MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 15, 2014, 08:47:34 PM |
|
Results console: "version" : "v1.0.1.0-unk-beta", "protocolversion" : 60005, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 1.80273700,"blocks" : 10128, "moneysupply" : 2032.31238700, "connections" : 16, "proxy" : "", "ip" : "83.86.92.116", "difficulty" : 55.68061811, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1407988769, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "unlocked_until" : 0, "errors" : "" So if I understand correct, it's even worse... While my GUI shows my coins to be there, the wallet thinks I'm emptied out!!!!  W T F...! So yeah, this helped A LOT ♥ NOW what do I do?  Devvie PS: last block was 1 hour ago... So I'll shut down the client once more and see what happens :s Peace! No, you're good. Stake is the balance that is mature (eligible to stake), balance is the balance that is not mature to stake (spendable coins) However, just because you are able to stake doesn't mean you will right away. Each staking block is like a lottery. Sometimes you will stake right away, sometimes it will take a while
|
|
|
|
Phosphorous
|
 |
August 15, 2014, 10:04:42 PM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
|
|
|
|
MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 16, 2014, 05:49:55 AM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
Send them to one address all at once
|
|
|
|
Mortimer452
|
 |
August 16, 2014, 07:12:59 AM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
Unfortunately that is pretty much how staking works. You can, periodically, transfer your entire balance to another wallet, or to Bittrex and back, to "re-consolidate" your coins.
|
|
|
|
Karn
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."
|
 |
August 16, 2014, 06:27:49 PM |
|
To the Person mining with 1EzUuYNmcVs5v1K6rww9wp4cqv8vbsi7J. This is an old address, please use your new address (starts with an "M") or you will not be paid.
Also, if you have not recieved a payment for the lastest shifts after the switch to PoS, you have to have a balance > 0.01 before you can be paid. I am keeping a sheet with payouts owed. That to is on the todo list for coding.
That was me totally forgot to change my bat files, sent you an email with new addy MjYmkvTatZ1ryoyMHBdXUTBwMSZQgjz2Qp Please PM me your private key to go with your old addy since anyone can claim that that is their address.  oh, and sig updated, thanks for the reminder Phosphorous . I pm'ed you what I hope was the key, had to look up what it was and how to find it
|
“But it's a poor fellow who can't take his pleasure without asking other people's permission.” ― Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf
|
|
|
Phosphorous
|
 |
August 16, 2014, 08:49:23 PM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
Unfortunately that is pretty much how staking works. You can, periodically, transfer your entire balance to another wallet, or to Bittrex and back, to "re-consolidate" your coins. Thanks for the explanation. Is there any reason to? Yesterday I got 7 stakes, all of the same size. Would I have received fewer stakes of a larger size if the balance was "consolidated" or is there any advantage to one approach vs another?
|
|
|
|
MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 06:52:59 AM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
Unfortunately that is pretty much how staking works. You can, periodically, transfer your entire balance to another wallet, or to Bittrex and back, to "re-consolidate" your coins. Thanks for the explanation. Is there any reason to? Yesterday I got 7 stakes, all of the same size. Would I have received fewer stakes of a larger size if the balance was "consolidated" or is there any advantage to one approach vs another? When you move your coins, you are resetting your timers, so I would do it as seldom as possible
|
|
|
|
MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 07:05:17 AM |
|
Sometime tomorrow (not telling you when) I'll be picking a random address from pool.mmxivcoin.com to give 1 TH of SHA power to for 24 hours
|
|
|
|
Karn
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 08:58:16 AM |
|
Sometime tomorrow (not telling you when) I'll be picking a random address from pool.mmxivcoin.com to give 1 TH of SHA power to for 24 hours Very cool, always some thing going on
|
“But it's a poor fellow who can't take his pleasure without asking other people's permission.” ― Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf
|
|
|
Phosphorous
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 03:38:51 PM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
Unfortunately that is pretty much how staking works. You can, periodically, transfer your entire balance to another wallet, or to Bittrex and back, to "re-consolidate" your coins. Thanks for the explanation. Is there any reason to? Yesterday I got 7 stakes, all of the same size. Would I have received fewer stakes of a larger size if the balance was "consolidated" or is there any advantage to one approach vs another? When you move your coins, you are resetting your timers, so I would do it as seldom as possible OK, but it was also explained that you had to keep the qt client open to stake. So what is the real effect of closing and re-opening the qt client?
|
|
|
|
szenekonzept
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1012
Europecoin Financecloud API
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 05:19:02 PM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
Unfortunately that is pretty much how staking works. You can, periodically, transfer your entire balance to another wallet, or to Bittrex and back, to "re-consolidate" your coins. Thanks for the explanation. Is there any reason to? Yesterday I got 7 stakes, all of the same size. Would I have received fewer stakes of a larger size if the balance was "consolidated" or is there any advantage to one approach vs another? When you move your coins, you are resetting your timers, so I would do it as seldom as possible OK, but it was also explained that you had to keep the qt client open to stake. So what is the real effect of closing and re-opening the qt client? the common way to function is(@MMXIV correct me if i am wrong) is that you don't loose coinage but staking time, so when you oben it up again you beginn where you stopped staking, but you did not make any progress in between. For oler Iplementations, there hasn't been any "staking-time", what turned out badly, because people just had to open their wallet once a month and harnest their stakes. Newer implementations require you to "stake" and contribute a certain amound of time to securing the network
|
|
|
|
MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 07:47:50 PM |
|
So I'm seeing something I am curious about. Say I started with 10 coins. I then earn a stake of 0.2 coins. And perhaps I receive a pool payout of 0.3 coins later that day. But now the age of the 10 coins is different than the 0.2 coins and the 0.3 coins.
