http://www.pyramining.com/ - Discussion thread (no advertising here)

[chrcoe01]

that's what I thought, but i wanted to make sure before I deposited anymore

thanks!

[1715486860]

1715486860

[1715486860]

1715486860

[1715486860]

1715486860

[platti]

Total hashing power:   1.1TH/s   

[platti]

@pyraminig

Account label:    6e3mf4ck
something goes wrong with the rewards
i got rewards from 5 deposits, but i have 13 deposits in this account


in other accounts simmilar

in Account label:    2h8rfnbg
no rewards

[pyramining]

Account label:    6e3mf4ck
something goes wrong with the rewards
i got rewards from 5 deposits, but i have 13 deposits in this account

I'm going to check what happened.

[platti]

Account label:    6e3mf4ck

at 4:30 there come 13 rewards

at 10:30 only 10 rewards

only deposits rewarded , which are paid in before 2013-05-03



Account label:   2h8rfnbg
at 22:30 no rewards

at 4:30 there come 9 rewards

at 10:30 only 3 rewards

only the 3 first made deposits rewardet


Account label:    6pqym9ca
also no rewards for the last 2 payins

in other accounts of me its the same

it look like your reward programm stops, before it is ready with all rewards

[pyramining]

at 4:30 there come 13 rewards
at 10:30 only 10 rewards

It should be fixed now. I created an account with a 10 BTC deposit under the first account you specified, to thank you for the bugreport.

[platti]

thx

[biddicoin]

...what I don't understand is: 1.1 Thash = 40 months break even ?? Its like nothing happened...

also for example: 10 BTC Asic deposit equivalent hashing power <0.8 GH ....

0.8 gh for 10 BTC ... 44 Months reward time....

What is it I don't see?

[aepfel]

...what I don't understand is: 1.1 Thash = 40 months break even ?? Its like nothing happened...

also for example: 10 BTC Asic deposit equivalent hashing power <0.8 GH ....

0.8 gh for 10 BTC ... 44 Months reward time....

What is it I don't see?

Imho that stats are not able to tell the truth, until at least all preordered hardware is installed. And even at this time, its hard to predict an exact reward time.

@pyramining: Could it be profitable, to limit payouts to happen once a day or even once a week (off course only if the threshold is reached) to save transactionfees? Because there are accounts with high deposits/rewards (for example s9q3bxy8 from hall of fame). And i could imagine it is really anoying, to get 10 payouts á 0.1 btc a day and therefore pay 10 times transactionfee.

[gektek]

@pyramining: Could it be profitable, to limit payouts to happen once a day or even once a week (off course only if the threshold is reached) to save transactionfees? Because there are accounts with high deposits/rewards (for example s9q3bxy8 from hall of fame). And i could imagine it is really anoying, to get 10 payouts á 0.1 btc a day and therefore pay 10 times transactionfee.

I wouldn't mind putting a second on this vote. I have a bunch of little deposits cuz I'm just a tiny miner so I deposit when and what I can. I know you get my BTC to me so I'd be more than ok with just one lump sum deposit going into my account(s) per 24 hour period. I could see how people might get poopie about only once a week but once a day seems reasonable. Not that we are constantly getting multiple deposits per day, especially since switching to p2pool (hehe...had to dig a little sry) but just sayin...if the idea needs a "second"...this is it

EDIT: I actually read the original idea wrong so my reply doesn't make sense but now that I 'get' it I still second the notion

[omegaflare]

I just joined a sponsor. I have a question, how many sponsor can I join? Its unlimited, no?

[pyra-proxy]

@pyramining: Could it be profitable, to limit payouts to happen once a day or even once a week (off course only if the threshold is reached) to save transactionfees? Because there are accounts with high deposits/rewards (for example s9q3bxy8 from hall of fame). And i could imagine it is really anoying, to get 10 payouts á 0.1 btc a day and therefore pay 10 times transactionfee.

I wouldn't mind putting a second on this vote. I have a bunch of little deposits cuz I'm just a tiny miner so I deposit when and what I can. I know you get my BTC to me so I'd be more than ok with just one lump sum deposit going into my account(s) per 24 hour period. I could see how people might get poopie about only once a week but once a day seems reasonable. Not that we are constantly getting multiple deposits per day, especially since switching to p2pool (hehe...had to dig a little sry) but just sayin...if the idea needs a "second"...this is it

EDIT: I actually read the original idea wrong so my reply doesn't make sense but now that I 'get' it I still second the notion

Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice.  Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?

