.

[altsheets]

Great work as usual.

Thanks a lot.


When I had finally sent out all individual messages to all 37 AAssetHZ-shareholders,
I was holding my breath for a while. Cause the next block ... just didn't happen. Oops.

But then it did. 21 minutes later. Might be because of the block size that I had caused.
Might also be just normal block time variations. I was relieved, anyways :-)

Thinking ... This tool must be used with utmost respect & responsibility, it is powerful.

...

shareholders.py  version v32

Much more info in my assetparser.py/shareholders.py thread.

I am very interested in this.

Nice. Then ... ask me anything.

Happy to see you in my assetparser.py/shareholders.py thread, or send a PM.

 

[1715011977]

1715011977

[1715011977]

1715011977

[1715011977]

1715011977

[1715011977]

1715011977

[1715011977]

1715011977

[1715011977]

1715011977

[yampi]

How much HZ should I buy to start forging blocks?

[n2004al]

How much HZ should I buy to start forging blocks?

Minimum 20 000 000 hz to see something from the forge process. I'm kidding.  You can buy the amount you will want and then lease you coins to one of pools which forge. It is not recommended to forge yourself from your account with your bought amount. Needed really to much hz to earn something. The earnings from forging are not to much even with leasing. And are much few than the bounty you will have for the same amount you will buy. 

[ifinta]

How much HZ should I buy to start forging blocks?

Minimum 20 000 000 hz to see something from the forge process. I'm kidding.  You can buy the amount you will want and then lease you coins to one of pools which forge. It is not recommended to forge yourself from your account with your bought amount. Needed really to much hz to earn something. The earnings from forging are not to much even with leasing. And are much few than the bounty you will have for the same amount you will buy. 

With ~22 450 000 HZ (it costs only ~20 BTC today - if you buy it on poloniex & bittrex):

 

[ifinta]

My node generated the 515000...   

[MaWo]

My node generated the 515000...   

Congratulations!

[ifinta]

My node generated the 515000...   

Congratulations!

The merit of your work.
Congratulations!

[Pizpie]

Block  #515,000 has hit and everything looks stable. MaWo will post his analysis about the hard fork after he has completed it, as it is currently ongoing.  

[duncan_idaho]

explorer.horizonplatform.io is down becouse of outdated ssl cert?

[MaWo]

Block  #515,000 has hit and everything looks stable. MaWo will post his analysis about the hard fork after he has completed it, as it is currently ongoing.  

I can confirm it looks good.
I only observed  an issue with nodes which use highly shared resources. Some of them needed a long time for the calculation of the 515000 checksum.

[duncan_idaho]

Block  #515,000 has hit and everything looks stable. MaWo will post his analysis about the hard fork after he has completed it, as it is currently ongoing.  

I can confirm it looks good.
I only observed  an issue with nodes which use highly shared resources. Some of them needed a long time for the calculation of the 515000 checksum.

Yeah something is strange

2015-12-06 10:09:59 INFO: Finished blockchain download
2015-12-06 10:10:17 INFO: Checksum calculated:
[52, -50, -25, 21, -64, 23, 123, -110, -74, 4, 91, -53, -91, 49, -117, -54, -119, -45, 112, -114, -85, 7, -123, -106, 65, -2, -97, 30, -36, 18, 49, 63]

And on most of my slower nodes

        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Login timeout
        at org.h2.jdbcx.JdbcConnectionPool.getConnection(JdbcConnectionPool.java:209)
        at nxt.db.BasicDb.getPooledConnection(BasicDb.java:170)
        at nxt.db.BasicDb.getConnection(BasicDb.java:164)
        at nxt.db.TransactionalDb.getConnection(TransactionalDb.java:62)
        at nxt.db.EntityDbTable.getManyBy(EntityDbTable.java:175)
        ... 8 more
2015-12-06 11:20:49 INFO: Blockchain download in progress
2015-12-06 11:20:49 INFO: Downloaded 68 blocks in 59 s, 20 per s, 0 min left
2015-12-06 11:20:49 INFO: Finished blockchain download

[n2004al]

Block  #515,000 has hit and everything looks stable. MaWo will post his analysis about the hard fork after he has completed it, as it is currently ongoing.  

I can confirm it looks good.
I only observed  an issue with nodes which use highly shared resources. Some of them needed a long time for the calculation of the 515000 checksum.

Good and congratulations. Even I don't know what does it mean this thing and its importance I am happy that everything went ok.    So, if for you is something important, that mean that is important.    That can be enough for me. I can try to ask Mawo for more explanations but I'm fear to not be able to understand nothing. So better to be happy only with your happiness.  

