I still think new deposits should get all the power from the new infrastructure with the exception of the 30% going upwards of course. This would call for a lower ROI for new investors (which we need to keep it going) and thus we'll get a lot more ASIC power. Of course this means that newer investors get more bitcoins than the old, but I thinks it's totally fair that way, as it'll benefit older investors in the long run as the newer ones finishes.
Another idea is that you can add the ability to make accounts where you can't have any referral accounts, but the benefit is that you get almost all of the ASIC mining power (like the above). This would mean that any investor right now who wouldn't have been able to benefit from the changes, now benefit in the way that new accounts have to use an older account as sponsor..
I'm just trying to get some ideas going...
Or maybe you can reach a compromise. 50% of your deposit goes towards buying your own hardware. The other 50% goes towards buying hardware for the pool (and you get that much stake in the pool).
Wondering if that would be hard to implement.
Say, you invest 1 Bitcoin.
Current infrastructure: 222.74 MH/BTC
New infrastructure: ~ 2127.66 MH
So You would get 1063.83 MH for buying new equipment.
And the other 0.5 btc will go towards buying the pool 1063.83 MH.
So then your pool stake would net you (111.37 MH + increase from you)
Yeah I think you have a very valid point. Currently the system is broken.
It's like this analogy that I read recently. I'll post soon.
