Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 05:50:11 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 [596] 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS  (Read 804614 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
johny08
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1045
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 21, 2016, 11:40:20 AM
 #11901

So, a few idiots burned all the money they got from XCR ICO and are now moving to yet another ICO to get more money to burn. Then they will move to yet another ICO and so on, very pathetic.

Actually, we completed all core features promised, over a 2 year period, on an initial fundraiser that lost 70% of it's value in the BTC crash. We initially raised the BTC equivalent of about $487,000, but BTC crashed about a month or two after and lowered our operating budget to about $150,000. By not being greedy (looking at you Eth devs) and accepting salaries of $250 a month or less for many on the team (despite having engineers and team members who were worth much more), we were able to continue development with a team numbering up to I think 12 or 15 at one time for the entire initial outlined time period and complete feature development on everything outlined in our initial goals and then some. We can also now say that we have built, open sourced, and launched to the community one of the most advanced core decentralized technologies in the market place and done it on a fraction of the budget of the other major players.

The core team members are not moving on to the new ICO or company and feel we have accomplished the goals we set for Crypti, the technology. At this point it's up to the people to use it. It just so happens that 2 of our initial community members who we brought on to help with the development cycle have some really strong ideas on where to go with the technology and want to pursue it on their own terms, which is totally legal and why open source software exists. Just as they have done, so can anyone else in the world who has an idea. We built the core technology that can make so many industries and ideas a reality, all you have to do is try.

For those upset about the core network, or forks taking away its potential, I have this to say. Crypti can't be shut down or turned off if you don't let it. If you believe in the network, your investment, and the potential that it has, then fight for it. Tell your friends, tell developers, tell people what it can do. Bitcoin became bitcoin because the core enthusiasts made it happen. Because a few nerdy guys geeked out on what it was and what it was capable of doing and kept spreading the word until they found the right people who pushed it to the next level.

Bitcoin still runs because the people run it. No project like Crypti can ever exist without the support of the people, especially those who truly believe in it. It could never run forever off the backs of 5 people, that's just fact.

But that's just my 2 cents....

Sorry if I seem a bit offended or emotional, but I think anyone who's been with me here since the beginning can understand. It's been a long road to this point.

NO.

its having bugs inside and a software development is always a progress, so it cant 'just' be used a piece of paper or a desk.
 
its more realistic and fair to say: we burned the money, we delivered, see, we are good. now we split and continue to develop.

and yes, you developed something there is no need to, because there is already eth doing the same, but need more work to be done.

if you had invested your time in eth development, the world could have one working product, so the world has now two not ready products, so dont say, you did something for the world, you did it for yourself. period.


i support lisk, but invest in Eth, because i never did in clone coins since start of ALTs
rtrtcrypto
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 627
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2016, 02:58:00 PM
Last edit: February 21, 2016, 03:10:15 PM by rtrtcrypto
 #11902

XCR MAC client still working as before?

EDIT:

just found and ran crypti.lisk... seems to work well.
YourMother
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1046



View Profile WWW
February 22, 2016, 12:31:09 PM
Last edit: February 22, 2016, 12:49:52 PM by YourMother
 #11903

The developers love to keep you all in confusion because they either stack on Crypti hard while you are selling them for a shitcoin fork called Lisk or they are just buying Lisk like maniacs while you are disregarding it, and moving entirely to it if, of course, they manage to get a large percentage.

It´s very hard to know in which project they are investing, but trust me on this one, everything is premeditated. The official developer only has to respond with "Yes" or "No", but he doesn't want to, because it would only make people inflate the price of that particular project he's choosing to stay in. (the dev and his crew wouldn't have the chance to own the majority)

This experiment just turned into a flop. It would've been nice to have some marketing activity in the past so you wouldn't have to screw the community up now. Marketing brings you more interest, more investors, potential partnerships and more developers. I guess that this mess was a result from the greed of farming the coins of your own project in silence.

The absolute worst people in history, ranked by the wisdom of the crowd: "Vlad the Impaler", "Mihnea the Evil", "Ivan the Terrible" and "Evan the Instaminer".
Lucas1981
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2016, 01:26:10 PM
 #11904

I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help
MalReynolds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 22, 2016, 03:37:05 PM
 #11905

I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help

It means that you typed in a different passphrase this time than last time.  Did you try multiple times / cut-and-paste?
Lucas1981
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2016, 03:59:40 PM
 #11906

I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help

It means that you typed in a different passphrase this time than last time.  Did you try multiple times / cut-and-paste?


yes, But passphase works only for new wallet with 0 XCR...
rtrtcrypto
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 627
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 22, 2016, 04:02:01 PM
 #11907

Passphrase = key to wallet = any typo will send to NEW wallet.

You have a small typo somewhere which is causing you to "appear" inside another wallet (which is generated by that typo in the first place).

Re-try a few times and you will find the "right" wallet. If not, your password was written down incorrectly.




