makoto1337
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
I am not Dorian Nakamoto.
|
 |
April 01, 2015, 08:40:31 AM |
|
When will assets be available? The client still states that they are "not yet available in beta release".
The above, and what happened to the Proof of Importance competition rewards? I came in 3rd place, and had 0.1 nemstake slated as a reward?  Did you provide an address to receive the reward? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Hollowman338
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:42:45 AM |
|
When will assets be available? The client still states that they are "not yet available in beta release".
The above, and what happened to the Proof of Importance competition rewards? I came in 3rd place, and had 0.1 nemstake slated as a reward? Did you provide an address to receive the reward? My address was listed in the nemesis block (NBVOVD-U27VD6-HHUCRM-SBFPX3-YQWKHB-4KTTQP-E4D4) |
|
|
|
|
coingirl87
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:43:42 AM |
|
NO. If you're getting error 699, it means you have tried harvesting with >1 account on a single machine. By default NIS is setup to allow only SINGLE harvester. If you want to increase the number change unclockedLimit in NIS settings: # Maximum number of unlocked accounts. Meaning: maximum number of accounts that are allowed to use this NIS for harvesting
nis.unlockedLimit = 1
ty...where i can do this?? |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptoconomist
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:44:52 AM |
|
NO. If you're getting error 699, it means you have tried harvesting with >1 account on a single machine. By default NIS is setup to allow only SINGLE harvester. If you want to increase the number change unclockedLimit in NIS settings: # Maximum number of unlocked accounts. Meaning: maximum number of accounts that are allowed to use this NIS for harvesting
nis.unlockedLimit = 1
I have only one open.... don't know what to do.... I tried changing the host with no success please help |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:45:31 AM |
|
Remote server may use your harvesting power for double-spending.
I assume you're trolling, as I cannot expect such statement from educated person and a developer. I assume that I'm right if it's the only counterargument that came to your mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:45:59 AM |
|
NO. If you're getting error 699, it means you have tried harvesting with >1 account on a single machine. By default NIS is setup to allow only SINGLE harvester. If you want to increase the number change unclockedLimit in NIS settings: # Maximum number of unlocked accounts. Meaning: maximum number of accounts that are allowed to use this NIS for harvesting
nis.unlockedLimit = 1
I have only one open.... don't know what to do.... I tried changing the host with no success please help any change you harvested locally and now trying to do delegated ? That's like harvesting with multiple accounts at once. |
|
|
|
gimre
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 866
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:46:57 AM |
|
I assume that I'm right if it's the only counterargument that came to your mind.
Please elaborate on your question, as I might have misunderstood it. |
|
|
|
|
cryptoconomist
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:48:34 AM |
|
NO. If you're getting error 699, it means you have tried harvesting with >1 account on a single machine. By default NIS is setup to allow only SINGLE harvester. If you want to increase the number change unclockedLimit in NIS settings: # Maximum number of unlocked accounts. Meaning: maximum number of accounts that are allowed to use this NIS for harvesting
nis.unlockedLimit = 1
I have only one open.... don't know what to do.... I tried changing the host with no success please help any change you harvested locally and now trying to do delegated ? That's like harvesting with multiple accounts at once. ok maybe I don't understand I'm harvesting locally... but what is correct and can I only harvest locally is that ok? |
|
|
|
|
|
BloodyRookie
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:55:29 AM |
|
When will assets be available? The client still states that they are "not yet available in beta release".
The above, and what happened to the Proof of Importance competition rewards? I came in 3rd place, and had 0.1 nemstake slated as a reward? Did you provide an address to receive the reward? My address was listed in the nemesis block (NBVOVD-U27VD6-HHUCRM-SBFPX3-YQWKHB-4KTTQP-E4D4) We will check on that. |
Nothing Else Matters
NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ
NXT: 11095639652683007953
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:56:47 AM |
|
NO. If you're getting error 699, it means you have tried harvesting with >1 account on a single machine. By default NIS is setup to allow only SINGLE harvester. If you want to increase the number change unclockedLimit in NIS settings: # Maximum number of unlocked accounts. Meaning: maximum number of accounts that are allowed to use this NIS for harvesting
nis.unlockedLimit = 1
I have only one open.... don't know what to do.... I tried changing the host with no success please help any change you harvested locally and now trying to do delegated ? That's like harvesting with multiple accounts at once. ok maybe I don't understand I'm harvesting locally... but what is correct and can I only harvest locally is that ok? Yep, that's perfectly fine. |
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:56:52 AM |
|
tools gonna be manipulated  |
|
|
|
|
|
hardshot
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:57:53 AM |
|
Will local node and remote node have to run at the same time to do delegated harvesting?
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
April 01, 2015, 08:59:30 AM |
|
Please elaborate on your question, as I might have misunderstood it.
We were analyzing scenario when harvesting is being done on a computer that may belong to an adversary. Let's name person who harvests as Alice and the owner of the server as Bob. If Alice doesn't have a copy of the whole blockchain and a fork has happened then she can't decide which branch of the two is legit. Bob may use this to trick Alice into harvesting on his secret branch trying to do a double-spending. |
|
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
April 01, 2015, 09:09:14 AM |
|
Will local node and remote node have to run at the same time to do delegated harvesting?
No they don't have to run at the same time. Only the node you're harvesting on needs to run. Anything else would defeat the point of the excecise. |
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
April 01, 2015, 09:09:59 AM |
|
Does Bob hump Alice ?
|
|
|
|
|
gimre
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 866
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 01, 2015, 09:14:59 AM |
|
We were analyzing scenario when harvesting is being done on a computer that may belong to an adversary. Let's name person who harvests as Alice and the owner of the server as Bob. If Alice doesn't have a copy of the whole blockchain and a fork has happened then she can't decide which branch of the two is legit. Bob may use this to trick Alice into harvesting on his secret branch trying to do a double-spending.
Your reasoning is perfectly valid with few buts... 1) he would have to convince "quite a few" users, to actually make this successful. If one person is able to do that we're doomed anyway (same in NXT) 2) it does not work like "power leasing", so attacker actually needs to generate block using every key == waste of time and resources, while meanwhile main chain is going forward... |
|
|
|
|
hardshot
|
|
April 01, 2015, 09:17:50 AM |
|
Will local node and remote node have to run at the same time to do delegated harvesting?
No they don't have to run at the same time. Only the node you're harvesting on needs to run. Anything else would defeat the point of the excecise. Ah nice.. So the approach is: - Setup remote node with NIS and NCC - Set remote node's address in local settings -> host - Activate delegated harvesting Is this correct? |
|
|
|
|
|
n3lz0n
|
|
April 01, 2015, 09:21:55 AM |
|
is NEM gonna do stealth ? similar to Darkcoin?
|
Go Bitcoin !!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
cryptoconomist
|
|
April 01, 2015, 09:22:37 AM |
|
sorry guys to be a pain
still the same issue on harvesting
now NIS an NCC are connected and sechronized
I see delegate harvesting is active on the top right on the "importance score"
but when I click on strat delegate harvest I get "error 699"
I guess i'm not harvesting or m'I?
what should I do?
|
|
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
April 01, 2015, 09:25:02 AM |
|
sorry guys to be a pain
still the same issue on harvesting
now NIS an NCC are connected and sechronized
I see delegate harvesting is active on the top right on the "importance score"
but when I click on strat delegate harvest I get "error 699"
I guess i'm not harvesting or m'I?
what should I do?
It means you're already harvesting on that node. Did you start harvesting locally ? You can harvest delegated and locally on one node unless you raise the account limit in the config file. |
|
|
|
|
