NoobKidOnTheBlock
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:18:30 PM |
|
Anyone that takes the time to read over anyone's previous posts will realize that the people FUDDING this thread are people who have developed coins before or offer to develop coins for other people for a price. Hmmm I can only assume that if I was a developer or creator of altcoins that I too would be upset if I seen a coin with a more talented developer than me making waves in the world of Crypto Pretty sad when the only people criticizing this coin are people who have failed where Mr. Spread has succeeded!! Pretty sad indeed Cheers I hope that this community will continue to grow and that people will realize the true potential of SpreadCoin and that this investment is definitely one worth holding onto VIVE LE SPREVOLUTION!!
|
▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ | | ... | ............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
|
|
|
|
|
NoobKidOnTheBlock
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:19:29 PM |
|
The spread GUI for the decentralized masternodes is an innovation by itself. Icing on the cake.
I agree the way that Mr. Spread has set up the masternode payment system seems truly innovating in its entirety Wicked job by a wicked DEV!!
|
▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ | | ... | ............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
|
|
|
|
|
Hatch
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:21:11 PM |
|
LOL every altcoin is a shitcoin clone blah blah blah, blahblah, blahblahblah, blah
Says yet another person either all by their lonesome, or too afraid to stand behind what they say that they have to use yet another "sockpuppet" account. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiggggghhhhtt!
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:21:23 PM |
|
Spread Masternodes working exactly as planned on their first testnet outing, continuing onslaught of retards and obvious sockpuppets spamming us with their technicolour bigfont Fucked Up Drivel, all signs are good.
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:21:53 PM |
|
LOL - ok first and foremost - I am ignoring pretty much all newbie accounts that start out with bs or are quoting some other fudsters bs. It really does help the screen view and allow me to see the important stuff. Try it it helps!
Ok - so I received my first 17+ tSPR MN payments - woot - it works! Ahemmm - I have over 42 MN's hehe. So I expect a lot of coin today! :-)
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:25:20 PM |
|
Ok - so I received my first 17+ tSPR MN payments - woot - it works! Ahemmm - I have over 42 MN's hehe. So I expect a lot of coin today! :-)
Wait till it's on main net. Checking your MN earnings over breakfast every morning is just wonderful.
|
|
|
|
Hatch
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:28:42 PM |
|
LOL - ok first and foremost - I am ignoring pretty much all newbie accounts that start out with bs or are quoting some other fudsters bs. It really does help the screen view and allow me to see the important stuff. Try it it helps!
Ok - so I received my first 17+ tSPR MN payments - woot - it works! Ahemmm - I have over 42 MN's hehe. So I expect a lot of coin today! :-)
Agreed... but sometimes just can't help myself from pointing out the hypocrisy and stupidity... Are a lot of them multiple addresses in one wallet, or single MN's per wallet instance?
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:29:23 PM |
|
LOL - ok first and foremost - I am ignoring pretty much all newbie accounts that start out with bs or are quoting some other fudsters bs. It really does help the screen view and allow me to see the important stuff. Try it it helps! Agreed... but sometimes just can't help myself from pointing out the hypocrisy and stupidity... Ok - so I received my first 17+ tSPR MN payments - woot - it works! Ahemmm - I have over 42 MN's hehe. So I expect a lot of coin today! :-) Are a lot of them multiple addresses in one wallet, or single MN's per wallet instance? Actually a mix of both - probably closer to half and half.
|
|
|
|
Hatch
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:31:19 PM |
|
Actually a mix of both - probably closer to half and half.
