rgm108
|
|
September 05, 2014, 07:25:39 PM |
|
who is constantly dumping? is it the devs? or 1gh? or is it the miners the got the early unfair coins?
Not sure but something/someone is manipulating the price.
|
|
|
|
surfer43
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 560
Merit: 250
"Trading Platform of The Future!"
|
|
September 05, 2014, 09:19:49 PM |
|
who is constantly dumping? is it the devs? or 1gh? or is it the miners the got the early unfair coins?
Not sure but something/someone is manipulating the price. It's not miners that got the early coins, they sold most at >5k satoshi. The cloud miners did not get coins unfairly, and I'm almost positive if they had held them until now they would be in the red. How would it be the devs? They bought coins well above this price, and they would be losing money by selling now. 1gh is not dumping a significant amount because with their fee of 2% they only get around 6000 XCN per day, or ~0.05 BTC at current prices. It is the gpu farms or small botnets that are selling. Nobody is "manipulating" the price.
|
|
|
|
th4o
Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2014, 08:35:47 AM |
|
did the dev apply this coin to the supernet?
|
|
|
|
heskey
|
|
September 06, 2014, 11:33:07 AM |
|
Cryptonite doesn't need superNET, superNET needs Cryptonite Fairly interesting project, but I'm not convinced that it will be of any bigger importance.
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
marada
|
|
September 06, 2014, 11:37:31 AM |
|
Im happy to sell my 64bit amd miner for around 1btc or 100btcd, ive been using it for around 6weeks with great success, onto bigger and better things now, first in gets it.
So probably you could paste some screenshot... Edit: which speed do you reach, what amd do you use. Give us some details😊 I had to stop development for two days I will try to release the miner this weekend, though I already see several optimizations that would take more time. Looks like Claymore will release their miner this weekend. So the situation with XCN mining evolves from good to bad and then to even worse. We can expect the diff to go high but price to go down due to extraordinary dumps. The coin mining being overtaken by any private and platform dependent miner is not a good situation at all.
|
|
|
|
Jungian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 930
Merit: 1010
|
|
September 06, 2014, 11:46:43 AM |
|
Im happy to sell my 64bit amd miner for around 1btc or 100btcd, ive been using it for around 6weeks with great success, onto bigger and better things now, first in gets it.
So probably you could paste some screenshot... Edit: which speed do you reach, what amd do you use. Give us some details😊 I had to stop development for two days I will try to release the miner this weekend, though I already see several optimizations that would take more time. Looks like Claymore will release their miner this weekend. So the situation with XCN mining evolves from good to bad and then to even worse. We can expect the diff to go high but price to go down due to extraordinary dumps. The coin mining being overtaken by any private and platform dependent miner is not a good situation at all. We'll see. It may also spark some interrest now that more people can get some XCN without having to buy on an exchange.
|
|
|
|
th4o
Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2014, 04:26:20 PM |
|
Cryptonite doesn't need superNET, superNET needs Cryptonite Fairly interesting project, but I'm not convinced that it will be of any bigger importance. I think superNET is able to get up the price. Atm it's really undervalued
|
|
|
|
lucazane
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1198
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 06, 2014, 07:06:58 PM |
|
I have asked cryptsy to add Cryptonite, hope they will add it.
|
|
|
|
heskey
|
|
September 06, 2014, 07:50:02 PM |
|
Cryptonite doesn't need superNET, superNET needs Cryptonite Fairly interesting project, but I'm not convinced that it will be of any bigger importance. I think superNET is able to get up the price. Atm it's really undervalued Perhaps. Compared to other cryptos, the price is just silly. I feel confident though since this is the only coin in it's niche. It's probably just a matter of time before people realize the benefits/value of a small blockchain, not to mention the other innovations that this coin has brought forth.
