presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2015, 09:11:12 PM |
|
Everyone please update to the latest build. If you are minting at least a few HYP blocks per day, then this should be considered a near mandatory update. Currently Win32 build is available, more builds will be added to the release page throughout the day/week. https://github.com/hyperstake/HyperStake/releases/tag/v1.1.2Changelog: - Fix potential tx malleability issues - update hard coded checkpoints - add ability to turn off dust combination code - keep stake coins set in memory instead of reiterating constantly - Do not query MintableCoins() as frequently - fix cclistcoins potential stake calculations - gettxfee RPC call - add MultiSend CoinStake (experimental, don't use to an exchange or automated service) - remove old legacy irc code Win64 Daemon and QT just built and added to the release page. Thanks iDunk!! PS - this now includes a new way to use HyperStake with the setup/install means instead of just copying in the .exe . iDunk gave us both the traditional exe and a 'setup' exe.
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 12:55:08 AM |
|
i have 2 wallets ruining on 2 computers 100000 hyp + 60000 (first does multisend to the snd) and sins a week both wallet crash 2-3 times a week ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Ok, what else can you tell us? What OS? What wallet version? Daemon or Qt? What does the log say? How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? I have received some information about this. It is believed to be transaction malleability testing on the HYP network, which can send in transactions that are not able to be handled by certain builds of the wallet (for example Windows 32 bit builds). Apparently PeerCoin suffered from this style of attack last month which caused a major fork in the chain essentially between different operating systems (as I understand it). I am testing the patched peercoin code that is believed to handle this, and will commit it to the repo and release a new version of the wallet if all goes well. I'm lazy AND ignorant, link for that? TOTALLY didn't hear about it.. OSX wallet will be up in a few boss.
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 02:26:37 AM |
|
i have 2 wallets ruining on 2 computers 100000 hyp + 60000 (first does multisend to the snd) and sins a week both wallet crash 2-3 times a week ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Ok, what else can you tell us? What OS? What wallet version? Daemon or Qt? What does the log say? How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? I have received some information about this. It is believed to be transaction malleability testing on the HYP network, which can send in transactions that are not able to be handled by certain builds of the wallet (for example Windows 32 bit builds). Apparently PeerCoin suffered from this style of attack last month which caused a major fork in the chain essentially between different operating systems (as I understand it). I am testing the patched peercoin code that is believed to handle this, and will commit it to the repo and release a new version of the wallet if all goes well. I'm lazy AND ignorant, link for that? TOTALLY didn't hear about it.. OSX wallet will be up in a few boss. Few links for ya sir. original description from Pieter Wuille - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009697.htmlpeercoins problems - https://github.com/ppcoin/ppcoin/issues/100
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 02:30:11 AM |
|
i have 2 wallets ruining on 2 computers 100000 hyp + 60000 (first does multisend to the snd) and sins a week both wallet crash 2-3 times a week ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Ok, what else can you tell us? What OS? What wallet version? Daemon or Qt? What does the log say? How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? I have received some information about this. It is believed to be transaction malleability testing on the HYP network, which can send in transactions that are not able to be handled by certain builds of the wallet (for example Windows 32 bit builds). Apparently PeerCoin suffered from this style of attack last month which caused a major fork in the chain essentially between different operating systems (as I understand it). I am testing the patched peercoin code that is believed to handle this, and will commit it to the repo and release a new version of the wallet if all goes well. I'm lazy AND ignorant, link for that? TOTALLY didn't hear about it.. OSX wallet will be up in a few boss. Few links for ya sir. original description from Pieter Wuille - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009697.htmlpeercoins problems - https://github.com/ppcoin/ppcoin/issues/100oooo toilet reading. Thank you very much. and Care to elaborate on "MultiSend CoinStake" ?
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 02:40:52 AM |
|
Care to elaborate on "MultiSend CoinStake" ?
You didnt hear the news??!!!!?? I added a special functionality to MultiSend that lets you send the multisend tx in the actual staked block instead of waiting for all those confirms and then sending. I am 97% sure this needs extra work to make it compatible with exchanges, as it is now the daemon will see it as a minted transaction rather than received from another address.
