Vilawil
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 1
|
|
July 16, 2014, 05:34:37 PM |
|
Everybody knows who the main stakeholders are, and if they decide to stir up something funny, nothing will stop them.
I won’t be surprised if I wake up once to find monero dead and gone. Can you tell me the names of stakeholders if you’re so positive? To me it sounds like total nonsense.
|
|
|
|
hodlmybtc
|
|
July 16, 2014, 05:36:42 PM |
|
It's odd that most members my age/activity have 99% of their post history corresponding about XMR in ways that don't even make sense. Bytecoin sockpuppet accounts, obvious is obvious.
Yeah it's too obvious. Why else would you go troll in a thread of a coin you aren't interested in? But we all know Monero will end up at the top and Bytecoin bagholders will all end in tears, what else would you expect from a 82% premined coin?
|
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
July 16, 2014, 05:40:58 PM |
|
I don't understand why "normal" people wouldn't just sell whatever other coin they have and buy XMR if they worry about XMR taking over, instead of trolling it endlessly. Their commitment to other coins (not naming any) in one way or another, must be way above "normal" for them to spend endless efforts sockpupping like that.
I was not reading the altcoin board before Monero, so I don't know if it is something usual or not. But I'm sure they are very poorly working towards their goal, their insistant trolling might even work against there goals.
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
titan86
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
July 16, 2014, 05:48:51 PM |
|
I will not insist or argue. The time will tell. One more thing - I think the time and money spent for so much PR was paid to cover a smart scheme.
|
|
|
|
samaricanin
|
|
July 16, 2014, 05:50:08 PM |
|
Everybody knows who the main stakeholders are, and if they decide to stir up something funny, nothing will stop them.
I won’t be surprised if I wake up once to find monero dead and gone. I would not be surprised if one day I wake up rich
|
|
|
|
r05
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
test cryptocoin please ignore
|
|
July 16, 2014, 06:27:52 PM |
|
321BTC volume on Polo.
This is crazy.
|
BTC: 18tS6E9FRnXuh4JitAJykm6YRtJRSkP6jq XMR: 46BzjaUU1fyfFJ2b9vvg9RXUsw3XQtkaoc7cRkzYxMre69GtCaX6jg3Luc4B6ABHAaBmZNpJ4zzmAiX deGsCiXJJMniDbWE
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Still wild and free
|
|
July 16, 2014, 06:42:05 PM |
|
321BTC volume on Polo.
This is crazy.
77% of total daily volume on poloniex is from XMR. Yeah, crazy. But not surprising
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
TeeBone
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:03:33 PM |
|
Melotic exchange new ? Getting some decent volume there.
|
|
|
|
iloveny161
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:04:28 PM |
|
This may have already been covered, but has anyone addressed the problem that AnonyMint has brought up? He seems like a very smart guy, and this should be worth looking into. This is very preliminary, but it appears to me that all anonymous coins based on unlinkability will not be able to solve the very serious double-spend threat. If am correct, this is both a major and fundamental solution for longest chain rule of proof-of-work, but it also eliminates unlinkability as a anonymity solution. Sorry to say. Again this is preliminary, and needs more peer review.
|
|
|
|
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Who cares?
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:28:23 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
celestio
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:30:57 PM |
|
I will not insist or argue. The time will tell. One more thing - I think the time and money spent for so much PR was paid to cover a smart scheme.
do you mean BCN? lol 80% premine and an apparent fake blockchain are not smart at all... Hi! Hitbtc team here. As you remember, several days ago we launched a new campaign: Now everyone can send us bug reports or usability improvements. Thank you for taking a part in this campaign. We now have more than 10 e-mails with different suggestions or reports. For now all of them are currently under investigation. Once this process is complete, we’ll send out rewards. But the first rewards have already been transfered! The campaign is not over, so send your bug reports or usability improvements to pr@hitbtc.com to get your reward: • 100 XMR for a bug report; • 50 XMR for any accepted usability improvement. Get your reward – get in touch with us. sent some suggestions, just my opinion but I think hitbtc would benefit with some of them. Hitbtc reminds me of Bter for some reason. Both good exchanges nevertheless.
|
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime" - Satoshi Nakamoto, June 17, 2010
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:31:29 PM |
|
321BTC volume on Polo.
