[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[btell]

drk up 18% xmr up 18% cloak up 13% XC up 4%

and xc is by far the best anonymous coin. I don't get it.

If you're talking about last 24 hrs, we've seen 12.63% up

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

[synechist]

just as a test i put 26 xc from cryptsy to my osx wallet. took me 2 minutes and 28 seconds. WAUW! but my walley says; not minting because you dont have mature coins, what does this mean? thx

You need to wait for a certain number of confirmations of the payment on the network before your coins are mature.

I can't remember how many, or how long this takes. Anyone here know?

and what does mature and minting mean? thx for your awnser

mature means how many ticks later a coin will "mature"... some need 50, others much higher or lower... all depends on the coin. Until the set number is reached the coins that were transferred are not "mature".

Minting is the process whereby new coins are created in XC. 3.33% more coins are created each year. They're created in the wallets of users who leave their wallets running so that they can "stake".

Once coins are created, it's still possible that a different wallet will process transactions in such a way as to leave out the coins you've just earned; this record of the blockchain will compete against yours as different nodes accept either your or the other wallet's version. Whichever version gets the majority wins out and all the nodes have to accept it. For this reason you can't spend coins for a while - until it's certain that your coins are well established in the blockchain.

[cryptico]

Lastly, whenever I pay someone, I specify that change is sent to an address I've already backed up the private key of. Otherwise, the wallet will create a new address for the change and I'll have to make a new backup of its private key. Always remember this last thing, or you'll lose coins at some point.

What does this mean?

When you make a payment, you pay from an address in your wallet.

If the amount paid is smaller than the amount held at an address, the remaining amount in the address is sent to a new address called a "change" address.

The change address will be created when the transaction is created.

Since it's a new address, you won't have a backup of its private key yet.

If you make a lot of payments, the next thing you know, you'll have 20 change addresses hanging around in your wallet.

If your wallet is lost/corrupted/whatever, you have no backup of the coins held at those change addresses.

Therefore when you make a payment, specify that the change is sent to an existing address in your wallet.

Use coin control to do so.



How-to: http://www.xc-official.com/wallet/

Ok I'll look at that thank you. did not know this at all. Does it mean that after a certain amount of transactions withouth Coin control your wallet.dat file will not work anymore when you put it in another computer?

[massivemark]

just as a test i put 26 xc from cryptsy to my osx wallet. took me 2 minutes and 28 seconds. WAUW! but my walley says; not minting because you dont have mature coins, what does this mean? thx

You need to wait for a certain number of confirmations of the payment on the network before your coins are mature.

I can't remember how many, or how long this takes. Anyone here know?

and what does mature and minting mean? thx for your awnser

mature means how many ticks later a coin will "mature"... some need 50, others much higher or lower... all depends on the coin. Until the set number is reached the coins that were transferred are not "mature".

Minting is the process whereby new coins are created in XC. 3.33% more coins are created each year. They're created in the wallets of users who leave their wallets running so that they can "stake".

Once coins are created, it's still possible that a different wallet will process transactions in such a way as to leave out the coins you've just earned; this record of the blockchain will compete against yours as different nodes accept either your or the other wallet's version. Whichever version gets the majority wins out and all the nodes have to accept it. For this reason you can't spend coins for a while - until it's certain that your coins are well established in the blockchain.

is it true that the more coins i have in my wallet, the more chance i have of earning coins?

[rockstahh]

drk up 18% xmr up 18% cloak up 13% XC up 4%

and xc is by far the best anonymous coin. I don't get it.

If you're talking about last 24 hrs, we've seen 12.63% up

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

Not to mention any names, but I think some of the other coins with the "anonymous" feature, buy from within to fuel their fire. Again, purely a guess.

The fact that Dan is releasing an updated "road map" this weekend has created some positive momentum within XC.

[battbot]

drk up 18% xmr up 18% cloak up 13% XC up 4%

and xc is by far the best anonymous coin. I don't get it.

If you're talking about last 24 hrs, we've seen 12.63% up

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

[_evolution_]

When is some proper PR gonna happen?

It's not all about getting paid-for ads in crypto news blogs.

Can I ask, respectfully, for the community to stop suggesting PR strategies?

We have one already. It is driven by tech developments and NOT hype.

Yes, we will plug the coin. Yes, the community should do so too, since it's in your interest.

You can either decide that the XC team is legit and trust us, or you can buy something else. If you think we're legit, then
- be patient when you think we ought to announce something but haven't.
- trust us, since you have outsider information and can't see our picture well enough to know why and how we're doing things.

But please stop offering outsider opinions. It spreads the false impression that we don't have a plan.


Why diminish investor confidence?

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

[synechist]

Lastly, whenever I pay someone, I specify that change is sent to an address I've already backed up the private key of. Otherwise, the wallet will create a new address for the change and I'll have to make a new backup of its private key. Always remember this last thing, or you'll lose coins at some point.

