Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 12:53:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ANTMINER U3 Discussion and Support Thread  (Read 149107 times)
bmoscato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361
Merit: 267


View Profile
September 09, 2015, 12:18:12 PM
 #941

I'm kinda getting a feeling that the only problems arise when there's more than one U3 plugged in? Has anyone had the same problem with just one U3 running?

This is pretty much what I've encountered.  I have 3 miners running for 7 days and 1 hour on three different computers, in that time, one slipped from port 0 to port 1, but it's still hashing fine.

http://solo.ckpool.org/users/14LxDWtRRdQAbnJdd4Ew5jwag8Bx9UfNRd
mileywiley
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 09, 2015, 01:46:02 PM
Last edit: September 09, 2015, 08:04:01 PM by mileywiley
 #942

I am going to share the process I use to keep my AntMiners running/hashing without any interaction on my part. I have 8 AntMiner U3's that are constantly running for me without an issue with the process I came up with.

Specs: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 BIT, 8 AntMiner U3 2nd Gens, latest version of cgminer, 2 non-powered 4 port USB hubs, zadig utility for the driver

First thing I did was made a batch file with the following:

:loop
cgminer.exe -o etc etc etc etc etc etc
timeout /T 10
goto loop

Next thing you will need to do is download "devcon.exe" from microsoft and drop that in c:\Windows\

Here is my 2nd batch file, which is called by a scheduled task every 2 hours...

taskkill /f /im cgminer.exe

devcon disable *PID_EA60

ping -n 15 127.0.0.1 >nul

devcon enable *PID_EA60

The first batch file is always running, once the second one starts it kills cgminer...the first script will restart cgminer after 10 seconds....

The second script kills cgminer so that devcon may disable the miners, then wait 15 seconds and re-enable them...

After a few seconds cgminer will pick back up with all the miners and start hashing again...

If anyone finds this useful and would like to tip here is my btc address: 1LqrCgqSWuHaJuZEkD5ViqD6UQ94nMA3nD
Blackbird0
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 207
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 12:54:18 AM
 #943

I'm kinda getting a feeling that the only problems arise when there's more than one U3 plugged in? Has anyone had the same problem with just one U3 running?

Yes. Mine zombies when running alone. It is a piece of crap piece of hardware. Period. Full stop.

There is no software solution to this "zombie" problem we have all encountered.
bmoscato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361
Merit: 267


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 01:23:12 AM
 #944

I have to agree, the U3 is a piece of crap... I'm sorry I bought them.
efodix
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 10, 2015, 07:00:19 AM
 #945

Has there been any talk of the successor, now that the new chips are coming in?
Mikestang
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 10, 2015, 04:21:06 PM
 #946

Yes, it's the gekkoscience compac, get them while they're hot: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1126705.0

Best usb miner available right now, and you're supporting our "local" community.  Unlike the U3, these work!
speedt_ouch
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 05:56:21 PM
 #947

Hi.
Its me again looking for help with my U3  Huh

I have been getting a pretty decent average from my two U3 for some time.
Most of the time 115/120GHz that is pretty good I believe.

Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.

I changed USB cable also the same result and many reboots (computer and u3)
I wonder if maybe a chip is dead? could it be?

They are been cooled and I run default comand in Windows 7 has follows
Code:
cgminer.exe -o POOL -u USER -p pass



WU value is always lower than the other, before I thing they were pretty much the same.

Is there something I can do to get better results has before although nothing changed?

At the end of the day it makes quite a difference in my earnings with this lower average.

Thanks in advance.  Smiley
Mikestang
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 10, 2015, 06:22:22 PM
 #948

Most of the time 115/120GHz that is pretty good I believe.

Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.


GHz?  Do you mean GH/s?  The hash rate, not a measure of frequency.

There is no answer, U3s do what they do, be lucky you have two that work at the same time.
bmoscato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361
Merit: 267


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 09:10:36 PM
 #949


Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.

Thanks in advance.  Smiley

Have you tried resetting the U3's (unplug both power and USB) and then restarting CGMiner?
speedt_ouch
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 09:34:36 PM
 #950


Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.

Thanks in advance.  Smiley

Have you tried resetting the U3's (unplug both power and USB) and then restarting CGMiner?


Yes I have rebooted all hardware.
Removed power and usb cables.
Tried with other cables. All the same.
Plugged USB cables in different USB ports.

No difference.


Most of the time 115/120GHz that is pretty good I believe.

Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.


GHz?  Do you mean GH/s?  The hash rate, not a measure of frequency.

There is no answer, U3s do what they do, be lucky you have two that work at the same time.

