⭐ Crypto.Games ⭐ Polygon (MATIC) added! ⭐ Wagering Contest ⭐ Daily Challenges ⭐

[Crypto-Games.net]

Wagering Contest ongoing, only 9 days left and these are current BTC leaders:

[rexxarofmoknathal]

And also the colors in the menu is not that good, with red/brown (yes, I am slightly colorblind) on dark grey.

There are several additional color schemes for people that prefer different optics or have issues with the default one.
You can find them in the settings, or use the hotkeys for light/dark mode (sun and moon).

Ok, thanks for the information. That will be useful.
What about the "mobile friendly design"? Any suggestions on what to do about that?

You can usually change the resolution your mobile browser displays at if it doesn't display properly on your phone.

This would be found in the display settings of the browser you use.

[stomachgrowls]

Someone just recently hit up a portion of the jackpot.

[newbie22]

Accounts are already being blocked just like that, have not been logged in for a long time, I decided to log in - so the account is blocked ..
Great, first block for free games, and now for no reason.
Why are you lying that’s all, write one thing and in the end do it all differently.

[DogecoinMachine]

Accounts are already being blocked just like that, have not been logged in for a long time, I decided to log in - so the account is blocked ..
Great, first block for free games, and now for no reason.
Why are you lying that’s all, write one thing and in the end do it all differently.

Email support@crypto-games.net with your nickname.

[DarkDays]

Whoop whoop, looks like the high rollers are having a blast today;



At least one user is going with the old bet a lot, high win chance strategy to net some quick gains.

[RHavar]

Terrible news. At least you could had allowed current investors to keep their investment. Eventually you would had achieved your goal of decreasing the investments from "outsiders" anyway, but this way you would at least let those that helped you grow stay with you, while still getting a fee from their investment profit. I'm very disappointed.

I think it's reasonable to be disappointed, but I also think it's reasonable for them to change terms or cancel investments (even if abruptly). A bankroll investment sort of has this nice liquidity aspect, where you can pull your funds at any time -- but i think it's fair that that cuts both ways. I'd obviously feel very different if the investment was some sort of tokens or stake of the actual business but you (or at least me) don't invest in a site because it'll be profitable in the future, but because it's currently worth the risk/reward.

When I ran my casino, I always just had a private bankroll as I had enough funds that I could do that, and I suspect as crowd funded casinos themselves make enough money "going private" is just a sort of natural end and a positive outcome (compared to something that keeps investors up at night: exit-scam risk).


I think the other natural end would be the casino keeps increasing the commissions to the point that it still makes sense for them to keep having a crowd funded bankroll (e.g. 75%+ commissions on profit). I've always wondered if that would be preferable? Or would just generate too much bad will

[newbie22]

Email support@crypto-games.net with your nickname.

No Thanks, I don't want to deal with your "Scam" casino. All the same, either ban or ... in anything. Yes, and perhaps you just write off my funds under the pretext of something from your rules.  I went to check how my account is doing on your site. And as it turned out, the account was blocked.
As I expected ...As I expected, "crooks" always do this when they cheat . Or write off or block the account or ..

[joksim299]

Terrible news. At least you could had allowed current investors to keep their investment. Eventually you would had achieved your goal of decreasing the investments from "outsiders" anyway, but this way you would at least let those that helped you grow stay with you, while still getting a fee from their investment profit. I'm very disappointed.

I think it's reasonable to be disappointed, but I also think it's reasonable for them to change terms or cancel investments (even if abruptly). A bankroll investment sort of has this nice liquidity aspect, where you can pull your funds at any time -- but i think it's fair that that cuts both ways. I'd obviously feel very different if the investment was some sort of tokens or stake of the actual business but you (or at least me) don't invest in a site because it'll be profitable in the future, but because it's currently worth the risk/reward.

When I ran my casino, I always just had a private bankroll as I had enough funds that I could do that, and I suspect as crowd funded casinos themselves make enough money "going private" is just a sort of natural end and a positive outcome (compared to something that keeps investors up at night: exit-scam risk).


I think the other natural end would be the casino keeps increasing the commissions to the point that it still makes sense for them to keep having a crowd funded bankroll (e.g. 75%+ commissions on profit). I've always wondered if that would be preferable? Or would just generate too much bad will

It's better this way than to 'force' current and future investors to convert/invest into ICO in exchange for some sort of tokens and end up with way more than you initially invested.
BitDice is good example, they offered investors bonuses to buy tokens that will pay dividend and then become quiet and did almost nothing good for the site in past three years, you can find more information on what happened in linked thread.

