Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 02:34:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][X11/X13] X11 (Darkcoin)/X13 (Marucoin) miner (based on sph-sgminer)  (Read 351508 times)
hashbrown9000
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 427
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 01:53:33 AM
 #881

@Wolf, what are your stales and rejects with those settings on your 270 cards?

Pinkcoin:
ETH:
VTC:
BTC:
Wolf_Pack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 386
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 01:59:35 AM
 #882

@Wolf, what are your stales and rejects with those settings on your 270 cards?
Rejects are about .6% I'm not sure about stales. I actually switched back to multipool about 2 hours ago because nanolite's difficulty shot through the roof.


                        ▄  ▄▄  ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄

   ▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄     ▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄      ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄       ▄▄       ▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ▄██▀▀▀▀██▄  ███▄   ██ ██▀▀▀▀▀    ▄██▀▀▀█▀      ███      ███     ███ ██▀▀▀▀▀
██▀      ▀██ ████▄  ██ ██        ██▀           ██▀██     ████   ████ ██
██        ██ ██ ▀██ ██ ██▄▄▄     ██    ████   ██▀ ▀██    ██▀██ ██▀██ ██▄▄▄
██▄      ▄██ ██  ▀████ ██▀▀▀     ██▄     ██  ██▀   ▀██   ██ ▀███▀ ██ ██▀▀▀
 ▀██▄▄▄▄██▀  ██    ▀██ ██▄▄▄▄▄    ▀██▄▄▄██▀ ████▄▄▄████  ██  ▀█▀  ██ ██▄▄▄▄▄
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀    ▀▀     ▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀      ▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀       ▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

                        ▀  ▀▀  ▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
A-Self Evolving Virtual World
Built on Top of Blockchain
▬ ▬▬ ▬▬▬   WHITEPAPER   ▬▬▬ ▬▬ ▬
TWITTER     TELEGRAM      MEDIUM
▬ ▬▬ ▬▬▬   ANN THREAD   ▬▬▬ ▬▬ ▬
jimlite
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 02:14:49 AM
 #883

Is there a reason why this doesn't work with Nicehash X11 -p p=1.0  ?
Also do 2nd pools or failovers work?

Binance, hottest/largest alt exchange, 2BTC daily no verification. https://www.binance.com/?ref=13309371
NEED TO RENT A RIG? All algos at http://www.miningrigrentals.com/register?ref=627


  ✵ Super FAST block times      ✵ Block Explorer right in the wallet!     ✵ Stealth Addresses     ✵ PoW/PoS hybrid  
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
Ancient Money
for a New World
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
Join the conversation!
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

TWITTER


miner555
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 02:18:15 AM
 #884

dont work.  pls help

[05:14:49] sgminer.exe: --kernel: Invalid parameter to set_kernel

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe --kernel x13mod -o stratum

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe -k x13mod -o stratum



i dont use x13mod pls help


ebliever
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1035


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 03:13:27 AM
 #885

Is there a reason why this doesn't work with Nicehash X11 -p p=1.0  ?
Also do 2nd pools or failovers work?

I've mined at Nicehash on X11 with this miner. When did you try it? I haven't seen X11 with rates over 1.0 in about 2 days, so that might be your problem. The current best rate is 0.50 so you would need to set p=0.5 or lower.

Luke 12:15-21

Ephesians 2:8-9
-Blueraiven-
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 04:36:00 AM
 #886

Anyone can share their hashrates for 270X?

I'm using Sapphire 270X Vapor-X & having hashrates of:

X11 = 2.2 MH/s
X13 = 1.75 MH/s

Wanna try to push it through anyone getting higher hashrates than this?
hero18688
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 06:08:24 AM
 #887

Someone give me a conf for 290 tri-x for x13mod.I can only get 2.56m.But my 280x gets 2.65m.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Ne2usjAnL8h1fHnT

minerjoen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 06:32:22 AM
Last edit: June 02, 2014, 06:51:36 AM by minerjoen
 #888

dont work.  pls help

[05:14:49] sgminer.exe: --kernel: Invalid parameter to set_kernel

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe --kernel x13mod -o stratum

C:\Users\Yavuz\Desktop\X13mod\sgminer.exe -k x13mod -o stratum



i dont use x13mod pls help




here my example from x11mod on my evga 580gtx
sgminer.exe -k x11mod -o stratum

i got just the x11mod folder, i dont use that c:/ blablabla. just sgminer.exe thats it. Because i use an .bat file with the info i need, i dont start everything step by step in the CMD..
My speed on the nvidia card get from 370Khs to 2.4Mhs. I hope the x13mod will also work soon for nvidia Cheesy because now i only get high speeds, but almost none accepted shares.

