[ANN][TAC] TalkCoin

[Freeman108]

lol agree. I have just bought another 10000 TAC at silly price. Not much I know but I'm a tiny fish in a big sea 

I've been mining TAC from day 1 and still here. Not much hash power (2x6950 + 2x7950) but have full confidence in the team and am looking forward to a bright future 

[AizenSou]

Most of people in crypto are just for quick buck, no one wants to wait a few months. Look at the mighty DRK, even it can't avoid a big pump & dump. TAC is still very new, so it needs time to grow.
Look at the recent NIST5 coin pump (N5Coin), the current price is around 20k sat while the block reward is 100 coins / minute (more than TAC with average 70 coins / minute).
If you ask me why people are willing to pay for that price I will ask you how much the price of this coin do you predict 2 weeks later ? Look at any coin with quick PoW period and PoS feature, which coin doesn't have the same pattern ?

We are so busy that we couldn't explain further about the advantage of each Release Candidate. After RC2 and RC3 we are confident to tell that Talkcoin is the first App coin which could boost the usage of the wallet to the mass more than any coin. People will engage to spend TAC to communicate using the wallet and Talkcoin will reach more people, even for people not in crypto.

Invest your time and money in what fundamentals and useful is, like Darkcoin. If you don't like that and want to get quick fast, Talkcoin is not the right coin for you right now.

Regards,

Aizen

[dragonmike]

Guys, I've been looking through this thread but I was unable to find the steps to compile the optimised miner... I'm on PiMP currently. I gave it a go myself but it didn't work properly and the nist5 kernel doesn't load.

Would a nice and sympathetic soul be willing to spell out the steps for me please?

[karimdr2]

Guys, I've been looking through this thread but I was unable to find the steps to compile the optimised miner... I'm on PiMP currently. I gave it a go myself but it didn't work properly and the nist5 kernel doesn't load.

Would a nice and sympathetic soul be willing to spell out the steps for me please?

I think you must install catalyst 14.6.

[AizenSou]

Guys, I've been looking through this thread but I was unable to find the steps to compile the optimised miner... I'm on PiMP currently. I gave it a go myself but it didn't work properly and the nist5 kernel doesn't load.

Would a nice and sympathetic soul be willing to spell out the steps for me please?

PM me if you need help.

some huge marketing company, please! it is much more important than things like "new gui". noone needs gui... Look at some really high valued coins. Noone had supercool GUI and won the prize because of that GUI. High price, attention, nethash are not about GUI. People like anon. People like steady block reward and hyped coins. So bring at least some marketing to make the hype. It will be steady healthy growing hype, since it's not pump-n-dumb coin. This coin being developed all the time. Just bring people.

I remember, when we showed up at Sharecoinx thread, it brought TAC like 10x nethash and attention, just like that(shitty new hyped exchange, that turned out to be scam later). After month of solomining, even without pools.

When we showed up at bittrex, dif and price growed a lot.

I believe in this coin and I want it to success. Mining from start, huge bag, I didn't dump at over 10k sat price, I believe it will worth much more.

No it's not like you think. Our potential target group is not only people in crypto, but normal internet user. Our user not only uses the wallet to send/receive coin, but keeps using the wallet as a means to secure and decentralized communicate between each others. So a modern and easy to use GUI is necessary for normal users to engage to use the wallet.
Thanks for supporting us and keeping faith in us. We will continue to work hard for users like you.

Regards,

Aizen

[skidog]

Guys, I've been looking through this thread but I was unable to find the steps to compile the optimised miner... I'm on PiMP currently. I gave it a go myself but it didn't work properly and the nist5 kernel doesn't load.

Would a nice and sympathetic soul be willing to spell out the steps for me please?

