[XMR] Monero Speculation

[bitjedi]

http://moneroblocks.info/

looks good.  But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync?  or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block?

not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it....

[elrippo]

My pool is stuck at block Blockchain Height: 1009826

2016-Mar-23 17:03:55.357447 [P2P7][155.94.243.106:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2016-Mar-23 17:04:37.981295 [P2P6][45.55.18.61:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2016-Mar-23 17:04:38.370613 [P2P3][155.94.243.106:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2016-Mar-23 17:04:38.978019 [P2P3][197.242.158.240:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unknown top block: 1009827 -> 1009830 [3 blocks (0 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started

Monero 'Hydrogen Helix' (v0.9.1.0-release)

Mine are all fine with 0.9.3 

[primer-]

http://moneroblocks.info/

looks good.  But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync?  or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block?

not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it....

It seems the peer submitted an old style block, all good now.

2016-Mar-23 17:05:26.502221 [P2P6]REORGANIZE SUCCESS! on height: 1009827, new blockchain size: 1009828
2016-Mar-23 17:05:26.917114 [P2P6][197.242.158.240:18080 OUT]Synced 1009831/1009831
2016-Mar-23 17:05:26.917319 [P2P6][197.242.158.240:18080 OUT] SYNCHRONIZED OK

[dEBRUYNE]

Link:

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/releases/tag/v0.9.3

[bitjedi]

anyone have the latest trezor binaries for monero? 

https://forum.getmonero.org/4/academic-and-technical/2495/experimental-trezor-firmware-testing

The Dropbox links on this page give me an error.

"Error (429)
This account's links are generating too much traffic and have been temporarily disabled!"

Ok, now that everyone got their fork done... can we talk about this please?

[dEBRUYNE]

anyone have the latest trezor binaries for monero? 

https://forum.getmonero.org/4/academic-and-technical/2495/experimental-trezor-firmware-testing

The Dropbox links on this page give me an error.

"Error (429)
This account's links are generating too much traffic and have been temporarily disabled!"

Ok, now that everyone got their fork done... can we talk about this please?

I'll shoot NoodleDoodle a PM about it.

[primer-]

Error: Failed to parse block
    at Object.BlockTemplate.nextBlob (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:120:23)
    at Object.Miner.getJob (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:297:41)
    at handleMinerMethod (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:492:28)
    at handleMessage (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:606:13)
    at Socket.socket.on.on.on.pushMessage (/root/test/cryptonote-universal-pool/lib/pool.js:660:25)
    at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:95:17)
    at Socket.<anonymous> (_stream_readable.js:746:14)
    at Socket.EventEmitter.emit (events.js:92:17)
    at emitReadable_ (_stream_readable.js:408:10)
    at emitReadable (_stream_readable.js:404:5)





cryptonote-universal-pool wont run after the fork. node-cryptonote-pool works just fine

[Quicken]

anyone have the latest trezor binaries for monero? 

https://forum.getmonero.org/4/academic-and-technical/2495/experimental-trezor-firmware-testing

The Dropbox links on this page give me an error.

"Error (429)
This account's links are generating too much traffic and have been temporarily disabled!"

Ok, now that everyone got their fork done... can we talk about this please?

Looks like it's too popular? Good sign, but it may need moving I suppose.

[explorer]

Lending rates are nuts   I am still bullish and lending my xmr.

Rates appear unchanged at < 0.1%.  I just checked, and none of my fine offers above that have been taken, so still waiting for 'nuts' again.
On the flip side, none of my 1%ers were returned while I slept either, so I'm still 

[nioc]

http://moneroblocks.info/

looks good.  But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync?  or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block?

not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it....

for some reason moneroblocks.info shows double the HR

[Johnny Mnemonic]

http://moneroblocks.info/

looks good.  But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync?  or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block?

not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it....

for some reason moneroblocks.info shows double the HR

I noticed that as well... it doubled at 1009827. I'm assuming it's an error?

[dEBRUYNE]

http://moneroblocks.info/

looks good.  But, as Primer pointed out... maybe there's still some issue even with 0.9.1 wallets and mining.... try to upgrade to 0.9.3 and resync?  or maybe your pool was linked to a peer that submitted and old style block?

not sure if version exclusions were added to the code without looking at it....

for some reason moneroblocks.info shows double the HR

I noticed that as well... it doubled at 1009827. I'm assuming it's an error?

Yes, this is reporting the right hashrate:

https://monerohash.com/#network

Alternatively, you can query the daemon for the hashrate. Just use "status".

[primer-]

Last Block Found: 15 minutes ago

a lot of miners got cut off.... Pool software was not ready for the fork..

[ungchy]

Well i guess now it's a good time to put my 2 x280 to use.
Any estimate about how much those will make?

[aminorex]

Well i guess now it's a good time to put my 2 x280 to use.
Any estimate about how much those will make?

Roughly 1 XMR/diem.

[primer-]

Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....

FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!

[ungchy]

Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....

FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!

You do realize that there are now only half as much blocks per time and with that the variance in time got bigger?

[dEBRUYNE]

Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....

FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!

You do realize that there are now only half as much blocks per time and with that the variance in time got bigger?

+ there were 4 blocks pushed out in 4-5 minutes.

[primer-]

Wow, what a failed fork. Difficulty FUCK-UP, no blocks in the last 20+ min... universal-pool not compatible ....

FUCKING AMATEUR DEVS!!!

You do realize that there are now only half as much blocks per time and with that the variance in time got bigger?

+ there were 4 blocks pushed out in 4-5 minutes.

Can  you fucking read ? POOL SOFTWARE (UNIVERSAL) REQUIRES MODIFICATION OTHERWISE IT STOPS WORKING... 50% of net hash has been cut off!

[Its About Sharing]

anyone have the latest trezor binaries for monero? 

https://forum.getmonero.org/4/academic-and-technical/2495/experimental-trezor-firmware-testing

The Dropbox links on this page give me an error.

"Error (429)
This account's links are generating too much traffic and have been temporarily disabled!"

Interesting question.
Do you or anyone know if it is an ok security practice to use the same Trezor for both BTC and Monero?