Bitcoin: 1GPjrqoWGQfqyCEYnPhbA3nWN9dmMwFHRE
Elementrem: 0xF4789b95826C4474B3E7C780Fd90f639b51C4B6c
sikboy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 07:03:13 AM
 #889

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?

I tried it last night, same settings by just changing x11mod to x13mod and mining
BoostCoin (BOST) and got the same speed as i would mining with the standard sgminer?


restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 07:26:58 AM
 #890

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?
yes
sikboy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 07:36:04 AM
 #891

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?
yes


is work being made to increase the speed of X13?
restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:00:41 AM
 #892

Am i right in assuming that mining x13 will be slower per MH than X11?
yes


is work being made to increase the speed of X13?
13>11 don't you think ?!
X11 improvements were already implemented into X13
bullus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:09:06 AM
 #893

Any news from x13 and hd5xxx,hd6xxx?

btc 16LWhms487bzCxQWq5oeW8SMDPmU2rvQjf
boubou
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:32:58 AM
 #894

I can't make it run on PIMP

I have an error: 100% rejected and HW with message "low difficulty share" .
I assume it's because it does not find the right kernel even if I put
"kernel" : "x11mod",

BEHNZiP6UZunp41vurNaQi4r2hvgG57yzi : BdG
Mister1k
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 520



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:35:40 AM
 #895

X11 hd 7950 x3. Ive been playing with xintensity.
I am also using cgwatcher. That way you can see shares per  second against the work utility.
For me. 1792 shaders * X= 1792x120=215,040 threads.
 I incrementally go up and watch shares and WU.
My hash changes 10-30khs but is deceiving. Hash goes down a bit but shares rise.
Cgwatcher you can see shares in real time.
I am running 2 threads per gpu. Work 256.
X=120 so that is X60 per thread.
1100 on the clocks 1500 memory.
3x hd7950 = 8.9 mh/s
2.96 mh per card .
My pool sees 9.25-10 mh/s
WU is .120+
.040 per card
According to this chart.
I:13 = 8192 threads
I:14 = 16384 threads
I:15 = 32768 threads
I:16 = 65536 threads
I:17 = 131072 threads
I:18 = 262144 threads
I:19 = 524288 threads
I:20 = 1048576 threads

1792x120=215040 or about I 17.75ish.
Will test more. Have a great day.Smiley
Bojcha
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 848
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:45:20 AM
 #896

where did you find that 120 and 60 number?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #nqWzb4qug4G9ATyT
topnetdeal
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:50:10 AM
 #897

X11 hd 7950 x3. Ive been playing with xintensity.
I am also using cgwatcher. That way you can see shares per  second against the work utility.
For me. 1792 shaders * X= 1792x120=215,040 threads.
 I incrementally go up and watch shares and WU.
My hash changes 10-30khs but is deceiving. Hash goes down a bit but shares rise.
Cgwatcher you can see shares in real time.
I am running 2 threads per gpu. Work 256.
X=120 so that is X60 per thread.
1100 on the clocks 1500 memory.
3x hd7950 = 8.9 mh/s
2.96 mh per card .
My pool sees 9.25-10 mh/s
WU is .120+
.040 per card
According to this chart.
I:13 = 8192 threads
I:14 = 16384 threads
I:15 = 32768 threads
I:16 = 65536 threads
I:17 = 131072 threads
I:18 = 262144 threads
I:19 = 524288 threads
I:20 = 1048576 threads

1792x120=215040 or about I 17.75ish.
Will test more. Have a great day.Smiley

Hi, xintensity is max 9999, I think You was working with rawintensity (max 2147483647).

▒ NOW token ▒ by ChangeNOW ▒ Get the WIN! ▒
ChangeNOW - an instant Non-custodial Exchange Service  (( changenow.io ))
Whitepaper  ▓  Telegram  ▓  Twitter  ▓  Facebook  ▓  Medium  ▓  Reddit  ▓  Bounty Thread
mapleshadow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 11:10:11 AM
 #898

amd 14.6 bate drive, a large number of hw error
restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 11:57:18 AM
 #899

Any news from x13 and hd5xxx,hd6xxx?
Several pages behind I had posted link to last "x13mod" which works for me on older cards
~ 790KH/s on stock 5850
~ 1.2GH on 6970 running at 900/1200
sgminer -k x13mod -o stratum+tcp://digit.suprnova.cc:3447 -u USER.U -p U -w 256 -g 1 -I 18 --thread-concurrency 7200

decreasing -w lowers hashrate, increase -I until the card is stable
Starscream
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 12:37:24 PM
 #900

amd 14.6 bate drive, a large number of hw error
14.6 has been problematic for a lot of people.
Use 14.4, 14.3 or 13.12
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!