[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[mr_random]

Voted 

[ib88]

Biskyb33's post on page-22 there - was vote #24 for Dan.
But plz keep voting - this will make rdnkjdi/Spoetnik "happy"

Yeah, I'm quite surprised with the level of support for Dan. Not because he doesn't deserve it (because he most certainly does), but because of the level of fud he's had to endure and XC's relative price the past few weeks. I haven't counted the total number of votes but he certainly looks to have received one of the highest number of nominations.

I don't attach too much value to this 'Proof of honor' award thing, especially considering some of shit CoinsSource have published in the past but I think when it comes to voting, Dan will finish quite high. It won't do his rep any harm and it'll be a good two fingers up to the above cretins you mentioned.

[URSAY]

I'm working on a lengthy presentation for Dan.  If the community finds value in graphics of ribbons then I may consider adding something similar to my project.  

[ib88]

I'm working on a lengthy presentation for Dan.  If the community finds value in graphics of ribbons then I may consider adding something similar to my project.  

I must say I find you a very hard character to judge; you have posted a lot of good helpful constructive criticism in the past but also a lot of posts have been full of cynicism. Each to their own though.

What's the premise of this presentation may I ask?

[cryptico]

I'm working on a lengthy presentation for Dan.  If the community finds value in graphics of ribbons then I may consider adding something similar to my project.  

Ursay you want to present Dan as a scammer and I have proof of it you have nerve to post in here.

The community will not back you up.

You might want to consider opening a new thread with your Tax lien doc friend that helped you put those together and was behind the first smear campaign. Do you want to start the second one now?

[McHammer]

yea ... lets counter the fud by hilarious hype
dan will free the world
altruistic motivations only !

[hoertest]

Don't trust ursay.

[guanchayuan]

oh  MT4   XC IS   DAVE . got shit.

[Dungor]

oh  MT4   XC IS   DAVE . got shit.

Can't tell if internet tourette or butthurt chinaman.

[sugarboy321]

oh  MT4   XC IS   DAVE . got shit.

Is this English?

[reebokasss]

i didint see that quiet in this thread since june :O Dan talked upcoming news and now here will be quiet one month or longer again? can we hope big news in NOVEMBER? because it sucks to see XC at 37-41 and 2-5 BTC volume... i have more XC than 24h volume wow

same about BLOCK, 0.38 BTC volume awful

[ib88]

i didint see that quiet in this thread since june :O Dan talked upcoming news and now here will be quiet one month or longer again? can we hope big news in NOVEMBER? because it sucks to see XC at 37-41 and 2-5 BTC volume... i have more XC than 24h volume wow

same about BLOCK, 0.38 BTC volume awful

And the award for the most annoying and ignorant community member goes to....*drum roll*....reebokass!

[infinitechaos]

derpaderrrrrr

Seriously, reebokasss, you have got to be kidding me with your shenanigans. You're worse than a troll - an ignorant and impatient bag holder with nothing to offer but bitching and moaning.

Dan posted this two, TWO, days ago:

Never a dull moment in this crypto world, as the troll's continue to spread FUD under multiple accounts it is quite clear that this is a motivated attack on XC and BLocknet to drive the price down
 
 
and with that, I wanted to provide a status update on things with XC
 
Currently I'm focusing on some B2B projects that leverage XC as the core/backbone payment system, once this implementation is complete, details will be released about the project and then I can release the updated XC Roadmap which includes a fork for Group XChat and Encrypted end to end Stealth transactions which are currently testing in the latest code,
 
Dan

Get a grip or find something else to do with your life. This shit ain't for you, son.

[URSAY]

Don't trust ursay.

While this is your choice, you seem to share no reasoning which in turn does not validate your opinion.

[ib88]

Don't trust ursay.

While this is your choice, you seem to share no reasoning which validates your opinion.

I'd go along with hoertest's opinion. You appear to have a lot of time for obvious fudsters while at the same time responding to official XC team members with a lot of snide sarcastic remarks. You complain a lot and it's been a long time since you've posted anything positive in relation to XC and you've recently removed XC from your signature which makes me think you're no longer invested. It's my opinion you're butthurt at making a loss and now just sticking around to create negativity out of spite.

I also get the impression you are quite a conceited person who thinks their opinion carries more weight than it actually does - you running away to create your own XC thread which has since just become a cesspool of trolls and yourself expressing unwarranted negativity around Dan and XC is an example of this. And I'm sure your upcoming 'lengthy presentation' on Dan will be full of praise. I would, at the very least, approach your posts with a very large degree of skepticism.

[URSAY]

Don't trust ursay.

While this is your choice, you seem to share no reasoning which validates your opinion.

I'd go along with hoertest's opinion. You appear to have a lot of time for obvious fudsters while at the same time responding to official XC team members with a lot of snide sarcastic remarks. You complain a lot and it's been a long time since you've posted anything positive in relation to XC and you've recently removed XC from your signature which makes me think you're no longer invested. It's my opinion you're butthurt at making a loss and now just sticking around to create negativity out of spite.

I also get the impression you are quite a conceited person who thinks their opinion carries more weight than it actually does - you running away to create your own XC thread which has since just become a cesspool of trolls and yourself expressing unwarranted negativity around Dan and XC is an example of this. And I'm sure your upcoming 'lengthy presentation' on Dan will be full of praise. I would, at the very least, approach your posts with a very large degree of skepticism.

Says the user with 42 posts, all about XC.

I have a long crypto history and I have demonstrated trust in many ways long before you had a registered account.  To many in the community, this is quite obvious.  

[MiningMinion]

Dan was easily nominated into the Proof of Honor.    It just says we have a strong community with an awesome dev team that delivers.

Be sure to go back to vote, voting will begin on: 12/1/2014 and last until 12/28/2014

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855130.0

[evok3d]

Congratulations Dan, you have made it to the voting round. XC really showed that DarkCoin was not the only successful anonymous coin. Your continuous work for privacy and security in the crypto environment is highly appreciated.

Twitter
https://twitter.com/ev0k3d/status/535500140585680896

Nomination Thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855130.msg9604806#msg9604806

[ib88]

Says the user with 42 posts, all about XC.

I have a long crypto history and I have demonstrated trust in many ways long before you had a registered account.  To many in the community, this is quite obvious.  

175 posts, actually 

[URSAY]

Says the user with 42 posts, all about XC.

I have a long crypto history and I have demonstrated trust in many ways long before you had a registered account.  To many in the community, this is quite obvious.  

175 posts, actually  

Strange.  I guess I'm seeing frozen post counts.  I see myself as having 980 posts and evok3Dm just above your post as having 70 posts.  I had thought my own post count wasn't changing but didn't really look into it further.  Maybe it's a forum bug of some sort?