LOL Smiley yes I mean GH/s. Sorry.

I guess I mite be lucky then. It took a lot of trial and error and a decent hardware computer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827356.msg11803834#msg11803834

Mikestang
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 10, 2015, 09:42:04 PM
 #951

Try running each U3 by itself and see if its hashrate is different than when they are plugged in together.
bmoscato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361
Merit: 267


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 09:49:36 PM
 #952

I have 3 of the U3's and they all run at different speeds.

I've tried:

225MHz 775mV
225MHz 800mV
225MHz 830mV
250MHz 800mV
250Mhz 830mV

on 3 separate PC's and they all clock different speeds against the same pool and same settings.
speedt_ouch
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 10, 2015, 10:36:27 PM
 #953

I have 3 of the U3's and they all run at different speeds.

I've tried:

225MHz 775mV
225MHz 800mV
225MHz 830mV
250MHz 800mV
250Mhz 830mV

on 3 separate PC's and they all clock different speeds against the same pool and same settings.

Those values are equal for both and they seem to be fixed values
The WU value is always changing, but after a while running there is always one that remains quite lower than the other resulting in a lower hashrate.

I will also test them seperatly has suggested by Mikestang
Jake36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 331
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 11, 2015, 03:01:24 AM
 #954


Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.

Thanks in advance.  Smiley

Have you tried resetting the U3's (unplug both power and USB) and then restarting CGMiner?


Yes I have rebooted all hardware.
Removed power and usb cables.
Tried with other cables. All the same.
Plugged USB cables in different USB ports.

No difference.


Most of the time 115/120GHz that is pretty good I believe.

Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.


GHz?  Do you mean GH/s?  The hash rate, not a measure of frequency.

There is no answer, U3s do what they do, be lucky you have two that work at the same time.

LOL Smiley yes I mean GH/s. Sorry.

I guess I mite be lucky then. It took a lot of trial and error and a decent hardware computer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827356.msg11803834#msg11803834



Are you using the garbage power supplies that came with them?

If so, switch the higher hashing one's power supply to the lower hashing one and see if the hashing rate on them changes around also. If the hashing switches, you need better power supplies.
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 11, 2015, 07:26:26 AM
 #955

Just started to play with one of these today.  Have to say it's been fun its going to make a nice lotto device.

Easy to install, easy to use.  Really a good product.
speedt_ouch
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 11, 2015, 08:25:35 AM
 #956


Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.

Thanks in advance.  Smiley

Have you tried resetting the U3's (unplug both power and USB) and then restarting CGMiner?


Yes I have rebooted all hardware.
Removed power and usb cables.
Tried with other cables. All the same.
Plugged USB cables in different USB ports.

No difference.


Most of the time 115/120GHz that is pretty good I believe.

Since monday, average dropped to 100GHz most times even lower.


GHz?  Do you mean GH/s?  The hash rate, not a measure of frequency.

There is no answer, U3s do what they do, be lucky you have two that work at the same time.

LOL Smiley yes I mean GH/s. Sorry.

I guess I mite be lucky then. It took a lot of trial and error and a decent hardware computer:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827356.msg11803834#msg11803834



Are you using the garbage power supplies that came with them?

If so, switch the higher hashing one's power supply to the lower hashing one and see if the hashing rate on them changes around also. If the hashing switches, you need better power supplies.

That I did not think of.
I must try that.
Thanks for the suggestion
efodix
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 11, 2015, 09:25:13 AM
 #957

Yes, it's the gekkoscience compac, get them while they're hot: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1126705.0

Best usb miner available right now, and you're supporting our "local" community.  Unlike the U3, these work!

That one's too expensive for the GH/s it offers. I was thinking something with BM1385. Whether from bitmaintech or gekkoscience, doesn't matter.
Mikestang
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 12, 2015, 12:29:25 AM
 #958

Really a good product.

No.
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 12, 2015, 12:31:04 AM
 #959


What problems do you have with it?  I'm still new with it I do have the second version with wire.     

So far good lotto machine.  That is my plan with it. 
bmoscato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361
Merit: 267


View Profile
September 12, 2015, 01:07:47 AM
 #960

What problems do you have with it?  I'm still new with it I do have the second version with wire.
So far good lotto machine.  That is my plan with it.

The units tend to just stop hashing for no reason; sometimes they just roll from from different USB ports which can take a few hours to a couple of days to stop. They seem to work best if they are the only USB hashing device, once you connect 2 to the same PC, one will go ZOMBIE sooner or later.

Long story short, I'm sorry that I purchased 3 of these things.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!