helloge
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1000
The Experience Layer of the Decentralized Internet
|
 |
March 29, 2014, 03:57:31 PM |
|
no news for the weekend?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
silverfuture
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 947
Merit: 1008
central banking = outdated protocol
|
|
March 29, 2014, 04:42:03 PM |
|
no news for the weekend? It'd be nice to get some updates from Garret or Samuel. We are currently at around 15Th/s according to these charts http://cognitivemining.com/charts/ |
|
|
|
stabs
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
March 29, 2014, 07:07:59 PM |
|
You people have delusions of grandeur. We should all be voting for liquidation.
|
|
|
|
|
El Cabron
Gnomo
VIP
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 29, 2014, 07:23:49 PM |
|
You people have delusions of grandeur. We should all be voting for liquidation.
I'm pretty sure the vast majority is. |
|
|
|
|
dunchy
|
|
March 29, 2014, 11:50:35 PM |
|
How the votes look so far ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
MilkyLep
|
|
March 30, 2014, 12:45:13 AM |
|
Maybe a shareholder would want to devote a certain email to "audit" the votes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dunchy
|
|
March 30, 2014, 07:30:25 AM |
|
dunchy /at/ vmail.me
vote:no
|
|
|
|
|
El Cabron
Gnomo
VIP
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 30, 2014, 07:41:38 AM |
|
dunchy /at/ vmail.me
vote:no
more than 4,000 shares voted no. sorry but your vote it meaningless at this point. garr is going to have to sell the units off asap. |
|
|
|
|
dunchy
|
|
March 30, 2014, 07:48:19 AM |
|
dunchy /at/ vmail.me
vote:no
more than 4,000 shares voted no. sorry but your vote it meaningless at this point. garr is going to have to sell the units off asap. I'm not sure I'm getting you ? I just wanted to reply to MilkyLep's post to support auditing of votes. I voted immediately after I received the email. |
|
|
|
|
robitnik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2014, 08:44:24 AM |
|
dunchy /at/ vmail.me
vote:no
more than 4,000 shares voted no. sorry but your vote it meaningless at this point. garr is going to have to sell the units off asap. I'm not sure I'm getting you ? I just wanted to reply to MilkyLep's post to support auditing of votes. I voted immediately after I received the email. yes, everyone is voting no. if Garr is honest (and we know he is not, he stole $300,000) he will sell of the units. don't know anything. All we have is your word. Want to share your evidence with the rest of us? Or at least let us know where you are filing your suit against Garr so we can see what the courts have to say on the matter. In regards to voting, we can use something along the lines of gmaxwell's "proof of solvency" idea to provide a verifiable voting record without revealing anyone's personal information or shareholding. Garrett can build the merkle tree, publish the root hash here and email the fragments to shareholders. Vote totals can be verified via Havelock and voters can verify that their votes were included in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
snowdropfore
|
|
March 30, 2014, 09:47:35 AM |
|
seems hashrate is 15th now，good work ，garr
|
|
|
|
arctos
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2014, 02:57:35 PM |
|
Liquidate!
|
|
|
|
|
stabs
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
March 30, 2014, 03:00:45 PM |
|
seems hashrate is 15th now，good work ，garr
What do you mean good work? It was at like 22th earlier, he's obviously still having problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
Surf Capital Management
|
|
March 30, 2014, 07:33:03 PM |
|
My slate for COG Board of Directors: 1.TafelPoot 2.Robitnik 3.Silverfuture 4.Theterabyte 5.His Most Eminent Highness Grand Caesar Imperator Goat I do not nominate myself for fear of jeopardizing the Chinese Wall established between COG management and my firm. BTW: We haven't discussed voting rights for unclaimed shares. Shall we add a nullification clause to the COG contract? |
|
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
March 30, 2014, 10:20:42 PM |
|
Voted no although I think by now majority and consensus was reached
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
|
zero3112
|
|
March 31, 2014, 12:01:32 AM |
|
Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware? It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.
I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends. I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.
|
|
|
|
El Cabron
Gnomo
VIP
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 31, 2014, 12:43:38 AM |
|
Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware? It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.
I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends. I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.
This cant be done with Garr involved. He will keep stealing funds / hashing power. |
|
|
|
stabs
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
March 31, 2014, 01:54:07 AM |
|
Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware? It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.
I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends. I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.
Cognitive is only worth the hardware it owns. There is no additional value. It's best to cut our losses while we still can and while the hardware has some value. |
|
|
|
|
|
zero3112
|
|
March 31, 2014, 04:05:19 AM |
|
Why can't the liquidated hardware be reinvested in buying newer, cheaper, and faster hardware? It's not in anyones best interest to redistribute the liquidated hardware in dividends since it would be like paying you pennies on the dollar. Its better to look long term and reinvest the money from the liquidated hardware into new hardware and to continue the mining operation. I would like to see a change in ownership of this operation before we move ahead.
I don't want to just end the operation and be paid dividends. I can't vote yes or no neither are what I want.
This cant be done with Garr involved. He will keep stealing funds / hashing power. COG.2 holders should get all the dividends from from the liquidated hardware there the ones who bought the hardware. Now I have waited 6 months and my shares are diluted with regular Cognitive Mining shares that never bought any of the hardware and I have not received any dividends from the new equipment since a lot of the equipment has not been mining. There has been nothing but missing dividends and late dividends. Now there is no dividends being paid at all since havelock has frozen trading. There is no accounting of these missing dividends and the contract with Cognitive Mining does not say how late dividends are handled. I think we should get all late, stolen, and missing dividends back plus interest for the late dividends. |
|
|
|
|
