Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 06:02:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 [1776] 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 ... 2458 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)  (Read 3376931 times)
favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 07:09:29 AM
 #35501

uh oh, someone's asking questions

https://hashtalk.org/topic/37267/any-news-about-hashlets-hashstakers-zencloud/

could someone archive it pls?

Buckeye2015
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 07:14:17 AM
 #35502

uh oh, someone's asking questions

https://hashtalk.org/topic/37267/any-news-about-hashlets-hashstakers-zencloud/

could someone archive it pls?
https://archive.is/JEfy4

PayCON: PHQAtLmwRXTskGqry1FBuFLnWuqMzcj1TH   --==*==--  Qora: QcgdKgPD1SkqzGXWGAY1gwao7257gyGVnB   --==*==--  BitCoin: 1L9NLA3wHcGwffm2avVg3tzhDGjtq9
Revelation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 07:37:40 AM
 #35503

Assume that Josh is dumping 100% of what he can daily. What could he possibly be making at the current price and volume? The coinstand pump was the last gasp, we won't see another.

Assuming he has 15 PCs he would be getting ~5k XPY per day, or 600-700 USD. Not too bad I guess. But miaviator keeps saying that "snake" Vadala stole the PCs so there's that.
Why does it even matter if Josh has control over those 15 PCs or one of his disciples? The bottom point is that more than 10% of money supply are in the hands of a single person who didn't incur much cost (if any) in obtaining them. The same applies for the rest of PCs that are in the hands of Foundation and Team XPY
jackblacksparrow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 10

Erotic Industry on the Blockchain! RachelX


View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 08:07:17 AM
 #35504

Sometimes...

I like to scroll really quick through the pages in the thread for this..





Then Ill know he has been sent to prison.


RachelX ✦ 
❝ THE REVOLUTION OF THE EROTIC INDUSTRY
WHITEPAPER ✤ ─────  FacebookTwitterInstagram ⋆  Telegram ⋆  YouTube ⋆  LinkedIn  ───── ✤ BUY RACH
Adam_Allcock
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 08:39:50 AM
 #35505

uh oh, someone's asking questions

https://hashtalk.org/topic/37267/any-news-about-hashlets-hashstakers-zencloud/

could someone archive it pls?

Lol some hastard says his friends and families lost $100k due to his advice..... Yet the dumbass seems relaxed...... Why the fuck dont i meet this species in life? I would be a millionaire by just talking to them.
cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1240


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 08:44:18 AM
 #35506

5% annually on a small portion of our allocation to customers isnt enough to get people excited about the payouts they would receive

Right, so the fact is that your properly-licensed US-based exchange is holding a Prime Controller solely so you can entice customers.

It is absolutely nothing at all to do with 'protecting the network', because a PC does nothing of the sort.

The truth is that you aren't doing it 'for the community', you aren't doing it to 'protect the network', you are doing it solely so you can offer your customers an incentive to trade XPY on your exchange which, as has already been acknowledged by Adam Matlack, lends legitimacy to XPY it would otherwise not have.


So has Cryptsy done anything about their Prime Controller yet, or at least said what they intend to do?

I'm getting the feeling they are hoping that this thread drops the topic and moves on to other things so they can continue with their plan to entice customers into trading XPY on their exchange by way of this incentive of a share of the PC poop-loot.

Even if they're intending on pleading ignorance about XPY being a scam should the three letter agencies start knocking heads, I'm sure that their decision to legitimise-by-proxy and play a part in the overall authority and decision-making process of this coin network is going to make it awfully hard to distance themselves from it when feces and fans collide.

 

WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk'
kken01
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1009


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 08:56:05 AM
 #35507

how long can Mr. DoucheCanoe™ live on his stolen btc in dubai and did he pay for his moms dental, probably not? did he bail out his drunk driving fuckface brother Carlos Garza?

jewels of Garza family tree
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 09:18:17 AM
 #35508

uh oh, someone's asking questions

https://hashtalk.org/topic/37267/any-news-about-hashlets-hashstakers-zencloud/

could someone archive it pls?

Lol some hastard says his friends and families lost $100k due to his advice..... Yet the dumbass seems relaxed...... Why the fuck dont i meet this species in life? I would be a millionaire by just talking to them.

Bitcoin is cool but this ganza guy is giving out bushels of $20, cash out that 401k!

Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.

cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1240


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 09:36:15 AM
 #35509

Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.

Absolutely, did you see BadBitcoin giving it large recently over how scrypt.cc is absolutely totally legit because [insert a bunch of shit here that doesn't quite add up].



