Scratchpad received ok, size: 524029Kb, heigh=50430
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.622521 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.797521 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 19:38:10.047521 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 19:38:10.057521 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:38:12.254525 GPU 1150762
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.439529 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.614529 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.799529 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.652575 Scratchpad received ok, size: 540406Kb, heigh=50430
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.672575 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.842575 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 19:38:48.102576 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 19:38:48.117576 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:38:50.349579 GPU 1240737
2014-Jul-27 19:38:53.564583 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:38:53.734584 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK

I have to restart it every ten mins or so.. Sad
Kaleran
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 08:11:14 AM
 #2609

Hi please help. When i try to start the new cpuminer, it was crashed. Minerd.exe stopped working. But the old cpuminer is works perfectly.
In the run.bat:

Code:
minerd.exe -a wildkeccak -o stratum+tcp://bbr.farm:7777 -u 1H7XL63Jqf9b1hg9cPxxWM2xEXpyV3c3KbX8rSXhjBxvBihp6vWHYHY9Af4Xj7BEWF2XvcoLZvA9hiDNm4sUKzmSRbandTL -p X -P -D -t 2 -k http://bbr.farm/download/scratchpad.bin
(Sorry for my bad english)
wenjiannin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 09:06:00 AM
 #2610

Earlier I tested my OpenCL mod on my 860M, now I tried on my 750Ti. 58% increase, it looks like. (nsfw as usual)

Here's the stock miner: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbr750Tistock.png
And here's my edits: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/bbr750Tiwolf.png

 Smiley Smiley Smiley :)thank you。
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 09:15:07 AM
 #2611

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
I am getting that on my own miners, I am looking into it now, seems to only effect the old http protocol, which was an issue with simpleminer in the beginning.  

Seems to get itself into a bit of a mess and completely fail to connect.

2014-Jul-27 19:37:31.973467 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:37:34.124470 GPU 1008209
2014-Jul-27 19:37:34.139470 GPU 1258199
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.290474 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.471475 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.641475 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.602521 Scratchpad received ok, size: 524029Kb, heigh=50430
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.622521 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.797521 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 19:38:10.047521 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 19:38:10.057521 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:38:12.254525 GPU 1150762
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.439529 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.614529 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.799529 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.652575 Scratchpad received ok, size: 540406Kb, heigh=50430
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.672575 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.842575 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 19:38:48.102576 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 19:38:48.117576 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:38:50.349579 GPU 1240737
2014-Jul-27 19:38:53.564583 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:38:53.734584 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK

I have to restart it every ten mins or so.. Sad


Seems to be running fine atm, have you tweaked at your end ?

Also I'm seeing the pool find blocks but my Total paid still says 0.. Is there a delay for the Coins to become confirmed ?

My BBR ADDy is 1E63PZ151BQa7AHWYgKGbkiKfk79Mmb5xg5cnNB5gAApffR4xGruDNwe9bEzq5K2wxiKhzs9gYsViho JyCQn7UofNjEjarH
wenjiannin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 09:21:04 AM
 #2612

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

the "hard true" is that saying that kind of thing is tactless and makes everyone in this thread look bad.

posting such drivel on other coins' threads just casts a bad image on whatever you're promoting.

This same person has been doing this again and again in this thread, the darkcoin thread, the monero thread and pretty much everywhere else.

well you can't stop people from writing it really.

the devs and PR team have been good about staying out of the board politics, so there shouldn't be any problem.

I understand that. Thanks for the comments. Looks like Dr. Zoidberg deleted his latest comment here in this thread which was quite inflammatory. There are quite a lot of us that respect real developers and do not want this type of fanboyism trickling to the main coin threads. We cannot stop it, but only express our dissatisfaction and hope it appeals to some of these outright trolling.

I think our voices have been heard and we can get back to main discussion here. Thanks again.

what you mean? i can't remember that i deleted my posts in last weeks...


I was concerned about the release of any information every day, in the hope of the team getting stronger, like XMR, have a strong promotion, so get up BBR launch, hoping that day come soon.
Apostle4444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 832
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 10:12:14 AM
 #2613

Getting these quite a bit pointing at the pool being slow.

I'm using simpleminer GPU edition on Boolberrypool.com on port 1111.

