Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2016, 02:50:25 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Starting a new FPGA mining farm/contract! Cognitive Resurrected on[Havelock]  (Read 274679 times)
helloge
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 710

I do escrow!


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 03:57:31 PM
 #2681

no news for the weekend? Huh

1481122225
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481122225

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481122225
Reply with quote  #2

1481122225
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481122225
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481122225

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481122225
Reply with quote  #2

1481122225
Report to moderator
silverfuture
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 863


central banking = outdated protocol


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 04:42:03 PM
 #2682

no news for the weekend? Huh

It'd be nice to get some updates from Garret or Samuel. We are currently at around 15Th/s  according to these charts http://cognitivemining.com/charts/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NastyFans - The Fan Club for Bitcoin Enthusiasts | MININGCOINS | POOL | ESCROW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
stabs
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 07:07:59 PM
 #2683

You people have delusions of grandeur.  We should all be voting for liquidation.
El Cabron
Gnomo
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 840



View Profile
March 29, 2014, 07:23:49 PM
 #2684

You people have delusions of grandeur.  We should all be voting for liquidation.

I'm pretty sure the vast majority is.

Sorry El Cabron, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
Trolling
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622250.msg7030081#msg7030081
dunchy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247


View Profile
March 29, 2014, 11:50:35 PM
 #2685

How the votes look so far ?
MilkyLep
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 583


Bitcoin for all & all for Bitcoin


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 12:45:13 AM
 #2686

Maybe a shareholder would want to devote a certain email to "audit"  the votes?

Either you own the bitcoins(private keys) or you don't. However with moneroj, nobody knows what you own.
Secure. Private. Untraceable.
Surf Capital Management
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 04:48:57 AM
 #2687

Maybe a shareholder would want to devote a certain email to "audit"  the votes?

COGproxy@SurfCapitalManagement.com

dunchy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 07:30:25 AM
 #2688

dunchy /at/ vmail.me

vote:no
El Cabron
Gnomo
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 840



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 07:41:38 AM
 #2689

dunchy /at/ vmail.me

vote:no

more than 4,000 shares voted no. sorry but your vote it meaningless at this point. garr is going to have to sell the units off asap.

Sorry El Cabron, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
Trolling
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622250.msg7030081#msg7030081
dunchy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 07:48:19 AM
 #2690

dunchy /at/ vmail.me

vote:no

more than 4,000 shares voted no. sorry but your vote it meaningless at this point. garr is going to have to sell the units off asap.

I'm not sure I'm getting you ? I just wanted to reply to MilkyLep's post to support auditing of votes. I voted immediately after I received the email.
robitnik
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 08:44:24 AM
 #2691

dunchy /at/ vmail.me

vote:no

more than 4,000 shares voted no. sorry but your vote it meaningless at this point. garr is going to have to sell the units off asap.

I'm not sure I'm getting you ? I just wanted to reply to MilkyLep's post to support auditing of votes. I voted immediately after I received the email.

yes, everyone is voting no.

if Garr is honest (and we know he is not, he stole $300,000) he will sell of the units.

We don't know anything. All we have is your word. Want to share your evidence with the rest of us? Or at least let us know where you are filing your suit against Garr so we can see what the courts have to say on the matter.

In regards to voting, we can use something along the lines of gmaxwell's "proof of solvency" idea to provide a verifiable voting record without revealing anyone's personal information or shareholding. Garrett can build the merkle tree, publish the root hash here and email the fragments to shareholders. Vote totals can be verified via Havelock and voters can verify that their votes were included in it.
snowdropfore
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 344


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 09:47:35 AM
 #2692

seems hashrate is 15th now,good work ,garr
arctos
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 02:57:35 PM
 #2693

Liquidate!
stabs
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 03:00:45 PM
 #2694

seems hashrate is 15th now,good work ,garr

What do you mean good work?  It was at like 22th earlier, he's obviously still having problems.
Surf Capital Management
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 07:33:03 PM
 #2695

My slate for COG Board of Directors:

1.TafelPoot
2.Robitnik
3.Silverfuture
4.Theterabyte
5.His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat

I do not nominate myself for fear of jeopardizing the Chinese Wall established between COG management and my firm.

BTW: We haven't discussed voting rights for unclaimed shares. Shall we add a nullification clause to the COG contract?

freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


Activity: 9001 == OP


View Profile WWW
March 30, 2014, 10:20:42 PM
 #2696

Voted no although I think by now majority and consensus was reached

zero3112
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
March 31, 2014, 12:01:32 AM
 #2697

Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware?  It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.

I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends.  I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.
El Cabron
Gnomo
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 840



View Profile
March 31, 2014, 12:43:38 AM
 #2698

Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware?  It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.

I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends.  I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.

This cant be done with Garr involved. He will keep stealing funds / hashing power.

Sorry El Cabron, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
Trolling
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622250.msg7030081#msg7030081
stabs
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 01:54:07 AM
 #2699

Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware?  It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.

I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends.  I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.

Cognitive is only worth the hardware it owns.  There is no additional value.  It's best to cut our losses while we still can and while the hardware has some value.
zero3112
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
March 31, 2014, 04:05:19 AM
 #2700

Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware?  It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.

I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends.  I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.

This cant be done with Garr involved. He will keep stealing funds / hashing power.

COG.2 holders should get all the dividends from from the liquidated hardware there the ones who bought the hardware.  Now I have waited 6 months and my shares are diluted with regular Cognitive Mining shares that never bought any of the hardware and I have not received any dividends from the new equipment since a lot of the equipment has not been mining. There has been nothing but missing dividends and late dividends.  Now there is no dividends being paid at all since havelock has frozen trading. There is no accounting of these missing dividends and the contract with Cognitive Mining does not say how late dividends are handled. I think we should get all late, stolen, and missing dividends back plus interest for the late dividends.
Pages: « 1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 [135] 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!