[Crypto-Games.net]

Bitcoin Lotto round #452 will close in approx 7 hours!

Current prizes:
1st place: 0.004320 BTC
2nd place: 0.000810 BTC
3rd place: 0.000270 BTC

Total tickets bought so far: 54
Price per ticket: 0.00010 BTC
Our lottery has no house edge; 100% of raised funds goes to winners.



We had 3 slot jackpot hits yesterday (21st), but still waiting for first hit with BTC this year. Jackpot pays out x1000, up to 5 BTC (max bet of 0.005 BTC).

[Timetwister]

Terrible news. At least you could had allowed current investors to keep their investment. Eventually you would had achieved your goal of decreasing the investments from "outsiders" anyway, but this way you would at least let those that helped you grow stay with you, while still getting a fee from their investment profit. I'm very disappointed.

I think it's reasonable to be disappointed, but I also think it's reasonable for them to change terms or cancel investments (even if abruptly). A bankroll investment sort of has this nice liquidity aspect, where you can pull your funds at any time -- but i think it's fair that that cuts both ways. I'd obviously feel very different if the investment was some sort of tokens or stake of the actual business but you (or at least me) don't invest in a site because it'll be profitable in the future, but because it's currently worth the risk/reward.

When I ran my casino, I always just had a private bankroll as I had enough funds that I could do that, and I suspect as crowd funded casinos themselves make enough money "going private" is just a sort of natural end and a positive outcome (compared to something that keeps investors up at night: exit-scam risk).


I think the other natural end would be the casino keeps increasing the commissions to the point that it still makes sense for them to keep having a crowd funded bankroll (e.g. 75%+ commissions on profit). I've always wondered if that would be preferable? Or would just generate too much bad will

Regarding buying "shares" in the casino, that could be an interesting option but quite harder to structure, the current system is way simpler.

75% would surely make most investors withdraw, and those that wouldn't would be paying so much that it should be attractive enough for the casino to keep them. At least in that case investors would have the option to stay, instead of being thrown away like nothing after years of helping them.

[ranlo]

Terrible news. At least you could had allowed current investors to keep their investment. Eventually you would had achieved your goal of decreasing the investments from "outsiders" anyway, but this way you would at least let those that helped you grow stay with you, while still getting a fee from their investment profit. I'm very disappointed.

I think it's reasonable to be disappointed, but I also think it's reasonable for them to change terms or cancel investments (even if abruptly). A bankroll investment sort of has this nice liquidity aspect, where you can pull your funds at any time -- but i think it's fair that that cuts both ways. I'd obviously feel very different if the investment was some sort of tokens or stake of the actual business but you (or at least me) don't invest in a site because it'll be profitable in the future, but because it's currently worth the risk/reward.

When I ran my casino, I always just had a private bankroll as I had enough funds that I could do that, and I suspect as crowd funded casinos themselves make enough money "going private" is just a sort of natural end and a positive outcome (compared to something that keeps investors up at night: exit-scam risk).


I think the other natural end would be the casino keeps increasing the commissions to the point that it still makes sense for them to keep having a crowd funded bankroll (e.g. 75%+ commissions on profit). I've always wondered if that would be preferable? Or would just generate too much bad will

Regarding buying "shares" in the casino, that could be an interesting option but quite harder to structure, the current system is way simpler.

75% would surely make most investors withdraw, and those that wouldn't would be paying so much that it should be attractive enough for the casino to keep them. At least in that case investors would have the option to stay, instead of being thrown away like nothing after years of helping them.

I'm going to agree that the site should have some way to benefit long-term investors. Some have been here since the site launched and have only continued to build their stake (and show trust) in the site's various coins. It's sad to see this situation happen. I understand WHY it is happening, and from a business perspective it makes sense, but there should be some way to say "thanks" for everyone who helped make the site possible and successful in the first place.

[BlackRed]

Terrible news. At least you could had allowed current investors to keep their investment. Eventually you would had achieved your goal of decreasing the investments from "outsiders" anyway, but this way you would at least let those that helped you grow stay with you, while still getting a fee from their investment profit. I'm very disappointed.

I think it's reasonable to be disappointed, but I also think it's reasonable for them to change terms or cancel investments (even if abruptly). A bankroll investment sort of has this nice liquidity aspect, where you can pull your funds at any time -- but i think it's fair that that cuts both ways. I'd obviously feel very different if the investment was some sort of tokens or stake of the actual business but you (or at least me) don't invest in a site because it'll be profitable in the future, but because it's currently worth the risk/reward.