So at some point, the 10 coins go to stake again but the 0.2 and 0.3 remain in my balance.
But then I think the 10 coins will generate another stake, let's say 0.2 again, and then the initial 0.2 and 0.3 will mature and I'll have 0.5 coins staking (perhaps at different times) and a lot of 10 and 0.2 coins in the balance. So I think you see where I'm going, is that there will be an increasing amount of "odd small lots" of coins staking and rotating through the process.
Is there any process by which the coins can all consolidate for the purpose of staking? Or will there be an increasing number of subsequently smaller lots of coins moving through the staking process and earning ever proportionately smaller stakes?
Unfortunately that is pretty much how staking works. You can, periodically, transfer your entire balance to another wallet, or to Bittrex and back, to "re-consolidate" your coins. Thanks for the explanation. Is there any reason to? Yesterday I got 7 stakes, all of the same size. Would I have received fewer stakes of a larger size if the balance was "consolidated" or is there any advantage to one approach vs another? When you move your coins, you are resetting your timers, so I would do it as seldom as possible OK, but it was also explained that you had to keep the qt client open to stake. So what is the real effect of closing and re-opening the qt client? the common way to function is(@MMXIV correct me if i am wrong) is that you don't loose coinage but staking time, so when you oben it up again you beginn where you stopped staking, but you did not make any progress in between. For oler Iplementations, there hasn't been any "staking-time", what turned out badly, because people just had to open their wallet once a month and harnest their stakes. Newer implementations require you to "stake" and contribute a certain amound of time to securing the network Right, coinage should be unaffected. Only if a staking block comes through during that 2 seconds (chances are it won't) do you lose a little stake time. Just do it fast and you'll be fine Or you can just do debug -> getinfo to double check that everything is correct
|
|
|
|
MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 09:28:09 PM |
|
I changed my mind on the free 1 TH today Instead I just sent every address on the pool 1 full MMXIV. So that's like .12 BTC worth, much more valuable than 1 TH to one person Enjoy and thanks for mining with pool.mmxivcoin.com!
|
|
|
|
MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 17, 2014, 10:50:43 PM |
|
We just hit over 2000 blocks on SHA this shift for the multipool. New record!?
|
|
|
|
Karn
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."
|
 |
August 18, 2014, 06:38:18 AM |
|
I changed my mind on the free 1 TH today Instead I just sent every address on the pool 1 full MMXIV. So that's like .12 BTC worth, much more valuable than 1 TH to one person Enjoy and thanks for mining with pool.mmxivcoin.com!Hell yea thanks man 
|
“But it's a poor fellow who can't take his pleasure without asking other people's permission.” ― Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf
|
|
|
Karn
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."
|
 |
August 18, 2014, 02:32:29 PM |
|
To the Person mining with 1EzUuYNmcVs5v1K6rww9wp4cqv8vbsi7J. This is an old address, please use your new address (starts with an "M") or you will not be paid.
Also, if you have not recieved a payment for the lastest shifts after the switch to PoS, you have to have a balance > 0.01 before you can be paid. I am keeping a sheet with payouts owed. That to is on the todo list for coding.
That was me totally forgot to change my bat files, sent you an email with new addy MjYmkvTatZ1ryoyMHBdXUTBwMSZQgjz2Qp Please PM me your private key to go with your old addy since anyone can claim that that is their address.  oh, and sig updated, thanks for the reminder Phosphorous . I pm'ed you what I hope was the key, had to look up what it was and how to find it Was that the right key, if not I have no idea how to find the key you need. Let me know
|
“But it's a poor fellow who can't take his pleasure without asking other people's permission.” ― Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf
|
|
|
szenekonzept
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1012
Europecoin Financecloud API
|
 |
August 18, 2014, 05:38:11 PM |
|
argh my miner fucked me up does not connect to the sha pool i missed the coin i guess anyway great giveway (i'll try not to feel greedy ....) 
|
|
|
|
Karn
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."
|
 |
August 18, 2014, 06:13:05 PM |
|
Pool seems to be having problems today. Im only connecting sporadically
|
“But it's a poor fellow who can't take his pleasure without asking other people's permission.” ― Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf
|
|
|
Phosphorous
|
 |
August 18, 2014, 06:14:10 PM |
|
Pool seems to be having problems today. Im only connecting sporadically
Yeah, looks like it's down. I also noted that the shift ended last night, and even though I mined yesterday and got the bonus (thanks MMXIV!), I didn't have an entry for it on my miner stats page.
|
|
|
|
MMXIV (OP)
|
 |
August 18, 2014, 06:51:04 PM |
|
Pool is working for me and the IRC bot says it is, too. You guys aren't able to connect? Let me know if you're still having issues and I'll bug ThePeePs
[15:49] <@MMXIV> !pool [15:49] <+MMXIV_Bot> Algo Workers Hashrate Blocks Shares [15:49] <+MMXIV_Bot> sha256 3 6.85 TH 658 180024192 [15:49] <+MMXIV_Bot> scrypt 4 143.36 MH 147 224657638 [15:49] <+MMXIV_Bot> x11 2 6.76 MH 29 62590662 [15:49] <+MMXIV_Bot> x13 0 0 KH 0 10620
|
|
|
|
|