CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[felixbrucker]

I adding rigs as we speak.I get around 780mhash on the 1070 and 460mhash on the 1060 3gb.

24 rigs added so far

I I find blocks I will add another 100 rigs.

if you will not be able to find a block with 100 rig which is 500G then something is clearly wrong here...

im interested as well in your findings, but im likely to just wait for the pool, as a small miner chances to find a block are getting lower and lower

[bensam1231]

I adding rigs as we speak.I get around 780mhash on the 1070 and 460mhash on the 1060 3gb.

24 rigs added so far

I I find blocks I will add another 100 rigs.

You're not going to. I was mining with 75GH for those 12 hours. Unless I'm missing something. The profitability is way too low, you're just playing russian roulette with power.

Also not sure what miner you're getting 780Mh with. The pub Nvidia ones produce 500~ at most. .3 is 250Mh. 780Mh maybe on one card for one work submit, if you're lucky. I rarely see that.

Never mind, found the new miner.

[sp_]

At tbe current difficulty its expexted to get 8192  share above target messages i  the wallet per block

[bathrobehero]

Volk's new miner works flawlessy. I found two blocks with one between them mined by someone else. Which is pretty lucky considering I should get 1 block about every 5-6 hours based on my sharerate (5-6 hours to get 8k shares).

[bensam1231]

Yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this fucked up miner. Do you need one wallet per computer? Importing the miner key mines all to the same account, correct?

I've tried just using one wallet, but it looks like it duplicates work for miners named the same thing prefix01. Using multiple wallets with the same miner key and miner name still yields to the same nonces being submitted by the same worker name.

Does each rig need one wallet with each a different miner name?

[bathrobehero]

I use one wallet.

[sp_]

Yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this fucked up miner. Do you need one wallet per computer? Importing the miner key mines all to the same account, correct?

I've tried just using one wallet, but it looks like it duplicates work for miners named the same thing prefix01. Using multiple wallets with the same miner key and miner name still yields to the same nonces being submitted by the same worker name.

Does each rig need one wallet with each a different miner name?

I get the same problem...i ru n one proxy on each rig and they get the same workername as the other rigs and work on duplicate data. So i think i need to create 1 key for each of my rigs.. 1 wallet, but one key/name for each of the rigs

[vaulter]

I use one wallet.

what -i and -c param are you using? 1070 rigs? What speed do you have per 1070?

Thanks in advance

[bathrobehero]

I use one wallet.

what -i and -c param are you using? 1070 rigs? What speed do you have per 1070?

Thanks in advance

Afaik -i/-c doesn't work for cuda. I just use the 'd' parameter.

Speed for 1070 is somewhere between 500-1200 Mh/s.

Yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this fucked up miner. Do you need one wallet per computer? Importing the miner key mines all to the same account, correct?

I've tried just using one wallet, but it looks like it duplicates work for miners named the same thing prefix01. Using multiple wallets with the same miner key and miner name still yields to the same nonces being submitted by the same worker name.

Does each rig need one wallet with each a different miner name?

I get the same problem...i ru n one proxy on each rig and they get the same workername as the other rigs and work on duplicate data. So i think i need to create 1 key for each of my rigs.. 1 wallet, but one key/name for each of the rigs

Yeah, each my rigs have different keys.

[bensam1231]

Yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this fucked up miner. Do you need one wallet per computer? Importing the miner key mines all to the same account, correct?

I've tried just using one wallet, but it looks like it duplicates work for miners named the same thing prefix01. Using multiple wallets with the same miner key and miner name still yields to the same nonces being submitted by the same worker name.

Does each rig need one wallet with each a different miner name?

I get the same problem...i ru n one proxy on each rig and they get the same workername as the other rigs and work on duplicate data. So i think i need to create 1 key for each of my rigs.. 1 wallet, but one key/name for each of the rigs

So wallets/minername doesn't matter, but the keys do? I thought each key is a wallet?

Yeah, each my rigs have different keys.

How can you have one wallet and multiple rigs with different keys?


If you have one wallet with one miner name, look at the payload name (which is the miner name and 01-05 for each device) and nonces, they're duplicated about 50% of the time across multiple machines.

[antantti]

Nanopool is running, no cuda support yet...

[giagge]

Any miner cuda for https://pasc.nanopool.org/ .

[bathrobehero]

Yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this fucked up miner. Do you need one wallet per computer? Importing the miner key mines all to the same account, correct?

I've tried just using one wallet, but it looks like it duplicates work for miners named the same thing prefix01. Using multiple wallets with the same miner key and miner name still yields to the same nonces being submitted by the same worker name.

Does each rig need one wallet with each a different miner name?

I get the same problem...i ru n one proxy on each rig and they get the same workername as the other rigs and work on duplicate data. So i think i need to create 1 key for each of my rigs.. 1 wallet, but one key/name for each of the rigs

So wallets/minername doesn't matter, but the keys do? I thought each key is a wallet?

Yeah, each my rigs have different keys.

How can you have one wallet and multiple rigs with different keys?


If you have one wallet with one miner name, look at the payload name (which is the miner name and 01-05 for each device) and nonces, they're duplicated about 50% of the time across multiple machines.

I don't get what you're saying.

I have different miner names.
Rig1 - bathr001
Rig2 - bathr002
with 6 GPU each so the payload for the 3rd card in the second rig is bathr00203.


I wonder if running two miner instances per GPU (which is much faster) would work.

