bitjedi
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:06:22 PM |
|
http://moneroblocks.info/ looks good. But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync? or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block? not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it....
|
|
|
|
elrippo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:06:59 PM |
|
My pool is stuck at block Blockchain Height: 1009826
2016-Mar-23 17:03:55.357447 [P2P7][155.94.243.106:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind] SYNCHRONIZATION started 2016-Mar-23 17:04:37.981295 [P2P6][45.55.18.61:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind] SYNCHRONIZATION started 2016-Mar-23 17:04:38.370613 [P2P3][155.94.243.106:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind] SYNCHRONIZATION started 2016-Mar-23 17:04:38.978019 [P2P3][197.242.158.240:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind] SYNCHRONIZATION started
Monero 'Hydrogen Helix' (v0.9.1.0-release)
Mine are all fine with 0.9.3
|
For Advertisement. PM me to discuss.
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:07:17 PM |
|
http://moneroblocks.info/ looks good. But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync? or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block? not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it.... It seems the peer submitted an old style block, all good now. 2016-Mar-23 17:05:26.502221 [P2P6]REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 1009827, new blockchain size: 1009828 2016-Mar-23 17:05:26.917114 [P2P6][197.242.158.240:18080 OUT]Synced 1009831/1009831 2016-Mar-23 17:05:26.917319 [P2P6][197.242.158.240:18080 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:07:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bitjedi
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:09:28 PM |
|
Ok, now that everyone got their fork done... can we talk about this please?
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:12:07 PM |
|
Ok, now that everyone got their fork done... can we talk about this please? I'll shoot NoodleDoodle a PM about it.
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:13:32 PM |
|
Error: Failed to parse block at Object.BlockTemplate.nextBlob (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:120:23) at Object.Miner.getJob (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:297:41) at handleMinerMethod (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:492:28) at handleMessage (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:606:13) at Socket.socket.on.on.on.pushMessage (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:660:25) at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:95:17) at Socket.<anonymous> (_stream_readable.js:746:14) at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:92:17) at emitReadable_ (_stream_readable.js:408:10) at emitReadable (_stream_readable.js:404:5)
cryptonote-universal-pool wont run after the fork. node-cryptonote-pool works just fine
|
|
|
|
Quicken
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:13:49 PM |
|
Ok, now that everyone got their fork done... can we talk about this please? Looks like it's too popular? Good sign, but it may need moving I suppose.
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:13:54 PM |
|
Lending rates are nuts I am still bullish and lending my xmr. Rates appear unchanged at < 0.1%. I just checked, and none of my fine offers above that have been taken, so still waiting for 'nuts' again. On the flip side, none of my 1%ers were returned while I slept either, so I'm still
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:14:23 PM |
|
http://moneroblocks.info/ looks good. But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync? or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block? not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it.... for some reason moneroblocks.info shows double the HR
|
|
|
|
Johnny Mnemonic
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:16:32 PM |
|
http://moneroblocks.info/ looks good. But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync? or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block? not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it.... for some reason moneroblocks.info shows double the HR I noticed that as well... it doubled at 1009827. I'm assuming it's an error?
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:17:37 PM |
|
http://moneroblocks.info/ looks good. But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync? or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block? not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it.... for some reason moneroblocks.info shows double the HR I noticed that as well... it doubled at 1009827. I'm assuming it's an error? Yes, this is reporting the right hashrate: https://monerohash.com/#networkAlternatively, you can query the daemon for the hashrate. Just use "status".
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:19:35 PM |
|
Last Block Found: 15 minutes ago
a lot of miners got cut off.... Pool software was not ready for the fork..
|
|
|
|
ungchy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:23:51 PM |
|
Well i guess now it's a good time to put my 2 x280 to use. Any estimate about how much those will make?
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:25:27 PM |
|
Well i guess now it's a good time to put my 2 x280 to use. Any estimate about how much those will make?
Roughly 1 XMR/diem.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:26:12 PM |
|
Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....
FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!
|
|
|
|
ungchy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:30:22 PM |
|
Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....
FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!
You do realize that there are now only half as much blocks per time and with that the variance in time got bigger?
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:32:04 PM |
|
Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....
FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!
You do realize that there are now only half as much blocks per time and with that the variance in time got bigger? + there were 4 blocks pushed out in 4-5 minutes.
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:33:29 PM |
|
Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....
FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!
You do realize that there are now only half as much blocks per time and with that the variance in time got bigger? + there were 4 blocks pushed out in 4-5 minutes. Can you fucking read ? POOL SOFTWARE (UNIVERSAL) REQUIRES MODIFICATION OTHERWISE IT STOPS WORKING... 50% of net hash has been cut off!
|
|
|
|
Its About Sharing
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000
Antifragile
|
|
March 23, 2016, 04:34:00 PM |
|
Interesting question. Do you or anyone know if it is an ok security practice to use the same Trezor for both BTC and Monero?
|
BTC = Black Swan. BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
|
|
|
|