philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8768
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
May 22, 2017, 08:36:05 PM |
|
Even so, as net diff rises so will total shares (and at some future point 2,313,251,445,387 will be < 100%)
we are almost certain to beat the share high one day in the future. We may never get to .999 cdf again it is only supposed to happen 1 time every 1000 blocks . I think we did it 3 times one of them no longer shows up. So we are 3 for 1880 and should be 3 for 3000. So going 2120 in a row before it happens would get us to 4 for 4000 which would be "normal" luck for a terrible luck block occurrence. And nice 3 for today.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 22, 2017, 08:50:02 PM |
|
Wow we just had the most difficult block Hope that will be the record forever 413.102% a record? You must be new here and really glad you missed Nov., Dec., and March. he meant shares. this one was bad cdf .999 1469 432112 jjmoraxxxxxxxxxx 12.98983431 2016‑09‑29 17:49:18 Matured 1,725,954,880,115 715.489% 0.999 95.03% 412 here is another cdf of .999 1643 443699 n20xxxxxxxx 12.89667870 2016‑12‑16 11:01:27 Matured 2,310,574,822,799 744.977% 0.999 81.79% 238 the one that just past is the most shares but not so bad cdf 1880 467610 llogic.s9-4 15.41482598 2017‑05‑22 17:34:59 +6 Confirms 2,313,251,445,387 413.102% 0.984 124.55% 1 we have 3 .999's I think ? only two on the charts. A .999 here would be 4,100,000,000,000 shares In random statistics you gotta take the good with the bad ... Those 0.999s ... and a 0.000 in April ... 1819 463197 mikese.R1x40 12.61774205 2017‑04‑23 18:00:11 Matured 70,665,401 0.014% 0.000 123.19% 64
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
May 22, 2017, 08:55:20 PM |
|
Wow we just had the most difficult block Hope that will be the record forever 413.102% a record? You must be new here and really glad you missed Nov., Dec., and March. he meant shares. this one was bad cdf .999 1469 432112 jjmoraxxxxxxxxxx 12.98983431 2016‑09‑29 17:49:18 Matured 1,725,954,880,115 715.489% 0.999 95.03% 412 here is another cdf of .999 1643 443699 n20xxxxxxxx 12.89667870 2016‑12‑16 11:01:27 Matured 2,310,574,822,799 744.977% 0.999 81.79% 238 the one that just past is the most shares but not so bad cdf 1880 467610 llogic.s9-4 15.41482598 2017‑05‑22 17:34:59 +6 Confirms 2,313,251,445,387 413.102% 0.984 124.55% 1 we have 3 .999's I think ? only two on the charts. A .999 here would be 4,100,000,000,000 shares In random statistics you gotta take the good with the bad ... Those 0.999s ... and a 0.000 in April ... 1819 463197 mikese.R1x40 12.61774205 2017‑04‑23 18:00:11 Matured 70,665,401 0.014% 0.000 123.19% 64 Yep! and the good thing is the pool lifetime luck here is 102.90% and PPS 106.06%
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8768
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
May 22, 2017, 09:02:27 PM |
|
Wow we just had the most difficult block Hope that will be the record forever 413.102% a record? You must be new here and really glad you missed Nov., Dec., and March. he meant shares. this one was bad cdf .999 1469 432112 jjmoraxxxxxxxxxx 12.98983431 2016‑09‑29 17:49:18 Matured 1,725,954,880,115 715.489% 0.999 95.03% 412 here is another cdf of .999 1643 443699 n20xxxxxxxx 12.89667870 2016‑12‑16 11:01:27 Matured 2,310,574,822,799 744.977% 0.999 81.79% 238 the one that just past is the most shares but not so bad cdf 1880 467610 llogic.s9-4 15.41482598 2017‑05‑22 17:34:59 +6 Confirms 2,313,251,445,387 413.102% 0.984 124.55% 1 we have 3 .999's I think ? only two on the charts. A .999 here would be 4,100,000,000,000 shares In random statistics you gotta take the good with the bad ... Those 0.999s ... and a 0.000 in April ... 1819 463197 mikese.R1x40 12.61774205 2017‑04‑23 18:00:11 Matured 70,665,401 0.014% 0.000 123.19% 64 Yep! and the good thing is the pool lifetime luck here is 102.90% and PPS 106.06% Still mining here day in and day out.
|
|
|
|
sac816Timber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2017, 09:07:47 PM |
|
Kano,
Is there any update on this and the 'accounting' functionality you mentioned? As a suggestion, if you do get around to it, can you setup a "minimum sweep" threshold? What I mean by this is once the dust rewards accumulate to a certain minimum level then this is paid out. If this was set as a min for the pool and then also could be adjust to be the pool minimum or higher I think it would be ideal.
