Rw13enlib88
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1025
|
 |
July 21, 2015, 04:46:57 PM |
|
Looks like we may have a problem with the fork, not code related but because there are simply not enough 1.5.0.0 wallets on the network to form a general consensus.
Me and Matthew are looking at multiple issues at the moment and trying to get Windows and Mac wallets built and move everyone up to the current version.
Looking at peers on the network it can be seen that people are still on version 1.2.0.0!!!!!
Anyone who is fully synced please message me (PM).
We advise to not complete any transactions at this current moment in time.
That also happened to TESLA with Cryptsy. We are looking for some nodes in https://bitnodes.net |
|
|
|
|
Sterlingcoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 21, 2015, 06:16:19 PM |
|
I am fully synced. Please add the below ip address as a seed node to your configuration files.
81.98.168.158
|
|
|
|
Sterlingcoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 21, 2015, 06:29:55 PM |
|
Name and shame time, who the hell is this running 1.2 and 1.3??
addr" : "149.210.183.108:1141",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437503198,
"lastrecv" : 1437503198,
"conntime" : 1437503111,
"version" : 70014,
"subver" : "/Sterlingcoin:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 260898,
"banscore" : 0
"addr" : "81.174.184.91:1141",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437503198,
"lastrecv" : 1437503198,
"conntime" : 1437502978,
"version" : 70014,
"subver" : "/Sterlingcoin:1.3.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 260898,
"banscore" : 0
"addr" : "192.95.29.153:1141",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437503198,
"lastrecv" : 1437503198,
"conntime" : 1437502978,
"version" : 70014,
"subver" : "/Sterlingcoin:1.3.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 260898,
"banscore" : 0
MAKE SURE WHEN THE MAC AND WINDOWS WALLETS ARE RELEASED YOU UPDATE TO VERSION 1.5.0.0
IF YOU ARE ON LINUX YOU CAN UPDATE NOW!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Rols
|
|
July 21, 2015, 07:21:25 PM |
|
Name and shame time, who the hell is this running 1.2 and 1.3??
addr" : "149.210.183.108:1141",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437503198,
"lastrecv" : 1437503198,
"conntime" : 1437503111,
"version" : 70014,
"subver" : "/Sterlingcoin:1.2.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 260898,
"banscore" : 0
"addr" : "81.174.184.91:1141",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437503198,
"lastrecv" : 1437503198,
"conntime" : 1437502978,
"version" : 70014,
"subver" : "/Sterlingcoin:1.3.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 260898,
"banscore" : 0
"addr" : "192.95.29.153:1141",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1437503198,
"lastrecv" : 1437503198,
"conntime" : 1437502978,
"version" : 70014,
"subver" : "/Sterlingcoin:1.3.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 260898,
"banscore" : 0
MAKE SURE WHEN THE MAC AND WINDOWS WALLETS ARE RELEASED YOU UPDATE TO VERSION 1.5.0.0
IF YOU ARE ON LINUX YOU CAN UPDATE NOW!!!!!
first one is from Romania, second one is from UK and the last one is from Canada. |
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
July 21, 2015, 08:19:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mrbee
|
|
July 24, 2015, 02:20:20 PM |
|
OK so how about I2P nativity with ToR and Clearnet compatibility for the next update?
Discuss.
Can you explane what this is? |
|
|
|
|
Sterlingcoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 24, 2015, 09:09:59 PM |
|
OK so how about I2P nativity with ToR and Clearnet compatibility for the next update?
Discuss.
Can you explane what this is? I2P is an anonymous overlay network - a network within a network. It is intended to protect communication from dragnet surveillance and monitoring by third parties such as ISPs. I2P is used by many people who care about their privacy: activists, oppressed people, journalists and whistleblowers, as well as the average person. No network can be "perfectly anonymous". The continued goal of I2P is to make attacks more and more difficult to mount. Its anonymity will get stronger as the size of the network increases and with ongoing academic review. I2P is available on desktops, embedded systems (like the Raspberry Pi) and Android phones. Help spread the word! More info on I2P - https://geti2p.net/en/Tor is free software and an open network that helps you defend against traffic analysis, a form of network surveillance that threatens personal freedom and privacy, confidential business activities and relationships, and state security. More info on Tor - https://www.torproject.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Mrbee
|
|
July 25, 2015, 08:51:02 AM |
|
OK so how about I2P nativity with ToR and Clearnet compatibility for the next update?
Discuss.
