[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[smooth]

Understanding we are not putting the blockchain on smartphones.  )

Putting the blockchain on smartphones will not be required certainly but it isn't something entirely avoid either. As computing is moving more and more to mobile platforms, if you don't have mobile nodes you won't have many nodes at all. And furthermore if you want the highest degree of privacy and security you have to run your own node.

It is already quite feasible to run a node on a smartphone as demonstrated by people running them on RPis which are significantly less powerful than current smartphone models. Also, the database and bandwidth are being optimized which will further reduce the footprint (along with the possibility of DB pruning features). The 2 minute block time change will reduce the overhead a bit too.

[nioc]

Nice upgraded Network Pool Hashrate Distribution listings on MoneroHash including some detailed comments.  Thank you

https://monerohash.com/#network


As always they show Active Node Distribution.  These are the ones with high up time. 

https://monerohash.com/nodes-distribution.html

[medusa13]

small cosmetics, dont know if it matters now that the GUI is coming..

still:

Code:

Your transaction needs to be split into 1 transactions.  This will result in a transaction fee being applied to each transaction, for a total fee of 0.210000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Money successfully sent, transaction <42921fe1371fabb39d51f1e54580c4fefcae0e64cb2a4f04d481aa1b0b64c86d>

with 9.1 official (trx on testnet)

cheers and hodl

[TooDumbForBitcoin]

you remind me of child_harold of SDC, or whats he called.
always bashing other coins/projects :p

Contempt can be earned, and thus merited.   Destroying other people's substance, whether by incompetence, recklessness, or malice, is one way to earn contempt.

Contempt can also be given, unearned.  To avoid being misled one must exercise discernment between cases.

Earned contempt average is amount of contempt divided by innings pitched.

Contempt of court, on the other hand, is an NBA problem, not a MLB problem.

Destroying other people's substance, also known as liposuction, is a profitable enterprise.

[digicoin]

where can i find a monero wallet client for 32 bit users? it seems like 32 bitusers like me are left behind for monero.

 this simple wallet download page don't work anymore https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613072.msg6787334#msg6787334

The devs are working on finalizing the official 32-bit binaries. Until then you can use the unofficial binaries that are posted here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/433w2u/new_32bit_binaries_for_v091/

Hyc is the author of LMDB (database Monero uses), thus pretty trustworthy.

Guys,

Howard Chu (hyc) is the chief architect of OpenLDAP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenLDAP. He invented LMDB http://symas.com/mdb/ as OpenLDAP backend database.

He is a talented developer. It will be great if he can contribute more on Monero code as a core team developer.

[Marcus Augustus]

I read Shnoe's expository on SDC's ring signature flaw with great interest. I have a couple of questions.


1. I noticed that the following equation discusses a hash function, but unlike other hash functions in the paper, it does not have a subscript.

https://i.imgur.com/y4bkTFF.png

From context this is a hash function that returns a point with unknown log, and that this was just a typo, correct?


2. I was curious about the form of Shnoe's following equation

https://i.imgur.com/gLEDHgB.png

It does not seem to agree with the cryptonote white paper, which provides a more complicated equation for ci

https://i.imgur.com/G1TJtNE.png

Whereas the cryptonote white paper would make sense in this context, Shnoe's form does not seem consistent with his final statement that this "proves that someone has actually signed the transaction, since the signer, knowing xi is able to solve alpha = si + cixi".

[MoneroMooo]

small cosmetics, dont know if it matters now that the GUI is coming..

still:

Code:

Your transaction needs to be split into 1 transactions.  This will result in a transaction fee being applied to each transaction, for a total fee of 0.210000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Money successfully sent, transaction <42921fe1371fabb39d51f1e54580c4fefcae0e64cb2a4f04d481aa1b0b64c86d>

with 9.1 official (trx on testnet)

cheers and hodl

Is this from sweep_dust ? If so, this is intended, as sweeping dust can result in a (comparatively) huge tx fee (though some want the actual message wording to change in that case).
If not, do you have set always-confirm-transfers enabled ? If so, that's the reason.
If not, that seems to be a bug.