Thanks for reading, Sam
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 22, 2017, 09:28:43 PM |
|
Kano,
Is there any update on this and the 'accounting' functionality you mentioned? As a suggestion, if you do get around to it, can you setup a "minimum sweep" threshold? What I mean by this is once the dust rewards accumulate to a certain minimum level then this is paid out. If this was set as a min for the pool and then also could be adjust to be the pool minimum or higher I think it would be ideal.
Thanks for reading, Sam
Well, it will probably be a value limit and a time limit, like a few months - and anyone who doesn't reach the tiny amount in a few months ... well I'll probably close them down or do some such. My main aim is to not have any owed bitcoin sitting in the pool wallet for eternity ... or even for months. Code itself is still moving forward, albeit a bit slowly, but things are happening, though I've not got to accounting yet. Pool hash rate is climbing so it would seem that what I've been spending most of my time on has been working ok so far ... lets see what happens next And totally aside: that fact that we didn't miss a day, even with a > 400% block, was pretty awesome IMO
|
|
|
|
HannRa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2017, 09:41:34 PM |
|
Block by hannra with 630TH/s! Welcome to the Acclaim Board with your 1st Kano block! This is our 2nd of BLOCK MONDAY! That is a pair of 15+ blocks today so far! Glad to contribute! That's 1st block in 1st week since onboarding
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 22, 2017, 10:30:37 PM |
|
Block by hannra with 630TH/s! Welcome to the Acclaim Board with your 1st Kano block! This is our 2nd of BLOCK MONDAY! That is a pair of 15+ blocks today so far! Glad to contribute! That's 1st block in 1st week since onboarding ... and on the 'quiet' node also It doesn't see too many blocks originate there - that's it's 3rd block, all 3 this month and last month, even though it's the longest running still active mining node (1 year), but it does it's job well also. It's the one outside China that's also critical if ever the relay has problems, since it's closest to China and best connected to places in China.
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
May 22, 2017, 11:10:04 PM |
|
Block by fuct999 with 28TH/s! Welcome to the Acclaim Board with your 1st Kano block! That is our 4th of BLOCK MONDAY! That is now four 15+ blocks in a row!
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 22, 2017, 11:16:13 PM |
|
S9v1 and the previous 3 were all S9v2
|
|
|
|
VRobb
|
|
May 22, 2017, 11:26:17 PM |
|
Now THAT'S a blockalanche!! Monday 4-way!!
|
I don't believe in superstition because it's bad luck: 13thF1oor6CAwyzyxXPNnRvu3nhhYeqZdc These aren't the Droids you're looking for: S5 & S7 (Sold), R4B2, R4B4 (RIP), 2x S9 obsolete, 2xS15-28, S17-56, S17-70 Pushing a whopping 1/5 PH! Oh The SPEED!!!
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8768
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
May 22, 2017, 11:27:32 PM |
|
nice 4 so let us drive for five! we still have the time.
|
|
|
|
bronder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
May 22, 2017, 11:40:36 PM |
|
As per some news sources there's a large number of unconfirmed bitcoin transactions, close to 200,000 of them. This has caused users to increase transaction fees in order for their's to go thru. In the short term this is very good for us miners. How about in the long term? would it cause some negative impact?
Also on news today, coinbase.com has been offline all day. Does anyone have any idea is this is a technical issue, something related to the number of unconfirmed transactions or if it's something else?
|
|
|
|
VRobb
|
|
May 22, 2017, 11:51:01 PM |
|
Even with the yummy txn fees we're all getting as miners, it's still much lower than the normal everyday fiat banking system so it's still a win/win at this point.
|
I don't believe in superstition because it's bad luck: 13thF1oor6CAwyzyxXPNnRvu3nhhYeqZdc These aren't the Droids you're looking for: S5 & S7 (Sold), R4B2, R4B4 (RIP), 2x S9 obsolete, 2xS15-28, S17-56, S17-70 Pushing a whopping 1/5 PH! Oh The SPEED!!!
|
|
|
HannRa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2017, 12:26:29 AM |
|
As per some news sources there's a large number of unconfirmed bitcoin transactions, close to 200,000 of them. This has caused users to increase transaction fees in order for their's to go thru. In the short term this is very good for us miners. How about in the long term? would it cause some negative impact?...
