Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 06:03:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 [494] 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 ... 2124 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency  (Read 4668384 times)
Vilawil
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 1


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 05:34:37 PM
 #9861

Everybody knows who the main stakeholders are, and if they decide to stir up something funny, nothing will stop them.


I won’t be surprised if I wake up once to find monero dead and gone.

Can you tell me the names of stakeholders if you’re so positive? To me it sounds like total nonsense.
hodlmybtc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
July 16, 2014, 05:36:42 PM
 #9862

It's odd that most members my age/activity have 99% of their post history corresponding about XMR in ways that don't even make sense. Bytecoin sockpuppet accounts, obvious is obvious.

Yeah it's too obvious.

Why else would you go troll in a thread of a coin you aren't interested in?

But we all know Monero will end up at the top and Bytecoin bagholders will all end in tears, what else would you expect from a 82% premined coin?
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 05:40:58 PM
 #9863

I don't understand why "normal" people wouldn't just sell whatever other coin they have and buy XMR if they worry about XMR taking over, instead of trolling it endlessly. Their commitment to other coins (not naming any) in one way or another, must be way above "normal" for them to spend endless efforts sockpupping like that.

I was not reading the altcoin board before Monero, so I don't know if it is something usual or not. But I'm sure they are very poorly working towards their goal, their insistant trolling might even work against there goals.

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
titan86
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 05:48:51 PM
 #9864

I will not insist or argue. The time will tell. One more thing - I think  the time and money spent for so much PR was paid to cover a smart scheme.
samaricanin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 697
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 16, 2014, 05:50:08 PM
 #9865

Everybody knows who the main stakeholders are, and if they decide to stir up something funny, nothing will stop them.


I won’t be surprised if I wake up once to find monero dead and gone.

I would not be surprised if one day I wake up rich

r05
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100

test cryptocoin please ignore


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 06:27:52 PM
 #9866

321BTC volume on Polo.

This is crazy.

BTC: 18tS6E9FRnXuh4JitAJykm6YRtJRSkP6jq
XMR: 46BzjaUU1fyfFJ2b9vvg9RXUsw3XQtkaoc7cRkzYxMre69GtCaX6jg3Luc4B6ABHAaBmZNpJ4zzmAiX deGsCiXJJMniDbWE
binaryFate
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003


Still wild and free


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 06:42:05 PM
 #9867

321BTC volume on Polo.

This is crazy.

77% of total daily volume on poloniex is from XMR.
Yeah, crazy. But not surprising Wink

Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. 
This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
TeeBone
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502
Merit: 251


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:03:33 PM
 #9868

Melotic exchange new ? Getting some decent volume there.
iloveny161
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:04:28 PM
 #9869

This may have already been covered, but has anyone addressed the problem that AnonyMint has brought up? He seems like a very smart guy, and this should be worth looking into.

This is very preliminary, but it appears to me that all anonymous coins based on unlinkability will not be able to solve the very serious double-spend threat.

If am correct, this is both a major and fundamental solution for longest chain rule of proof-of-work, but it also eliminates unlinkability as a anonymity solution.

Sorry to say. Again this is preliminary, and needs more peer review.
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Who cares?


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:28:23 PM
 #9870

Whats up with this?
http://www.slideshare.net/boolberry/boolberry-solves-cryptonoteflaws-37055246
celestio
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:30:57 PM
 #9871

I will not insist or argue. The time will tell. One more thing - I think  the time and money spent for so much PR was paid to cover a smart scheme.

do you mean BCN? lol 80% premine and an apparent fake blockchain are not smart at all...

Hi! Hitbtc team here.
As you remember, several days ago we launched a new campaign:
Now everyone can send us bug reports or usability improvements.


Thank you for taking a part in this campaign. We now have more than 10 e-mails with different suggestions or reports.
For now all of them are currently under investigation. Once this process is complete, we’ll send out rewards.
But the first rewards have already been transfered!
The campaign is not over, so send your bug reports or usability improvements to pr@hitbtc.com to get your reward:
100 XMR for a bug report;
50 XMR for any accepted usability improvement.
Get your reward – get in touch with us.



sent some suggestions, just my opinion but I think hitbtc would benefit with some of them.

