NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
January 17, 2018, 02:41:43 AM |
|
You have bitvest.io on the radar to be added? I like to know their weekly stats=)
Was added many months ago already :p https://dicesites.com/bitvest https://dicesites.com/bitvest/ltc https://dicesites.com/bitvest/ethYou can put on the site that yolodice has added a new coin to their site to be used to wager with. They have put the addition of litecoin on their site since Jan 15th launched it during their last update to the site. It also has a faucet for this coin if you do not want be pinned down to just using bitcoin.
Added yesterday already https://dicesites.com/yolodice/ltc They are all the way down on the frontpage list since wagering just started so still low amount.
|
|
|
|
darkschneider78
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 1
|
|
February 27, 2018, 03:09:41 AM |
|
Is there a reason why Duckdice.com is not on list? Is it because they cant be verified? I noticed they have the word provably fair.. thinking they were certified by the site.. I like to introduce my website https://dicesites.comOn DiceSites.com there is: - an overview of dice sites - statistics of these websites (updated automatically every 15 mins) - graphs to compare the websites - provably fair verifiers for most popular dice sites - more features later Basically it should give you a way to compare dice sites without reading subjective reviews. And just checking out the activity of several dice sites. Any feature requests or feedback is welcome. I personally still have a lot of ideas/plans too. https://dicesites.com
|
|
|
|
Erza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 27, 2018, 07:00:53 AM |
|
Is there a reason why Duckdice.com is not on list? Is it because they cant be verified? I noticed they have the word provably fair.. thinking they were certified by the site.. I like to introduce my website https://dicesites.comOn DiceSites.com there is: - an overview of dice sites - statistics of these websites (updated automatically every 15 mins) - graphs to compare the websites - provably fair verifiers for most popular dice sites - more features later Basically it should give you a way to compare dice sites without reading subjective reviews. And just checking out the activity of several dice sites. Any feature requests or feedback is welcome. I personally still have a lot of ideas/plans too. https://dicesites.comWhat do you mean? I do not think that is the reason why they are not on the list. Bte their bet can be verified, where do you get this info about their site is not provably fair? I played there before and everything is just smooth. There is reason why their site is not on the list, the reasonable thing is they do not have huge wagered amount Because on dicesites.com they categorized sites into 5 different way, total wagered, total bets, opening time, max payout and total invested, i do not think duckdice meet this conditions
|
|
|
|
NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
February 28, 2018, 04:25:52 AM |
|
Is there a reason why Duckdice.com is not on list? Is it because they cant be verified? I noticed they have the word provably fair.. thinking they were certified by the site..
They don't have a "total wagered" statistic so I can't add them. Besides that, they had a bit of scammy bonus so that could be another reason for me to not add them (but I didn't read all details.) However, all of that has nothing to do with provably fair. I guess you might just be talking about a provably fair verifier? They could be still perfectly provably fair (I didn't check yet.) On quick look they do use a nonce-implementation and that generally is really provably fair. Just make sure to verify your bets, their third-party verifier seems fine: https://codepen.io/anon/pen/bwJLjj
|
|
|
|
DarkStar_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
|
|
March 04, 2018, 11:32:45 PM |
|
Bustadice stats seem to be broken, they've been showing 0 for everything except bankroll since March 1st. https://dicesites.com/bustadice
|
taking a break - expect delayed responses
|
|
|
NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
March 05, 2018, 12:38:46 AM |
|
Thanks for reporting. Right now https://bustadice.com says: bustadice is undergoing maintenance and will be back online soon. So I am curious whether it's me or them
|
|
|
|
trepxtz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 6
|
|
March 17, 2018, 08:49:46 AM |
|
Why not list bustabit and bustadice on the front page?
|
|
|
|
NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
March 19, 2018, 03:32:55 AM |
|
Why not list bustabit and bustadice on the front page?
Well bustabit isn't really a dice site. On new version of my site I made a filter so you can still show it, but unfortunately I didn't work on it for over a year. One day.. lol. Bustadice was relatively new. I only add popular sites that have been around for a while (even though trusted Ryan is auditor on there.) However in less than 2 weeks bustadice will be 6 months old, so I just added it to frontpage PS, on an unrelated note, there was an issue with the bitsler verifier for the game "multicolor" where I calculated the correct roll result but incorrect color/payout multiplier for specific rolls (it seems mostly roll 8-11.5); this is fixed now. PS2, I noticed SafeDice hired a support guy, so that is great to see I will just observe for a bit more and then re-add them if it looks like their support is really improved.
|
|
|
|
klink10k
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2018, 04:39:37 PM |
|
is there a way to see the sites tracked that aren't on the front page?
|
|
|
|
SDmod
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2018, 09:44:36 PM |
|
Why not list bustabit and bustadice on the front page?