[bensam1231]

Yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this fucked up miner. Do you need one wallet per computer? Importing the miner key mines all to the same account, correct?

I've tried just using one wallet, but it looks like it duplicates work for miners named the same thing prefix01. Using multiple wallets with the same miner key and miner name still yields to the same nonces being submitted by the same worker name.

Does each rig need one wallet with each a different miner name?

I get the same problem...i ru n one proxy on each rig and they get the same workername as the other rigs and work on duplicate data. So i think i need to create 1 key for each of my rigs.. 1 wallet, but one key/name for each of the rigs

So wallets/minername doesn't matter, but the keys do? I thought each key is a wallet?

Yeah, each my rigs have different keys.

How can you have one wallet and multiple rigs with different keys?


If you have one wallet with one miner name, look at the payload name (which is the miner name and 01-05 for each device) and nonces, they're duplicated about 50% of the time across multiple machines.

I don't get what you're saying.

I have different miner names.
Rig1 - bathr001
Rig2 - bathr002
with 6 GPU each so the payload for the 3rd card in the second rig is bathr00203.


I wonder if running two miner instances per GPU (which is much faster) would work.

That's what I was originally asking. You have a different miner name for each rig. Only way to do this is with a different wallet on each rig, otherwise the wallet wont accept the work. You can't mine from one PC to another using the same miner name or it starts duplicating the work. Pretty sure this is why I didn't find any blocks.

There is reference to this back in Oct in the Pasc thread as well, I didn't think it was still a issue. I don't think AMD miners suffer from this. The bandaid 'fix' they made was making each miner through the proxy add +1 to the miner name so the '03', but if you have multiple rigs, it still duplicates work.

This coin is such a piece of shit.

[bensam1231]

Apparently with the new miner your hashrate can go negative now too...

Code:

    The hash is:
00000000 0876e67b 40553183 13afbbe1 68f8aa5c d0907242 9e679a7a 8d151b83
Found nonce: d1bb752c    T: 588bde42    Hashrate: 417.430 MH/s   Total: 18
 Real: 58DF0000CA02200011B252E7F87A379B07C4BE09828B3908398DFE2142EF9B243F42
2CB5F26200099D14487407CC264B57D27A2CC21A7634EDFDDE8D2DEF3A311BBEE9D5B54929D
F00000000000100010094B1B0316C6174696E7530383030B89DF9E4AC7539040A6CA738C63C
973265BA020691EAAE9DACB9D3471DFE3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B
495991B7852B85500000000000000000000000
 Real: 59DF0000CA02200011B252E7F87A379B07C4BE09828B3908398DFE2142EF9B243F42
2CB5F26200099D14487407CC264B57D27A2CC21A7634EDFDDE8D2DEF3A311BBEE9D5B54929D
F000000000001000100F70BB4316C6174696E7530383030D72FD6B135314BB9608DF73DF597
965BFD50133959CB93C8E898824D00CE3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B
495991B7852B85500000000000000000000000
    The hash is:
00000000 08d26acd e8cc82d1 e33b3a9d 68dcb540 8ed2caa6 818007dd 4b927497
Found nonce: 05fbd016    T: 588bdf31    Hashrate: -14.942 MH/s   Total: 19
    The hash is:
00000000 0fa482db 2d7410d9 f52ed544 09ddde82 6b648851 063735f2 62dc75b2
Found nonce: 7690bc22    T: 588bdf53    Hashrate: -15.735 MH/s   Total: 20
    The hash is:
00000000 0a9b3600 a8e4edb7 268853c0 5933344e 15d6f2aa 60ca8247 43c9e5cf
Found nonce: 1b08e00d    T: 588bdf7f    Hashrate: -16.530 MH/s   Total: 21
    The hash is:
00000000 08b47ad6 a945981b 9839d04b cc36e498 fe7135c2 fa1a4778 ce7194f6
Found nonce: 7cdc282d    T: 588be08a    Hashrate: -17.373 MH/s   Total: 22

Happens on multiple machines. Shortly there after one of the miners on a multi GPU system will crash. Others still seem to be mining fine, submitting their negative hashrate.

[bensam1231]

Hey look the block explorer hashrate is negative too as Nanopool has more hashrate on the pool! Hue hue hue... In soviet russia, block explorer mines you!

Seriously fucked up coin. There is a lot of problems with this. I'm definitely confident the net hashrate has never once been correct on any sources.


BTW apparently some of my 970s are producing 1500Mhs... Totally legit. ~_~

[antantti]

My wallet shows 5.6GH right now (positive), block explorer 4.7GH (again positive) and nanopool 3.9GH (Yup, positive). Scotchtape just like bensam said...

[bensam1231]

Nano is showing 9.7TH for me. Block explorer is 4.7TH.

[bensam1231]

If the miner goes negative does that mean it's not hashing properly anymore? It still seems to be submitting nonces and the wallet keeps accepting them... It happens often enough where I don't feel like constantly rebooting machines.

[redmonski]

If the miner goes negative does that mean it's not hashing properly anymore? It still seems to be submitting nonces and the wallet keeps accepting them... It happens often enough where I don't feel like constantly rebooting machines.

https://github.com/Vorksholk/PascalCoin-CUDA/blob/master/kernel.cu

268 // Only used for determining hashrate, and it's this method's fault that the hashrate sometimes shows as negative (this "rolls over" since nothing over the hour is used in creating the relative time
269 long getTimeMillis()