When I ran my casino, I always just had a private bankroll as I had enough funds that I could do that, and I suspect as crowd funded casinos themselves make enough money "going private" is just a sort of natural end and a positive outcome (compared to something that keeps investors up at night: exit-scam risk).


I think the other natural end would be the casino keeps increasing the commissions to the point that it still makes sense for them to keep having a crowd funded bankroll (e.g. 75%+ commissions on profit). I've always wondered if that would be preferable? Or would just generate too much bad will

Regarding buying "shares" in the casino, that could be an interesting option but quite harder to structure, the current system is way simpler.

75% would surely make most investors withdraw, and those that wouldn't would be paying so much that it should be attractive enough for the casino to keep them. At least in that case investors would have the option to stay, instead of being thrown away like nothing after years of helping them.

I'm going to agree that the site should have some way to benefit long-term investors. Some have been here since the site launched and have only continued to build their stake (and show trust) in the site's various coins. It's sad to see this situation happen. I understand WHY it is happening, and from a business perspective it makes sense, but there should be some way to say "thanks" for everyone who helped make the site possible and successful in the first place.

@Ranlo Like Moneypot?

[Timetwister]

Terrible news. At least you could had allowed current investors to keep their investment. Eventually you would had achieved your goal of decreasing the investments from "outsiders" anyway, but this way you would at least let those that helped you grow stay with you, while still getting a fee from their investment profit. I'm very disappointed.

I think it's reasonable to be disappointed, but I also think it's reasonable for them to change terms or cancel investments (even if abruptly). A bankroll investment sort of has this nice liquidity aspect, where you can pull your funds at any time -- but i think it's fair that that cuts both ways. I'd obviously feel very different if the investment was some sort of tokens or stake of the actual business but you (or at least me) don't invest in a site because it'll be profitable in the future, but because it's currently worth the risk/reward.

When I ran my casino, I always just had a private bankroll as I had enough funds that I could do that, and I suspect as crowd funded casinos themselves make enough money "going private" is just a sort of natural end and a positive outcome (compared to something that keeps investors up at night: exit-scam risk).


I think the other natural end would be the casino keeps increasing the commissions to the point that it still makes sense for them to keep having a crowd funded bankroll (e.g. 75%+ commissions on profit). I've always wondered if that would be preferable? Or would just generate too much bad will

Regarding buying "shares" in the casino, that could be an interesting option but quite harder to structure, the current system is way simpler.

75% would surely make most investors withdraw, and those that wouldn't would be paying so much that it should be attractive enough for the casino to keep them. At least in that case investors would have the option to stay, instead of being thrown away like nothing after years of helping them.

I'm going to agree that the site should have some way to benefit long-term investors. Some have been here since the site launched and have only continued to build their stake (and show trust) in the site's various coins. It's sad to see this situation happen. I understand WHY it is happening, and from a business perspective it makes sense, but there should be some way to say "thanks" for everyone who helped make the site possible and successful in the first place.

It doesn't make much sense from a business perspective. If in the future they start some other project, or let people invest in the casino again, potential investors will be more hesitant. This is only beneficial for them short term. Just not allowing people to increase their investment is the most reasonable option, as they would eventually achieve their goal of owning all the bankroll, but while letting investors stay if they want to (and they benefit from charging them a fee).

[Crypto-Games.net]

We've already had 4 Dice Jackpot hits this month, 2 of them were hit this morning:




Congrats!

[stomachgrowls]

Still have 5 days left before the monthly wager contest ends.

[Crypto-Games.net]

Current top 10 BTC players:




Current top 10 Ethereum players:




Current top 7 LTC players:




Current top 5 DOGE players:




The more you wager, the higher your reward. Check full rankings and estimated rewards for all coins on our website.

[stomachgrowls]

BTC Lottery round 453 ends in 13hrs!


First place
0.004720 BTC

Second place
0.000885 BTC

Third place
0.000295 BTC

Total tickets (of all players)
59

Price per ticket
0.000100 BTC

[DarkDays]

We've already had 4 Dice Jackpot hits this month, 2 of them were hit this morning:




Congrats!

Looks like today has been a lucky day overall for players on crypto-games;



Several players are absolutely dominating with Dice right now too.

[stomachgrowls]

ETH Lottery round 196 ends in 13hrs!


First place
0.0360 ETH

Second place
0.0067 ETH

Third place
0.0022 ETH

Total tickets (of all players)
30

Price per ticket
0.0015 ETH