Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 02:39:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 [977] 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 ... 1628 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1483649 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 12:24:11 PM
 #19521

the final XChat needs some sort of notification (maybe color change or small icon) when a message is received/read.


It definitely will have notifications.

That is great,

but have another request/question for the XChat, do we really need the address and the public key as destination?
After all, its not called a public key for nothing

I've wondered about this myself. The address is just a hash of the public key after all.

I'll get back to you on that one... no doubt there's a good reason for it.


Co-Founder, the Blocknet
Arrogantx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 166
Merit: 100

“What can’t kill Bitcoin, makes it (us) stronger.”


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 12:25:56 PM
 #19522

If a user is unable to fit their Xchat info into their sig space for member rank reasons, would this prevent eligibility for the tor stick contest?

No. But that would be surprising.



Surprise! I can't fit it in my sig space :/.   But thanks for the reply Smiley

“It will be everywhere, and the world will have to readjust. World governments will have to readjust.”
1KbCRTGQc7oma5NN4taw9ELVhp5PhB149r
conradjohnson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 05, 2014, 12:28:08 PM
Last edit: August 05, 2014, 01:50:33 PM by conradjohnson
 #19523




***Win an XC TOR Stick signed by Dan Metcalf!***



Here's your chance to win the industry-leading privacy tool signed by its incredible developer!





How to win:

When the XC Bitcointalk thread reaches page 1000, do the following:

1) Use XChat to send a message to:
       Address:     XDzTA6xMsx1FJkitgKaj3S9mMvPQEzN4w9
       Public key:  eRyb6fBBZxfkVp1kLcgc81WQuZw8pgpPwkVfKNhJBHBC

      (If you don't have XChat yet, download it here.)

2) Post the address you sent the message from onto the Official XC Forum here.

3) Put your XChat address and public key into your Bitcointalk signature.



Since XChat is not yet released for Mac and Linux, users can alternatively send a micropayment to the address above, and then post their sending address on the Official XC Forum as described.

The competition will run for 24 hours from the time of the first post on page 1000.

The winner will be decided upon by a suitably random method. If needs be, a video or other means of proof will be posted to establish the randomness of the selection.

The signed TOR Stick will be shipped to the winner at the earliest possible date. This may be in advance of TOR Sticks being shipped to the general public.






Entered! - edit: Dangit! (not page 1000).
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 12:40:16 PM
 #19524

If a user is unable to fit their Xchat info into their sig space for member rank reasons, would this prevent eligibility for the tor stick contest?

No. But that would be surprising.



Surprise! I can't fit it in my sig space :/.   But thanks for the reply Smiley

Ha ha. Perhaps just write "XChat: [address] PM for pubkey" then.

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 12:40:56 PM
 #19525

Entered!

Except we're still only on page 994. Competition opens on page 1000. ;-)

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
RW-Stott
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 12:43:51 PM
 #19526

It's about time XC releases some exciting news, I'd say.  Grin
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 12:51:59 PM
 #19527

It's about time XC releases some exciting news, I'd say.  Grin

The chance to get a TOR Stick before anyone else isn't exciting?

["No," RW-Stott might reply, "the undisclosed Rev 2 privacy feature is exciting."]

;-)



Co-Founder, the Blocknet
KimmyF
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 978
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 12:55:14 PM
 #19528

the final XChat needs some sort of notification (maybe color change or small icon) when a message is received/read.


It definitely will have notifications.

That is great,

but have another request/question for the XChat, do we really need the address and the public key as destination?
After all, its not called a public key for nothing

I've wondered about this myself. The address is just a hash of the public key after all.

I'll get back to you on that one... no doubt there's a good reason for it.


Think its not needed, added your XChat address to my addressbook and can copy your Public Key from there.
If it's that simple am sure the new interface will do it automagically
LD2164
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 12:56:33 PM
 #19529

lol I just saw conrad had entered so I entered.  Didn't even look at the page number.  Guess I'll try again in a little while.

synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 01:01:42 PM
 #19530

the final XChat needs some sort of notification (maybe color change or small icon) when a message is received/read.


It definitely will have notifications.

That is great,

but have another request/question for the XChat, do we really need the address and the public key as destination?
After all, its not called a public key for nothing

I've wondered about this myself. The address is just a hash of the public key after all.

I'll get back to you on that one... no doubt there's a good reason for it.