I had some problems with my v 5.3 wallet and the connection with the server. No one of those worked for some minutes at the moment of the creation of the above block. And all my hz disappeared from my v5.3 wallet. But seeing those in my 5.2 wallet and having seen the same experience even before had no worries. Anyhow now everything is ok. In both variants of wallets. 

[duncan_idaho]

Guys can you fix the website?

[Pizpie]

Guys can you fix the website?

It's been looked at.

[n2004al]

I've just renewed the SSL cert but can't install it until I get home. In the meantime, you can check out the new website at http://newhz.jamesmalach.com

I'm aware that it doesn't work that well on mobile yet, but I'll rectify that sometime this week.

I like very much the colors and their combination. Also even the conception of the build of the webpage. Its simple and easy to be understand everything needed to know. If I could give a thought about something else that can be made to add value to the webpage (according to me) may be the distribution of all the information given to all the screen. The actual appearance is a good one but if everything showed and told there can be redistributed in all the screen not only can be more esthetical but even seen as more professionally build. In the graphically point of view. This can realize (as a "side effect" but not so important on itself to cause the change proposed above) even the less need of use of the "elevator" to scroll down or up the page to read everything.

Anyhow this is only my opinion and something that I told with the desire to see a better product. But am not me who can decide which is good and which not. So if this can help I will be happy to have told something useful. If not, can be sent without problem at the trash files and told me "thank you" for your not required thoughts and begin to think for the next one (which can have again its place at the trash files).  

Congrats James for your work. If my above thoughts will have not value for you I will try always to find some way to contribute in this project. Beginning with nothing things like the above and slowly giving others trying to understand always more about it and seeing where I can do something. But most of all waiting proposals from them which know everything about it and, knowing me better in time, can find more easily where I can give more. Naturally coordinating the time needed.

I like this project. The "why" is a my secret.  

[Nxtblg]

I've just renewed the SSL cert but can't install it until I get home. In the meantime, you can check out the new website at http://newhz.jamesmalach.com

I'm aware that it doesn't work that well on mobile yet, but I'll rectify that sometime this week.

Nice Website! Right now, I'm giving myself some "crash courses" on HTML5/CSS/JS so I can join in the fun.

[Nxtblg]

Waited for your answer but yet is not here.

Sorry I didn't get back to you. I just meant what I said as a general warning against buying too high. There's now some available in the mid-60s.

[Nxtblg]

With ~22 450 000 HZ (it costs only ~20 BTC today - if you buy it on poloniex & bittrex):

 

Hey, I'm there! With "only" 8.4 million.

[n2004al]

Waited for your answer but yet is not here.

Sorry I didn't get back to you. I just meant what I said as a general warning against buying too high. There's now some available in the mid-60s.

Good. Was curios to have your opinion about my answer and happy to receive it. But I see that it is not a big deal. Seems that have another meaning your words at your posts. Anyhow, if we will continue, in this moment the price is even lower (near 50). And this for you is a fact that overturn all my interpretations or my conclusions about the situations to which were directed?

So for you it is always only rainy or only sunny. Cannot be some time one of those and another time the other situation. But the real world tell totally the opposite. Not only are not verified only one of the (or the another) previous just named situations but there are not never two days the same. And cannot be told that since is rainy today it were rainy even yesterday if yesterday was sunny.

The same even with your argumentation. Cannot serve as argument the today situation about the yesterday (or even more days ago) situation. Cannot be told that since today is rainy it was so even yesterday (or even more days ago) when yesterday was sunny.

If you want to comment and argues, must comment the situation about what me and you were talking about, in the respective posts above. So about the situation when the price was at 80 and more. Not about the today's when is 50. Cannot be told that since the price is about 50 today this is a good argument about the situation when the price was 80. Today can (must) be made a totally another interpretation. Which has nothing to do with the previous one.  

[altsheets]

Today, I had probably started my well-working 3.9.2 for the last time.
But I ended up on my own fork *g*  So ... upgrading. All looking goooood.

About coding, and the HZ 5 API ...

When I am coding tools that are using the HZ API,
the wiki is useful, because it documents well the API calls.

But as the HZ port is a bit behind the innovation brand front of NXT,
I am wondering which version of the wiki.


Until recently (HZ 3.9.2), the nearest analogous NXT version of the API was probably this one:
http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/w/index.php?title=Nxt_API&oldid=29356 (~autumn 2014)

Now, with HZ v5.3, I am wondering to which NXT version it corresponds.
NXT1.5.15  (~August 2015)?  Or which version is HZ5 based on?


-->

Then please answer, which older wiki version is a good resource to use as an API manual:
This one perhaps? http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/w/index.php?title=The_Nxt_API&oldid=40071
(August 15th 2015). See all versions


Thanks a lot!