2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.706838 ERROR C:\Develop\GitHub\boolberry-opencl\contrib\epe
e\include\storages/http_abstract_invoke.h:112[epee::net_utils::invoke_http_json_
rpc]RPC call of "submit" returned error: -1, message: Low difficulty share
2014-Jul-27 18:20:39.781838 Failed to submit share!  Updating job.
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.793839 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:20:40.973840 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:20:41.158840 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.695888 Scratchpad received ok, size: 49093Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.715888 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.885888 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.932888 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:21:14.942888 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.584896 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.759896 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:21:20.944897 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.809944 Scratchpad received ok, size: 65457Kb, heigh=50393
2014-Jul-27 18:21:53.829944 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 18:22:02.339956 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.404961 Numbers of blocks added to scratchpad: 1
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.449961 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.454961 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 18:22:05.464961 slow pool response 11622 ms
2014-Jul-27 18:22:09.971967 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.166967 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 18:22:10.351968 Getting scratchpad...
I am getting that on my own miners, I am looking into it now, seems to only effect the old http protocol, which was an issue with simpleminer in the beginning.  

Seems to get itself into a bit of a mess and completely fail to connect.

2014-Jul-27 19:37:31.973467 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:37:34.124470 GPU 1008209
2014-Jul-27 19:37:34.139470 GPU 1258199
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.290474 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.471475 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 19:37:37.641475 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.602521 Scratchpad received ok, size: 524029Kb, heigh=50430
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.622521 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:09.797521 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 19:38:10.047521 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 19:38:10.057521 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:38:12.254525 GPU 1150762
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.439529 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.614529 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK
2014-Jul-27 19:38:15.799529 Getting scratchpad...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.652575 Scratchpad received ok, size: 540406Kb, heigh=50430
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.672575 Getting next job...
2014-Jul-27 19:38:47.842575 Job didn't change
2014-Jul-27 19:38:48.102576 [OCL 0/0] copy scratchpad
2014-Jul-27 19:38:48.117576 [OCL 0/0] error:  CL_INVALID_VALUE
2014-Jul-27 19:38:50.349579 GPU 1240737
2014-Jul-27 19:38:53.564583 Connecting boolberrypool.com:1111....
2014-Jul-27 19:38:53.734584 Connected boolberrypool.com:1111 OK

I have to restart it every ten mins or so.. Sad


Seems to be running fine atm, have you tweaked at your end ?

Also I'm seeing the pool find blocks but my Total paid still says 0.. Is there a delay for the Coins to become confirmed ?

My BBR ADDy is 1E63PZ151BQa7AHWYgKGbkiKfk79Mmb5xg5cnNB5gAApffR4xGruDNwe9bEzq5K2wxiKhzs9gYsViho JyCQn7UofNjEjarH

Nah slow pool again.. Sad
damashup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 259
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 11:03:40 AM
 #2614

Doing some due diligence on BBR...as you do on a slow Sunday morning.  Smiley

I was wondering if someone could help explain the irregular transactions that took place on July 24th between 16:40:51 and 16:54:37 (Blocks 48604 to 48613)? The transaction volume in this 15 minute window was extraordinary when compared to anything that happened before or since.

Below is the details of the relevant transaction volumes/ no. of transactions (excluding block rewards):

Block 48604
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/51c998643f5db106fea2f864b9096716399597eb41fd684ed1a9458a47260f6d
Volume = 21,000 BBR
No. of tx = 3

Block 48605
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/d73714f139dfca60fbcc9c9515efee9408334d166ef09b41bc8952ad07bc34a9
Volume = 30,000 BBR
No. of tx = 2

Block 48607
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/25dbb6fe8745c744108a4eddca4d592efc454ff3db0dfd35b1ae2e2de25c869f
Volume = 250,000 BBR
No. of tx = 5
Unless this is a huge coincidence, it would suggest someone with control of around a THIRD of all BBR (in circulation) shifting/ transferring funds? A whale or an exchange? In my view it's important to understand which.


Block 48609
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/d4fe013e6fd65570d7f3fd568e4ef3a53e408f827cae8516ea2298c0ccfeeed0
Volume = 25,000 BBR
No. of tx = 1

Block 48610
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/1bba30f4a58a03cf1c8b6cf91b500c570f8a7219e16a0812e90d423a1fdab586
Volume = 100,000 BBR
No. of tx = 1

Block 48611
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/2f061cb0993852842f514b8342472956a589ac770311aca13aa3b16cfb355111
Volume = 25,000 BBR
No. of tx = 1

Block 48612
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/cda4bde2f6cde17809147e1706a633fa49d96f4d08e3c6d925d1dad6854abefa
Volume = 25,000 BBR
No. of tx = 1

Block 48613
http://bbr.cryptostats.org/block/52b6b6d37b3ea68b2aed76236230b82e09733d9ba28f33d15423650be40d5d61
Volume = 25,000 BBR
No. of tx = 1

I'm trying to get a handle on the likely distribution of this coin, and as you can imagine this tx history raised a few eyebrows. It is such a pronounced spike in tx volume that I'm hoping there's an innocuous explanation, like an exchange (e.g. Poloniex?) shifting coins to a new wallet. I'm guessing this activity was prompted by the wallet upgrade as oppose to geniune OTC transactions? Not sure if this has already been addressed, couldn't see anything on this thread - however I do believe it's the kind of activity that most serious investors would look to understand before committing to supporting the coin.