Kewl... Think I'll try splitting up that 300 SPR MN into two more "virtual" nodes
|
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:44:00 PM |
|
One thing about the MN : The fact that you can have 10 MN on the same wallet is not a problem? This is only for testnet or it'll be like this on mainnet? Normally the MNs should help the network to achieve diferent task, and I don't see how 10 or more MN on the same wallet/deamon/server would help more than only 1 per server. What I want to say is that this is not really decentralized concept
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:46:34 PM |
|
Payments rolling in on my VPS nicely:
{ "account" : "mn15", "address" : "muCckRXnSmCYehpUD6b8ezQtoD88fTZqvF", "category" : "immature", "amount" : 1.99777350, "confirmations" : 72, "generated" : true, "blockhash" : "ab11bd6e2dec6c674514d41eac13493cc99b3ebd9a1d2a3e203744d1052cd0ac", "blockindex" : 0, "blocktime" : 1422552526, "txid" : "cb234301939e8c5b7dffd825d7cc0434091e028683a18ff110bf538049d39d36", "time" : 1422552526, "timereceived" : 1422552527 }, { "account" : "mn6", "address" : "mtqqYni2Zjeob4tfvGeogZ7RnY49Qq5k4s", "category" : "immature", "amount" : 1.99774350, "confirmations" : 12, "generated" : true, "blockhash" : "0fef3f9d2350d2b132f3af3d12ee3b0ef9a7b1b947f1cdb9ad3d22552da494de", "blockindex" : 0, "blocktime" : 1422555717, "txid" : "e11f977e128d63499d217c70bfe8a088d78bd08ab1a880a8d7926e1cb9cbc834", "time" : 1422555717, "timereceived" : 1422555718 }, { "account" : "mn9", "address" : "mmrfjEL9XZoDGpnTyEm3rNnk1MJAs84Ten", "category" : "immature", "amount" : 1.99773900, "confirmations" : 3, "generated" : true, "blockhash" : "b38a4db57aa83edf588dd7d501563df59ffe0a6f78e395c540d1d0cd7bb0b907", "blockindex" : 0, "blocktime" : 1422556590, "txid" : "fc82408c12362e695d8ea845dd034c3c57338767f8c7d86a0064732e54e554a9", "time" : 1422556590, "timereceived" : 1422556592 }, { "account" : "mn4", "address" : "mq4GBfmg5hi9eGu883CruYLKx43oXzmFBQ", "category" : "immature", "amount" : 1.99773800, "confirmations" : 1, "generated" : true, "blockhash" : "a55c03f509daf7b7b874858cfd249af9a2844be3c481cf2bfe6371dc92bdd547", "blockindex" : 0, "blocktime" : 1422556999, "txid" : "e8179e3651587473cdc342233094e2606acb9f4ae082bbd12a191c334dbb48cb", "time" : 1422556999, "timereceived" : 1422557000 }
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:51:52 PM |
|
One thing about the MN : The fact that you can have 10 MN on the same wallet is not a problem? This is only for testnet or it'll be like this on mainnet? Normally the MNs should help the network to achieve diferent task, and I don't see how 10 or more MN on the same wallet/deamon/server would help more than only 1 per server. What I want to say is that this is not really decentralized concept I agree, 2000 Darkcoin Masternodes running on 2000 separate machines is a very robust network. Spread has a voting system though, hopefully it can be modified to give higher scores to machines running fewer Masternodes. Then competition is going to push people trying to run dozens of Masternodes on the same crappy Windows box off the network. This is early testing, Mr Spread seems to know what he's doing.
|
|
|
|
hefty
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:53:09 PM |
|
first off all im not here to pun, i like this coin and i bought some but yesterday at this time i put 2 machines with 6 gpus to mine this coin and didnt find any blocks in last 24 hours is this coin become to hard to mine for small miners or i was just to unlucky again this is about 5th time i tried to mine and i set up everything alright but didnt found even one block. I think it should be better for small miners that this coin start to make some official pools for small miners lets say 10 mhs max per same ip/miner so that small miners can have some chance to get some coins 2 .
|
|
|
|
LitcoinCollector
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:55:21 PM |
|
All I can say Mr. Spread delivers what he sets out to do.
|
|
|
|
NoobKidOnTheBlock
|
|
January 29, 2015, 06:57:29 PM |
|
All I can say Mr. Spread delivers what he sets out to do. Yep he definitely is one to make sure that when he sets out to do something he damn well makes sure that he does it lol Here's to greater things to come from SpreadCoin and to our amazing developer Mr. Spread Cheers
|
▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ | | ... | ............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
|
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 07:04:09 PM |
|
first off all im not here to pun, i like this coin and i bought some but yesterday at this time i put 2 machines with 6 gpus to mine this coin and didnt find any blocks in last 24 hours is this coin become to hard to mine for small miners or i was just to unlucky again this is about 5th time i tried to mine and i set up everything alright but didnt found even one block. I think it should be better for small miners that this coin start to make some official pools for small miners lets say 10 mhs max per same ip/miner so that small miners can have some chance to get some coins 2 . I think it would be better for small miners if they didn't have the attention span of a gnat and stopped feeling entitled to instant free money, then whining when they don't get any. You make just as much or more mining solo long term than you would via a pool.
