|
zwiggel
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 12:52:28 AM |
|
Any thoughts on this post in the XC thread?... 26,000,000 of VRC mined in a few weeks. this mean someone do have a lot of VRC to dump, just don't get caught holding bags. I have seen the dump from 12s to 5s like nothing, it don't even need 1,000,000 VRC. I would be nervous to have any VRC right now.
That could have happen at any time. But so far it hasn't. Such is the life in crypto. Yur stupid if you think that whales who have alot of coins are going to dump their stacks way below 50k. While the know this coin has everthing and lately pumps have gone alot higher then before. Look at XC coin. People kept buying at 100k and 200k cozz it had everything to keep going. This one has 2 open devs and is really innovative
|
|
|
|
|
n00bnoxious
Sr. Member
  

Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Bitnation Development Team Member
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 01:00:22 AM |
|
Can anyone give me basic instructions on how to install the VeriCoin Linux wallet on Mint 17 (Ubuntu)? The instructions on Github are confusing and I'm fairly new to this process.
I installed QT Creator and then opened the vericoin-qt.pro file, but now it's saying that it's using an invalid kit "Desktop" to parse the project. It's asking me to add a kit and I don't know where to find it. I assumed I'd just be able to hit "Build", but I clearly don't know what I'm doing.
I also tried doing it the other way by installing these packages:
apt-get install qt4-qmake libqt4-dev build-essential libboost-dev libboost-system-dev \ libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev \ libssl-dev libdb4.8++-dev
However, libdb4.8++-dev apparently "has no installation candidate" and won't install. I found it online and installed it manually after I installed the other dependencies. When I go to run "qmake" and then "make", I'm uncertain what to specify with it, so this doesn't work either.
I'm sure my issues are coming from my lack of understanding when it comes to building packages.
Try this sudo apt-get install qt4-qmake libqt4-dev build-essential libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev libboost-all-dev libqrencode-dev git That worked instantly! I can now open the VeriCoin-qt. Thank you! Please be careful compiling with non-4.8 libdb.... If you try and load that wallet on a Windows precompiled client, it will fail horribly. The reason for this is the Windows version is compiled against libdb4.8++, and libdb5.x++ is NOT backwards compatible. A better bet might be to install libdb4.8++-dev from bitcoin's ppa and recompile from scratch. Bear in mind you should dump your address's private key first, then re-import it into the new wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kleineaap
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 01:09:21 AM |
|
Yep, remember folks this coin has more than increased 20 fold in the space of a fortnight - any sensible miner, even the most ardent bagholder, will have sold somewhere between a doubling in price and 5 times increase in price. You would have to be completely nuts to baghold after your coins increase 10 fold - that or you just forgot about them or went away away on holiday and didn't check the price lol
What we have now is people like myself who bought in somewhere between 5500 and 19,000. It's almost like a resetting of the scoreboard - From here the next threshold will be around 20,000. It's going to take some solid buy support (which we are lucky enough to have in the waiting) but should happen sometime in the next 12 hours. This, much like the Blackcoin moon launch, will not stop here. There's big money involved now, Big money seeks to make even more money. We can see pre-pump buys every couple hours on Mintpal - around 30 BTC at a time buying everything on offer 2000 Sat above the market price.
XC, DRK and Blackcoin are done. Once big money leaves a coin it will NEVER return to its former peaks - never has a coin gone on to make new ATHs once it has been deserted by the big boys. VRC is their new golden child - it should be around 0.001 BTC per VRC within the next few days. As DRK and XC go down, VRC will go up. There is nothing out there right now to suck BTC away from VRC in any serious amount - its a safe bet.
I share this opinion. Great analysis.
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 01:13:00 AM |
|
i am holding both XC and VRC from early beginning.
do not start any war between coins.
only bagholders are whining.
hail to XC and VRC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CatKiwi
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 01:28:48 AM |
|
i am holding both XC and VRC from early beginning.
do not start any war between coins.
only bagholders are whining.
hail to XC and VRC.
XC is a nice coin but the money is leaving it. Its a far cry from its 0.0046 glory days and is on a steady day on day decline. Sell it, buy VRC to trade with - the volume is such that you will make far more than just holding a coin waiting for a pump. Remember, it is twice as hard to go from 0.001 to 0.002 than it is to go from 0.002 to 0.001. XC will need to increase over 470% to achieve a new ATH - its just not going to happen, not while VRC is on the way up with no signs of stopping. There is nothing worse than holding a bag of coins that you paid say 3BTC for only to see someone else buy the same amount of coins for just .5 BTC for example. Holders always lose in a down trending market.
|
|
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 02:54:59 AM |
|
Is there a link to a rich list wallet list? A lot of twitter posts requesting this but no answers. I think it's becoming a bit of a point of concern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pnosker
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:17:23 AM |
|
Is there a link to a rich list wallet list? A lot of twitter posts requesting this but no answers. I think it's becoming a bit of a point of concern.
No. Feel free to make one or fund the creation of one. I don't see many twitter posts requesting this. Honestly, a rich list doesn't do much for the coin. But the block chain is public so the onus is on you now.
|
Support the VeriFund Endowment. VRC: VFEndownxxnHea9mv59kZx8c7TysGbndYx
|
|
|
|
Kevondo
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:26:44 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
Am I missing something or is a "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
|
|
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:27:23 AM |
|
I have no clue how to make one, but would like to see one. Check twitter. There's been multiple requests.
|
|
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:28:56 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevondo
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:35:20 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one. So you'll put the effort into tweeting about such matters but won't learn to check the "Block Chain" yourself,
Or, build one yourself to satisfy like minded folks.
There r alot of things that need to be accomplished when Developing a coin. To my way of thinking a "Rich List" is superfluous.
|
|
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:36:00 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
Am I missing something or is a "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
And for the record I agree with your sentiments. I was merely asking because it's been brought up numerous times. I own VRC and would like to see it succeed, which I feel is based in part on users requests being responded to. That is all.
|
|
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:38:00 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one. So you'll put the effort into tweeting about such matters but won't learn to check the "Block Chain" yourself,
Or, build one yourself to satisfy like minded folks.
There r alot of things that need to be accomplished when Developing a coin. To my way of thinking a "Rich List" is superfluous.
I personally have no experience building such a list. I would see that as something the Dev team would do to show transparency. Like I said FORGET I ASKED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevondo
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:42:50 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one. So you'll put the effort into tweeting about such matters but won't learn to check the "Block Chain" yourself,
Or, build one yourself to satisfy like minded folks.
There r alot of things that need to be accomplished when Developing a coin. To my way of thinking a "Rich List" is superfluous.
I personally have no experience building such a list. I would see that as something the Dev team would do to show transparency. Like I said FORGET I ASKED. Do U Know how to Learn?
|
|
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:46:01 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one. So you'll put the effort into tweeting about such matters but won't learn to check the "Block Chain" yourself,
Or, build one yourself to satisfy like minded folks.
There r alot of things that need to be accomplished when Developing a coin. To my way of thinking a "Rich List" is superfluous.
I personally have no experience building such a list. I would see that as something the Dev team would do to show transparency. Like I said FORGET I ASKED. [size=20Do U Know how to Learn?pt][/size] No I have no learning ability. None whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevondo
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:47:46 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one. So you'll put the effort into tweeting about such matters but won't learn to check the "Block Chain" yourself,
Or, build one yourself to satisfy like minded folks.
There r alot of things that need to be accomplished when Developing a coin. To my way of thinking a "Rich List" is superfluous.
I personally have no experience building such a list. I would see that as something the Dev team would do to show transparency. Like I said FORGET I ASKED. [size=20Do U Know how to Learn?pt][/size] No I have no learning ability. None whatsoever. Good to Know. It explains alot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoLTD
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:48:38 AM |
|
*Awkward*
|
|
|
|
|
Stratobitz
Legendary

