delete

[Spoetnik]

I hope Monero gets taken down.. maybe they will do the world a favor and shut the fuck up ?
Not likely.. they will clone and rename and fork something else to jam down your fucking throat  
let me know how that tactic works for ya idiot cheerleaders.
and how is the playing dumb game workin' out for ya ? still think your clever ?
get a refund on your "marketing degrees" lol

when your pathetic ass """"" business """"" revolves around sitting here on this forum nagging and spamming and advertising some shit fork clone coin ponzi psuedo-coin
that is just fucking sad.

maybe just bite the bullet and go get a job shills ?
look around see what your doing yet ?

Nothing grander than being the king of the last 8 guys invested in ponzi coins eh ? LOL

All this shit is gay and pathetic big time and the proof is when some loser noobs comes here and jams *yet another shit coin down our throat
and says THIS one.. this NEW one.. is "THE" one true Bitcoin killer.
only problem is you released it and hyped it up along side 1,000 other coins.. get it yet ?
how legit it is is irrelevant when you post it as coin number 1,001.. get it ?
ya but but there is no scam code..
ya and it's coin number 1,001
get it ?
Spout off about a foundation and a hoity toity "business" that revolves around a Github chunk of code on a fork of 1,000 other coins LOL
I am the official Spoetnik Foundation CEO of Github clonery.. gimme all your fucking BITCOINS !!!!!

Ziplock Kids gotta flog their Baggies  
i just wish they would die off quicker.. watching these douche bags limp along is sad to watch.. truly cringe worthy
watching thinly veiled multi-level marketing scheme tactics used with pyramid schemes being masqueraded as pseudo-digital currencies as not even laughable at coin #1,001
the joke is just not even funny anymore.

Monero is SOOOO great i want you all to give me all your Bitcoin to buy them.  

By the way that name is really REALLY fucking gay BIG time !

[Karl Hungus]

Yesterday I did notice a few times, when looking at it, that my miner software was reporting periods where blocks were being found ad little as 15 seconds apart some times 3-4 in a row.  I thought it was odd at the time, now after BCXs last post maybe it was more than just odd.. I guess we shall see.

I would look at recent blocks (235525,235526) (235532,235533) (235542,235543)

Coincidence, I think not.

If I were the guessing type, I would call this symptoms of an "Anonymint inspired modified ArtForz Time Warp Attack"

Just an observational opinion from a casual observer LOL


~BCX~

boring ... just do it, or piss off

What part of 22 day process do you not understand?

Multiple people have explained it.




~BCX~

You said 'a couple of days'.

I was bent over with my pants down three days ago, and you didn't deliver.

Just do it, or piss off!

[pineapples]

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Another post from Hawaiian Islands.

Interesting.


~BCX~

Why are you doing this? You say forced evolution, but can't you just relay the exploit information to the devs? You are trying to kill a project that many people care about, and has only good intentions for all, (private, instantaneous transactions).

I make a plea to you to stop your TW and play the good fight.

yes you do have to wonder why some trolls go for the throat, while others are quite happy to explain themselves.

[Viper1]

Yesterday I did notice a few times, when looking at it, that my miner software was reporting periods where blocks were being found ad little as 15 seconds apart some times 3-4 in a row.  I thought it was odd at the time, now after BCXs last post maybe it was more than just odd.. I guess we shall see.

I would look at recent blocks (235525,235526) (235532,235533) (235542,235543)

Coincidence, I think not.

If I were the guessing type, I would call this symptoms of an "Anonymint inspired modified ArtForz Time Warp Attack"

Just an observational opinion from a casual observer LOL


~BCX~

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Edit:  Months even!  (122604, 122605), (122614, 122615) - what's up with THAT?  You sneaky devil.

Would those blocks just happen to coincide with when BCX first came out on here and said there was a potential exploit a couple months back now?

[nioc]

Yesterday I did notice a few times, when looking at it, that my miner software was reporting periods where blocks were being found ad little as 15 seconds apart some times 3-4 in a row.  I thought it was odd at the time, now after BCXs last post maybe it was more than just odd.. I guess we shall see.

I would look at recent blocks (235525,235526) (235532,235533) (235542,235543)

Coincidence, I think not.

