BloodyRookie
|
|
May 19, 2017, 04:34:51 PM |
|
I'm sure this is a simple problem, so wondering if anyone knows the answer. I just downloaded and installed the new nanowallet. I'd like to activate delegated harvesting. When I try, I get the error message that says
FAILURE_IMPORTANCE_TRANSFER_NEEDS_TO_BE_DEACTIVATED
How do I resolve it?
Thanks!
If you had activated delegated harvesting in NCC, it is still activated when you switch to Nano. You could just start delegated harvesting in Nano.
|
Nothing Else Matters NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ NXT: 11095639652683007953
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
BloodyRookie
|
|
May 19, 2017, 04:35:38 PM |
|
I'm sure this is a simple problem, so wondering if anyone knows the answer. I just downloaded and installed the new nanowallet. I'd like to activate delegated harvesting. When I try, I get the error message that says
FAILURE_IMPORTANCE_TRANSFER_NEEDS_TO_BE_DEACTIVATED
How do I resolve it?
Thanks!
I also have a question: If I import the old wallet to nano, will delegated harvesting be active or do I need to restart it again and pay a fee? It will still be active, no need to activate it again.
|
Nothing Else Matters NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ NXT: 11095639652683007953
|
|
|
kocodile
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2017, 04:42:31 PM |
|
We have been saying this for a couple of days now Will the NEM replace XRP to be No 2? 100%
|
|
|
|
wiser
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1029
|
|
May 19, 2017, 05:22:11 PM |
|
I'm sure this is a simple problem, so wondering if anyone knows the answer. I just downloaded and installed the new nanowallet. I'd like to activate delegated harvesting. When I try, I get the error message that says
FAILURE_IMPORTANCE_TRANSFER_NEEDS_TO_BE_DEACTIVATED
How do I resolve it?
Thanks!
If you had activated delegated harvesting in NCC, it is still activated when you switch to Nano. You could just start delegated harvesting in Nano. I figured that out. But now I am having the hardest time finding a node with available slots for delegated harvesting. Is there an easier way to search for an open slot than manually going through each node on the list? If all else fails, is there a way to create a node (not a supernode) just to allow for delegated harvesting? If I wanted to just harvest on my computer, can I do that with nanowallet? If so, how? My preference would be to just connect to someone else's node for harvesting, but that is proving difficult and has been for a long time, which is why I have not harvested in almost a year.
|
|
|
|
qwertyqwerty
|
|
May 19, 2017, 06:09:19 PM |
|
Sigh. Wish I wouldn't have dumped at 30 statoshis. I could have been a millionaire!
|
|
|
|
liemly
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2017, 06:20:39 PM |
|
Sigh. Wish I wouldn't have dumped at 30 statoshis. I could have been a millionaire!
still under 1usd, buy back now and u maybe a hundrednaires
|
|
|
|
ciappa
|
|
May 19, 2017, 06:22:23 PM |
|
i want to participate in the ico of xarcade any link?
what is the ico of xarcade? In NEM thread.. I have missed something?
|
|
|
|
Jamthirteen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2017, 06:55:25 PM |
|
Hello good day, I am JAMTHIRTEEN and this letter is in reference to a claim I made on NEM forum sometime ago. I reported a situation to this platform about how we were being cheated out of our rights but no steps were taken to remedy the situation. We are three friends that work together in the same place, and because we believed in this idea, we all decided to create accounts on the platform, we did the registrations at our office, the same location. We were aware of the house rule that states that a member cannot own more than one stake, and can only get another for a loved one. None of us flouted that rule because we understood why the rule was put up. So we all took care and ensured that we abided by this rule, two of us opened an account each, and also opened one each for our partners, the third only created an account for himself. We followed the rule to the letter. The BTT accounts in question are: JAMTHIRTEEN: NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3 MAMEN (JAMTHIRTEEN’s partner): NBKEYS-BJB74B-5M7Q4Z-Y6N5AZ-JPDUY7-5T7UHZ-VINH JERJU80: NC7IWM-24KC6K-BT7SH2-2VOESS-QNGCTA-CSDKZT-CK72 SANDRAMABE (JERJU80’s partner): NC2V53-WKYFCC-MKETYL-M3IXHJ-VF3HJZ-B4IHTC-LQDZ OSCARVENEGAS: NC7545-ULAZAR-5CEWIU-R3H5R6-6Z6SGH-XP64NX-JNUY It therefore came as a surprise to us when the administrators decided to only give SANDRAMABE her stake and deny the rest of us ours; they claimed that only one person opened all five accounts; and that was after coming up with a new rule that made separate accounts registered on the same IP address invalid. This was surprising to us as each of us are different persons and if it was made clear that registering with the same IP address was wrong, we would have done our registrations in different places. We contacted the administrators and clarified the situation, as far as we were concerned, the rule was to ensure that one person doesn’t get more than one stake, so we offered to provide any proof they requested to prove that all five accounts were valid. All the accounts were registered with work email address, which are unique to every employee and cannot be falsified. We even offered to send pictorial evidence even as far as sending our passports as seen in these two posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654845.msg11975858#msg11975858and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654845.msg11962374#msg11962374 None of our offers were accepted. I posted a few times on the forum to bring the admins’ attention to the situation, all I got was cold shoulder. Eventually I made it clear that I would not let it go, and that at a certain time, if we were not given what we were promised, we would take legal action. That time has come now and I am now using this opportunity to give the administrators one last opportunity to ensure that we settle this out of court, I am giving the administrators a one month notice to give us our stakes or we will have to meet in court to resolve this. Thank you! PS: I will be sending this to all members involved in this project. I will be sending it to the NEM Core developers, Jaguar0625, BloodyRookie, Gimre; and the NEM Core marketers Rockethead, Kodtycoon, Jabo38, Mixmaster, and Ronel. I will be doing this to ensure that everyone involved understands the situation.