So which scrypt asic manufacturer is selling miners which ROI? AFAIK there was a brief period for a couple of months during the middle of last year when Innosilicon released the A2 where ROI could be achieved but that's it.

Even the scrypt.cc website is entirely absent any discussion about their hardware. As for the excuse that it can't be a Ponzi because it has been running for over a year, one word, GAW.

Scrypt.cc only has to pay out when a user withdraws and most of them talking constantly about how they take every satoshi of 'profit' and buy more 'KH' with it.

Which is the same business-model that the Hashlets and .png sales were being run under.


WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk'
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 09:38:44 AM
 #35510

Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.

Absolutely, did you see BadBitcoin giving it large recently over how scrypt.cc is absolutely totally legit because [insert a bunch of shit here that doesn't quite add up].



So which scrypt asic manufacturer is selling miners which ROI? AFAIK there was a brief period for a couple of months during the middle of last year when Innosilicon released the A2 where ROI could be achieved but that's it.

Even the scrypt.cc website is entirely absent any discussion about their hardware. As for the excuse that it can't be a Ponzi because it has been running for over a year, one word, GAW.

Scrypt.cc only has to pay out when a user withdraws and most of them talking constantly about how they take every satoshi of 'profit' and buy more 'KH' with it.

Which is the same business-model that the Hashlets and .png sales were being run under.



Scam confirmed. That's why I think full exit scam is coming vs any ponzi gains.

favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 09:40:05 AM
 #35511

Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.

Absolutely, did you see BadBitcoin giving it large recently over how scrypt.cc is absolutely totally legit because [insert a bunch of shit here that doesn't quite add up].



So which scrypt asic manufacturer is selling miners which ROI? AFAIK there was a brief period for a couple of months during the middle of last year when Innosilicon released the A2 where ROI could be achieved but that's it.

Even the scrypt.cc website is entirely absent any discussion about their hardware. As for the excuse that it can't be a Ponzi because it has been running for over a year, one word, GAW.

Scrypt.cc only has to pay out when a user withdraws and most of them talking constantly about how they take every satoshi of 'profit' and buy more 'KH' with it.

Which is the same business-model that the Hashlets and .png sales were being run under.



same goes for cointellect and badbadbitcoin bashed them from the beginning. there's only one reason for them to shill for scrypt: it's related to GAW

bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 09:44:57 AM
 #35512

Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.

Absolutely, did you see BadBitcoin giving it large recently over how scrypt.cc is absolutely totally legit because [insert a bunch of shit here that doesn't quite add up].



So which scrypt asic manufacturer is selling miners which ROI? AFAIK there was a brief period for a couple of months during the middle of last year when Innosilicon released the A2 where ROI could be achieved but that's it.

Even the scrypt.cc website is entirely absent any discussion about their hardware. As for the excuse that it can't be a Ponzi because it has been running for over a year, one word, GAW.

Scrypt.cc only has to pay out when a user withdraws and most of them talking constantly about how they take every satoshi of 'profit' and buy more 'KH' with it.

Which is the same business-model that the Hashlets and .png sales were being run under.



same goes for cointellect and badbadbitcoin bashed them from the beginning. there's only one reason for them to shill for scrypt: it's related to GAW

What better pivot than Homero letting scrypt.cc shill on every thread and cut him in on the Bitcoin from the muggles. Every thread is currently being filled with scrypt.cc

https://hashtalk.org/topic/37267/any-news-about-hashlets-hashstakers-zencloud/

skinnyboy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 09:45:55 AM
 #35513

Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.

Absolutely, did you see BadBitcoin giving it large recently over how scrypt.cc is absolutely totally legit because [insert a bunch of shit here that doesn't quite add up].



So which scrypt asic manufacturer is selling miners which ROI? AFAIK there was a brief period for a couple of months during the middle of last year when Innosilicon released the A2 where ROI could be achieved but that's it.

Even the scrypt.cc website is entirely absent any discussion about their hardware. As for the excuse that it can't be a Ponzi because it has been running for over a year, one word, GAW.

Scrypt.cc only has to pay out when a user withdraws and most of them talking constantly about how they take every satoshi of 'profit' and buy more 'KH' with it.

Which is the same business-model that the Hashlets and .png sales were being run under.



same goes for cointellect and badbadbitcoin bashed them from the beginning. there's only one reason for them to shill for scrypt: it's related to GAW

Funny you should say that reg being related to GAW.

