kondiomir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
|
|
May 02, 2014, 08:29:22 AM |
|
Is there a chance the pool to hit a jackpot ?
|
|
|
|
kondiomir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
|
|
May 02, 2014, 08:29:41 AM |
|
10x a lot. Shure will donate !!! BTW Is somewhere windows binaries ? I have no skills to compile it
|
|
|
|
AizenSou
|
|
May 02, 2014, 08:39:00 AM |
|
Thanks for your miner. It seems AMD CPU has more advantage than Intel this time (depend on clock rate)? My old friend Phenom X6 gets 0.9Mhs while my shiny new Core I7-4770k gets only 1Mhs. Thanks anyway. It maybe a good start for new miner but I will stay out this time
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 02, 2014, 08:45:15 AM |
|
Is the following are right hashrates for 270x and 280x accordingly? http://imgur.com/qpFc8xiOne the left is rig of 270x,On the right is rig of 4 280x and a 290.I use the latest v2s miner. I have 290's and they are hitting just 2.1mh/s so yeah I think you're good . Mind sharing your details to hit those #'s? lol my 7950 is doing 2.2 mh/s edit: and it cost me $199 from Newegg lol Why you said your 7950 got 83m/s before?What's the different? Btw,bro,from your avatar,Are you a cryptsy's guy? Yes you are correct i was getting that speed and now i am a lot slower.. This was because of the coin itself.. it was changed on the hard fork at block 6000 so after that we all had to use a slower miner.. This was in response i believe to the cudamniner dev finding a way to exploit the coins code to hash faster in response the dev promptly announced a fix and and put it into effect rapidly.. i was impressed how fast he got it under control. and chubners disclosure on the issue was commendable also. edit: my avatar is just one i created to help promote Cryptsy some time last year and then i could never change it again later lol
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 02, 2014, 08:54:22 AM |
|
We have a whale with 270Mhs at cloudminers Congrats. This coin gets more attention. i see a 261mh/s and 95mh/s user i am looking at a bunch of things for the miner(s) such as work on the Radeon kernel and Fermi support for cuda / nvidia.. i am not that good with math or hashing algo's so what i can do is limited sadly.. the cuda guys know more than me about that advanced stuff i think. i did see and i get what chubner said about the speed limitation on the radeon kernel though and i am looking into that specifically. also their ccminer does not work for anyone but Kepler or higher compute nvidia devices because a shuffle cuda command they used (on purpose) so i plan on seeing if i can find an alternative that is not hard to implement so ALL users can mine not just people who buy newer nvidia cards. leaving out Fermi cards seems like a big slap in the face.. those cards are not that old so it's a pitty have them sit there idle what am i suppose to do with a fermi card ? mine scrypt ? lol nice to see the rich get richer and the poor get the middle finger not while i'm patrol lol
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
Andy2009
|
|
May 02, 2014, 09:27:04 AM |
|
Trades are picking up at allcrypt ( https://www.allcrypt.com/market?id=684) I hope cryptsy also adds JPC I have already asked them to look into it and I hope more people will do that as well since it will increase the odds.
|
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 02, 2014, 10:13:27 AM |
|
http://www.datafilehost.com/d/261edf61if Radeon guys want to try my alternate jackpot kernel i modded.. just remember to un-check use download manager on the file hoster (like on any file hoster service) i think it may be a bit quicker for me but it's hard to tell lol and back up your original one before hand if you don't know what your doing switching kernels it's prob not worth the hassle hahaha so i think i might be getting like anywhere from 50 to 80kh/s more out of my 7950 ..maybe ..like i said it's hard for me to tell
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
Adatrader
|
|
May 02, 2014, 10:20:03 AM |
|
http://www.datafilehost.com/d/261edf61if Radeon guys want to try my alternate jackpot kernel i modded.. just remember to un-check use download manager on the file hoster (like on any file hoster service) i think it may be a bit quicker for me but it's hard to tell lol and back up your original one before hand if you don't know what your doing switching kernels it's prob not worth the hassle hahaha so i think i might be getting like anywhere from 50 to 80kh/s more out of my 7950 ..maybe ..like i said it's hard for me to tell Nice, thank you for sharing!
