neoscrypt algo for ccminer and nvidia card: call for donation

[StuffOfInterest]

My 2 gainward 750ti's non powered are doing 155-160 without overclocking.

Neoscrypts seems to be the most profitable to mine now.  Here are my hashrate's on standard clock's:

2 750ti, 1 970 and 1 980

sp_, looks like you have another machine mining the heck out of X11 there.

Looking forward to trying out NeoScrypt when I get home tonight.  Thanks for getting it out to us DJM.

[lextad]

hey all im gettin 4 to 500khs but i do no like this http://s18.postimg.org/iafmt643d/Capture1.png is going really fast and only show gpu#0 and some time the other 3
what can this be

[djm34]

hey all im gettin 4 to 500khs but i do no like this is going really fast and only show gpu#0 and some time the other 3
what can this be

you need to reduce a bit the overclock on at least gpu#0 (it probably has crashed)

[lextad]

im running no OC


PS is ok i interchange the cards and all good now

[frazier34567]

Getting about 148-152KH/s on my non OC 5X EVGA 750 ti SC and the one with the monitor gets 22KH/s

Added it to MC for now, 4th best crypto for me after Quark, X13 and X11

On concern is that when I launch it it says it is bind the GPUs 0-5 to CPUs 0-5.  I only have a 2 core Pentium CPU. Is it just a thread count or something?

Most other say that 3 bind to CPU 0 and 3 Bind to CPU 1.

Fraz

[djm34]

Getting about 148-152KH/s on my non OC 5X EVGA 750 ti SC and the one with the monitor gets 22KH/s

Added it to MC for now, 4th best crypto for me after Quark, X13 and X11

On concern is that when I launch it it says it is bind the GPUs 0-5 to CPUs 0-5.  I only have a 2 core Pentium CPU. Is it just a thread count or something?

Most other say that 3 bind to CPU 0 and 3 Bind to CPU 1.

Fraz

It could be a lot a 750ti to handle both the monitor and algo.
usually when one of my card is plugged to a monitor it allocates about 200Mb of vram and the current version the algo use about 1.8Gb of vram, so that may cause problem as well as lag...

Regarding the number of gpu and number of cpu thread, I am not sure, but if it worked with older ccminer there is no reason it wouldn't work with this one.

[StuffOfInterest]

Sadly, not the best for me right now.  Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed.  Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt.  For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP.  When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning.  Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup.  Thanks for getting it out there for us to try.  It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.

[djm34]

Sadly, not the best for me right now.  Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed.  Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt.  For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP.  When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning.  Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup.  Thanks for getting it out there for us to try.  It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.

I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput

[tbearhere]

the dll's are from september 2014. Not sure though, the hashrate dropped now. down to 620. Need to test some more.

you might need to increase a bit the voltage so it can systain your oc...
I tried to remove the dll but I don't see any difference: my core clock is 1466MHz (it is an factory OC so +175 lead to a crash)


edit: I must really have a crappy 750ti, I can't do more than 155MH/s
In case of crash you need to back up a bit the OC (it was crashing after a while with my defaut OC)

I believe you meant 155kh/s right.
With my standard oc I get 155kh/s and 1 750ti ( it is factory super oc ) I get  5kh/s. My oc on my 750ti's like 1350 MHz.
I have noticed with scrypt my oc is  +60  and +300mem .... on ccminer +130  and +60mem so I think I need to try as if i'm doing scrypt.
EDIT:The oc I used is my ccminer settings not my scrypt Cuda miner settings. It does seam that the card with the video out does very low hash. I'll try it on my asrock rig that has no cards with video output pluged in...using the mobo for the video.

[scryptr]

THANKS DJM34!!!

I now have something to test a new 960 with.     I should check my messages more often!       --scryptr

[StuffOfInterest]

Sadly, not the best for me right now.  Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed.  Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt.  For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP.  When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning.  Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup.  Thanks for getting it out there for us to try.  It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.

I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput

Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.

Launch command:

ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1

Result is fast repeating:

[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!

[djm34]

Sadly, not the best for me right now.  Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed.  Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt.  For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP.  When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning.  Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup.  Thanks for getting it out there for us to try.  It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.

I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput

Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.

Launch command:

ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1

Result is fast repeating:

[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!

apparently there is something wrong in the default setup of the throughput
try to add "--througput 3.5" (or less) to the command line

[StuffOfInterest]

Sadly, not the best for me right now.  Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed.  Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt.  For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP.  When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning.  Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup.  Thanks for getting it out there for us to try.  It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.