If I were the guessing type, I would call this symptoms of an "Anonymint inspired modified ArtForz Time Warp Attack"

Just an observational opinion from a casual observer LOL


~BCX~

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Edit:  Months even!  (122604, 122605), (122614, 122615) - what's up with THAT?  You sneaky devil.

Would those blocks just happen to coincide with when BCX first came out on here and said there was a potential exploit a couple months back now?

Blocks that are close together happen all the time.

[Cryptobro]

...

I guess it's the weekend and you're bored... both you and BCX come out of the woodwork and start spouting more shit.

Just when things had calmed down in here.

[black_jesus]

Yesterday I did notice a few times, when looking at it, that my miner software was reporting periods where blocks were being found ad little as 15 seconds apart some times 3-4 in a row.  I thought it was odd at the time, now after BCXs last post maybe it was more than just odd.. I guess we shall see.

I would look at recent blocks (235525,235526) (235532,235533) (235542,235543)

Coincidence, I think not.

If I were the guessing type, I would call this symptoms of an "Anonymint inspired modified ArtForz Time Warp Attack"

Just an observational opinion from a casual observer LOL


~BCX~

And (192298, 192299), (192326,192327), (192357, 192358) ... diabolical ... you've been at this for weeks!!

Edit:  Months even!  (122604, 122605), (122614, 122615) - what's up with THAT?  You sneaky devil.

Would those blocks just happen to coincide with when BCX first came out on here and said there was a potential exploit a couple months back now?

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges.  Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range.  I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue.  I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.  

[Karl Hungus]

Price hasn't moved. I think to get any effect this time BCX needs more than just ominous words.

No cheap coins for BCX now without some real evidence.

[nutildah]

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges.  Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range.  I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue.  I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.  

I do believe this is called back peddling.

~BCX~

Hey-O!

[OrientA]

How can we be sure that the close block time is not from TW attack? Will dev's recent work mitigate the attack?

[2dogs]

(Grabs some popcorn and something to drink....)

[Karl Hungus]

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges.  Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range.  I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue.  I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.  

I do believe this is called back peddling.

Price hasn't moved. I think to get any effect this time BCX needs more than just ominous words.

No cheap coins for BCX now without some real evidence.

Newsflash newbie,

I do not nor have I ever cared what the price is doing.


~BCX~

Newsflash wanker,

You have not shown any evidence you are mounting a successful attack.

Just more words to drop the price again, but I think this time it wont work.

[black_jesus]

I just put in random numbers close to those block ranges.  Once in the range between 192298 and 192358, and once in the lower range.  I'm pretty confident given the 60 second target time between blocks that this can be repeated throughout the blockchain.

That doesn't mean there isn't some sort of attack underway ... I have no clue.  I'm just pointing out that the anomalies that BCX pointed out aren't anything extraordinary.  

I do believe this is called back peddling.

Back peddling from what, exactly?  And why do you ignore tough questions?  

[nutildah]

have you seen that before?

[vuduchyld]

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.


~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread.  Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin.  Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.  

[infofront]

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.

~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread.  Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin.  Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.  

Coincidentally timed near the release of their hyped up V2 wallet.

[infofront]

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.


~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread.  Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin.  Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.  

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.

This coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.

~BCX~

It really is an awful coin.
That's what I don't get though. Why not just attack the obvious scamcoins?

[BitcoinDN.com]

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.


~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread.  Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin.  Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.  

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.

This coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.

~BCX~

Then why not attack it instead of monero? What is your reason for attacking monero and refusing to allow devs to fix your exploit?

[OrientA]

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.
~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread.  Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin.  Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.  

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.
his coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.
~BCX~

It really is an awful coin.

Coin itself is fine. Too many Monero threads.

[vuduchyld]

Yep I agree, this is an awesome coin.


~BCX~

This was in the NEOS thread.  Maybe we should all dump XMR and buy NEOS, another anon coin.  Mass market cap exodus from XMR into a $166K cap coin...man, that could run the price up.  

I guess your sarcasm detection was set to zero.

This coin is so absurd I thought it would be obvious.

~BCX~

My sarcasm meter was, indeed, set to zero.  I did think you were endorsing.  

I was also being sarcastic, although I'd suspect that somebody would have to have some knowledge of my post history to know it.  I certainly don't blame you for missing that.  

EDIT: hell, I suppose I should thank you for clarifying, just in case I was about to get victimized in a pump'n'dump