CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[bathrobehero]

is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).

[Amph]

is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).

not with the possible optimization, which would put a single 970 to hash 5m on that algo, which is 800k-900k satoshi, vs etehreum which is only 500k-600k now because of the recent mini pump...

[sp_]

960 does about 10-11 MH/s in ETH.

And the 950 does about the same with lower power, but slower in dual mining.

[bensam1231]

is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).

not with he possible optimization, which would put a single 970 to hash 5m on that algo, which is 800k-900k satoshi, vs etehreum which is only 500k-600k now because of the recent mini pump...

Where do you get your potential numbers from if no one has done it?

960 does about 10-11 MH/s in ETH.

And the 950 does about the same with lower power, but slower in dual mining.

Give it to me SP.

[thevictimofuktyranny]

is someone working on the sib optimization algo? i could pay 0.1 for that

ethereum in comparison is unprofitable...

I'm not sure where you're getting that.

Eth is roughly 80% more profitable than Sib after electricity on the 970s (20.5 and 2.06 Mh/s).

not with he possible optimization, which would put a single 970 to hash 5m on that algo, which is 800k-900k satoshi, vs etehreum which is only 500k-600k now because of the recent mini pump...

Where do you get your potential numbers from if no one has done it?

960 does about 10-11 MH/s in ETH.

And the 950 does about the same with lower power, but slower in dual mining.

Give it to me SP.

I agree with SP_ 

I have one 950 and it is better for gaming than mining crypto

[Amph]

Where do you get your potential numbers from if no one has done it?

Wolfo said so, and then another guy tried and reached 5mega, wolfo actually said 4.6mega

[Stein]

Heck ya lol

[Stein]

Heck ya lol

Do you want sp5...I'm thinking of it.

Well I don't have tons of rigs like you. Just one 970

Come to think of it, never mind. Maybe SP will be nice and give me it since I didn't take it lol

[tbearhere]

Heck ya lol

Do you want sp5...I'm thinking of it.

Well I don't have tons of rigs like you. Just one 970

Come to think of it, never mind. Maybe SP will be nice and give me it since I didn't take it lol

No I have very little very little sp has tons.

[sp_]

I am busy writing the dual/tripple miner. Good for everybody with NVIDIA cards. and 1% etherum +1% of each of the other algos in fee.

[go6ooo1212]

I still can't understand the benefit of those double miners. My point is that if you want to separate the hashpower on each rig , you can do it by managing which cards will mine CoinA , and which - CoinB..
What am I missing here ...

[thevictimofuktyranny]

I still can't understand the benefit of those double miners. My point is that if you want to separate the hashpower on each rig , you can do it by managing which cards will mine CoinA , and which - CoinB..
What am I missing here ...

The idea is to mine one primary algo and at the same time mine another algo for different crypto coin.

The primary algo, would have more or less the same output as in single mining mode.

The secondary algo, would utilise wasted capacity on the GPU (980 or 970 or 960 or 950 or 750), it would have lower hash output.

This boosts the daily productivity of your GPU and also gives greater accumulation in two different cryptos.

The developer, would get daily fee of 1% or 2% of daily hash output for ongoing technical support and reward them for spending their precious waking hours doing all that crazy coding.

This is copied from the Legendary AMD software developer called Claymore

Claymore, recoded the Ethereum mining software for AMD GPUs, raising the hash output by 5%, but Claymore also recycled the unused GPU output to mine a second algo (Decred).

This meant, AMD GPU owners got a 5% boost on the main algo (Dagger used to mine Ethereum) and 14% extra profit each day from the Decred algo.

For this software, Claymore designed a pay as you go system, 1% developer fee for single mining mode and 2% developer fee for dual mining mode.

Every hour, the Claymore AMD miner will disconnect from your pool and will mine Ethereum's Dagger algo to Calymore's wallet address.

Total daily single mining mode fee: 14 minutes 24 seconds.

Total daily dual mining mode fee:28 minutes 28 seconds.

This is 36 seconds in single mining mode and 72 seconds in dual mining mode each hour.

In terms of Decred, their is no fee on the Decred hash output on AMD Claymore miner, which saved Claymore a huge headache in coding and finding pools for second algo.

Essentially, AMD GPU owners made an extra 19% and gave Claymore 2% of those profits back for doing all that hard work for them!

There is nothing like it for Nvidia GPUs and SP_ is trying to ride to the rescue of Nvidia GPUs owners



  

[go6ooo1212]

Thank you , very productive explanation , I appreciate it

[bensam1231]

I still can't understand the benefit of those double miners. My point is that if you want to separate the hashpower on each rig , you can do it by managing which cards will mine CoinA , and which - CoinB..
What am I missing here ...

Each card has a certain amount of resources on board. Certain coins utilize some resources more then others (like memory instead of GPU). This means your GPU is doing practically nothing, in the case of Eth. That leaves room to mine another coin at the same time.

It's essentially free profit. Since Nvidia hardware is so under-utilized in the case of Eth, it should be able to mine another algo like Dcr at maybe 50% normal speed, while mining Eth at full speed.

[pallas]

hihi you really must be mad at him

[sp_]

I cannot reproduce your problem on my rigs. Did you try the 1.7.6 release or the 1.5.79 sp-mod. Do you get the same problem? What are your settings on your profit switching software? Does it work if you mine f.eks quark without the switcher? Why is one of your rigs working without any problems and the other doesn't? Reinstall the whole rig with windows 8.1 and the latest drivers

[ldw-com]

I still can't understand the benefit of those double miners. My point is that if you want to separate the hashpower on each rig , you can do it by managing which cards will mine CoinA , and which - CoinB..
What am I missing here ...

Each card has a certain amount of resources on board. Certain coins utilize some resources more then others (like memory instead of GPU). This means your GPU is doing practically nothing, in the case of Eth. That leaves room to mine another coin at the same time.

It's essentially free profit. Since Nvidia hardware is so under-utilized in the case of Eth, it should be able to mine another algo like Dcr at maybe 50% normal speed, while mining Eth at full speed.

However, people tend to forget to mention that this will obviously raise your power use.

Something a lot of us don't want.

In case of Claymore's, i only ETH mine with it because when i dual mine it uses a shitload of extra electricity. When optimizing it to use the exact same amount as before, i will obviously lose hash. Thus not profitable anymore.

If your electricity is free, then it's a great miner.

[sp_]

If your electricity is free, then it's a great miner.

You get around 25% of the second algoo for "free" with a little more power. The problem is that if you run 6 970's on a 1000w powersupply, you might get problems with the new miner, while genoils etherum miner works. So you need to make sure you have enough power. The +25% should be enough to cover the extra powercost. Depends on the algo.. decred is tanking. My miner will support blake2s skein blakecoin etc. In dual mode

[sp_]

hihi you really must be mad at him

REALLY MAD BECAUSE HE IGNORES ME  HE NEEDS TO FIX IT NOW! NOT TOMORROW NOW SP
I'M SICK AND TIED OF REBOOTING MY COMPUTER EVERY 2 MINUTES

How can I fix something that I cannot reproduce. You need to helo me to troubleshoot. I listed a couple of questions. Please answr them.

[sp_]

"faster" at the command line, slower at the pool ;-)

But in version #8 I have fixed the bug, and the hashrate is the same on the pool.

FIX SP5

Sp5 is.working. the comment you are refeering to is decreed #4 with -i 29.6 wich caused crazy numbers.