Bitcoin Forum
November 15, 2024, 12:04:00 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin  (Read 43250 times)
maqa71
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:36:44 PM
 #321

Its hilarious to see those threats while the number of users grows on polo.

Muppets first made money on polo and now they complain because bagholding.
Most of you where going to dump that coin into oblivion anyways once it launced on polo.
This community is weak as shit. If you had faith you hadnt dumped in panic.

But pls continue, its amusing to watch this drama  Grin

surely you make only scalping and don't understand what it means to work on a project. Maybe your mother gives you money not only for the ice cream but also for trade... be ready, life is a spinning wheel

Me thinks the one that is scalped is you, how much did you loose  Grin
Btw, yes i am ready and eating ice-cream while watching this hopeless shit.
Troll as you like, but i aint butthurt  Wink
bitcoinwonders010
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:37:02 PM
 #322

You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.

read the OP you fool
heartastack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:40:29 PM
 #323

You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.

read the OP you fool

Oh mah gawwwwd hahaha
chesthing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:41:42 PM
 #324

You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.

fucktard.

can you tell us which saint coin you are holding?



So original, wonder where you got that name from?

A centralized trust based anon system contradicts the whole point of bitcoin and cryptos. It is the blockchain and not people that ensure transactions. It is this that makes it what it is, safe from human greed.
I'm just blown away by how blind, deaf and dumb people here are. To miss that just tells me what I already knew, just a bunch of assholes trying to profit fiat off others. They could care less about what's happening here, all they see is fiat in their eyes.
Just go to a casino or play poker since you see nothing else here.
heartastack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:44:30 PM
 #325

You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.

fucktard.

can you tell us which saint coin you are holding?



So original, wonder where you got that name from?

A centralized trust based anon system contradicts the whole point of bitcoin and cryptos. It is the blockchain and not people that ensure transactions. It is this that makes it what it is, safe from human greed.
I'm just blown away by how blind, deaf and dumb people here are. To miss that just tells me what I already knew, just a bunch of assholes trying to profit fiat off others. They could care less about what's happening here, all they see is fiat in their eyes.
Just go to a casino or play poker since you see nothing else here.


This thread is about discrimination of coins due to max coin code as stated in first post. Go make another thread, you're talking about other bullshit wtf... Who's dumb again ?
chesthing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:46:59 PM
 #326

You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.

fucktard.

can you tell us which saint coin you are holding?



So original, wonder where you got that name from?

A centralized trust based anon system contradicts the whole point of bitcoin and cryptos. It is the blockchain and not people that ensure transactions. It is this that makes it what it is, safe from human greed.
I'm just blown away by how blind, deaf and dumb people here are. To miss that just tells me what I already knew, just a bunch of assholes trying to profit fiat off others. They could care less about what's happening here, all they see is fiat in their eyes.
Just go to a casino or play poker since you see nothing else here.


This thread is about discrimination of coins due to max coin code as stated in first post. Go make another thread, you're talking about other bullshit wtf... Who's dumb again ?

Either you are too fucking stupid to see what's really going on or you are a Supercoin bagholder trying to keep the coins value up.
Either way, you are a waste of space.
SoapMaker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:48:20 PM
 #327

Poloniex is a great exchange.
It's their exchange, it's their call.
too many scams these days in the cryptocommunity.
If they've been burned before with "max supply" exceeding specs
why couldn't they decide not to trade this coin.

May this start a new precedent of altcoin code being examined
& potentially being rejected from exchanges if all isn't perfectly up to par & upfront.

If supercoin has nothing to hide then calmly post what happened & continue building your coin.
If this hits a nerve there was probably some bad intentions to begin with.
Well done, Busoni.

This corporate empire of three city states controls the world economically through London’s inner city, militarily through the District of Columbia, and spiritually through the Vatican
                 http://youtu.be/C1pkJaNbzLU              https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc4-launch.2033/                      http://conspiracycoin.org/                          
mistress
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:49:01 PM
 #328

Its hilarious to see those threats while the number of users grows on polo.

Muppets first made money on polo and now they complain because bagholding.
Most of you where going to dump that coin into oblivion anyways once it launced on polo.
This community is weak as shit. If you had faith you hadnt dumped in panic.

But pls continue, its amusing to watch this drama  Grin

surely you make only scalping and don't understand what it means to work on a project. Maybe your mother gives you money not only for the ice cream but also for trade... be ready, life is a spinning wheel

Me thinks the one that is scalped is you, how much did you loose  Grin
Btw, yes i am ready and eating ice-cream while watching this hopeless shit.
Troll as you like, but i aint butthurt  Wink


to be honest I've bought at 1000 sat  but I was thinking to gain more and more. This time you are eating your pop corn. No problem: i m sporting girl! But i repeat u, life is a spinning wheel! Stay tuned!
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:49:30 PM
 #329

You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.

fucktard.

can you tell us which saint coin you are holding?



So original, wonder where you got that name from?

A centralized trust based anon system contradicts the whole point of bitcoin and cryptos. It is the blockchain and not people that ensure transactions. It is this that makes it what it is, safe from human greed.
I'm just blown away by how blind, deaf and dumb people here are. To miss that just tells me what I already knew, just a bunch of assholes trying to profit fiat off others. They could care less about what's happening here, all they see is fiat in their eyes.
Just go to a casino or play poker since you see nothing else here.


This thread is about discrimination of coins due to max coin code as stated in first post. Go make another thread, you're talking about other bullshit wtf... Who's dumb again ?

Either you are too fucking stupid to see what's really going on or you are a Supercoin bagholder trying to keep the coins value up.
Either way, you are a waste of space.

asshole is the best word to describe you, such a moron.
traumschiff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001


180 BPM


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:49:46 PM
 #330

You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.

fucktard.

can you tell us which saint coin you are holding?