I have a crypti account with 6693 XCR and I put passprase today and now it's opened with new address with O XCR! It means that new address have old passprase and I cannot get into 6693 XCR. Did somebody have the same problem? Thanks for help

It means that you typed in a different passphrase this time than last time.  Did you try multiple times / cut-and-paste?


yes, But passphase works only for new wallet with 0 XCR...
freshman777
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
February 23, 2016, 11:15:29 AM
 #11908

After i stopped my delegate Roll Eyes



From this I think something is very wrong with Crypti (and Lisk) Angry

I have similar experience, the load on the system from running Crypti is too high, I stopped running it. A bad design?

ARDOR - Blockchain as a Service. Three birds with one stone. /// Do not hold NXT at exchanges, NXT wallets: core+lite, mobile Android
LiskHQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 509


Decentralized Application Platform


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 12:54:36 AM
 #11909

After i stopped my delegate Roll Eyes



From this I think something is very wrong with Crypti (and Lisk) Angry

I have similar experience, the load on the system from running Crypti is too high, I stopped running it. A bad design?


I don't see anything wrong. The load on the system is not high, it can even run on a 9$ computer called C.H.I.P., check this out:


Lisk.io - Blockchain Application Platform
Primitive
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 06:32:47 AM
 #11910

XCR withdrawal from Poloniex pending for 2 hrs+

I guess that's not too surprising.  Are my coins stuck there for good?

NEM, LSK, STRAT
Mrboot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 07:37:25 AM
 #11911

XCR withdrawal from Poloniex pending for 2 hrs+

I guess that's not too surprising.  Are my coins stuck there for good?

I have the same problem pending for 12 hours , maybe its the delegate switch couse of votes removing when xcr transfer.

bitseedmike
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 09:53:38 AM
 #11912

XCR withdrawal from Poloniex pending for 2 hrs+

I guess that's not too surprising.  Are my coins stuck there for good?

I have the same problem pending for 12 hours , maybe its the delegate switch couse of votes removing when xcr transfer.



No change in delegates for last 24 hours. I am monitoring the Crypti delegates to watch for any problems. We are adding the voting to the Lisk XCR receiving account to replace the non-performing delegates with new ones which will run for at least the next 6 months while keeping the current reliably forging delegates.

MalReynolds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 04:56:31 PM
 #11913

XCR withdrawal from Poloniex pending for 2 hrs+

I guess that's not too surprising.  Are my coins stuck there for good?

I have the same problem pending for 12 hours , maybe its the delegate switch couse of votes removing when xcr transfer.



No change in delegates for last 24 hours. I am monitoring the Crypti delegates to watch for any problems. We are adding the voting to the Lisk XCR receiving account to replace the non-performing delegates with new ones which will run for at least the next 6 months while keeping the current reliably forging delegates.

I tried to restart and reload my node (currently offline) from the XCR images I downloaded from Github but had some problems with them.  I have reported to Olivier and he is going to correct the issue.   I'll come back up then.

Max / Olivier are trying to get the escrow manager to use the Lisk-held XCR to vote and "correct" the network...
starik69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1367
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 10:34:11 PM
 #11914


I don't see anything wrong. The load on the system is not high, it can even run on a 9$ computer called C.H.I.P., check this out:

How long it will run with such disk writes? Huh
Hint: on the right side VPS still runs NXT and Qora nodes! Wink
MadCow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 655
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 25, 2016, 12:31:37 AM
 #11915

is there a block explorer still running for the original chain, before the 2.0 re-launch of crypti?
LiskHQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 509


Decentralized Application Platform


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2016, 12:35:04 AM
 #11916

is there a block explorer still running for the original chain, before the 2.0 re-launch of crypti?

Crypti: https://cryptichain.lisk.io

Lisk testnet: https://explorer.lisk.io

Lisk.io - Blockchain Application Platform
WorldCoiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1069
Merit: 682



View Profile WWW
February 25, 2016, 12:24:16 PM
 #11917

Max, Stas, Oli, Boris & Co,

is Crypti still on fork or working now?

Thanks for clarification.

Markus
LiskHQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 509


Decentralized Application Platform


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2016, 12:28:58 PM
 #11918

Max, Stas, Oli, Boris & Co,

is Crypti still on fork or working now?

Thanks for clarification.

Markus

All good now. We are trying to get 101 delegates online today. Smiley

Lisk.io - Blockchain Application Platform
WorldCoiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1069
Merit: 682



View Profile WWW
February 25, 2016, 09:27:02 PM
 #11919

Max, Stas, Oli, Boris & Co,

is Crypti still on fork or working now?

Thanks for clarification.

Markus

All good now. We are trying to get 101 delegates online today. Smiley

Danke Max Smiley
bitseedmike
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 26, 2016, 05:27:29 AM
 #11920

Max, Stas, Oli, Boris & Co,

is Crypti still on fork or working now?

Thanks for clarification.

Markus

All good now. We are trying to get 101 delegates online today. Smiley

Danke Max Smiley

24 new delegates launched this morning. will be launching the rest later this evening.

Pages: « 1 ... 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 [596] 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!