[digicoin]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1285787.0 People highly value privacy/anonymity but a few knows what ring signature is

[villabacho]

while the first one is missing one transaction with two outputs.

The info show_transfers uses was originally not stored by default, but was switched to be on by default later on. If this is the case, the missing tx would be the first one. Is the missing tx the first one ?

An interesting test is to also run rescan_bc from the wallet, and see it that fixes it. If it does, it's likely a bug in the handling of blockchain reorgs in the wallet.

The missing tx wasn't the first one, but rescan_bc helped insofar that the missing tx is now shown. BUT: the funny thing now is that each of the txs that were already shown previously by "show_transfers in" is now shown twice after I did rescan_bc.

The wallet was created with 0.8.8.6 iirc. Should I just make a new wallet with 0.9.1 and transfer everything there to be sure there are no inconcistencies?
I wouldn't have the transfer history though in the new wallet, which I'd like to keep.

Thanks!

[MoneroMooo]

OK, I see why the double counting, it's a simple bug I think, I'll just have to make sure it doesn't have side effects before committing. There may be a bug with the missing tx too, will need some investigating.

[dEBRUYNE]

I read Shnoe's expository on SDC's ring signature flaw with great interest. I have a couple of questions.


1. I noticed that the following equation discusses a hash function, but unlike other hash functions in the paper, it does not have a subscript.



From context this is a hash function that returns a point with unknown log, and that this was just a typo, correct?


2. I was curious about the form of Shnoe's following equation



It does not seem to agree with the cryptonote white paper, which provides a more complicated equation for ci



Whereas the cryptonote white paper would make sense in this context, Shnoe's form does not seem consistent with his final statement that this "proves that someone has actually signed the transaction, since the signer, knowing xi is able to solve alpha = si + cixi".

Your post has been forwarded to Shen, hopefully he'll able to answer you soon.

[villabacho]

OK, I see why the double counting, it's a simple bug I think, I'll just have to make sure it doesn't have side effects before committing. There may be a bug with the missing tx too, will need some investigating.

Ok, thanks for following up!

[Hueristic]

And now for something completely different.

Does anyone play https://github.com/farin/JCloisterZone ?

If so toss me a pm when your up for a game. I generally play withing a group of 5 for the last 6 months a few times a week.

[xxxgoodgirls]

Can someone point me to the latest roadmap/results achieved?

[dEBRUYNE]

Can someone point me to the latest roadmap/results achieved?

https://getmonero.org/design-goals/

https://getmonero.org/2016/02/10/monero-missive-2015-year-in-review.html

Ring CT (and multisig) implementation is probably the most salient development -> https://lab.getmonero.org/pubs/MRL-0005.pdf

[AnnoyMint]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1285787.0 People highly value privacy/anonymity but a few knows what ring signature is

Of course the bovine hordes have no idea what a ring signature is, much less how to use points on an eliptic curve to properly calculate a feasibly unbreakable key pair.

To be honest it is my opinion that most of the coven hoofed members of this forum could not even pick a good password.  My password, on the other hand, is so well picked I can tell you what it is and you will STILL not be able to access any of my 214 accounts here.  Actually I cannot access many of them anymore either, but that is a story for another post.

My password is the first and only multi dimensional mathematical representation of a singularity.  Not the one at the center of OUR galaxy as Sagitarius A would just be too obvious.

I am not worried about revealing that is is based on APM 08279+5255 as no hackers would be able to understand the gravitational algorithms I needed to calculate the checksum for my singularity model, and I believe if they even tried to hack my password the sheer weight of it's genius would cause them to go entirely mad.

I chose, for this reason, not to even change my password when this site was hacked.  But also because I am somewhat suspicious there would a devastating effect on the fabric of OUR universe if I WERE to change it.  Even my mistakes are so magnificent it is difficult to know what they are capable of.

