GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[doogsan]

This is the "Time to put hashtalk to rest" screenie:

Revealing the source's name is disgusting.

[suchmoon]

seems like just that, oh wait that MUST be proof it was him then, if you are going to which hunt just get real proof, server logs, domain registrar emails, email trail, something, its really not an unfair thing to ask for ... proof.

This is not a courtroom you muppet. We don't need to prove anything else than you being a shill or a sock for allcryptocoins, hence your word is worth absolutely nothing.

Now whether allcryptocoins hacked something or not - that's another story, and one for proper authorities to take care of. Not some random forum thread with some random sockpuppets showing up on cue.

[cryptofunk]

Isn't it funny how asking a question can get you banned on HT but bragging about hacking a website / Twitter account doesn't! lol

[strangerdanger101]

I know him , hes a nice guy, lots of people know him, he wouldn't have done that. Show proof or its all bullshit, seems simple right?

Great, then you have nothing to worry about. Have a nice weekend.

lol yup, so you have no proof, just slandering based on nothing, enjoy court buddy.

court? wow, that certainly made you angry, huh? Geez, go have a beer it's a friday, and the show is just getting started!  

lol i will in about 3 hours, and no not mad, just dont take shit from internet tough guys, best way to stop that is having the police show up at their door. Amazing how many internet tough guys cry like babies when the police show up lol. That gif of the hands on face is awesome though.

I'm embarrassed for you dude.  What are you going to tell the police?  This guy named suchmoon on bitcoin talk suggested that my friend might be involved in a hacking attempt can you please put an APB out on him.

[doogsan]

Isn't it funny how asking a question can get you banned on HT but bragging about hacking a website / Twitter account doesn't! lol

That place is toxic in disgusting. Everyone there seems to think it amusing that someone's career was just destroyed.

[1024KB]

seems like just that, oh wait that MUST be proof it was him then, if you are going to which hunt just get real proof, server logs, domain registrar emails, email trail, something, its really not an unfair thing to ask for ... proof.

This is not a courtroom you muppet. We don't need to prove anything else than you being a shill or a sock for allcryptocoins, hence your word is worth absolutely nothing.

Now whether allcryptocoins hacked something or not - that's another story, and one for proper authorities to take care of. Not some random forum thread with some random sockpuppets showing up on cue.

what make my defense of him worth any less then your accusation?. It's hard to think lots of people know him in real life eh?. Weird. Until I see actual proof that it was him, I will not slander him in anyway, I am not that silly and don't have that much money to lose.

I am curious though, are you basing this accusation on nothing more then forum and twitter posts? <---- Serious Question

 

[1024KB]

I know him , hes a nice guy, lots of people know him, he wouldn't have done that. Show proof or its all bullshit, seems simple right?

Great, then you have nothing to worry about. Have a nice weekend.

lol yup, so you have no proof, just slandering based on nothing, enjoy court buddy.

court? wow, that certainly made you angry, huh? Geez, go have a beer it's a friday, and the show is just getting started! 

lol i will in about 3 hours, and no not mad, just dont take shit from internet tough guys, best way to stop that is having the police show up at their door. Amazing how many internet tough guys cry like babies when the police show up lol. That gif of the hands on face is awesome though.

I'm embarrassed for you dude.

Thanks for your thoughts

[1024KB]

Isn't it funny how asking a question can get you banned on HT but bragging about hacking a website / Twitter account doesn't! lol

That place is toxic in disgusting. Everyone there seems to think it amusing that someone's career was just destroyed.

regardless of who it was. I agree that releasing the name was in very poor taste

[not.you]

Revealing the source's name is disgusting.

You can't have it both ways.  Ostensibly the reason they hacked coinfire is because they ran a fake news fud report just to hurt paycoin.  So then the hacker turns around and validates the whole story by "naming the source"?  Just goes to show that hacking is more about what you know than necessarily how smart you actually are.

[ikeboy]

This is the "Time to put hashtalk to rest" screenie:

http://i.snag.gy/uw8Y1.jpg

Revealing the source's name is disgusting.

Yes. That makes it less likely IMO that it was a GAW source, as they wouldn't have incentive to reveal that. Maybe it was someone unrelated to the whole story, who did it for lulz? Or, as everything seems to be tied to the website's email, maybe they could ransom it back to coinfire or use it to get into bank accounts/other ways of making money? It just doesn't seem likely that someone would do this with the intention of propping up xpy.

[1024KB]

I know him , hes a nice guy, lots of people know him, he wouldn't have done that. Show proof or its all bullshit, seems simple right?