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
sempyper
|
|
September 06, 2014, 11:13:35 PM |
|
can someone compile me the new webwallet for win 64bit everyone remember to tweet @BittrexExchange about adding #XCN
|
|
|
|
CasualSam
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 11
|
|
September 07, 2014, 09:53:46 AM |
|
Bitfreak,
I'd like to create a stratum pool that uses the GetBlockTemplate RPC command. The problem is that when you create a coinbase tx you need to recalculate the AccountRootHash. This seems impractical to do on the pool server.
What I think it would need is a modified GetBlockTemplate that accepts coinbase txouts as arguments. This would enable it to return the correct precalculated AccountRootHash.
Am I understanding this correctly? If so would this be a change you'd consider?
I could potentially create the patch myself if you are interested.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1240
|
|
September 07, 2014, 09:58:50 AM |
|
Bitfreak,
I'd like to create a stratum pool that uses the GetBlockTemplate RPC command. The problem is that when you create a coinbase tx you need to recalculate the AccountRootHash. This seems impractical to do on the pool server.
What I think it would need is a modified GetBlockTemplate that accepts coinbase txouts as arguments. This would enable it to return the correct precalculated AccountRootHash.
Am I understanding this correctly? If so would this be a change you'd consider?
I could potentially create the patch myself if you are interested.
I am interested in this too, as I did not got getblocktemplate to work too (at least not @ mainnet)
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
CasualSam
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 11
|
|
September 07, 2014, 12:32:32 PM |
|
Bitfreak,
I'd like to create a stratum pool that uses the GetBlockTemplate RPC command. The problem is that when you create a coinbase tx you need to recalculate the AccountRootHash. This seems impractical to do on the pool server.
What I think it would need is a modified GetBlockTemplate that accepts coinbase txouts as arguments. This would enable it to return the correct precalculated AccountRootHash.
Am I understanding this correctly? If so would this be a change you'd consider?
I could potentially create the patch myself if you are interested.
After further investigation GetBlockTemplate does return a coinbase tx that pays to the default receive address (./cryptonited getaccountaddress ""). This is workable. It would still be nice if you could specify each coinbase txout address/amount but it is not a high priority issue.
|
|
|
|
catia
|
|
September 07, 2014, 03:02:15 PM |
|
After further investigation GetBlockTemplate does return a coinbase tx that pays to the default receive address (./cryptonited getaccountaddress ""). This is workable. It would still be nice if you could specify each coinbase txout address/amount but it is not a high priority issue.
Coinbase transactions only allow a single output. Would be nice if there was a way to specify which address though. The supposed goal of stratum is to allow miners to modify txset which is going to be impossible without a copy of the trie.
|
|
|
|
CasualSam
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 11
|
|
September 07, 2014, 03:51:48 PM |
|
After further investigation GetBlockTemplate does return a coinbase tx that pays to the default receive address (./cryptonited getaccountaddress ""). This is workable. It would still be nice if you could specify each coinbase txout address/amount but it is not a high priority issue.
Coinbase transactions only allow a single output. Would be nice if there was a way to specify which address though. The supposed goal of stratum is to allow miners to modify txset which is going to be impossible without a copy of the trie. Understood, thanks. Not worried about miners selecting transactions. Just trying to get cryptonite running on coinium without too much modification.
|
|
|
|
Claymore
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
September 08, 2014, 11:55:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
September 08, 2014, 12:03:14 PM |
|
no linux support. bummer.
|
|
|
|
tc61
|
|
September 08, 2014, 01:04:18 PM |
|
pallas, do you know of any good linux support threads? I am trying to in install it on a dual boot and am having problems.
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
September 08, 2014, 01:39:43 PM |
|
pallas, do you know of any good linux support threads? I am trying to in install it on a dual boot and am having problems.
Sorry, I've been running on Linux-only for many years now, no experience on recent windows versions...
|
|
|
|
yonghongtang
|
|
September 08, 2014, 02:37:52 PM |
|
no linux support. bummer. Thank you so much for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|