Can you explane what this is? I2P is an anonymous overlay network - a network within a network. It is intended to protect communication from dragnet surveillance and monitoring by third parties such as ISPs. I2P is used by many people who care about their privacy: activists, oppressed people, journalists and whistleblowers, as well as the average person. No network can be "perfectly anonymous". The continued goal of I2P is to make attacks more and more difficult to mount. Its anonymity will get stronger as the size of the network increases and with ongoing academic review. I2P is available on desktops, embedded systems (like the Raspberry Pi) and Android phones. Help spread the word! More info on I2P - https://geti2p.net/en/Tor is free software and an open network that helps you defend against traffic analysis, a form of network surveillance that threatens personal freedom and privacy, confidential business activities and relationships, and state security. More info on Tor - https://www.torproject.org/Tnx for the info! This all helps to improve and secure SLG. You should add this in the next update! |
|
|
|
|
california_jim
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
July 25, 2015, 12:13:35 PM |
|
I'm on my way to being full synced. Pity I can't fully sync my brain when building the qt wallet, I forgot to use "USE_UPNP=1" when doing the qmake - that was why I wasn't connecting to the network properly  Sorry SLG team for my idiocy, I've made a note for when I build the next versions of the wallet. CJ |
|
|
|
|
|
Rols
|
|
July 25, 2015, 12:35:37 PM |
|
I have no use for either I2P or ToR. I dont think they give much to the coin. Wallet and Multipool is what is needed now. Then some PR to move it forward. A lot of good coins are having a hard time because people dont invest like they did. Nowdays its shitcoins that rules. Its hard work and much time to build a good coin. I know the devs have put a lot of hard work, money and time into this coin. Thats why I support it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
24core
|
|
July 26, 2015, 07:15:49 AM |
|
Can you please fix the windows wallet link on the op ?
|
|
|
|
Sterlingcoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 26, 2015, 10:04:43 AM |
|
I have no use for either I2P or ToR. I dont think they give much to the coin. Wallet and Multipool is what is needed now. Then some PR to move it forward. A lot of good coins are having a hard time because people dont invest like they did. Nowdays its shitcoins that rules. Its hard work and much time to build a good coin. I know the devs have put a lot of hard work, money and time into this coin. Thats why I support it.
Noted. I would like to say that its me (Spencer Lievens) asking and I do the wallet work whereas Matthew does the web based systems i.e. Multipool |
|
|
|
Sterlingcoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 26, 2015, 10:10:54 AM
Last edit: July 26, 2015, 10:21:43 AM by Sterlingcoin |
|
Can you please fix the windows wallet link on the op ?
The Windows link isn't broken, it isn't built for 1.5.0.0 yet as I upped the version of LevelDB to 1.18 which has caused some issues which I should of seen coming. It's on its way, we have been on it since the day I pushed the Linux version of 1.5.0.0 to Github and Bitbucket. |
|
|
|
|
24core
|
|
July 26, 2015, 11:01:15 AM |
|
Can you please fix the windows wallet link on the op ?
The Windows link isn't broken, it isn't built for 1.5.0.0 yet as I upped the version of LevelDB to 1.18 which has caused some issues which I should of seen coming. It's on its way, we have been on it since the day I pushed the Linux version of 1.5.0.0 to Github and Bitbucket. Thanks for the update ;-) |
|
|
|
|
Mrbee
|
|
July 26, 2015, 11:17:59 AM |
|
I have no use for either I2P or ToR. I dont think they give much to the coin. Wallet and Multipool is what is needed now. Then some PR to move it forward. A lot of good coins are having a hard time because people dont invest like they did. Nowdays its shitcoins that rules. Its hard work and much time to build a good coin. I know the devs have put a lot of hard work, money and time into this coin. Thats why I support it.
Noted. I would like to say that its me (Spencer Lievens) asking and I do the wallet work whereas Matthew does the web based systems i.e. Multipool Can Matthew tell us his progress on the multipool, maybe any screenshots of the multipool? |
|
|
|
|
|
nixon99
|
|
July 26, 2015, 01:57:34 PM |
|
Is the new mac wallet coming soon.  |
|
|
|
|
Sterlingcoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 26, 2015, 05:46:29 PM |
|
OK so currently we are falling behind from block 260,000 's hard fork.
What this means is that the majority of the network is still on version 1.4.0.0 which has a different calculation for PoS blocks to version 1.5.0.0
Any PoS blocks generated on any wallet prior to version 1.5.0.0 will in fact be a wrong calculation but will be accepted as currently the majority of the wallets on the network have the old PoS code and that is still the general consensus/agreement between the wallets on the network.