Hitbtc reminds me of Bter for some reason. Both good exchanges nevertheless.

"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime" - Satoshi Nakamoto, June 17, 2010
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:31:29 PM
 #9872

321BTC volume on Polo.

This is crazy.

77% of total daily volume on poloniex is from XMR.
Yeah, crazy. But not surprising Wink


Not super crazy though, we were doing 1000BTC a day when we were up at 0.01
darkota
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:32:26 PM
 #9873

It doesn't matter about Boolberry, that coin was instamined in the 100s of thousands...by One guy who still makes over 2k boolberry per day with his private gpu miner....
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:33:01 PM
 #9874


It refers to a well known privacy issue on CN coins. We've had a fix for this in the development for weeks now after corresponding with a Bitcoin core devs that should be more effective than the solution for Boolberry, we're just waiting until the core of the software is more mature before we roll it out.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
Johnny Mnemonic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 795
Merit: 514



View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:37:45 PM
 #9875


Forcing ambiguity upchain. Keeps your transaction from being outed but adds considerable bloat to the blockchain.
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127


Whimsical Pants


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 07:40:57 PM
 #9876

Hitbtc reminds me of Bter for some reason. Both good exchanges nevertheless.

I hold accounts at both and do arbitrage at times.  I execute lots of trades. 

HitBTC is simply superior.  They seem highly reliable, fast, and the overall fees are better.
btell
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 08:08:35 PM
 #9877


It refers to a well known privacy issue on CN coins. We've had a fix for this in the development for weeks now after corresponding with a Bitcoin core devs that should be more effective than the solution for Boolberry, we're just waiting until the core of the software is more mature before we roll it out.

tacotime, it's very important to put this answer sticky this thread or somewhere std. FAQ location!

Otherwise, newbies are coming and asking it again and again, to test our patience.

Dear newbies, read tacotime's answer twice, Monero devs are much more academic guys than you suppose, so they do know what things to go when.

rpietila
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036



View Profile
July 16, 2014, 08:12:42 PM
 #9878

I had the following idea to raise some money for the Monero development.

HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
r05
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100

test cryptocoin please ignore


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 08:28:15 PM
 #9879


It refers to a well known privacy issue on CN coins. We've had a fix for this in the development for weeks now after corresponding with a Bitcoin core devs that should be more effective than the solution for Boolberry, we're just waiting until the core of the software is more mature before we roll it out.

tacotime, it's very important to put this answer sticky this thread or somewhere std. FAQ location!

Otherwise, newbies are coming and asking it again and again, to test our patience.

Dear newbies, read tacotime's answer twice, Monero devs are much more academic guys than you suppose, so they do know what things to go when.


It is very reassuring when replies like this are given. Definitely needs to be added to the FAQ.

BTC: 18tS6E9FRnXuh4JitAJykm6YRtJRSkP6jq
XMR: 46BzjaUU1fyfFJ2b9vvg9RXUsw3XQtkaoc7cRkzYxMre69GtCaX6jg3Luc4B6ABHAaBmZNpJ4zzmAiX deGsCiXJJMniDbWE
btell
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 16, 2014, 08:33:53 PM
 #9880

This may have already been covered, but has anyone addressed the problem that AnonyMint has brought up? He seems like a very smart guy, and this should be worth looking into.

This is very preliminary, but it appears to me that all anonymous coins based on unlinkability will not be able to solve the very serious double-spend threat.

If am correct, this is both a major and fundamental solution for longest chain rule of proof-of-work, but it also eliminates unlinkability as a anonymity solution.

Sorry to say. Again this is preliminary, and needs more peer review.

Dear Monero devs, please answer this stuff.

My English is not well to understand what does AnonyMint speak about. I just feel, he sheds light on possible fundamental vulnerability that says unlinkability is not compatible with longest chain rule of proof-of-work. I may mistake.
Pages: « 1 ... 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 [494] 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 ... 2124 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!