I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput

Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.

Launch command:

ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1

Result is fast repeating:

[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!

apparently there is something wrong in the default setup of the throughput
try to add "--througput 3.5" (or less) to the command line

Much better.  Settles in at about 300 kh/s (+/- 30 after 45 units) on my setup.  Will have to play with the tuning settings later.

[djm34]

Sadly, not the best for me right now.  Getting 180 kh/s with 2 x eVGA 750 Ti SC (2GB) running at stock speed.  Since one of the cards also supports my monitor the system experiences horrible lag while mining NeoScrypt.  For my setup, currently gross earning is 1/6 of Quark on YAAMP.  When power is factored in I'm barely in the positive net earning.  Still, it's a start and with a little TLC I expect we'll see better even for my limited setup.  Thanks for getting it out there for us to try.  It is in the mix on my machine so we'll see how it does over the next few days as prices fluctuate up and down.

I'll try to release tomorrow a version with an adjustable intensity/throughput

Sorry, new version has no love for my 2 x 750 Ti setup.

Launch command:

ccminer.exe -q -r 3 -R 10 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://yaamp.com:4233 -u [myaddress] -p 1

Result is fast repeating:

[2015-01-27 21:45:04] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!

apparently there is something wrong in the default setup of the throughput
try to add "--througput 3.5" (or less) to the command line

Much better.  Settles in at about 300 kh/s (+/- 30 after 45 units) on my setup.  Will have to play with the tuning settings later.

try the new version I just uploaded, there was definitely a bug in this one (the throughput was getting rounded as integer...)

[Ausar66]

date: 1/29/2015

sent: 0.01817859 BTC

Transaction ID: 8705c1991125ca01e14a917dd7206449664831b25adfb1fa68c8cd6e506d20e1

Thanks for the excellent work.

[StuffOfInterest]

djm,

3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup.  Here are a few test runs I did:

Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s

Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s

Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.

With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.

[frazier34567]

V3 Release getting between 730 and 779 with my rig. 6 750 ti no overclock and monitor running one card at -throughput 3.5

[djm34]

djm,

3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup.  Here are a few test runs I did:

Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s

Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s

Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.

With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.

What is particular regarding gpu1 ? Is it one plugged into a monitor ?
Try using with release 3 --throughput 3 (because of rounding bug, that was what you were using in release 2)

[StuffOfInterest]

djm,

3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup.  Here are a few test runs I did:

Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s

Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s

Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.

With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.

What is particular regarding gpu1 ? Is it one plugged into a monitor ?
Try using with release 3 --throughput 3 (because of rounding bug, that was what you were using in release 2)

Oh yeah, that made a difference.  --throughput 3 is reporting about 308 kh/s combined for the two cards on accepted blocks.  If I exclude the first couple of blocks which have low rates then the actual speed is around 320-330 kh/s.  The reported values per gpu are around 160 kh/s and 170 kh/s for GPU 0 and 1 respectively.  Looks like 3.5 was just too much for GPU 1.

Not sure which is connected to the monitor but I'd hazard a guess that it is GPU 1.

Thanks.

[djm34]

djm,

3rd release does not like my 2 x 750 Ti setup.  Here are a few test runs I did:

Release 3, no options: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 21 kh/s
Release 3, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 159 kh/s, GPU1 = 18 kh/s

Release 2, no options: no options: (boom) GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CPU!
Release 2, --throughput 3.5: GPU0 = 167 kh/s, GPU1 = 164 kh/s

Release 2 with the "throughput" option specified is my champ right now.

With release 2, I've had NeoScrypt bubble up to most profitable in Miner Control a few times.

What is particular regarding gpu1 ? Is it one plugged into a monitor ?
Try using with release 3 --throughput 3 (because of rounding bug, that was what you were using in release 2)

Oh yeah, that made a difference.  --throughput 3 is reporting about 308 kh/s combined for the two cards on accepted blocks.  If I exclude the first couple of blocks which have low rates then the actual speed is around 320-330 kh/s.  The reported values per gpu are around 160 kh/s and 170 kh/s for GPU 0 and 1 respectively.  Looks like 3.5 was just too much for GPU 1.

Not sure which is connected to the monitor but I'd hazard a guess that it is GPU 1.

Thanks.

ok good. actually if needed you can also adjust the throughput for each card separately using "-d750ti#1,750ti#2 --throughput 3,3.5" (however 750ti#1 may or may not corresponds to gpu1... )