What does this mean?

When you make a payment, you pay from an address in your wallet.

If the amount paid is smaller than the amount held at an address, the remaining amount in the address is sent to a new address called a "change" address.

The change address will be created when the transaction is created.

Since it's a new address, you won't have a backup of its private key yet.

If you make a lot of payments, the next thing you know, you'll have 20 change addresses hanging around in your wallet.

If your wallet is lost/corrupted/whatever, you have no backup of the coins held at those change addresses.

Therefore when you make a payment, specify that the change is sent to an existing address in your wallet.

Use coin control to do so.



How-to: http://www.xc-official.com/wallet/

Ok I'll look at that thank you. did not know this at all. Does it mean that after a certain amount of transactions withouth Coin control your wallet.dat file will not work anymore when you put it in another computer?

No it doesn't. It just means your coins will be in innumerable addresses in your wallet. Your wallet.dat will work fine in any computer you copy it to.

The problem is keeping a backup of all the change addresses you'd create. You'll inevitably miss one. And then at some point your wallet.dat will get corrupted, and then either your backed up wallet.dat or your private key backup will be out of date.

[synechist]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

What??

[_evolution_]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

[synechist]

just as a test i put 26 xc from cryptsy to my osx wallet. took me 2 minutes and 28 seconds. WAUW! but my walley says; not minting because you dont have mature coins, what does this mean? thx

You need to wait for a certain number of confirmations of the payment on the network before your coins are mature.

I can't remember how many, or how long this takes. Anyone here know?

and what does mature and minting mean? thx for your awnser

mature means how many ticks later a coin will "mature"... some need 50, others much higher or lower... all depends on the coin. Until the set number is reached the coins that were transferred are not "mature".

Minting is the process whereby new coins are created in XC. 3.33% more coins are created each year. They're created in the wallets of users who leave their wallets running so that they can "stake".

Once coins are created, it's still possible that a different wallet will process transactions in such a way as to leave out the coins you've just earned; this record of the blockchain will compete against yours as different nodes accept either your or the other wallet's version. Whichever version gets the majority wins out and all the nodes have to accept it. For this reason you can't spend coins for a while - until it's certain that your coins are well established in the blockchain.

is it true that the more coins i have in my wallet, the more chance i have of earning coins?

Yup, because you'll get 3.33% interest on average per annum on however many coins you have.

[synechist]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

[BrewCrewFan]

just as a test i put 26 xc from cryptsy to my osx wallet. took me 2 minutes and 28 seconds. WAUW! but my walley says; not minting because you dont have mature coins, what does this mean? thx

You need to wait for a certain number of confirmations of the payment on the network before your coins are mature.

I can't remember how many, or how long this takes. Anyone here know?

and what does mature and minting mean? thx for your awnser

mature means how many ticks later a coin will "mature"... some need 50, others much higher or lower... all depends on the coin. Until the set number is reached the coins that were transferred are not "mature".

Minting is the process whereby new coins are created in XC. 3.33% more coins are created each year. They're created in the wallets of users who leave their wallets running so that they can "stake".

Once coins are created, it's still possible that a different wallet will process transactions in such a way as to leave out the coins you've just earned; this record of the blockchain will compete against yours as different nodes accept either your or the other wallet's version. Whichever version gets the majority wins out and all the nodes have to accept it. For this reason you can't spend coins for a while - until it's certain that your coins are well established in the blockchain.

is it true that the more coins i have in my wallet, the more chance i have of earning coins?

Not really. I think there is an opt number which I believe is around 50 to 500 per wallet is best. Much of mining is random too.... some times you might get it in hours, or some cases wait a few weeks before you stack hits.

[_evolution_]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

[btell]

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

[synechist]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

I think you'd be mistaken in assuming that a community is an individual. :-)

You'd also be mistaken in assuming that XC is a company.

Finally you'd be mistaken in assuming that the community disagrees with me about treating others with respect.

Kindly be respectful, or leave.

[KimmyF]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

Wow, cool down guy, double check who you are talking to & look around, come back tomorrow & chill before you awaken the kraken

[qawzsx]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

STFU already you idiotic moron...

[cryptoholic11]

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

[qawzsx]

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

Except the devs of DRK are a fucking bunch of scamers, who tried to scam the community at first...So stop comparing this coin with a shity pump&dump coin, developed by some greedy fucks...
Now they are so legit because they said something like... "ok, we had this fucking 50% instamine, but well, we destroyed it cause you noticed it...so we are good now..."

You are tracking DRK & XC for a long time? dude, its a 6 months old coin vs a 2 months old coin, lets talk in 3 months, and compare this coin with DRK after 3 months...

"So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS"....

Dude, you're a senile one...why the fuck are you even in crypto? Seems like you have no fucking idea...