Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 06:27:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 ... 186 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite | 1st mini-blockchain coin | M7 PoW | No Premine  (Read 578440 times)
wacko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014


View Profile
August 21, 2014, 05:10:47 PM
 #1801

+500 on ram? poor 750ti, they won't last long
Why would memory overclock significantly shorten the card's life? Those ddr5 memory chips consume next to nothing, raising memory clock by 500 MHz will probably add a couple W at most and make them 1-3 degrees hotter — no big deal. It's the gpu that consumes most power, and overvolting it might cause some trouble, but simply increasing memory clocks is as safe an overclock as it gets.
1714112854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714112854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714112854
Reply with quote  #2

1714112854
Report to moderator
1714112854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714112854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714112854
Reply with quote  #2

1714112854
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714112854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714112854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714112854
Reply with quote  #2

1714112854
Report to moderator
1714112854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714112854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714112854
Reply with quote  #2

1714112854
Report to moderator
1714112854
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714112854

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714112854
Reply with quote  #2

1714112854
Report to moderator
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
August 21, 2014, 05:12:03 PM
 #1802

I have my 750Tis up to almost 5MH/s per card!

https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/xcnwolf750ti5.png
How do you achieve that, I can only get 4.2 Mh per card ?

He is trying to sell u his miner
Apparently the latest ccminer binary from djm34 is just as fast as Wolf's private miner.

mega.co.nz/#!8RsDiJxY!61uRgJmlkr-Y_mwaE0HrCrzI-O85s71qhvW3f7kM3uQ

Wolf latest is faster. He got 5 mh whereas djm got around 4.6 - 4.7

So wolf version is around 10% faster
A person on the IRC channel is reporting an average of 5mh/s using the 750Ti. Are you sure you're using djm's latest build?

I don't think djm miner hit 5 mh on average. Djm report hash of 4.6 - 4.7.

Prepares that person on IRC is wolf or that person did some custom OC or flash card



+500 on ram? poor 750ti, they won't last long, and if everyone is getting 10% more there is no point in gaining that speed
I wouldn't try either +500 on the mem clock  Grin (with some earlier version I had a crash at 200... I didn't insist)
I run +135 on core +150 mem and it does 4.8MHash

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
August 21, 2014, 05:16:24 PM
 #1803

+500 on ram? poor 750ti, they won't last long
Why would memory overclock significantly shorten the card's life? Those ddr5 memory chips consume next to nothing, raising memory clock by 500 MHz will probably add a couple W at most and make them 1-3 degrees hotter — no big deal. It's the gpu that consumes most power, and overvolting it might cause some trouble, but simply increasing memory clocks is as safe an overclock as it gets.

it's not all about temps, those gpu are not built to work at that clock, expect a crash
surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
August 21, 2014, 06:35:52 PM
 #1804

Quote
The Secret Chain Attack
If an attacker had enough hashing power he could generate a fake chain in secret using the real proof chain but a fake account tree. He would need to out-pace the real mini-blockchain for a full cycle until there's no evidence left to indicate his account tree is fake and then start broadcasting the fake chain.

This wont affect older nodes who have been validating blocks for longer than the cycle of the mini-blockchain because they can detect the fake chain or simply ignore super long forks. In Cryptonite existing nodes will just stick with the chain they have if the origin point of the fork appears to be older than the cycle time.

So there's no way the attacker could trick existing nodes to accept his fake chain, but new nodes are still at risk. New nodes have no way of determining which is the valid chain because they have no history of what happened before the oldest block in the mini-blockchain. Using some sort of consensus mechanism is not perfect either.

How much hashing power would be required for the secret chain attack? Would it be 51% of the network hashing power for 10000 blocks?
mirny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005



View Profile
August 21, 2014, 08:51:07 PM
 #1805

I have my 750Tis up to almost 5MH/s per card!

https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/xcnwolf750ti5.png
How do you achieve that, I can only get 4.2 Mh per card ?

He is trying to sell u his miner
Apparently the latest ccminer binary from djm34 is just as fast as Wolf's private miner.

mega.co.nz/#!8RsDiJxY!61uRgJmlkr-Y_mwaE0HrCrzI-O85s71qhvW3f7kM3uQ

Wolf latest is faster. He got 5 mh whereas djm got around 4.6 - 4.7

So wolf version is around 10% faster
A person on the IRC channel is reporting an average of 5mh/s using the 750Ti. Are you sure you're using djm's latest build?

I don't think djm miner hit 5 mh on average. Djm report hash of 4.6 - 4.7.

Prepares that person on IRC is wolf or that person did some custom OC or flash card



Hi zelante, what card exactly you have?

This is my signature...
truckythin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 781
Merit: 501



View Profile
August 22, 2014, 12:59:26 AM
 #1806

dropping hard, no more buy  Undecided
RavenXBR
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 01:20:35 AM
 #1807

I have my 750Tis up to almost 5MH/s per card!

https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/xcnwolf750ti5.png
How do you achieve that, I can only get 4.2 Mh per card ?

He is trying to sell u his miner
Apparently the latest ccminer binary from djm34 is just as fast as Wolf's private miner.

mega.co.nz/#!8RsDiJxY!61uRgJmlkr-Y_mwaE0HrCrzI-O85s71qhvW3f7kM3uQ

Wolf latest is faster. He got 5 mh whereas djm got around 4.6 - 4.7

So wolf version is around 10% faster
A person on the IRC channel is reporting an average of 5mh/s using the 750Ti. Are you sure you're using djm's latest build?

I don't think djm miner hit 5 mh on average. Djm report hash of 4.6 - 4.7.

