Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 02:38:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 114 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?  (Read 142393 times)
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002



View Profile
March 08, 2012, 08:44:59 AM
 #121

We may never know who Satoshi is(and do we really want to know?), but I think it's starting to be clear where Bitcoin was invented: University of Dublin Trinity College
1714012693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714012693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714012693
Reply with quote  #2

1714012693
Report to moderator
1714012693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714012693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714012693
Reply with quote  #2

1714012693
Report to moderator
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714012693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714012693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714012693
Reply with quote  #2

1714012693
Report to moderator
1714012693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714012693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714012693
Reply with quote  #2

1714012693
Report to moderator
1714012693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714012693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714012693
Reply with quote  #2

1714012693
Report to moderator
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
March 08, 2012, 08:45:58 AM
 #122


or Michael Pierce is his student who produced this ...

http://www.w3.org/Conferences/WWW4/Papers/228/

To be clear, even though the other thread I just created is in reference to marcus_of_augustus's post (quoted) and is time stamped one minute later, I was not aware of this post when I pen the OP of the new thread. If that were not the case, I would've stated it as such.

~Bruno~
labestiol
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 08, 2012, 09:17:16 AM
 #123

IMO the best proof we could get would be obtained by doing an extensive bibliographic research on the topic. Then :

- Compare writing style in paper (difficult, since there's never one person to write a paper)
- Compare figures, and trying to find out which software was used to generate them (again not the best proof, but still informative)
- Get source code examples from the articles, and compare it with Satoshi style. Mostly in comments, and in the naming of functions/variables.

Something odd about the satoshi whitepaper is that there's no Fig # below the figures. That's something most researcher automatically do while writing, which could suggest a young one, not used to write papers.

Anyway, we'll never be sure, and that's ok with me. Whoever you are, thanks dude Wink

1BestioLC7YBVh8Q5LfH6RYURD6MrpP8y6
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
March 08, 2012, 09:49:19 AM
 #124


The concepts in the paper
http://www.w3.org/Conferences/WWW4/Papers/228/

are clearly related to bitcoin and online cash but I would say are an iteration or two beforehand, they all are based on client-server models (like Open Transactions). The peer-to-peer (decentralisation) crucial (and most brilliant) step of bitcoin has come along after, or entirely separately, I would guess.

The forth-like script stuff for the tx is someone experienced with thinking in very low level network functionality (big endian) ...

Holy Trinity, O'Mahony, Pierce and Clear? Smiley

Who knows, who really cares anyway? Godspeed to whoever it is.

Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
March 10, 2012, 04:37:36 AM
Last edit: March 10, 2012, 05:23:41 AM by Phinnaeus Gage
 #125

What if Satoshi works for Yahoo! oppose to Google? I'm referring to Peter Stern who wrote this White Paper: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:soGU-gM9X_MJ:www.cs.rutgers.edu/~iftode/smph04.pdf+&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgYWo0Xy8UB3qDWt0gG8pWhSKSHlVWy0AbnckchB5VQChrWmP_kV7nE-rKz4tCLbCsskFFYIVCg4C0M_OH7AfJGPesxv_qdTAnaKlSSMIASnHTvgQAE1SLHqhQFv0_22-B1YZ0N&sig=AHIEtbQbovrLX0gr_a25V8pw5NyGOT9QCA as well as this: http://discolab.rutgers.edu/smartphone/Bill-README

In it, you'll read about millicents of which you'll find in the table of contents in this book: http://www.amazon.com/Electronic-Payment-Systems-Computer-Science/dp/0890069255/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1331348298&sr=1-1

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/peter-stern/3/a36/7b4
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
March 12, 2012, 08:07:00 PM
 #126

For those curious as to why Satoshi Nakamoto opt to become mysterious, perhaps the answer lies here: http://www.ted.com/talks/j_j_abrams_mystery_box.html (for what it's worth, you won't be disappointed)
runeks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1008



View Profile WWW
March 12, 2012, 09:19:52 PM
 #127

We will know who Satoshi Nakamoto is the day he chooses to reveal himself (for example, by revealing the private key that can redeem the generation transaction from the genesis block). Until that happens, all we can do is guess - and we won't know if we are right.
Cosbycoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 506



View Profile
March 12, 2012, 10:22:10 PM
 #128

We will know who Satoshi Nakamoto is the day he chooses to reveal himself (for example, by revealing the private key that can redeem the generation transaction from the genesis block). Until that happens, all we can do is guess - and we won't know if we are right.

somehow i think the percieved value of those first 50 bitcoins is much higher than $5 per btc.

Just a thought. Grin
check_status
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician


View Profile
March 12, 2012, 10:34:17 PM
 #129

Note: When I first joined this forum I made a post in the Newbie thread, "Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?". Since this thread has the same title I'll repeat my post here because it's relevant.