Well bustabit isn't really a dice site. On new version of my site I made a filter so you can still show it, but unfortunately I didn't work on it for over a year. One day.. lol. Bustadice was relatively new. I only add popular sites that have been around for a while (even though trusted Ryan is auditor on there.) However in less than 2 weeks bustadice will be 6 months old, so I just added it to frontpage PS, on an unrelated note, there was an issue with the bitsler verifier for the game "multicolor" where I calculated the correct roll result but incorrect color/payout multiplier for specific rolls (it seems mostly roll 8-11.5); this is fixed now. PS2, I noticed SafeDice hired a support guy, so that is great to see I will just observe for a bit more and then re-add them if it looks like their support is really improved. NLNico, I wanted to introduce myself to you, my name is Ethan and I'm the new Sr. Mod/Support over at SafeDice.com. I've been working with Sam, the site owner here for a few weeks now and we've been working hard to get support up to par with the sites reputation here recently. So far, things have been running smoothly and response times have been reduced significantly for both BCT posts as well as email inquiries. SD chat has picked up as well recently due to better support response times, which has increased overall trust in players I've noticed that SD has been off the DiceSites front page for a little while now, is there anything we can do to get listed back on there? A few players have been asking us about this, and I think that it would be in our best interest to work with you to be re-listed on the site. Any input on this subject (or any others) would be much appreciated, and I look forward to hopefully working with you on this! - Ethan (SDmod) @ SafeDice.com
|
|
|
|
NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
March 28, 2018, 03:52:33 PM |
|
Hi Ethan, Yes, like I said in my previous post, I am glad that you are working there now. It does seem like support is much better lately, so I re-added SafeDice. Obviously I hope you and Sam can keep up the quicker support
|
|
|
|
thebitcoinbanker
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2018, 03:27:27 PM |
|
Hi NLNico We have just released our shiny new dice game on https://www.stakeabit.com, as a master of Dice games we would love to get your feedback and thoughts on areas of improvement? Kind Regards Scott
|
|
|
|
thesourc3
Member
Offline
Activity: 201
Merit: 11
|
|
April 05, 2018, 11:05:27 PM |
|
NLNico - Im pretty sure that Nitrogensports wagers themselves constantly on their site, if you check the all bets tab on their site you'll see that there is ALWAYS someone betting 0.001 over and over again from the same accounts, no matter what time of day. This explains how their wager amount is so high compared to other sites on dicesites.com. I rarely see anyone else play there. Might be a good idea to look into this and possibly remove nitrogen from dicesites until they can prove otherwise, as it doesn't seem like its too accurate for the front page. I dont know anyone that actually plays at Nitrogen for dice It's also impossible to actually see what users wager on their site as they make it so that you cannot click on user accounts to see their wager amount. Seems like its almost impossible to actually verify whether bets are legitimate or not on there.
|
|
|
|
NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
April 06, 2018, 03:45:18 AM |
|
Normally Nitrogen doesn't have that much wagered, only since ~10 days or so. I understand that looks fishy together with that specific bet amount, but there is actually a good reason It is currently EV+ to bet on Nitrogen because of their jackpot. You need to have a 7 in the result for 13 times in a row. So on average you would lose the following amount: 1/(0.3439^13) = 1062629.12315 rolls. 1062629.12315 *0.001*0.01 = BTC10.626 While the jackpot right now is BTC18.74, so the player has a positive edge to bet! Note there is a minimum bet amount which explains the bets you are seeing You must have a bet amount and a profit amount of at least 0.001 for your roll to count towards the jackpot. TBH, I am actually considering to even put up a bot myself lol.
|
|
|
|
RHavar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1463
Merit: 1886
|
|
April 06, 2018, 02:38:06 PM |
|
What do you think about for your "Daily invested" chart, that you subtract the "Daily profit"? As it's a lot more interesting to see net investments/divestments rather than (net investments + profit) Awesome site, btw :d
|
Check out gamblingsitefinder.com for a decent list/rankings of crypto casinos. Note: I have no affiliation or interest in it, and don't even agree with all the rankings ... but it's the only uncorrupted review site I'm aware of.
|
|
|
BTCevo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1008
|
|
April 07, 2018, 12:26:48 PM |
|
Normally Nitrogen doesn't have that much wagered, only since ~10 days or so. I understand that looks fishy together with that specific bet amount, but there is actually a good reason It is currently EV+ to bet on Nitrogen because of their jackpot. You need to have a 7 in the result for 13 times in a row. So on average you would lose the following amount: 1/(0.3439^13) = 1062629.12315 rolls. 1062629.12315 *0.001*0.01 = BTC10.626 While the jackpot right now is BTC18.74, so the player has a positive edge to bet! Note there is a minimum bet amount which explains the bets you are seeing You must have a bet amount and a profit amount of at least 0.001 for your roll to count towards the jackpot. TBH, I am actually considering to even put up a bot myself lol. But this is only just numbers there, you are not going to hit it exactly there unless you are really lucky on betting that. I tried it once but of course not hit 7 for 13 times but tried it roll all day but got nothing, still losing much of my balance. Make the exact same deposit again and still can't do this thing. Double balance but nothing like this jackpot can be hit
|
|
|
|
thesourc3
Member
Offline
Activity: 201
Merit: 11
|
|
April 07, 2018, 05:41:03 PM |
|
Normally Nitrogen doesn't have that much wagered, only since ~10 days or so. I understand that looks fishy together with that specific bet amount, but there is actually a good reason It is currently EV+ to bet on Nitrogen because of their jackpot. You need to have a 7 in the result for 13 times in a row. So on average you would lose the following amount: 1/(0.3439^13) = 1062629.12315 rolls. 1062629.12315 *0.001*0.01 = BTC10.626 While the jackpot right now is BTC18.74, so the player has a positive edge to bet! Note there is a minimum bet amount which explains the bets you are seeing You must have a bet amount and a profit amount of at least 0.001 for your roll to count towards the jackpot. TBH, I am actually considering to even put up a bot myself lol. This would be understandable if I saw multiple people rolling on their site for this but every time I’m on there I literally only see one user (4938518) betting. Looks like everyone else bets less than 0.001, and you can actually tell that it’s a real user playing. Not saying they’re betting on their own dice for sure, but it just seems too fishy. Furthermore, the “player” 4938519 seems to have hit the jackpot yesterday but they’re still betting the exact same way...it’s all too strange that the only player betting like that wins the jackpot and continues to do so. Is it just me, or do others think the same? I mean, I literally never see anyone playing there yet they’re somehow beating even PD in their weekly wager volume. EDIT: looks like they actually have 2 bots running, 4938518 and 4938519. What are the chances that users that close together are both wagering the same way? This just keeps getting weirder and weirder...