Prepares that person on IRC is wolf or that person did some custom OC or flash card



+500 on ram? poor 750ti, they won't last long, and if everyone is getting 10% more there is no point in gaining that speed
I wouldn't try either +500 on the mem clock  Grin (with some earlier version I had a crash at 200... I didn't insist)
I run +135 on core +150 mem and it does 4.8MHash
I'm doing +135/+200 (+250 crashes miner eventually)
tc61
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 494
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 01:51:36 AM
 #1808

where you getting driver version 340.62?
zflan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 02:09:24 AM
 #1809

dropping hard, no more buy  Undecided

never  give up!!!
truckythin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 781
Merit: 501



View Profile
August 22, 2014, 02:42:09 AM
 #1810

last 0.0000108, we gonna have additional 0 soon lol  Grin
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 04:13:40 AM
 #1811

I have my 750Tis up to almost 5MH/s per card!

https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/xcnwolf750ti5.png
How do you achieve that, I can only get 4.2 Mh per card ?

He is trying to sell u his miner
Apparently the latest ccminer binary from djm34 is just as fast as Wolf's private miner.

mega.co.nz/#!8RsDiJxY!61uRgJmlkr-Y_mwaE0HrCrzI-O85s71qhvW3f7kM3uQ

Wolf latest is faster. He got 5 mh whereas djm got around 4.6 - 4.7

So wolf version is around 10% faster
A person on the IRC channel is reporting an average of 5mh/s using the 750Ti. Are you sure you're using djm's latest build?

I don't think djm miner hit 5 mh on average. Djm report hash of 4.6 - 4.7.

Prepares that person on IRC is wolf or that person did some custom OC or flash card



+500 on ram? poor 750ti, they won't last long, and if everyone is getting 10% more there is no point in gaining that speed
I wouldn't try either +500 on the mem clock  Grin (with some earlier version I had a crash at 200... I didn't insist)
I run +135 on core +150 mem and it does 4.8MHash

Similar here: +140 / + 200 (one GPU has to run at +135 else it crashes). Mem could even be lower that I wouldn't see any difference at all. - Not sure why Zelante is pushing the mem at + 500.
bitfreak! (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000


electronic [r]evolution


View Profile WWW
August 22, 2014, 05:00:51 AM
 #1812

How much hashing power would be required for the secret chain attack? Would it be 51% of the network hashing power for 10000 blocks?
Yes pretty much, but it's unlikely 10k blocks would be enough in a real attack.

XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF
Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script
Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
August 22, 2014, 06:30:12 AM
 #1813

+500 on ram? poor 750ti, they won't last long
Why would memory overclock significantly shorten the card's life? Those ddr5 memory chips consume next to nothing, raising memory clock by 500 MHz will probably add a couple W at most and make them 1-3 degrees hotter — no big deal. It's the gpu that consumes most power, and overvolting it might cause some trouble, but simply increasing memory clocks is as safe an overclock as it gets.

it's not all about temps, those gpu are not built to work at that clock, expect a crash

No, it's about binning. Some chips are better than others - my 750Tis take 1475/3500 just fine with no voltage increase.

Lowest point I observed in the miner was 5.15MH/s. Still improving.

https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/xcnwolf750ti8.png

well that's for sure, memory type is also important
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 07:06:09 AM
 #1814

1 XCN = 0.0000098 BTC
zflan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 07:27:40 AM
 #1815

1 XCN = 0.0000098 BTC


1 XCN = 0.0000068 BTC
polanskiman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 07:40:06 AM
 #1816

1 XCN = 0.0000098 BTC


1 XCN = 0.0000068 BTC

??

https://bter.com/trade/XCN_BTC
Viper1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 320


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 07:58:31 AM
 #1817

Couple weeks back I had a look at this coin and it seemed pretty interesting especially since the price seemed fairly stable after the initial drop.  Set myself a watch point on the price where I would consider buying some but it's dropped far past that and seems to be continuing to drop.

What's the current supply?  One thing I've noticed is that coins with a billion or more coins pretty much always end up having very low prices.

So did something happen?  Please don't say fud and trolls as there's always a "real" reason.

BTC: 1F8yJqgjeFyX1SX6KJmqYtHiHXJA89ENNT
LTC: LYAEPQeDDM7Y4jbUH2AwhBmkzThAGecNBV
DOGE: DSUsCCdt98PcNgUkFHLDFdQXmPrQBEqXu9
bitfreak! (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1536
Merit: 1000


electronic [r]evolution


View Profile WWW
August 22, 2014, 08:30:38 AM
 #1818

So did something happen?  Please don't say fud and trolls as there's always a "real" reason.
I'm guessing it's due to a combination of factors. I don't think we have any merchants accepting XCN yet, so features such as withdrawal limits and unmalleable transactions are pretty useless right now. We also haven't done much promotion or marketing yet, so we probably don't have a great deal of buy support right now. And on top of that the price of BTC is starting to drop again, causing the price of most altcoins to drop with it. I'm a very patient person though, and temporary price fluctuations mean very little to me. Given enough time XCN will easily get into the top 20 largest market caps once people realize how significant the underlying innovations are.

XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF
Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script
Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
truckythin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 781
Merit: 501



View Profile
August 22, 2014, 08:32:45 AM
 #1819

bitfreak, are you f'ing your self? come back to reality. WHO THE WILL BUY THIS COIN? huh who?
yellowduck2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 08:35:45 AM
 #1820

bitfreak, are you f'ing your self? come back to reality. WHO THE WILL BUY THIS COIN? huh who?

Chinese ?
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 ... 186 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!