Think its not needed, added your XChat address to my addressbook and can copy your Public Key from there.
If it's that simple am sure the new interface will do it automagically


That's my guess.

Also we should be able to use compressed addresses. That'll make things a little friendlier as well.


Co-Founder, the Blocknet
RW-Stott
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:04:00 PM
 #19531

It's about time XC releases some exciting news, I'd say.  Grin

The chance to get a TOR Stick before anyone else isn't exciting?

["No," RW-Stott might reply, "the undisclosed Rev 2 privacy feature is exciting."]

;-)




Wink it could also be some real world adoption type news. What ever happened to our two guys from the XC foundation? What are they doing? We haven't heard from them since that one day they were introduced...
Artoodeetoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:05:32 PM
 #19532

Back from weekend away guys, all I see is good news, why did the price retrace? In a nutshell?

Cheers all.

DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
rockstahh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:09:25 PM
 #19533

Back from weekend away guys, all I see is good news, why did the price retrace? In a nutshell?

Cheers all.

Because we had an update.

1MKvsb5ULZrJqX9UjBpgESvfn5ftSg85qH
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 01:11:46 PM
 #19534

It's about time XC releases some exciting news, I'd say.  Grin

The chance to get a TOR Stick before anyone else isn't exciting?

["No," RW-Stott might reply, "the undisclosed Rev 2 privacy feature is exciting."]

;-)




Wink it could also be some real world adoption type news. What ever happened to our two guys from the XC foundation? What are they doing? We haven't heard from them since that one day they were introduced...

Indeed. Let's just say we almost always wait until something is real before announcing it.

But stay tuned for the XC Daily Update later today.


Co-Founder, the Blocknet
RW-Stott
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:17:49 PM
 #19535

It's about time XC releases some exciting news, I'd say.  Grin

The chance to get a TOR Stick before anyone else isn't exciting?

["No," RW-Stott might reply, "the undisclosed Rev 2 privacy feature is exciting."]

;-)




Wink it could also be some real world adoption type news. What ever happened to our two guys from the XC foundation? What are they doing? We haven't heard from them since that one day they were introduced...

Indeed. Let's just say we almost always wait until something is real before announcing it.

But stay tuned for the XC Daily Update later today.



Cool. Thanks synechist, always appreciate your active presence on this thread. Looking forward to the XC daily update!
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 01:31:37 PM
 #19536



Indeed. Let's just say we almost always wait until something is real before announcing it.

But stay tuned for the XC Daily Update later today.



Cool. Thanks synechist, always appreciate your active presence on this thread. Looking forward to the XC daily update!

Only a pleasure. This community gets better and better by the week.


Co-Founder, the Blocknet
conradjohnson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:51:49 PM
 #19537

lol I just saw conrad had entered so I entered.  Didn't even look at the page number.  Guess I'll try again in a little while.

Yeah, I jumped the gun.  I'm all set now for page 1000.  Smiley

Teka (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:53:42 PM
 #19538

lol I just saw conrad had entered so I entered.  Didn't even look at the page number.  Guess I'll try again in a little while.

Yeah, I jumped the gun.  I'm all set now for page 1000.  Smiley



5 more !!!
RW-Stott
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:57:13 PM
 #19539

lol I just saw conrad had entered so I entered.  Didn't even look at the page number.  Guess I'll try again in a little while.

Yeah, I jumped the gun.  I'm all set now for page 1000.  Smiley



5 more !!!

Let's try to reach 1000 today!!!
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
August 05, 2014, 01:58:09 PM
 #19540

the final XChat needs some sort of notification (maybe color change or small icon) when a message is received/read.


It definitely will have notifications.

That is great,

but have another request/question for the XChat, do we really need the address and the public key as destination?
After all, its not called a public key for nothing

I have some clarification on this:

The public key is used to encrypt messages sent to a given address. So you need it if you want the message to be private.

Here's a summary of the mechanism:

   - User A‏ wants to send a message to user B‏
   - User A gets public key‏ of user B‏
   - User A encrypts a packet which has his own public key and sends to user B‏
   - Only user B can decrypt‏, since the private key of user B is required‏ to decode a message encrypted with user B's public key‏
   - Now user B has user A's public key, and can encrypt and send back‏ a message.

So addresses are analogous to phone numbers, and in order to secure the communication, a public key is needed.



Co-Founder, the Blocknet
Pages: « 1 ... 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 [977] 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 ... 1628 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!