|
|
|
|
kauppalahti
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 235
Merit: 110
HAVUJA PERKELE!
|
|
May 19, 2017, 07:00:54 PM |
|
Hello good day, I am JAMTHIRTEEN and this letter is in reference to a claim I made on NEM forum sometime ago. I reported a situation to this platform about how we were being cheated out of our rights but no steps were taken to remedy the situation. We are three friends that work together in the same place, and because we believed in this idea, we all decided to create accounts on the platform, we did the registrations at our office, the same location. We were aware of the house rule that states that a member cannot own more than one stake, and can only get another for a loved one. None of us flouted that rule because we understood why the rule was put up. So we all took care and ensured that we abided by this rule, two of us opened an account each, and also opened one each for our partners, the third only created an account for himself. We followed the rule to the letter. The BTT accounts in question are: JAMTHIRTEEN: NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3 MAMEN (JAMTHIRTEEN’s partner): NBKEYS-BJB74B-5M7Q4Z-Y6N5AZ-JPDUY7-5T7UHZ-VINH JERJU80: NC7IWM-24KC6K-BT7SH2-2VOESS-QNGCTA-CSDKZT-CK72 SANDRAMABE (JERJU80’s partner): NC2V53-WKYFCC-MKETYL-M3IXHJ-VF3HJZ-B4IHTC-LQDZ OSCARVENEGAS: NC7545-ULAZAR-5CEWIU-R3H5R6-6Z6SGH-XP64NX-JNUY It therefore came as a surprise to us when the administrators decided to only give SANDRAMABE her stake and deny the rest of us ours; they claimed that only one person opened all five accounts; and that was after coming up with a new rule that made separate accounts registered on the same IP address invalid. This was surprising to us as each of us are different persons and if it was made clear that registering with the same IP address was wrong, we would have done our registrations in different places. We contacted the administrators and clarified the situation, as far as we were concerned, the rule was to ensure that one person doesn’t get more than one stake, so we offered to provide any proof they requested to prove that all five accounts were valid. All the accounts were registered with work email address, which are unique to every employee and cannot be falsified. We even offered to send pictorial evidence even as far as sending our passports as seen in these two posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654845.msg11975858#msg11975858and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654845.msg11962374#msg11962374 None of our offers were accepted. I posted a few times on the forum to bring the admins’ attention to the situation, all I got was cold shoulder. Eventually I made it clear that I would not let it go, and that at a certain time, if we were not given what we were promised, we would take legal action. That time has come now and I am now using this opportunity to give the administrators one last opportunity to ensure that we settle this out of court, I am giving the administrators a one month notice to give us our stakes or we will have to meet in court to resolve this. Thank you! PS: I will be sending this to all members involved in this project. I will be sending it to the NEM Core developers, Jaguar0625, BloodyRookie, Gimre; and the NEM Core marketers Rockethead, Kodtycoon, Jabo38, Mixmaster, and Ronel. I will be doing this to ensure that everyone involved understands the situation. Unfortunatly the time have resolved your issues.
|
|
|
|
BloodyRookie
|
|
May 19, 2017, 07:04:17 PM |
|
I figured that out. But now I am having the hardest time finding a node with available slots for delegated harvesting. Is there an easier way to search for an open slot than manually going through each node on the list?
HugeAlice.nem.ninja has enough slots.
|
Nothing Else Matters NEM: NALICE-LGU3IV-Y4DPJK-HYLSSV-YFFWYS-5QPLYE-ZDJJ NXT: 11095639652683007953
|
|
|
tyz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1531
|
|
May 19, 2017, 08:15:51 PM |
|
In the long term yes. Ripple polarized very much. This is because it has been premined and is proof-of-trust. It must be noted that 100 billion ripples have been created, but only one third has been circulated so far. The rest belongs the Ripple company. NEM, on the other hand, is completely distributed and completely decentralized. And distribution is very well compared to many other similar projects. I am convinced, NEM will overtake Ripple in market cap anyway in the long run. We have been saying this for a couple of days now Will the NEM replace XRP to be No 2?