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 02, 2014, 10:49:06 AM |
|
ya no prob let me know if you think it's quicker.. and if people don't know you can inspect them with any text editor to see what was changed
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
May 02, 2014, 10:55:47 AM |
|
ya no prob let me know if you think it's quicker.. and if people don't know you can inspect them with any text editor to see what was changed It looks like the code of the jackpot miner before the fork... (will give it a try though...) Did you just modify the loop or is there some more in depth modification ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 02, 2014, 11:03:10 AM |
|
ya no prob let me know if you think it's quicker.. and if people don't know you can inspect them with any text editor to see what was changed It looks like the code of the jackpot miner before the fork... (will give it a try though...) Did you just modify the loop or is there some more in depth modification ? if you looked and said that why are you asking ? lol seems you know the answer would have been helpful to say if it was quicker for you or not eh. if your into working on the code yourself i suggest using something like Beyond Compare to compare the code.. it is available for Win/Linux
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
zuludrag
|
|
May 02, 2014, 11:09:10 AM |
|
Tried - but not working for me at all: [14:04:35] Started sgminer [14:04:37] Kernel JackPotCoin(AdvSHA3) is experimental. [14:04:37] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [14:04:37] "C:\Users\ZuluDrag\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL889E.tmp.cl", line 320: erro r: invalid type conversion (unsigned int)(((unsigned char *)input)[84]) << 0 | ^
"C:\Users\ZuluDrag\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL889E.tmp.cl", line 321: [14:04:37] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0 [14:04:37] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this. [14:04:37] Try restarting sgminer. Press enter to continue: Maybe not compatible with juniper kernel?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
May 02, 2014, 11:16:47 AM |
|
ya no prob let me know if you think it's quicker.. and if people don't know you can inspect them with any text editor to see what was changed It looks like the code of the jackpot miner before the fork... (will give it a try though...) Did you just modify the loop or is there some more in depth modification ? if you looked and said that why are you asking ? lol seems you know the answer would have been helpful to say if it was quicker for you or not eh. if your into working on the code yourself i suggest using something like Beyond Compare to compare the code.. it is available for Win/Linux getting a compilation error... same as in the previous post (which version of the sgminer should be used ?)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
otila
|
|
May 02, 2014, 11:20:58 AM |
|
cpuminer-otila-x86_64_linux.bin, 15% faster than ig0tik3d version on SandyBridge https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9h02pRWKaODazhNa1hyc1FPaHM/edit?usp=sharingsize = 132132 bytes SHA1 = de9676de0590066303d719680aecabbbf77c232a blake2b = d1724febe8458f4cf23c5874ca891a643677e25751017b84c7a33388995fa75c086a49c2d9c74b4 aac970b03f86254a19be6132f4d61b122b3525317a81da3b7 Does someone want sources? Donations: JPC:Jf91KGbozYVygHXW1a8UegpnngiheroKr7 BTC:1FNUXt9HriGchjYZLP7u7e7MFfUdFCjAsz
|
|
|
|
|
liomojo1
|
|
May 02, 2014, 11:46:21 AM |
|
So if you mine jackpotcoin on a pool and you find a superblock , WHO takes the money?
|
|
|
|
dasource
|
|
May 02, 2014, 11:49:04 AM |
|
cpuminer-otila-x86_64_linux.bin, 15% faster than ig0tik3d version on SandyBridge https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9h02pRWKaODazhNa1hyc1FPaHM/edit?usp=sharingsize = 132132 bytes SHA1 = de9676de0590066303d719680aecabbbf77c232a blake2b = d1724febe8458f4cf23c5874ca891a643677e25751017b84c7a33388995fa75c086a49c2d9c74b4 aac970b03f86254a19be6132f4d61b122b3525317a81da3b7 Does someone want sources? Donations: JPC:Jf91KGbozYVygHXW1a8UegpnngiheroKr7 BTC:1FNUXt9HriGchjYZLP7u7e7MFfUdFCjAsz Source would be good
|
^ I am with STUPID!
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 02, 2014, 11:56:03 AM |
|
cpuminer-otila-x86_64_linux.bin, 15% faster than ig0tik3d version on SandyBridge https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9h02pRWKaODazhNa1hyc1FPaHM/edit?usp=sharingsize = 132132 bytes SHA1 = de9676de0590066303d719680aecabbbf77c232a blake2b = d1724febe8458f4cf23c5874ca891a643677e25751017b84c7a33388995fa75c086a49c2d9c74b4 aac970b03f86254a19be6132f4d61b122b3525317a81da3b7 Does someone want sources? Donations: JPC:Jf91KGbozYVygHXW1a8UegpnngiheroKr7 BTC:1FNUXt9HriGchjYZLP7u7e7MFfUdFCjAsz Source would be good as I use linux so will need to compile ya if he changed any source.. if he didn't it's on OP's first post.. or you have to pay him $$$ to get it i guess hahaha but what would have been REALLY useful is just telling us all what compiler flags and compiler etc you used. feed a man a fish.. also i think i am dropping my test kernel i posted i don't think it's helping actually and if it didn't work for you i have no idea what to say sorry i only can test it on my Radeon 7950. edit: the op's posted sgminer kernel looks like it tries to hash using the old Keccak only mode First and then tests it and what is weird i when i get rid of that old hashing mode support on all my various tests it comes out slower in hash rate.. which makes no sense to me at all lol edit: and guys you can only use the op's sgminer version he posted.
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
May 02, 2014, 12:25:56 PM Last edit: May 02, 2014, 12:46:41 PM by Spoetnik |
|
Tried - but not working for me at all: [14:04:35] Started sgminer [14:04:37] Kernel JackPotCoin(AdvSHA3) is experimental. [14:04:37] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram) [14:04:37] "C:\Users\ZuluDrag\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL889E.tmp.cl", line 320: erro r: invalid type conversion (unsigned int)(((unsigned char *)input)[84]) << 0 | ^
"C:\Users\ZuluDrag\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL889E.tmp.cl", line 321: [14:04:37] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0 [14:04:37] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this. [14:04:37] Try restarting sgminer. Press enter to continue: Maybe not compatible with juniper kernel? ya sorry there was an error ..i made a quick mod and i am testing quick and will re-upload prob pretty quick. for some reason my kernel was not updating unless i changed the conf / scan time setting even though i was manually deleting the bin files on every launch :/ edit: ok here is a new link.. http://www.datafilehost.com/d/91d5a66d <-- un-check use download manager on host site. not the same as the last one but maybe a tad quicker though.. i dropped support for hashing like how it was pre-fork. so it *should be a bit quicker i think.. less work to do technically..
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
|