Does martingale really works?

[rayhan]

Gamble is just luck

yes, but i doubt if gambling is just about luck
we also must be smart to read the pattern ...
if we know the pattern that will come out then we could minimize losses.. i think so

[agustina2]

Everyone who has been a part of any gambling site must have tried martingale. so i just wanted to know your experience that have u ever gained profit from martingale? or its name should be changed to martinfail?

its depend how much bankroll btw base bet do u have and depends what game u enter, if you get in dice of course 80% player experience fail (i made some profit) but if u play social gambling 80% player say martingale is the best..

[dooglus]

Looks like he lost 3000 Clam which is like 15 BTC. But looking at the chart, it looks like he started from 0. So did he actually lose any money or break-even?

The y-axis shows his profit. It started at zero, went up to 3k, then down to -2.5k. The final loss was a loss of 5.5k, 3k of which was pre-existing profit, and 2.5k of which wasn't.

[waterpile]

Gamble is just luck

yes, but i doubt if gambling is just about luck
we also must be smart to read the pattern ...
if we know the pattern that will come out then we could minimize losses.. i think so

man, there is no pattern from what i observe its more like of a math and some little touch of luck.

[jjacob]

Gamble is just luck

yes, but i doubt if gambling is just about luck
we also must be smart to read the pattern ...
if we know the pattern that will come out then we could minimize losses.. i think so

man, there is no pattern from what i observe its more like of a math and some little touch of luck.

That is correct.
Bets are usually memory-less.
ie, the probability of the outcome of a bet doesn't change with past history.

[rayhan]

Gamble is just luck

yes, but i doubt if gambling is just about luck
we also must be smart to read the pattern ...
if we know the pattern that will come out then we could minimize losses.. i think so

man, there is no pattern from what i observe its more like of a math and some little touch of luck.

actually i dont know about math,, haha but from what i experienced while playing dice at some sites dice
there is a pattern in which when i played with 49.95% chance to win, they system gave me zigzag win, (i mean low hi low hi low hi)
and stright low / hi, point is we must know how many times we have to lo and how many times we have to high ..
if we dwell only on one bet (assuming low bet) i think we're not going to win in the end .. and ofc little luck very influential 

[dooglus]

actually i dont know about math,, haha but from what i experienced while playing dice at some sites dice
there is a pattern in which when i played with 49.95% chance to win, they system gave me zigzag win, (i mean low hi low hi low hi)
and stright low / hi, point is we must know how many times we have to lo and how many times we have to high ..
if we dwell only on one bet (assuming low bet) i think we're not going to win in the end .. and ofc little luck very influential 

If there really is a tendency for HLHLH, HHHHH, and LLLLL to come up more often than they should, you should be able to use that information to beat the house.

Simply bet small amounts until you see HLHL, HHHH, or LLLL, and then bet a larger amount on your next bet, since you "know" what is most likely to happen next.


Or, in other words "put your money where your mouth is".

[rayhan]

actually i dont know about math,, haha but from what i experienced while playing dice at some sites dice
there is a pattern in which when i played with 49.95% chance to win, they system gave me zigzag win, (i mean low hi low hi low hi)
and stright low / hi, point is we must know how many times we have to lo and how many times we have to high ..
if we dwell only on one bet (assuming low bet) i think we're not going to win in the end .. and ofc little luck very influential 

If there really is a tendency for HLHLH, HHHHH, and LLLLL to come up more often than they should, you should be able to use that information to beat the house.

Simply bet small amounts until you see HLHL, HHHH, or LLLL, and then bet a larger amount on your next bet, since you "know" what is most likely to happen next.


Or, in other words "put your money where your mouth is".

it becomes a problem when the numbers come out different than expected
and emotions into my problems so far, i cant control
if i lose i think i have to obtain it again then i will double my bet, and lost again and double again and so on until they run out ..

*marti is sucks indeed

[adaseb]

Looks like he lost 3000 Clam which is like 15 BTC. But looking at the chart, it looks like he started from 0. So did he actually lose any money or break-even?