So original, wonder where you got that name from?

A centralized trust based anon system contradicts the whole point of bitcoin and cryptos. It is the blockchain and not people that ensure transactions. It is this that makes it what it is, safe from human greed.
I'm just blown away by how blind, deaf and dumb people here are. To miss that just tells me what I already knew, just a bunch of assholes trying to profit fiat off others. They could care less about what's happening here, all they see is fiat in their eyes.
Just go to a casino or play poker since you see nothing else here.


This thread is about discrimination of coins due to max coin code as stated in first post. Go make another thread, you're talking about other bullshit wtf... Who's dumb again ?

Either you are too fucking stupid to see what's really going on or you are a Supercoin bagholder trying to keep the coins value up.
Either way, you are a waste of space.

Watching your comment history, all you do is spread fud on every coin you deem a "shitcoin". Even if 99% of the coins are trash, you seriously waste your time and life to spread negativity on an online forum?

How pathetic.

cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:51:32 PM
 #331

Poloniex is a great exchange.
It's their exchange, it's their call.
too many scams these days in the cryptocommunity.
If they've been burned before with "max supply" exceeding specs
why couldn't they decide not to trade this coin.

May this start a new precedent of altcoin code being examined
& potentially being rejected from exchanges if all isn't perfectly up to par & upfront.

If supercoin has nothing to hide then calmly post what happened & continue building your coin.
If this hits a nerve there was probably some bad intentions to begin with.
Well done, Busoni.

go to ask Busoni,

he even already admitted his mistake in a innuendo way.

Busoni can not read code!
maqa71
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:53:39 PM
 #332

This is called SLOPPY CODING you noobs.
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

This is how to do it, without hardcoding values
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)


But then, too much greed to see the truth  Grin
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 03:56:25 PM
 #333

This is called SLOPPY CODING you noobs.
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

This is how to do it, without hardcoding values
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)


But then, too much greed to see the truth  Grin


truth is also lying in CINNI and SC codes.

and POLO will review them. they will face a big problem if get caught?

right???
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:00:06 PM
 #334

busoni, i respect you, but it seems you do make a mistake.
maqa71
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:04:08 PM
 #335

This is called SLOPPY CODING you noobs.
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

This is how to do it, without hardcoding values
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)


But then, too much greed to see the truth  Grin


truth is also lying in CINNI and SC codes.

and POLO will review them. they will face a big problem if get caught?

right???

YES, I think it would be only fair to freeze those coins too untill they solve the problem, if any found.
I guess the same counts for SUPER. Fix whats found and explain the concept of 'anonymity'.
Its up to the exchange owner to decide if to add the coin or not. Its him taking the risk, not us.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:04:31 PM
 #336

i admit that i invested a lot in different alt coins. that means i am greedy.

but what a hell logic, that you stupid morons are not greedy to search for potential alt coins?

i am buying XC at 8000 satoshi, VRC at 1000 satoshi, SUPER at 1000 sats.

Pump and Dump means nothing to me.

but the truth is BUSONI make a big mistake and cause those weakhands lose money.

all he is doing is unprofessional!

if you discuss merits of alt coins, you will draw yourself into never ending circle. don't tell me you want all exchanges to trade only BTC.

and fucking idiots like chesthing is only waste of space.

melfrecords
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:05:56 PM
 #337

Wow!  It is great to see an exchange actually do some homework and screen the coins it lists and not just list every pump and dump coin for the transaction fees.  Poloniex has a lot of coins listed but this type of review gives me hope that they have some legitimacy.

Nice work, thanks, and good luck!

Indeed! Still good work from Poloniex, investigating the code of another scam coin before adding it to their exchange. Finally some checks and balances.

This supercoin was, is and will always be a major SCAM coin!

Keep up the good work Poloniex Smiley
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:06:16 PM
 #338

busoni, my friend, how is the code review by yourself going? We need some clarification from you. Thanks.

?
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:06:52 PM
 #339

This is called SLOPPY CODING you noobs.
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
Code:
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;

This is how to do it, without hardcoding values
Code:
if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > MAX_MONEY)


But then, too much greed to see the truth  Grin


truth is also lying in CINNI and SC codes.

and POLO will review them. they will face a big problem if get caught?

right???

YES, I think it would be only fair to freeze those coins too untill they solve the problem, if any found.
I guess the same counts for SUPER. Fix whats found and explain the concept of 'anonymity'.
Its up to the exchange owner to decide if to add the coin or not. Its him taking the risk, not us.


bingo. this is what i want "YES, I think it would be only fair to freeze those coins too untill they solve the problem, if any found."

BUSONI, do as supporters suggest!
Zer0Sum
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 15, 2014, 04:06:55 PM
 #340

Wow!  It is great to see an exchange actually do some homework and screen the coins it lists and not just list every pump and dump coin for the transaction fees.  Poloniex has a lot of coins listed but this type of review gives me hope that they have some legitimacy.

Nice work, thanks, and good luck!

The Supercoin bagholders seem to have no clue about Polo...
They are right in the thick of the mid-range exchanges with MintPal, Polo, Cryptsy, Bittrex...
All doing in the 1,000 BTC/day range more or less.

With listing fees and proprietary trading Polo probably makes >> $500K/year...
And they were smart adding the CNote coins now a big percent of their business and growing...
Polo >> Cryptsy and will very likely be here when Cryptsy is "hacked" and disappears.

So they need a dodgy coin?

Polo could have just said no... but they stuck their neck out to warn people.
Just go list somewhere else and pump away, please.

http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/v2/markets/info
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!