PM me if you need help.

some huge marketing company, please! it is much more important than things like "new gui". noone needs gui... Look at some really high valued coins. Noone had supercool GUI and won the prize because of that GUI. High price, attention, nethash are not about GUI. People like anon. People like steady block reward and hyped coins. So bring at least some marketing to make the hype. It will be steady healthy growing hype, since it's not pump-n-dumb coin. This coin being developed all the time. Just bring people.

I remember, when we showed up at Sharecoinx thread, it brought TAC like 10x nethash and attention, just like that(shitty new hyped exchange, that turned out to be scam later). After month of solomining, even without pools.

When we showed up at bittrex, dif and price growed a lot.

I believe in this coin and I want it to success. Mining from start, huge bag, I didn't dump at over 10k sat price, I believe it will worth much more.

No it's not like you think. Our potential target group is not only people in crypto, but normal internet user. Our user not only uses the wallet to send/receive coin, but keeps using the wallet as a means to secure and decentralized communicate between each others. So a modern and easy to use GUI is necessary for normal users to engage to use the wallet.
Thanks for supporting us and keeping faith in us. We will continue to work hard for users like you.

Regards,

Aizen

Maybe get the chat function independent of the block chain, with some form of add support in the  wallet. I like the idea of chat but why would someone pay for a message, when you can send a message for free? We need some kind of Google approach with advertising. Just some ideas. Maybe I'm off base. Just an idea...Any thoughts?

[xwebnetwork]

You do have a point. Even encrypted messaging elsewhere is free. So how do we solve this dilemma?

[atleticofa]

ROADMAP ANNOUNCEMENT

RC1: (RELEASED 3rd week of July)

• Updated GUI (djm34, Aizen)
• API functions (Talkdev)
• Change the lowest voting reward from 1TAC to 5 or 10TAC (Aizen)
• Change the voting fee to 1 TAC (Aizen)
• Remove chats by countries (Talkdev)

RC2:(RELEASED End of JULY)

• Private messaging (Talkdev)
• All fees are choosen by voting (Talkdev, Aizen, djm)

RC3: (RELEASES End of AUGUST)

• User created groups with fees

RC4: (RELEASED Middle of SEPTEMBER)

• Searching functions for User created groups, making Talkcoin the first decentralized communication/forum platform
• Broadcasting message to all clients (for advertising)

RC5: (RELEASED End of OCTOBER)

• Mobile wallet (Android + iOS) with full features of Talkcoin

Not a bad plan, but I think Talkcoin must include a VOIP feature.

And fees should be chosen automatically, no with a vote. Take the example of the new fees for bitcoin transactions.

[TalkTeam]

You do have a point. Even encrypted messaging elsewhere is free. So how do we solve this dilemma?

using the blockchain for communications is key to the Talkcoin tech.

The blockchain is totally decentralized and resilient to disaster, censorship, and information can be validated by consensus across the network.

Any other communications product has some central point of failure, Talkcoin is the first pure decentralized communication system that just requires the internet to function.

And messages need to be carried on transactions via the block chain to gain these benefits, hence the cost.  All TAC from message costs are destroyed in the genesis block to decrease the total TAC supply and increase the velocity of TAC in circulation.

[TalkTeam]

ROADMAP ANNOUNCEMENT

RC1: (RELEASED 3rd week of July)

• Updated GUI (djm34, Aizen)
• API functions (Talkdev)
• Change the lowest voting reward from 1TAC to 5 or 10TAC (Aizen)
• Change the voting fee to 1 TAC (Aizen)
• Remove chats by countries (Talkdev)

RC2:(RELEASED End of JULY)

• Private messaging (Talkdev)
• All fees are choosen by voting (Talkdev, Aizen, djm)

RC3: (RELEASES End of AUGUST)

• User created groups with fees

RC4: (RELEASED Middle of SEPTEMBER)

• Searching functions for User created groups, making Talkcoin the first decentralized communication/forum platform
• Broadcasting message to all clients (for advertising)

RC5: (RELEASED End of OCTOBER)

• Mobile wallet (Android + iOS) with full features of Talkcoin

Not a bad plan, but I think Talkcoin must include a VOIP feature.