|
|
|
|
Tehfiend
|
|
May 19, 2017, 08:31:07 PM |
|
Hello good day, I am JAMTHIRTEEN and this letter is in reference to a claim I made on NEM forum sometime ago. I reported a situation to this platform about how we were being cheated out of our rights but no steps were taken to remedy the situation. We are three friends that work together in the same place, and because we believed in this idea, we all decided to create accounts on the platform, we did the registrations at our office, the same location. We were aware of the house rule that states that a member cannot own more than one stake, and can only get another for a loved one. None of us flouted that rule because we understood why the rule was put up. So we all took care and ensured that we abided by this rule, two of us opened an account each, and also opened one each for our partners, the third only created an account for himself. We followed the rule to the letter. The BTT accounts in question are: JAMTHIRTEEN: NBXVHA-S2TOYM-H4GFFO-V3SGIN-SP6DLT-HERCMK-RBN3 MAMEN (JAMTHIRTEEN’s partner): NBKEYS-BJB74B-5M7Q4Z-Y6N5AZ-JPDUY7-5T7UHZ-VINH JERJU80: NC7IWM-24KC6K-BT7SH2-2VOESS-QNGCTA-CSDKZT-CK72 SANDRAMABE (JERJU80’s partner): NC2V53-WKYFCC-MKETYL-M3IXHJ-VF3HJZ-B4IHTC-LQDZ OSCARVENEGAS: NC7545-ULAZAR-5CEWIU-R3H5R6-6Z6SGH-XP64NX-JNUY It therefore came as a surprise to us when the administrators decided to only give SANDRAMABE her stake and deny the rest of us ours; they claimed that only one person opened all five accounts; and that was after coming up with a new rule that made separate accounts registered on the same IP address invalid. This was surprising to us as each of us are different persons and if it was made clear that registering with the same IP address was wrong, we would have done our registrations in different places. We contacted the administrators and clarified the situation, as far as we were concerned, the rule was to ensure that one person doesn’t get more than one stake, so we offered to provide any proof they requested to prove that all five accounts were valid. All the accounts were registered with work email address, which are unique to every employee and cannot be falsified. We even offered to send pictorial evidence even as far as sending our passports as seen in these two posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654845.msg11975858#msg11975858and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654845.msg11962374#msg11962374 None of our offers were accepted. I posted a few times on the forum to bring the admins’ attention to the situation, all I got was cold shoulder. Eventually I made it clear that I would not let it go, and that at a certain time, if we were not given what we were promised, we would take legal action. That time has come now and I am now using this opportunity to give the administrators one last opportunity to ensure that we settle this out of court, I am giving the administrators a one month notice to give us our stakes or we will have to meet in court to resolve this. Thank you! PS: I will be sending this to all members involved in this project. I will be sending it to the NEM Core developers, Jaguar0625, BloodyRookie, Gimre; and the NEM Core marketers Rockethead, Kodtycoon, Jabo38, Mixmaster, and Ronel. I will be doing this to ensure that everyone involved understands the situation. If your story is true then my heart goes out to you but only for the loss of around 1000 USD. If you truly believed in NEM then you could have easily purchased a stake for $200-$300 in late 2015 and if you did receive your stake then there's a good chance you would have also sold it long ago.
|
|
|
|
|
ElitistCA
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 477
Merit: 250
Blockchain Just Entered The Real World
|
|
May 19, 2017, 08:52:16 PM |
|
In the long term yes. Ripple polarized very much. This is because it has been premined and is proof-of-trust. It must be noted that 100 billion ripples have been created, but only one third has been circulated so far. The rest belongs the Ripple company. NEM, on the other hand, is completely distributed and completely decentralized. And distribution is very well compared to many other similar projects. I am convinced, NEM will overtake Ripple in market cap anyway in the long run. We have been saying this for a couple of days now Will the NEM replace XRP to be No 2? I do think NEM will replace Ripple and in long term I also think it will steal wind from Ethereum as busses rules are coming, I just think it is much more convienent solution than programing smart contract...
|
|
|
|
samysamy1
|
|
May 19, 2017, 08:53:55 PM |
|
Ouch This is really sad. I'm not sure if anyone has the time to rectify this.
|
|
|
|
|
rigel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1240
Merit: 1001
Thank God I'm an atheist
|
|
May 19, 2017, 09:12:17 PM |
|
Developers have the private key of genesis account. I guess they can return him coins if they want.
|
|
|
|
lx001
|
|
May 19, 2017, 09:17:46 PM |
|
Ouch This is really sad. I'm not sure if anyone has the time to rectify this. poor guy. i really hope he will get everything back, otherwise it will drive him crazy. you should pay more attention when you operate with half a million
|
|
|
|
teletobi
|
|
May 19, 2017, 09:21:47 PM |
|
Developers have the private key of genesis account. I guess they can return him coins if they want. As I remember in nxt you can't do tx from genesis Account. I don't think you can do tx from genesis Account in nem.
|
|
|
|
kocodile
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2017, 09:34:32 PM |
|
he stupidly send his money back to the genesis account lol with the funny message Boo lol yeah Boo Boo he must assume his responsibility not accusing the wallet what a joke this dude maybe a dev can return his money if they still have control of the nemsis wallet
|
|
|
|
|