that are major changes in coin rolloutplan....
be very sensitive with that
adapt technology to have a better technology reach same coinrollout effect is one thing
but change coinrollout at all total coins coin rollout speed become mineable agains instead of POS as only coin rollout source
that sounds to me like overkill
get the better technology but try to touch the basic coin specs regarding aimed total coins and coin rollout speed as less as possible
because that where the values investors based their decision on when they did chose ERC
noone want the ruleset of his investment changed to be different than what made him invest
best would be u make it visible for us how the new rulesets will create similar results
i am for example not keen to be forced to mine to keep my share of total coins
Yes i can see your point, we will modify the specs to make a similar outcome (or better) fpr our investors,
i will get mor specific in numbers when we are done with our tests.
The only difference should be the investore will do something different then staking.
But on the other hand he will have TWO possibilities to achieve the goal:
1) mining and supporting the network
2) saving and limiting the supply for a certain time
if we achive that by a saving rate of max 8% and a slow mining reward,
that is attractiv to single users, but not attractive enough for multipools,
would you be able to argee on that?
Raeson for my decission:
1) If you watch currend POS coins, they are all running on an ridiculous old core, the is rarely any progress.
With the new solution we could work with bitcoin core engines and take advatage of their currend developments.
2) miners are creating rumors and we need some more public discussions talking about us, POS is mostly quitely staking people, that
do not talk that much. So i searched for a solution that could make both of them happy. I am sure stakers will lover the saving concept.
and yes, i agree with rollout speed and total coins should stay the same
tell me what you think
Matthias
Poll
?