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1010
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:51:57 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one. So you'll put the effort into tweeting about such matters but won't learn to check the "Block Chain" yourself,
Or, build one yourself to satisfy like minded folks.
There r alot of things that need to be accomplished when Developing a coin. To my way of thinking a "Rich List" is superfluous.
I personally have no experience building such a list. I would see that as something the Dev team would do to show transparency. Like I said FORGET I ASKED. [size=20Do U Know how to Learn?pt][/size] No I have no learning ability. None whatsoever. Good to Know. It explains alot. Please tell me you're not part of the Dev team. If you are I need to consider if holding 120k VRC is really a good investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 03:56:04 AM |
|
Though I agree there have been multiple calls for a "Rich List" to be published. I don't understand Y they exist @ all. Can some one explain to me why they exist?
With all the concerns about privacy in society today why should others be privy to how many coins I have?
If people fear skullduggery I don't C how a "Rich List" is preventative. Unless I'm missing some crypto-world unwritten rule of ethics.
Or I could be mistaken in my understanding of how such a list is compiled.
I thought, only coins held in wallets can be counted for inclusion on the list. Coins held elsewhere, such as exchanges or off line (Cold Storage??) can't be accounted for.
Not to mention that someone bent on larceny could have multiple wallets, with different addresses obfuscating their totals and intent.
I'm I missing something or is this "Rich List" the stuff juveniles, and other small minded individuals perpetuate wanting to know who has the biggest, longest, fastest whatever?
Forget I asked. I'll post in twitter a link here that no it doesn't exist, and it doesn't look like there will be one. So you'll put the effort into tweeting about such matters but won't learn to check the "Block Chain" yourself,
Or, build one yourself to satisfy like minded folks.
There r alot of things that need to be accomplished when Developing a coin. To my way of thinking a "Rich List" is superfluous.
I personally have no experience building such a list. I would see that as something the Dev team would do to show transparency. Like I said FORGET I ASKED. [size=20Do U Know how to Learn?pt][/size] No I have no learning ability. None whatsoever. Good to Know. It explains alot. Kevondo your attitude is shit and you are being very condescending. I hope you are in no way affiliated with the dev team because you are terrible PR. Strato's request, and anybodies request, for a richlist is completely justified- people want to have an idea as to how well distributed a coin and whether or not the big holders are selling or buying. Nearly every freaking coin has a rich list, even the ones which have been far less successful than this one as of yet.
|
|
|
|
|
PUMPBANDIT
Member


Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 08, 2014, 04:48:29 AM |
|
Kevodo is acting like a troll talking like that about Vericoin questions.  Their sure are some Muppets around. Got paid from MP finally so they are progressing and delivered as said. I agree Rich list adds Transparency! Its the standard for coins now, not some special request or lack of inability to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
|