|
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 29, 2015, 07:05:31 PM |
|
One thing about the MN : The fact that you can have 10 MN on the same wallet is not a problem? This is only for testnet or it'll be like this on mainnet? Normally the MNs should help the network to achieve diferent task, and I don't see how 10 or more MN on the same wallet/deamon/server would help more than only 1 per server. What I want to say is that this is not really decentralized concept I agree, 2000 Darkcoin Masternodes running on 2000 separate machines is a very robust network. Spread has a voting system though, hopefully it can be modified to give higher scores to machines running fewer Masternodes. Then competition is going to push people trying to run dozens of Masternodes on the same crappy Windows box off the network. This is early testing, Mr Spread seems to know what he's doing. Oh yes maybe the Score system will prevent the use of multi MN per server. I think it should be prohibited, but this is only my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Jesse Livermore
|
|
January 29, 2015, 07:12:45 PM |
|
I took a hack at trying to figure out what the average mn size might be in SPR given 1440 risk possible MN's. Since there are currently 1.71 million SPR in circulation and since most holders want to have as many mn's as is possible given total holdings this would imply an average SPR per mn of about 1190 SPR. Now the distribution of 1440 mn's, if it is similar to the testnet, will be overall similar in size with gradual increases and decreases. So if you assume a gradual increase and decrease of about 10 SPR in either direction per 100 mn's until all coins in circulation are used up you get a total range of 1120-1260. The biggest wildcard here will be exactly what % of total coins in circulation will be in mn's... There's no way it'll be anywhere close to 100%, at least not this early in the game.
JL
|
I own a DASH Masternode.... And you should too.
|
|
|
sparkster
|
|
January 29, 2015, 07:24:54 PM |
|
first off all im not here to pun, i like this coin and i bought some but yesterday at this time i put 2 machines with 6 gpus to mine this coin and didnt find any blocks in last 24 hours is this coin become to hard to mine for small miners or i was just to unlucky again this is about 5th time i tried to mine and i set up everything alright but didnt found even one block. I think it should be better for small miners that this coin start to make some official pools for small miners lets say 10 mhs max per same ip/miner so that small miners can have some chance to get some coins 2 . 1) Calculate average time for finding a block. Net hashrate/your hashrate = average time in minutes. If you have no blocks in more then, let's say, x2 of this time, you can start to worry that you're doing something wrong (or you're very unlucky). 2) I guess you CAN use testnet with ONE gpu for SHORT time to see if you get any blocks whatsoever so your config is OK. But I can't say that for sure... MAYBE that's a bad idea... Maybe we need yet another testnet for miners testing their rigs actually mine some blocks... Hope I don't give an idea for some of our haters and trolls...
|
|
|
|
girino
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1170
Advertise Here - PM for more info!
|
|
January 29, 2015, 07:34:08 PM |
|
first off all im not here to pun, i like this coin and i bought some but yesterday at this time i put 2 machines with 6 gpus to mine this coin and didnt find any blocks in last 24 hours is this coin become to hard to mine for small miners or i was just to unlucky again this is about 5th time i tried to mine and i set up everything alright but didnt found even one block. I think it should be better for small miners that this coin start to make some official pools for small miners lets say 10 mhs max per same ip/miner so that small miners can have some chance to get some coins 2 . 1) Calculate average time for finding a block. Net hashrate/your hashrate = average time in minutes. If you have no blocks in more then, let's say, x2 of this time, you can start to worry that you're doing something wrong (or you're very unlucky). 2) I guess you CAN use testnet with ONE gpu for SHORT time to see if you get any blocks whatsoever so your config is OK. But I can't say that for sure... MAYBE that's a bad idea... Maybe we need yet another testnet for miners testing their rigs actually mine some blocks... Hope I don't give an idea for some of our haters and trolls... currently nvidia miner doesn't work on testnet. AMD miner works fine.
|
Advertise Here - PM for more info!
|
|
|
|