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 03:47:40 AM |
|
Care to elaborate on "MultiSend CoinStake" ?
You didnt hear the news??!!!!?? I added a special functionality to MultiSend that lets you send the multisend tx in the actual staked block instead of waiting for all those confirms and then sending. I am 97% sure this needs extra work to make it compatible with exchanges, as it is now the daemon will see it as a minted transaction rather than received from another address. I didn't hear, till just now. Wow, nicely done! This was always my goal, but I have gotten to far away from the code recently, to be able to even think about it. Impressed sir, keep it up!
|
|
|
|
4x13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1011
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 04:38:39 AM |
|
That would be freaking sweet!!
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 05:03:11 AM |
|
Care to elaborate on "MultiSend CoinStake" ?
You didnt hear the news??!!!!?? I added a special functionality to MultiSend that lets you send the multisend tx in the actual staked block instead of waiting for all those confirms and then sending. I am 97% sure this needs extra work to make it compatible with exchanges, as it is now the daemon will see it as a minted transaction rather than received from another address. I didn't hear, till just now. Wow, nicely done! This was always my goal, but I have gotten to far away from the code recently, to be able to even think about it. Impressed sir, keep it up! Hey Tranz good to see you around! Yes I was able to get it into the coinstake tx, but I did get inspiration from some of Dooglus' work on CLAM. That being said, this is still experimental and I need to change the code of the receiving party to not see this as a transaction minted, and thus it would also mean an exchange or other automated party would need to update once the code is complete. Edit - also I forgot to mention the best part. Free transactions ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 03:21:24 PM |
|
Care to elaborate on "MultiSend CoinStake" ?
You didnt hear the news??!!!!?? I added a special functionality to MultiSend that lets you send the multisend tx in the actual staked block instead of waiting for all those confirms and then sending. I am 97% sure this needs extra work to make it compatible with exchanges, as it is now the daemon will see it as a minted transaction rather than received from another address. ya know, that sounds vaguely familiar but in all honesty, I was probably drunk at the time. that is pretty damn sexy.
|
|
|
|
dalistar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 05:07:43 PM |
|
My wallet coin age are 10 days old till now still minting and didnt pay out ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
|
fragilefungi
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 08:28:39 PM |
|
My wallet coin age are 10 days old till now still minting and didnt pay out ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) My last four stakes were 55.7 days, 41.2 days, 28.6 days, and 112 days old. HYP coins keep gaining weight for 30 days. The coins just START staking after 8.8 days and the probability at that time is >0% but still not very high.
|
XMG tips: 9HTdqWpuJpTx51dpskb6XASXPg2GLkD2jL Best small coin exchange is cryptopia! Sign up and trade!
|
|
|
Kushedout
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1123
Merit: 1000
SaluS - (SLS)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 08:34:55 PM |
|
My wallet coin age are 10 days old till now still minting and didnt pay out ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Hope this makes you feel better http://imgur.com/QdoTbSP
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 08:53:00 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Foi63.tinypic.com%2F2csgho9.jpg&t=665&c=i7_mqiUVTa5Mgw) Patience is key
|
|
|
|
Kushedout
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1123
Merit: 1000
SaluS - (SLS)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 09:00:44 PM |
|
iDunks wallet MinerFTWs wallet ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSk79B2v.png&t=665&c=4LamquV2E_QbrQ)
|
|
|
|
dalistar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 09:54:19 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Foi63.tinypic.com%2F2csgho9.jpg&t=665&c=i7_mqiUVTa5Mgw) Patience is key they said paid each 8 days ,,,, I am no patient so i will quit
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 09:58:46 PM |
|
Patience is key
they said paid each 8 days ,,,, I am no patient so i will quit It is 8 days minimum. HYP is one of the highest difficulty PoS coins. If you are not patient, then yes you are correct it is not for you. If you are patient, you get a fairly generous stake reward.