Martin Armstrong wrote:

"However, IF money is created by society, then Smith wins with a hidden element. he implies that government is not a producer of wealth but a consumer – the black hole that sucks in everything until society exists no more."

The emphasis, of course, is mine.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/archives/27578

I expect none of you are intelligent enough to understand this reasoning. (apart from possibly Smooth (though I am not certain of this as he has been somewhat resistant of my idea to rename his Aeon project into a particular Pygmy dialect that I am fond of (the pronunciation would be something like djanalaloa*CLICK*tasahee))).

I simply do not have time to try to teach cattle to read much less understand.

Good day.

[c789]

For all of this time I thought Dwight Schrute was a fictional character from "The Office (US)." Evidently he's real and is posting as AnnoyMint. Ahh, i miss that show.

[iCEBREAKER]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1285787.0 People highly value privacy/anonymity but a few knows what ring signature is

Of course the bovine hordes have no idea what a ring signature is, much less how to use points on an eliptic curve to properly calculate a feasibly unbreakable key pair.

To be honest it is my opinion that most of the coven hoofed members of this forum could not even pick a good password.  My password, on the other hand, is so well picked I can tell you what it is and you will STILL not be able to access any of my 214 accounts here.  Actually I cannot access many of them anymore either, but that is a story for another post.

My password is the first and only multi dimensional mathematical representation of a singularity.  Not the one at the center of OUR galaxy as Sagitarius A would just be too obvious.

I am not worried about revealing that is is based on APM 08279+5255 as no hackers would be able to understand the gravitational algorithms I needed to calculate the checksum for my singularity model, and I believe if they even tried to hack my password the sheer weight of it's genius would cause them to go entirely mad.

I chose, for this reason, not to even change my password when this site was hacked.  But also because I am somewhat suspicious there would a devastating effect on the fabric of OUR universe if I WERE to change it.  Even my mistakes are so magnificent it is difficult to know what they are capable of.

Martin Armstrong wrote:

"However, IF money is created by society, then Smith wins with a hidden element. he implies that government is not a producer of wealth but a consumer – the black hole that sucks in everything until society exists no more."

The emphasis, of course, is mine.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/archives/27578

I expect none of you are intelligent enough to understand this reasoning. (apart from possibly Smooth (though I am not certain of this as he has been somewhat resistant of my idea to rename his Aeon project into a particular Pygmy dialect that I am fond of (the pronunciation would be something like djanalaloa*CLICK*tasahee))).

I simply do not have time to try to teach cattle to read much less understand.

Good day.

How does Martin Armstrong's computer model account for the revolutionary acceleration of the Singularity that is now occuring as the result of the existence of Martin Armstrong's computer model?

If the Halting Problem and Incompleteness Theorem walked into a bar, who would formerly decide on which drinks to order?

I alone can answer these questions, based on my visions relating to quantum annealing in TimeCube-like Hofstadter manifolds.

The Universe is a frictionless, hyperspherical, holographic blockchain.  Subscribe to my newsletter.  Pay me to work on a closed source altcoin.

[nioc]

I assume you guys know you are responding to a parody.

[iCEBREAKER]

I assume you guys know you are responding to a parody.

Satoshi is a lie.  Monero is not private.  Martin Armstrong's self-aware computer model will Link All The Things.

My dad is a fancy lawyer.  I am not in good health.  This is serious.

Please take me off Ignore!  You don't deserve to read my posts!

This one time, I wrote a driver for a printer.  Can you understand this advanced paradigm?  Or am the only sentient in all spacetime, running as a simulation at the end of the Big Crunch in order to retroactively initialize the fine-grain atomicity of loop quantum gravity?

I had a raw kale + egg shake for breakfast, then jogged 10 miles and ate three Jollybee bacon cheeseburgers for lunch.  Why do I feel so bad?

Why does smooth respond to my Munchhausen syndrome lunacy?  Is he a social worker, specializing in care of deranged New Age hustlers and their victimized dissociative identities?