And fees should be chosen automatically, no with a vote. Take the example of the new fees for bitcoin transactions.

We can adjust fees. Once the private messages and user groups features are released, volume of messaging will increase, messaging needs to be affordable for all but disincentivize spam.  Various ways we can do this.

[jwinterm]

We can adjust fees. Once the private messages and user groups features are released, volume of messaging will increase, messaging needs to be affordable for all but disincentivize spam.  Various ways we can do this.

maybe one way to do this is start out with very low fee, but every message sent makes it increase a tiny bit. So, start it at 0.001 TAC, and each message makes it increase by 0.01 or something (in one week or month period). That way most people should be able to message the whole month for 1 TAC, but spammer start getting charged lot of TAC.

[Hodor_keeper_of_the_light]

We can adjust fees. Once the private messages and user groups features are released, volume of messaging will increase, messaging needs to be affordable for all but disincentivize spam.  Various ways we can do this.

maybe one way to do this is start out with very low fee, but every message sent makes it increase a tiny bit. So, start it at 0.001 TAC, and each message makes it increase by 0.01 or something (in one week or month period). That way most people should be able to message the whole month for 1 TAC, but spammer start getting charged lot of TAC.

spammers can create different wallets

[jwinterm]

We can adjust fees. Once the private messages and user groups features are released, volume of messaging will increase, messaging needs to be affordable for all but disincentivize spam.  Various ways we can do this.

maybe one way to do this is start out with very low fee, but every message sent makes it increase a tiny bit. So, start it at 0.001 TAC, and each message makes it increase by 0.01 or something (in one week or month period). That way most people should be able to message the whole month for 1 TAC, but spammer start getting charged lot of TAC.

spammers can create different wallets

good point...

Maybe better solution then is to make first message charged at 1 TAC, 0.01 TAC after that with increasing penalty for more messages sent...I dunno tho, seems pretty convoluted for chatting.

[AizenSou]

A new article which mentions Talkcoin as the first application coin. Worths a read.
http://altcoinspeculation.com/newest-altcoin-trends-coins-with-applications/

[Fatov]

What do you think about master nodes?

[Fatov]

I need help to compile https://github.com/djm34/sgminer-nist5 on  pimp(ubuntu)

[/opt/sgminer-nist5]:# make
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
make  all-recursive
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5'
Making all in lib
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5/lib'
.deps/memmem.Po:1: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5/lib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Some ideas?
Thanks

[karimdr2]

I need help to compile https://github.com/djm34/sgminer-nist5 on  pimp(ubuntu)

[/opt/sgminer-nist5]:# make
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
make  all-recursive
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5'
Making all in lib
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5/lib'
.deps/memmem.Po:1: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5/lib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Some ideas?
Thanks

try this:

sudo make clean
sudo make

[lobo13hf]

can anyone share the configuration for R9 290s?

[crz]

Wow - Nice network hash rate increase :-) x2 now

[AizenSou]

I need help to compile https://github.com/djm34/sgminer-nist5 on  pimp(ubuntu)

[/opt/sgminer-nist5]:# make
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
make  all-recursive
fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything.
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5'
Making all in lib
make[2]: Entering directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5/lib'
.deps/memmem.Po:1: *** multiple target patterns.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5/lib'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/sgminer-nist5'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Some ideas?
Thanks

try this:

sudo make clean
sudo make

I rather delete all .deps folders in all subfolders of sgminer-nist5. It works for me. PM me if you need further help.

Wow - Nice network hash rate increase :-) x2 now

Guys if you support Talkcoin please tweet/retweet more about Talkcoin. Talkcoin is the first innovative application coin which already got 5 clones. It deserves more attention. I notice that many whales/big traders tweets about Talkcoin/NIST5 clone but nothing about Talkcoin. The price is maybe not important right now, important is how many people heard about Talkcoin.