My anger is pointed in the right direction.
You do realize that I have taken issue with the developers diverting resources to other coins (Dans reviews) directly to the XC thread in saying that it wasn't right for the XC holders and I was censored?
I've explained how the blockNET is directly taking money from the holders of XC and I've been censored - right?
Then this information comes out that paints BlockNET, Dan & XC in a horrific light. I was not the one who brought the information out (although I've been smelling something not quite right, trying to bring it up and been censored for it).
So maybe you could start by requesting an unmoderated thread where actual discussions happen instead of insisting on blind sheep? That might keep this from growing to the point that it explodes everywhere. And no - your anger is not directed at the right place. I didn't take your money. I don't want your money. I cannot cost you money.
I just refuse to compromise on figuring out what's going on behind closed doors. And I refuse to be intimidated by a moderated thread or the opinion of the masses. I know it burns you up inside that you can't have the dedicated XC PR people moderate the entire altcoin section.
Get over it. If a coin can't thrive under free speech conditions it doesn't deserve to exist.
P.S. I'm still asking questions about escrow & auditors that should have been answered before the devs took a dime in ITO's and the questions still haven't been answered as far as I can tell. These are things you guys should be demanding.
It shocks me that you can say "We will have an escrow & an auditor" and not know who those people are most of the way thru an ITO.