I guess we all want Bitcoin to scale in one way or another. If this situation continues, people will just switch to altcoins. Personally, I support BIP100 as the best way forward, but this is unlikely to reach as high hash rate support as BU or SegWit. BU is widely supported, but a few recent bugs which have caused node crashes have resulted in some loss of community support. It is not perceived as a worthy alternative to Core client due to lack of testing/QA efforts. SegWit is also widely supported, but there are trust issues as it's aggressively propagated by Blockstream, a private for-profit company with no good reputation among 50% of community. While they maintain Core client and develop SegWit, we still have no idea why the company was established and how it intends to make money for their investors. They also censor discussions and push their agenda too aggressively. They are not perceived as collaborative and do not support bigger blocks. No solution in sight yet
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
May 23, 2017, 12:27:01 AM |
|
As per some news sources there's a large number of unconfirmed bitcoin transactions, close to 200,000 of them. This has caused users to increase transaction fees in order for their's to go thru. In the short term this is very good for us miners. How about in the long term? would it cause some negative impact?
Also on news today, coinbase.com has been offline all day. Does anyone have any idea is this is a technical issue, something related to the number of unconfirmed transactions or if it's something else?
Coinbase.com partial outage Identified - The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented. May 22, 08:27 PDT Update - We've identified root cause of site response times and are working to resolve the issue. Some customers may continue to experience issues. We will update with more information shortly. Thank you for your patience. May 22, 08:22 PDT Investigating - We are currently investigating issues with site response times and customers may be unable to sign into Coinbase.com. We will update with more information shortly. Thank you for your patience. May 22, 07:55 PDT
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
bronder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2017, 12:56:27 AM |
|
Coinbase.com partial outage Identified - The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented. May 22, 08:27 PDT Update - We've identified root cause of site response times and are working to resolve the issue. Some customers may continue to experience issues. We will update with more information shortly. Thank you for your patience. May 22, 08:22 PDT Investigating - We are currently investigating issues with site response times and customers may be unable to sign into Coinbase.com. We will update with more information shortly. Thank you for your patience. May 22, 07:55 PDT Thank you. I saw that posting but that was this morning (in my timezone), it's now almost 10 hours later and the site is still down, and the app is also down even if they say it's up. (the app opens but to a blank page). In my day job If I had a 10 hour system-wide outage on a stabilized system (not a new one) would be the first in 17 years of operations and after all the redundancy in place I would probably be looking for a job once I got it up and running again. Hopefully they will post something else because "A fix is being implemented" doesn't cut it after so many hours offline.
|
|
|
|
oawan
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
May 23, 2017, 01:08:05 AM |
|
Well, it will probably be a value limit and a time limit, like a few months - and anyone who doesn't reach the tiny amount in a few months ... well I'll probably close them down or do some such. My main aim is to not have any owed bitcoin sitting in the pool wallet for eternity ... or even for months. Code itself is still moving forward, albeit a bit slowly, but things are happening, though I've not got to accounting yet. Pool hash rate is climbing so it would seem that what I've been spending most of my time on has been working ok so far ... lets see what happens next And totally aside: that fact that we didn't miss a day, even with a > 400% block, was pretty awesome IMO Eagerly awaiting as well. I know I'm strange... I'm just an efficiency nut - and every last extra KB of TX space freed up is more income for us I would guess something like any balances over say .25 or 0.5 btc are paid in next block, and any matured balances over dust are paid once a week in first block found after say sat morning at 12:01am (weekends tend to have less transaction volume and lower TX fees) would work. If you really want to get crazy with the efficiency you could say large once-weekly payouts are to be included in the first block where they would only be displacing transactions that are paying say 40% less than the average TX fee over the last 7 days. That way if by some fluke there are no transactions for an hour and the first block after 12:01 sat would be a monster in fees, the system would hold the payments for a block that was found at a more inopportune time and had much lower paying transactions.
|
|
|
|
bronder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2017, 01:33:27 AM |
|
Thank you. I saw that posting but that was this morning (in my timezone), it's now almost 10 hours later and the site is still down, and the app is also down even if they say it's up. (the app opens but to a blank page). In my day job If I had a 10 hour system-wide outage on a stabilized system (not a new one) would be the first in 17 years of operations and after all the redundancy in place I would probably be looking for a job once I got it up and running again. Hopefully they will post something else because "A fix is being implemented" doesn't cut it after so many hours offline.
Seems like they shut me up. Site is up now, although it's working a bit weird in some areas.
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
May 23, 2017, 02:52:59 AM |
|
Block by blockmines! This is our 1st of BLOCK TUESDAY! Block size is 14.998 so we can count that as a 15...that would be 5 in a row in the 15 range!
|
|
|
|
|