|
|
|
|
billotronic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Crackpot Idealist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 10:02:38 PM |
|
Patience is key
they said paid each 8 days ,,,, I am no patient so i will quit It is 8 days minimum. HYP is one of the highest difficulty PoS coins. If you are not patient, then yes you are correct it is not for you. If you are patient, you get a fairly generous stake reward. speaking of which, would there be any sort of universal way we could compare that across different coins? I vaguely remember chatting with you about net diff once and how its not always calculated the same ways... or did I just dream that?
|
|
|
|
Tranz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1060
May the force bit with you.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 04, 2015, 11:53:33 PM |
|
Care to elaborate on "MultiSend CoinStake" ?
You didnt hear the news??!!!!?? I added a special functionality to MultiSend that lets you send the multisend tx in the actual staked block instead of waiting for all those confirms and then sending. I am 97% sure this needs extra work to make it compatible with exchanges, as it is now the daemon will see it as a minted transaction rather than received from another address. I didn't hear, till just now. Wow, nicely done! This was always my goal, but I have gotten to far away from the code recently, to be able to even think about it. Impressed sir, keep it up! Hey Tranz good to see you around! Yes I was able to get it into the coinstake tx, but I did get inspiration from some of Dooglus' work on CLAM. That being said, this is still experimental and I need to change the code of the receiving party to not see this as a transaction minted, and thus it would also mean an exchange or other automated party would need to update once the code is complete. Edit - also I forgot to mention the best part. Free transactions ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Yes the free transaction part was what I envisioned would be beneficial for S4C. I never dug deep enough to get that far, I always assumed it would require a fork to get it fully implemented, but so far not looking that way.
|
|
|
|
presstab (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Blockchain Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 05, 2015, 04:53:42 AM |
|
Care to elaborate on "MultiSend CoinStake" ?
You didnt hear the news??!!!!?? I added a special functionality to MultiSend that lets you send the multisend tx in the actual staked block instead of waiting for all those confirms and then sending. I am 97% sure this needs extra work to make it compatible with exchanges, as it is now the daemon will see it as a minted transaction rather than received from another address. I didn't hear, till just now. Wow, nicely done! This was always my goal, but I have gotten to far away from the code recently, to be able to even think about it. Impressed sir, keep it up! Hey Tranz good to see you around! Yes I was able to get it into the coinstake tx, but I did get inspiration from some of Dooglus' work on CLAM. That being said, this is still experimental and I need to change the code of the receiving party to not see this as a transaction minted, and thus it would also mean an exchange or other automated party would need to update once the code is complete. Edit - also I forgot to mention the best part. Free transactions ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Yes the free transaction part was what I envisioned would be beneficial for S4C. I never dug deep enough to get that far, I always assumed it would require a fork to get it fully implemented, but so far not looking that way. I thought the same myself, but when looking deeper you find that it is totally within the bounds of the protocol.
|
|
|
|
altcoiner-
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 06, 2015, 07:05:45 PM |
|
This coins daemon is 100% impossible to sync...
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 31a471982f272fefaae842dbaa0ab1507b014162c40310c4dde0087714a66675 received block df1f9b6cb2da78fa9fbf ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block df1f9b6cb2da78fa9fbf7a651f5936e29d02b2fc0949d824524019e78521c45d received block 2d9d163b348d29d5d66f ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 2d9d163b348d29d5d66f8c65497ce481a26c776c7dcc0a565bcabd75ba34af5b received block f1385230f46c3040bce6 ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block f1385230f46c3040bce674e0b6787729e311429ebf60226081dc2ceba9a48d24 received block 30f335481d6b4831eddb ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 30f335481d6b4831eddbd0151abe01db5efc63e5c2ae92b2a1ac7da9b8c70aeb received block db95163b1389a1fed6ae ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block db95163b1389a1fe
I've synced around 170k blocks in 24 hours, at this rate it will take me over 10 days to sync the whole 1.9m blocks.
Is it just me or is this normal?
|
|
|
|
|