The y-axis shows his profit. It started at zero, went up to 3k, then down to -2.5k. The final loss was a loss of 5.5k, 3k of which was pre-existing profit, and 2.5k of which wasn't.

Well looks like in the short term his stragegy was working but he really should of just took the profit and left.

[itod]

Gamble is just luck

yes, but i doubt if gambling is just about luck
we also must be smart to read the pattern ...
if we know the pattern that will come out then we could minimize losses.. i think so

man, there is no pattern from what i observe its more like of a math and some little touch of luck.

actually i dont know about math,, haha but from what i experienced while playing dice at some sites dice
there is a pattern in which when i played with 49.95% chance to win, they system gave me zigzag win, (i mean low hi low hi low hi)
and stright low / hi, point is we must know how many times we have to lo and how many times we have to high ..
if we dwell only on one bet (assuming low bet) i think we're not going to win in the end .. and ofc little luck very influential 

Your belief is called Gambler's fallacy. There are no patterns which you can exploit, they are all illusion, games of the mind. Dice has no memory.

[deisik]

Looks like he lost 3000 Clam which is like 15 BTC. But looking at the chart, it looks like he started from 0. So did he actually lose any money or break-even?

The y-axis shows his profit. It started at zero, went up to 3k, then down to -2.5k. The final loss was a loss of 5.5k, 3k of which was pre-existing profit, and 2.5k of which wasn't.

Well looks like in the short term his stragegy was working but he really should of just took the profit and left.

It was dooglus' cunning move to lure users into thinking that *they* can indeed stop at the right moment and run with the money gambled...

But greed is beyond and above reason

[Ingatqhvq]

Sometimes martingale really works, and Sometimes it doesn't work.
We call this is lucky
It's just the possibility, it need very large samples to work.

[Erza]

Sometimes martingale really works, and Sometimes it doesn't work.
We call this is lucky
It's just the possibility, it need very large samples to work.

But everytime I used this kind of gambling method I always lose in the end of my game whether is works or not. Not saying that you got a big cash of

money you can try this again and again may be it can change your luck a little bit

[BitBatFan]

Martinglae or any other system doesn't work! that's why it's called gambling. On the long run you can't win if there's an house edge!

[waterpile]

Martinglae or any other system doesn't work! that's why it's called gambling. On the long run you can't win if there's an house edge!

I think even if it has no house edge, you will still lose in the long run.

[gkv9]

Martinglae or any other system doesn't work! that's why it's called gambling. On the long run you can't win if there's an house edge!

I think even if it has no house edge, you will still lose in the long run.

Anything can probably in anyone's favor as far as my own experience is concerned, but I always try to learn when to stop...
I won't say that I lost too much on this and it is just because I had patience in my heart and knew where should I end it up...

[dominicg]

Martinglae or any other system doesn't work! that's why it's called gambling. On the long run you can't win if there's an house edge!

Martingale needs huge bankroll if you want to hit but still it is not a guarantee, you will only have high chance of winning

[BTCevo]

Martinglae or any other system doesn't work! that's why it's called gambling. On the long run you can't win if there's an house edge!

Martingale needs huge bankroll if you want to hit but still it is not a guarantee, you will only have high chance of winning

Winning doesnt determine on a huge bankroll, you just need luck to have a chance of winning, altough you got good cash if no luck is on you that is just same as suicide. Martingale is good for a short term. After you win some you can start to withdraw your money or in the end you will lose all of it

[fast2fix]

Martinglae or any other system doesn't work! that's why it's called gambling. On the long run you can't win if there's an house edge!

Martingale needs huge bankroll if you want to hit but still it is not a guarantee, you will only have high chance of winning

yeah martingale will work if you have enough bank roll and if you know how much profit you want to make, if you get greedy you'll lose.

[grendel25]

well, technically if you have an infinite bank roll you can always profit.  That's why high rollers are so dangerous in casinos where there are no limits.  But... there usually are limits.