This isn't my area of expertise so I'm hoping someone more knowledgable can help me understand.
mvidetto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 01:17:11 PM
 #2615

BBR now < 1/10 of XMR going rate and about 1/30 XMRs market cap.  Anyone have any ideas why this is?
sonoIO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 01:19:55 PM
Last edit: July 30, 2014, 03:58:55 PM by sonoIO
 #2616

I would like to share some thoughts on promotion of BBR, but before that i'll try to give motivation for them.
......
Some suggest MNCs are the devil, but when you have people in different countries working toward common goals, those nations have good reasons not to fight.  So maybe you don't care, but maybe you live in a country that might be in a war but isn't because of this sort of trade.  Wars suck, less of these, please.  This fact is the reason for one of those other weird alt coins, created by that little dev team, the ECB (The EURO).

"If goods don't cross borders, armies will" - Frederic Bastiat (probably)
...
I must admit that i do not know what is MNC, but i will try to give an interpretation of few other things mentioned, and suggest to read the whole original post offc. I like to think in terms of entropy as it gives a sense of time, at least the age of a system.

I'll assume here that any system tends to produce entropy as slow as possible (statistically).

That should hold also for any one of us. Indeed, everyone tends to a sort of harmony with its surroundings (local), some more successfully than others. This local harmony doesn't means that for a larger system (global, e.g. some region of space, or the whole World we live in) entropy production is slowest offc Smiley but in an ideal state larger scales should be optimally organized by the state, with further optimal organization between the states to the World level.

What happens in war is that entropy is produced very fast in every sense  - and in that sense huge amount of time and resources is wasted, e.g. to produce war machine in the first place, resources which could be used constructively otherwise. And this is not something that majority wants - e.g. as a consequence of the assumption.

Ppl just wish to live their lives decently, and with Internet can have consensus on a new scales with unprecedented dynamics. For that to mean that wars are becoming less probable, as average Joe will better understand its neighborhood, i think that with each day language barrier is becoming smaller obstacle compared to the terminology unification problem.

Thus, and to cut long story short, for presentation of BBR i would suggest two types of terminology, dependent on who is audience is offc: technical one (unlinkability etc.) and wider public one (privacy etc.). For wider public terminology i'm pretty sure that UN Declaration of Human Rights is the best document in existence that can be consulted, not just because it is already translated to almost all languages - which would make localizations of promotion materials straight forward process.

EDIT1: Winston Churchill described one of the places at which probably always entropy was(is) produced in higher rate per capita than its surroundings that "produces more history than they can consume”. EDIT2: and not completely off-topic, in those places significant amount of entropy production is in a high rate of knowledge getting lost, which allows history to repeat itself in smaller time intervals. Indication of the socio-state is the amount of collective amnesia. And amnesia is a consequence of the assumption, as ppl will live their lives if they cannot live them decently for some reason, producing entropy at higher rates. It kinda that high entropy production perpetuate itself, it has to take god enough impulse from outside (e.g. quantum leap from historical channels of “communication”) to have a chance to correct itself (to find out that it lives in a bigger system which gives a new sense of the neighborhood and allows the assumption to kicks with an attempt of reorganization)
superplus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 475
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 27, 2014, 01:30:35 PM
 #2617

CPU pools appear to be taking way to long to get BBR. We need a GPU pool to stop all the heavy hitting GPU solo miners. This coin will stall till this happens imo.
...
any ideas how stratum gpu development is going on?
cayars
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 02:05:28 PM
 #2618

Ignore 32-bit users. They are poor.
what a terribly stupid thing to say  Angry

thats the hard true about this world, most people dont say it but its everywhere... about bbr not being 32-bit compatible, cryptonotecoins require x64 architecture, things evolve.

Actually in ccminer/nvminer land we are doing CryptoNight in 32-bit releases.

Carlo
Youghoor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 275


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 02:06:40 PM
 #2619

CPU pools appear to be taking way to long to get BBR. We need a GPU pool to stop all the heavy hitting GPU solo miners. This coin will stall till this happens imo.
...
any ideas how stratum gpu development is going on?

no idea unless we have something posted in order to know.
wenjiannin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 27, 2014, 04:12:47 PM
 #2620

Dear crypto_zoidberg wish to expand some of your team, like the BC team now has 60 people, so the team can go on a balanced development, carry out their duties, we will always support you in silence. Thank you Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 ... 486 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!