This is crazy.
77% of total daily volume on poloniex is from XMR. Yeah, crazy. But not surprising Not super crazy though, we were doing 1000 BTC a day when we were up at 0.01
|
|
|
|
darkota
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:32:26 PM |
|
It doesn't matter about Boolberry, that coin was instamined in the 100s of thousands...by One guy who still makes over 2k boolberry per day with his private gpu miner....
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:33:01 PM |
|
It refers to a well known privacy issue on CN coins. We've had a fix for this in the development for weeks now after corresponding with a Bitcoin core devs that should be more effective than the solution for Boolberry, we're just waiting until the core of the software is more mature before we roll it out.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
Johnny Mnemonic
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:37:45 PM |
|
Forcing ambiguity upchain. Keeps your transaction from being outed but adds considerable bloat to the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 5142
Whimsical Pants
|
|
July 16, 2014, 07:40:57 PM |
|
Hitbtc reminds me of Bter for some reason. Both good exchanges nevertheless.
I hold accounts at both and do arbitrage at times. I execute lots of trades. HitBTC is simply superior. They seem highly reliable, fast, and the overall fees are better.
|
|
|
|
btell
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
July 16, 2014, 08:08:35 PM |
|
It refers to a well known privacy issue on CN coins. We've had a fix for this in the development for weeks now after corresponding with a Bitcoin core devs that should be more effective than the solution for Boolberry, we're just waiting until the core of the software is more mature before we roll it out. tacotime, it's very important to put this answer sticky this thread or somewhere std. FAQ location! Otherwise, newbies are coming and asking it again and again, to test our patience. Dear newbies, read tacotime's answer twice, Monero devs are much more academic guys than you suppose, so they do know what things to go when.
|
|
|
|
rpietila
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
|
|
July 16, 2014, 08:12:42 PM |
|
|
HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
|
|
|
r05
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
test cryptocoin please ignore
|
|
July 16, 2014, 08:28:15 PM |
|
It refers to a well known privacy issue on CN coins. We've had a fix for this in the development for weeks now after corresponding with a Bitcoin core devs that should be more effective than the solution for Boolberry, we're just waiting until the core of the software is more mature before we roll it out. tacotime, it's very important to put this answer sticky this thread or somewhere std. FAQ location! Otherwise, newbies are coming and asking it again and again, to test our patience. Dear newbies, read tacotime's answer twice, Monero devs are much more academic guys than you suppose, so they do know what things to go when. It is very reassuring when replies like this are given. Definitely needs to be added to the FAQ.
|
BTC: 18tS6E9FRnXuh4JitAJykm6YRtJRSkP6jq XMR: 46BzjaUU1fyfFJ2b9vvg9RXUsw3XQtkaoc7cRkzYxMre69GtCaX6jg3Luc4B6ABHAaBmZNpJ4zzmAiX deGsCiXJJMniDbWE
|
|
|
btell
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
July 16, 2014, 08:33:53 PM |
|
This may have already been covered, but has anyone addressed the problem that AnonyMint has brought up? He seems like a very smart guy, and this should be worth looking into. This is very preliminary, but it appears to me that all anonymous coins based on unlinkability will not be able to solve the very serious double-spend threat. If am correct, this is both a major and fundamental solution for longest chain rule of proof-of-work, but it also eliminates unlinkability as a anonymity solution. Sorry to say. Again this is preliminary, and needs more peer review. Dear Monero devs, please answer this stuff. My English is not well to understand what does AnonyMint speak about. I just feel, he sheds light on possible fundamental vulnerability that says unlinkability is not compatible with longest chain rule of proof-of-work. I may mistake.
|
|
|
|
|