A former mod on the scrypt-cc chatbox went by the handle "TheCleanGame".  Maybe he's still there.

The same handle was also used by someone selling hashlets on the market place on Zencloud a few months ago.

Coincidence?  I doubt it.

favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 09:57:33 AM
 #35514

so Garza is involved in the former Paycoinpoker site? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1041634.0 smells like his business practice.

bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
April 30, 2015, 10:20:22 AM
 #35515

Supposedly bitjane worked at ltcgear

CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086
Merit: 1042


HODL


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 11:16:49 AM
 #35516

Also scrypt.cc is shilling hard, I feel an exit scam is coming very very soon.

Absolutely, did you see BadBitcoin giving it large recently over how scrypt.cc is absolutely totally legit because [insert a bunch of shit here that doesn't quite add up].



So which scrypt asic manufacturer is selling miners which ROI? AFAIK there was a brief period for a couple of months during the middle of last year when Innosilicon released the A2 where ROI could be achieved but that's it.

Even the scrypt.cc website is entirely absent any discussion about their hardware. As for the excuse that it can't be a Ponzi because it has been running for over a year, one word, GAW.

Scrypt.cc only has to pay out when a user withdraws and most of them talking constantly about how they take every satoshi of 'profit' and buy more 'KH' with it.

Which is the same business-model that the Hashlets and .png sales were being run under.



You can make good money on these types of site.  Just keep an eye on HashTalk.  They all have the small dick syndrome...it is a competition to see who can accumulate the most hash rate.  They never withdraw BTC, always reinvest. During this time, it is safe to stay in.  Once they start talking about withdrawing BTC to realize profit, it is your time to get out.  That is how to safely profit from a scam site...with the help of the hashtards.

coinits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019


011110000110110101110010


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 11:38:33 AM
 #35517

Supposedly bitjane worked at ltcgear

Where is she working now? I will make sure to avoid it and her dirty money.

Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1240


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
April 30, 2015, 11:39:02 AM
 #35518

BTW, is this not a contender for the most asinine reasoning ever?



What's worse is that HippieMiner is thanking Badbitcoin for 'doing what you do'!

As far as I can tell, all Badbitcoin does is slag off the competition to the scam operations he is shilling.

/OT

He is part of the GAW/XPY fraud.


WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk'
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 30, 2015, 11:41:20 AM
 #35519

Exactly.  And i don't work on pay coin, i did a one off job for TeamXPY.

Well good for you. Tell us, did the money you were paid that was conned from from the unwary, old men, little boys, and retards spend ok?

teamxpy != gaw

Prove it. I personally do not believe the fancy story that the team of crooks handpicked by Homero are not still doing his bidding.

There is no way to prove it.  Paul Revere hasn't answered what would constitute proof.

And no attempts at any sort of proof have even been attempted. Why in the world would I believe a known liar that his hand picked team of crooks is not still working for him? There is every reason to lie, and Homero is a liar. You are not making sense here.

P.S: Please feel free to amaze us all with even a single tangible shred of evidence that Team XPY and or any of the other gangs of crooks are not still working for Homero.


Just to play devils advocate here Paul, I dont think this can really be proven. Sadly this is a situation where you need to take everyone's word at face value. The only thing I can suggest is actions speak louder than words and evaluate people based on their actions.

Let's look at the actions of these jokers. They worked for GAW. That leads to 2 possibilities. They are scumbags who were working on an operation that they knew was a scam, or they are incompetents who didn't realize they were working a scam.

You can pick which one you want, both options don't give me much confidence for whatever their next adventure is, especially if that adventure is related to the same scam like Team Paycoin and whatever the other group of jokers is calling themselves.
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 30, 2015, 11:44:24 AM
 #35520

Currently it would take 78 BTC worth of XPY to find out if these work. If the historical Paycoin Price Plunge continues at near the same rate it has been, this should be down to 1-3 BTC in a couple months. For that price I would try it, just for shits and giggles. Not that 100% continuously compounding interest would make you a profit when the coin is losing value so rapidly.

I was thinking the same.

Using the leaked keys it would be possible to achieve 100% per year staking if you bought 125k XPY. But to break even on that you would need to be able to sell for at least 50% of what you paid for it in a year's time.

The way the price continues to plummet it seems very unlikely you'll be able to break even, even if you do "cheat" and use a prime controller key like those at the top of the paycoin foodchain do.

The math on this, like every "project" since the launch of paycoin only makes sense if you start with a bunch of coins created out of thin air.
Pages: « 1 ... 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 [1776] 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 ... 2458 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!