Great, then you have nothing to worry about. Have a nice weekend.

lol yup, so you have no proof, just slandering based on nothing, enjoy court buddy.

court? wow, that certainly made you angry, huh? Geez, go have a beer it's a friday, and the show is just getting started!  

lol i will in about 3 hours, and no not mad, just dont take shit from internet tough guys, best way to stop that is having the police show up at their door. Amazing how many internet tough guys cry like babies when the police show up lol. That gif of the hands on face is awesome though.

I'm embarrassed for you dude.  What are you going to tell the police?  This guy named suchmoon on bitcoin talk suggested that my friend might be involved in a hacking attempt can you please put an APB out on him.

lol, No once there is proof it was not him all this becomes "slander" and can then be sued for, the police take it from there. Keep talking it all helps

[cryptofunk]

Isn't it funny how asking a question can get you banned on HT but bragging about hacking a website / Twitter account doesn't! lol

That place is toxic in disgusting. Everyone there seems to think it amusing that someone's career was just destroyed.

It's double standard paradise.

They also didn't realized they just went from "there's no documents" to "good someone loses their job" (meaning there was a leak and the story was true).

[suchmoon]

seems like just that, oh wait that MUST be proof it was him then, if you are going to which hunt just get real proof, server logs, domain registrar emails, email trail, something, its really not an unfair thing to ask for ... proof.

This is not a courtroom you muppet. We don't need to prove anything else than you being a shill or a sock for allcryptocoins, hence your word is worth absolutely nothing.

Now whether allcryptocoins hacked something or not - that's another story, and one for proper authorities to take care of. Not some random forum thread with some random sockpuppets showing up on cue.

what make my defense of him worth any less then your accusation?. It's hard to think lots of people know him in real life eh?. Weird. Until I see actual proof that it was him, I will not slander him in anyway, I am not that silly and don't have that much money to lose.

I am curious though, are you basing this accusation on nothing more then forum and twitter posts? <---- Serious Question

Are you talking to me? Show me where I accused "him" - whoever it is - and what exactly I accused "him" of?

Then we can go from there.

To avoid your further public embarrassment we can do this via PM.

[1024KB]

Revealing the source's name is disgusting.

You can't have it both ways.  Ostensibly the reason they hacked coinfire is because they ran a fake news fud report just to hurt paycoin.  So then the hacker turns around and validates the whole story by "naming the source"?  Just goes to show that hacking is more about what you know than necessarily how smart you actually are.

OMG a rationale thought!. You ! get out!

[bumpershot]

FWIW, I was wrong about the facebook being down. It was just facebook having issues, I guess. The person's page still exists to the public.

Still, this can't be good.

[1024KB]

seems like just that, oh wait that MUST be proof it was him then, if you are going to which hunt just get real proof, server logs, domain registrar emails, email trail, something, its really not an unfair thing to ask for ... proof.

This is not a courtroom you muppet. We don't need to prove anything else than you being a shill or a sock for allcryptocoins, hence your word is worth absolutely nothing.

Now whether allcryptocoins hacked something or not - that's another story, and one for proper authorities to take care of. Not some random forum thread with some random sockpuppets showing up on cue.

what make my defense of him worth any less then your accusation?. It's hard to think lots of people know him in real life eh?. Weird. Until I see actual proof that it was him, I will not slander him in anyway, I am not that silly and don't have that much money to lose.

I am curious though, are you basing this accusation on nothing more then forum and twitter posts? <---- Serious Question

Are you talking to me? Show me where I accused "him" - whoever it is - and what exactly I accused "him" of?

Then we can go from there.

To avoid your further public embarrassment we can do this via PM.

no need to pm. Def got my quotes mixed up, sorry about that, point and question remains though.

[Paul Revere]

The "leak" from the SEC was likely not actually what would be termed a leak, but rather an intentional release of information to make the party being investigated panic and thus further incriminate themselves by "digging up the bodies to move them", etc. It is this type of thing that can prove intent, which is required when trying to prove fraud.

[bumpershot]

The "leak" from the SEC was likely not actually what would be termed a leak, but rather an intentional release of information to make the party being investigated panic and thus further incriminate themselves by "digging up the bodies to move them", etc. It is this type of thing that can prove intent, which is required when trying to prove fraud.

coinfire mentioned he went to lengths to redact information to protect his source.

[strangerdanger101]

The "leak" from the SEC was likely not actually what would be termed a leak, but rather an intentional release of information to make the party being investigated panic and thus further incriminate themselves by "digging up the bodies to move them", etc. It is this type of thing that can prove intent, which is required when trying to prove fraud.

Coinfire also said at the time they had attorneys guiding them as to what they could legally release ALSO its not the first time they posted something about GAW and got hacked/Dos'ed shortly after.

[TheCoinFinder]

1024kb - your first part proved you owned the allcryptocoins.ca domain. Therefore it seems likely that you are allcryptocoins.

Get it now?