[gektek]

Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice.  Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?

I was with ya up until the raising the threshold. I'm a small investor with Pyra...if it goes back up to even .5 I won't see another payout for 4 or 5 months...even with the raising hash rate. If a change is made to the threshold I would like to vote that the minimum stay at 0.1 but maybe add an option to allow individual accounts to raise the threshold if they so desire. Maybe even make the payouts more of an 'option' that can be set and let the users decide how nice they want to be on Pyra's bandwidth ...?

[aepfel]

Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice.  Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?

I was with ya up until the raising the threshold. I'm a small investor with Pyra...if it goes back up to even .5 I won't see another payout for 4 or 5 months...even with the raising hash rate. If a change is made to the threshold I would like to vote that the minimum stay at 0.1 but maybe add an option to allow individual accounts to raise the threshold if they so desire. Maybe even make the payouts more of an 'option' that can be set and let the users decide how nice they want to be on Pyra's bandwidth ...?

Maybe 2 different payoutintervalls. One daily with with 0.5 threshold and one weekly with 0.1 treshhold. Or a procentual treshhold (e.g. 1% of deposited ammount). Because i dont think, pyramining want to use an individual payoutoption.

[Raoul Duke]

Third this vote, tbh weekly payouts don't seem at that bad but no more than daily would be nice.  Since more hash rate is being added I might recommend we start moving back to the 1 BTC payout threshold as well, maybe up to 0.5 for now until the entire hash rate has been released?

I was with ya up until the raising the threshold. I'm a small investor with Pyra...if it goes back up to even .5 I won't see another payout for 4 or 5 months...even with the raising hash rate. If a change is made to the threshold I would like to vote that the minimum stay at 0.1 but maybe add an option to allow individual accounts to raise the threshold if they so desire. Maybe even make the payouts more of an 'option' that can be set and let the users decide how nice they want to be on Pyra's bandwidth ...?

Maybe 2 different payoutintervalls. One daily with with 0.5 threshold and one weekly with 0.1 treshhold. Or a procentual treshhold (e.g. 1% of deposited ammount). Because i dont think, pyramining want to use an individual payoutoption.

Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
You mentioned my account(s9q3bxy8) as an example of a person that maybe will prefer bigger payouts. I like the threshold like it is. Don't use me as an example.

[platti]

Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
You mentioned my account(s9q3bxy8) as an example of a person that maybe will prefer bigger payouts. I like the threshold like it is. Don't use me as an example.

+1

[aepfel]

Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
You mentioned my account(s9q3bxy8) as an example of a person that maybe will prefer bigger payouts. I like the threshold like it is. Don't use me as an example.

At first: I never used you as an example for anything. I just mentioned a random account, that is visible to everybody. If you claim that to be your account, then this is your business. If you want you can find plenty other accounts that are also "affected". (and simply edit your account out, Mr. Global Moderator)
And second: This is a Discussion thread! So tell me, what is wrong about disgusting possible improvements? I never tryed to fix something broken, like you said. I just tried to help improve that service. So tell me, where you take all your offence from.
If you dont like improvement, then you may be wrong in bitcoinworld.

[Raoul Duke]

Stop trying to fix what isn't broken.
You mentioned my account(s9q3bxy8) as an example of a person that maybe will prefer bigger payouts. I like the threshold like it is. Don't use me as an example.

At first: I never used you as an example for anything. I just mentioned a random account, that is visible to everybody. If you claim that to be your account, then this is your business. If you want you can find plenty other accounts that are also "affected". (and simply edit your account out, Mr. Global Moderator)
And second: This is a Discussion thread! So tell me, what is wrong about disgusting possible improvements? I never tryed to fix something broken, like you said. I just tried to help improve that service. So tell me, where you take all your offence from.
If you dont like improvement, then you may be wrong in bitcoinworld.

You mad?

[aepfel]

You mad?

Seemed to me more like you are mad. But thats OT.

[biddicoin]

...what I don't understand is: 1.1 Thash = 40 months break even ?? Its like nothing happened...

also for example: 10 BTC Asic deposit equivalent hashing power <0.8 GH ....

0.8 gh for 10 BTC ... 44 Months reward time....

What is it I don't see?

Could pyramining please explain?