|
|
|
|
NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
April 08, 2018, 03:45:28 AM Last edit: April 08, 2018, 04:34:41 AM by NLNico |
|
This would be understandable if I saw multiple people rolling on their site for this but every time I’m on there I literally only see one user (4938518) betting. There are definitely others. Right now user "636296" is going for the jackpot. Obviously you still have to risk a decent amount of money, so it's not like there are that many going for it. Furthermore, the “player” 4938519 seems to have hit the jackpot yesterday but they’re still betting the exact same way...it’s all too strange that the only player betting like that wins the jackpot and continues to do so. Somehow the jackpot got reset to ~5.6 BTC after the JP win. I am not sure what rules they have for that. However, with the 12 required sevens, it's still EV+ right now. (Note they can change the required sevens to 13, it is unclear when they do this.) looks like they actually have 2 bots running, 4938518 and 4938519. What are the chances that users that close together are both wagering the same way? Chances are very high that this is indeed the same user running a bot on 2 accounts to increase their odds (assuming that there is an account-bet-limit.) I am not sure if that's allowed per nitrogen TOS, but that would be his problem lol. If Nitrogen wanted to fake players, it seems like getting 2 more random IDs would be pretty easy. To be clear: of course Nitrogen (or any dice site) could fake players And I do appreciate you reporting this, I definitely take it serious and in the past I have analyzed many bets on other sites very carefully. I was planning to do the same before I saw the jackpot. But overall, I really don't think it's far-fetched to imagine people are taking a EV+ opportunity. Personally I didn't try to go for the JP, because there is still some risk you don't win it and with the required 13 times you would still have to risk a decent sum. That being said, I even got a PM from someone after my first reply to ask some details. And he actually did give it a try with the autobet option (unfortunately he didn't win the JP though.) While it might be only 3-10 players going for it (from time to time), constantly betting 0.001 definitely increases their total wager. If someone hits the JP again and when it's not EV+ anymore, I certainly expect the wager to be lower again.
|
|
|
|
slaman29
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1280
Livecasino, 20% cashback, no fuss payouts.
|
|
April 08, 2018, 12:59:01 PM |
|
Normally Nitrogen doesn't have that much wagered, only since ~10 days or so. I understand that looks fishy together with that specific bet amount, but there is actually a good reason It is currently EV+ to bet on Nitrogen because of their jackpot. You need to have a 7 in the result for 13 times in a row. So on average you would lose the following amount: 1/(0.3439^13) = 1062629.12315 rolls. 1062629.12315 *0.001*0.01 = BTC10.626 While the jackpot right now is BTC18.74, so the player has a positive edge to bet! Note there is a minimum bet amount which explains the bets you are seeing You must have a bet amount and a profit amount of at least 0.001 for your roll to count towards the jackpot. TBH, I am actually considering to even put up a bot myself lol. I think it is pretty common to see the same player or players making the same bets, especially when dice bots are in play. Almost every site I visit has their regulars, although they come and go, some return after ages, some move on elsewhere. Huge JPs like that do tend to attract as they're +EV like you said. Some admins also openly gamble on their casinos, I see nothing wrong with that, although others might say conflict of interest, it proves to me the site is good enough for admins to play at. Keep up the good comments, admin. Thread is almost 4 years old!
|
|
|
|
NLNico (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1295
DiceSites.com owner
|
|
April 15, 2018, 03:04:56 AM |
|
First of all, compliments for your nice site! Thank you I want to ask you to mention my (school)project on your site. On the site you can play 100% transparent and demonstrably honest gambling through the blockhash. https://www.blockhash.win/Pretty cool you could initially build that for a school project hehe Dicesites.com is meant to be an overview of the most popular dice sites, so I could only add your site in the future if it's already more popular. Best of luck though.
|
|
|
|
|