bradyon
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
TradeFortress has to pay his debitors
|
 |
July 16, 2013, 04:23:31 PM |
|
Great idea: Pyramining pool.
Maybe it would be more difficult for the operator, but if accomplished could get us an extra percentage of earnings and reduce our variance. Isn´t it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
July 16, 2013, 04:32:10 PM |
|
Would it be possible to consider that when/if you go solo that you consider running your own pool? I'd think some/many pyramining users who also mine on their own would consider mining on the pool that also supports their pyramining accounts, in full spirit of the pyramining model of business they could link their "pool" account to a "pyramining" account to get a boost based on the number of MH/s or GH/s they mine with and even have the option to directly ingest their earnings into their pyramining account, otherwise they cash out to wherever they want.
It's worth considering. As soon as I have time, I will work on it! |
|
|
|
|
|
inaltoasinistra
|
|
July 17, 2013, 08:00:02 AM |
|
I'm not undestandind: why the hashing power of old accounts is going up? Is it because of the referral speed of ASIC accounts has quickly freed some of the old hardware?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
links-pyramining
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
July 17, 2013, 08:24:45 AM |
|
Go Pyramining... go!!! 356.2GH/s  |
|
|
|
|
ninjaboon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 17, 2013, 08:45:53 AM |
|
I am installing 100GH/s more today, and activating some more queued deposits.
well mine is not active yet. 3x7cktdh date: 2012-11-11 |
|
|
|
ninjaboon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 17, 2013, 08:47:50 AM |
|
Great idea: Pyramining pool.
Maybe it would be more difficult for the operator, but if accomplished could get us an extra percentage of earnings and reduce our variance. Isn´t it?
Good idea. I would love to do this once my BFL 60Gh/s unit arrives. |
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
July 17, 2013, 10:35:04 AM |
|
I'm not undestandind: why the hashing power of old accounts is going up? Is it because of the referral speed of ASIC accounts has quickly freed some of the old hardware?
ASIC accounts add hashing power to the whole pool, and revenues are distributed proportionally to each deposit. This protects all the deposits, because the day when better devices are available, everyone will get advantages. |
|
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
July 17, 2013, 10:55:37 AM |
|
ASIC accounts add hashing power to the whole pool, and revenues are distributed proportionally to each deposit. This protects all the deposits, because the day when better devices are available, everyone will get advantages.
+1 |
|
|
|
|
maxl
|
|
July 17, 2013, 06:47:31 PM |
|
Why does this show by my last transactions:
Date Amount Description
2013-06-29 10:25:02 UTC 0.00011802 reward on deposit [gz496dm2] (0.00015166:mining, 0.00001689:1st lev.ref., -0.00002527:1st lev.sp., -0.00001263:2nd lev.sp., -0.00001263:3rd lev.sp.)
Why is the last transaction on 2013-06-29 and not newer?
|
|
|
|
|
ArethusaF38
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2013, 12:17:48 AM |
|
Why does this show by my last transactions:
Date Amount Description
2013-06-29 10:25:02 UTC 0.00011802 reward on deposit [gz496dm2] (0.00015166:mining, 0.00001689:1st lev.ref., -0.00002527:1st lev.sp., -0.00001263:2nd lev.sp., -0.00001263:3rd lev.sp.)
Why is the last transaction on 2013-06-29 and not newer?
I think it's the same for everyone. My understanding is that Mr. Pyramining has been really busy setting up the new ASIC structure. Would be nice to see an update soon, but I understand that it's a lot for one person to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
July 18, 2013, 12:57:31 AM |
|
I have done a lot of work in the last two weeks, including change of pools. There was a slightly negative balance (around 6 BTC) and new pools (mainly P2Pool, which now is working very well) generates payout that are active after 120 confirmations. All summed up has caused some delays in the payouts. However don't worry, they will come again very soon and they will be a bit more "consistent".
|
|
|
|
|
|
maxl
|
|
July 18, 2013, 02:54:47 AM |
|
Alright. Thank you pyramining!
|
|
|
|
|
|
btharper
|
|
July 18, 2013, 04:34:21 AM |
|
Would it be possible to consider that when/if you go solo that you consider running your own pool? I'd think some/many pyramining users who also mine on their own would consider mining on the pool that also supports their pyramining accounts, in full spirit of the pyramining model of business they could link their "pool" account to a "pyramining" account to get a boost based on the number of MH/s or GH/s they mine with and even have the option to directly ingest their earnings into their pyramining account, otherwise they cash out to wherever they want.
It's worth considering. As soon as I have time, I will work on it! As long as you're looking at running a fast P2Pool node you could just open it to the public with a small fee (0.1?), something just over the expected bandwidth/hosting costs for running it publicly. |
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
July 18, 2013, 08:50:26 AM |
|
As long as you're looking at running a fast P2Pool node you could just open it to the public with a small fee (0.1?), something just over the expected bandwidth/hosting costs for running it publicly.
Yes, it's what I was thinking about, for the moment (until I'll switch to solo), the only concern is that knowing an IP address could lead to DoS attacks... I will ponder it. |
|
|
|
|
|
inaltoasinistra
|
|
July 18, 2013, 11:33:44 AM |
|
I'm not undestandind: why the hashing power of old accounts is going up? Is it because of the referral speed of ASIC accounts has quickly freed some of the old hardware?
ASIC accounts add hashing power to the whole pool, and revenues are distributed proportionally to each deposit. This protects all the deposits, because the day when better devices are available, everyone will get advantages. So, what's the meaning of pre-allocate ASIC power? I thought that the sharing of the ASIC power with the old accounts would be started after the activation of the ASIC pre-orders. Thanks  Great work! |
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
July 18, 2013, 11:39:44 AM |
|
p2pool found block 3 minutes ago
|
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
July 18, 2013, 12:41:45 PM |
|
and the next one 20 minutes later :-)
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
July 18, 2013, 02:12:52 PM |
|
So, what's the meaning of pre-allocate ASIC power? I thought that the sharing of the ASIC power with the old accounts would be started after the activation of the ASIC pre-orders.
Indeed the sharing is started when ASIC accounts are activated. |
|
|
|
|
|
btharper
|
|
July 18, 2013, 03:51:48 PM |
|
As long as you're looking at running a fast P2Pool node you could just open it to the public with a small fee (0.1?), something just over the expected bandwidth/hosting costs for running it publicly.
Yes, it's what I was thinking about, for the moment (until I'll switch to solo), the only concern is that knowing an IP address could lead to DoS attacks... I will ponder it. Assuming you're using something like BFGMiner/CGminer you could setup the public p2pool as default and then have local solomining as backup (or another public p2pool node, or any other number of pools). A backup is probably something you've already started worry about of course. If there's a way to segregate the P2Pool server on a different IP (it could even be using the same instance of bitcoind on the backend). If the public pool gets DoS's (or fails for any other reason) the pyramining hashing power keeps moving on like nothing happened, but that's an extra level of abstraction. For what it's worth I've not heard of any P2Pool nodes having DoS issues, but you're adding significant hashing power behind your node of course that may make it a bigger target. Given your overall size though I figure other pools are better targets anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
pyromaniac
|
|
July 18, 2013, 04:32:34 PM |
|
I'd like to use my hash power as I see fit, e.g. for mining other crypto currencies if it more profitable, than bitcoin. Is it possible to realize this in future?
|
|
|
|
|