If you are running the 1.5.0.0 Linux wallet you will notice your PoS blocks are not being accepted as the calculation is different to the rest of the network.
(Same as if you got any coin with PoS and changed just your code to give you 100000% interest, it wouldn't work as you are the only one running that code)
However, once the network switches to version 1.5.0.0 any PoS blocks generated after block 260,000 will not confirm.
What does this mean?
We may have to issue a blockchain of the current chain to users not synced and possibly have to induce another hardfork.
When will we know?
Once Windows and Mac wallets are launched and version 1.5.0.0 is the majority wallet and general consensus on the network.
|
|
|
|
Rw13enlib88
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1025
|
|
July 27, 2015, 09:31:20 PM |
|
OK so currently we are falling behind from block 260,000 's hard fork.
What this means is that the majority of the network is still on version 1.4.0.0 which has a different calculation for PoS blocks to version 1.5.0.0
Any PoS blocks generated on any wallet prior to version 1.5.0.0 will in fact be a wrong calculation but will be accepted as currently the majority of the wallets on the network have the old PoS code and that is still the general consensus/agreement between the wallets on the network.
If you are running the 1.5.0.0 Linux wallet you will notice your PoS blocks are not being accepted as the calculation is different to the rest of the network.
(Same as if you got any coin with PoS and changed just your code to give you 100000% interest, it wouldn't work as you are the only one running that code)
However, once the network switches to version 1.5.0.0 any PoS blocks generated after block 260,000 will not confirm.
What does this mean?
We may have to issue a blockchain of the current chain to users not synced and possibly have to induce another hardfork.
When will we know?
Once Windows and Mac wallets are launched and version 1.5.0.0 is the majority wallet and general consensus on the network.
sounds you have the situation controled... btw, bittrex doesnt undestand the concept of long term investment and here we've got it back This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on July 31st unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC. |
|
|
|
|
Sterlingcoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 27, 2015, 09:59:47 PM
Last edit: July 28, 2015, 12:36:49 AM by Sterlingcoin |
|
OK so currently we are falling behind from block 260,000 's hard fork.
What this means is that the majority of the network is still on version 1.4.0.0 which has a different calculation for PoS blocks to version 1.5.0.0
Any PoS blocks generated on any wallet prior to version 1.5.0.0 will in fact be a wrong calculation but will be accepted as currently the majority of the wallets on the network have the old PoS code and that is still the general consensus/agreement between the wallets on the network.
If you are running the 1.5.0.0 Linux wallet you will notice your PoS blocks are not being accepted as the calculation is different to the rest of the network.
(Same as if you got any coin with PoS and changed just your code to give you 100000% interest, it wouldn't work as you are the only one running that code)
However, once the network switches to version 1.5.0.0 any PoS blocks generated after block 260,000 will not confirm.
What does this mean?
We may have to issue a blockchain of the current chain to users not synced and possibly have to induce another hardfork.
When will we know?
Once Windows and Mac wallets are launched and version 1.5.0.0 is the majority wallet and general consensus on the network.
sounds you have the situation controled... btw, bittrex doesnt undestand the concept of long term investment and here we've got it back This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on July 31st unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC. Well you all know what to do to make the message go away  |
|
|
|
Rw13enlib88
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1025
|
|
July 27, 2015, 10:51:29 PM |
|
OK so currently we are falling behind from block 260,000 's hard fork.
What this means is that the majority of the network is still on version 1.4.0.0 which has a different calculation for PoS blocks to version 1.5.0.0
Any PoS blocks generated on any wallet prior to version 1.5.0.0 will in fact be a wrong calculation but will be accepted as currently the majority of the wallets on the network have the old PoS code and that is still the general consensus/agreement between the wallets on the network.
If you are running the 1.5.0.0 Linux wallet you will notice your PoS blocks are not being accepted as the calculation is different to the rest of the network.
(Same as if you got any coin with PoS and changed just your code to give you 100000% interest, it wouldn't work as you are the only one running that code)
However, once the network switches to version 1.5.0.0 any PoS blocks generated after block 260,000 will not confirm.
What does this mean?
We may have to issue a blockchain of the current chain to users not synced and possibly have to induce another hardfork.
When will we know?
Once Windows and Mac wallets are launched and version 1.5.0.0 is the majority wallet and general consensus on the network.
Well you all know what to do to make the message go away sounds you have the situation controled... btw, bittrex doesnt undestand the concept of long term investment and here we've got it back This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on July 31st unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC. lol great answer  |
|
|
|
|
|