Quote from: Dinkytoyz
My bet is that he/she is just a middle aged American with a anime fetish or so
I can see your perspective.  Wink

Quote
Oshi, which means “Push,” is inspired by a Japanese legend in which the Goddess Amaterasu gifted the first Japanese emperor with her ancient wisdom, in the form of a game. The game is said to have taught the emperor and his court to temper their influence and power with caution.
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/23935/oshi

There is even a reference to low earth orbit debris that might give some kind of geo positional location.  Lips sealed

Quote from: predic
because government can make the law against bitcoins, when it become enough popular that government become crazy about hidden money (unpaid taxes), and satoshi can finish in the prison or he can be hunted by police.
Maybe Bitcoins were created because the enforcement of Laws were unjust already.

Originally posted in the Newbie thread: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?

For Bitcoin to be a true global currency the value of BTC needs always to rise.
If BTC became the global currency & money supply = 100 Trillion then ⊅1.00 BTC = $4,761,904.76.
P2Pool Server List | How To's and Guides Mega List |  1EndfedSryGUZK9sPrdvxHntYzv2EBexGA
nobbynobbynoob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


Annuit cœptis humanae libertas


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2012, 11:34:11 AM
 #130

I know who Satoshi is about as well as the next guy does. Smiley

I do, however, have a theory that he could be Phil Zimmerman of PGP fame. But he probably isn't.

Earn Free Bitcoins!   Earn bitcoin via BitcoinGet
BTC tip: 1PKkvuwC24Vqjv9odigXs1QVzE66jEJqmb (if <200 µBTC, please donate to charity)
LTC tip: LRqXaNdF79QHvhPpS5AZdEJZnLiNnAkJvq (if <Ł0,05, please donate to charity)
paulie_w
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 12:00:44 PM
 #131

its jed mccaleb probably
Bitcoin_Silver_Supply
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:46:50 PM
 #132

I know who Satoshi is about as well as the next guy does. Smiley

I do, however, have a theory that he could be Phil Zimmerman of PGP fame. But he probably isn't.

Thank you, wise sage.
Sitarow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047



View Profile
October 07, 2012, 07:07:12 PM
 #133


Anything bitcoin related that is shrouded in mystery can be an intriguing subject and a great way to bring up cryptocurrency at any party.
samadamsbeer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 21, 2012, 12:40:37 PM
 #134

Could it really be him?Huh
http://www.linkedin.com/in/satoshinakamoto
and links to
https://www.facebook.com/satoshi.nakamoto
nobbynobbynoob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


Annuit cœptis humanae libertas


View Profile WWW
October 21, 2012, 12:43:26 PM
 #135


It could be, but probably not. Smiley

Earn Free Bitcoins!   Earn bitcoin via BitcoinGet
BTC tip: 1PKkvuwC24Vqjv9odigXs1QVzE66jEJqmb (if <200 µBTC, please donate to charity)
LTC tip: LRqXaNdF79QHvhPpS5AZdEJZnLiNnAkJvq (if <Ł0,05, please donate to charity)
cdnbcguy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 128
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2013, 02:15:38 PM
 #136

He's Bill Murray, but no one ever believes it.

Annona ad! Please keep in mind that there is nothing wrong with Bitcoin itself. All it's scandals are caused by wonky websites and sleazy people exploiting it. The light attracts bugs.

When all this bullshit drys up and blows away, Bitcoin will be stronger than ever.
bg002h
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1463
Merit: 1047


I outlived my lifetime membership:)


View Profile WWW
February 12, 2013, 07:44:04 PM
 #137

I have a guess as to where he was on a particular weekend last millennium...

Hardforks aren't that hard. It’s getting others to use them that's hard.
1GCDzqmX2Cf513E8NeThNHxiYEivU1Chhe
GenTarkin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1002


View Profile
February 13, 2013, 08:59:12 PM
 #138

Simple answer: Chuck Norris...

GenTarkin's MOD Kncminer Titan custom firmware! v1.0.4! -- !!NO LONGER AVAILABLE!!
Donations: bitcoin- 1Px71mWNQNKW19xuARqrmnbcem1dXqJ3At || litecoin- LYXrLis3ik6TRn8tdvzAyJ264DRvwYVeEw
mpfrank
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250


Cosmic Cubist


View Profile
February 14, 2013, 02:33:28 AM
 #139

We will know who Satoshi Nakamoto is the day he chooses to reveal himself (for example, by revealing the private key that can redeem the generation transaction from the genesis block). Until that happens, all we can do is guess - and we won't know if we are right.

He wouldn't even need to reveal his actual private key, just use it to sign a message saying "here I am."  So long as the public key in the signature hashes to the address that received the genesis block reward, then Q.E.D.

If all the sovereign non-cryptocurrencies will eventually collapse from hyperinflation, you can't afford *not* to invest in Bitcoin...  See my blog at http://minetopics.blogspot.com/ .

Donations accepted at:  17twYNyqTiCTM2gJmumkytvhZh4sCVSKNH
robertprosper
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 14, 2013, 04:00:52 PM
 #140

Gareth Williams
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 114 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!