WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested

[Work2Work]

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed...

[cheekychap]

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed...

Can't you see it was just a scam ?

[padrino]

Be careful, excalibur (cheako911) is playing double spend attack again, he's trying to recover his lost from previous weekly round

I smell tears getting closer

Those were false starts, they didn't show up in the game.

It looks like the attack was successful, thus this is the problem with going based on confirmed order.  Players can double spend if they don't get confirmed in the first block, thus we end up with a single block Ponzi.

Who are you?

Nasty computer hacker.

Or just someone that pays shit for TX fees and his payouts are missed like last week...

[arallmuus]

Be careful, excalibur (cheako911) is playing double spend attack again, he's trying to recover his lost from previous weekly round

I smell tears getting closer

Those were false starts, they didn't show up in the game.

It looks like the attack was successful, thus this is the problem with going based on confirmed order.  Players can double spend if they don't get confirmed in the first block, thus we end up with a single block Ponzi.

Who are you?

Nasty computer hacker.

Or just someone that pays shit for TX fees and his payouts are missed like last week...

if someone keep on repeating this kind of cycle than this game isnt really a ponzi game anymore but instead a cheating game where someone keep on trying to do double spend and tried to cheat by depositting earlier every week, i wonder why people keep on playing in this nasty script

[cheako911]

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed...

Can't you see it was just a scam ?

5BTC out of 14BTC hardly makes for a scam.  Though it's been a while with no movement.

[Force.]

I wish this site was as active as it used to be.
I remember the first day i made $100 profit.

[cheako911]

Be careful, excalibur (cheako911) is playing double spend attack again, he's trying to recover his lost from previous weekly round

I smell tears getting closer

Those were false starts, they didn't show up in the game.

It looks like the attack was successful, thus this is the problem with going based on confirmed order.  Players can double spend if they don't get confirmed in the first block, thus we end up with a single block Ponzi.

Who are you?

Nasty computer hacker.

Or just someone that pays shit for TX fees and his payouts are missed like last week...

if someone keep on repeating this kind of cycle than this game isnt really a ponzi game anymore but instead a cheating game where someone keep on trying to do double spend and tried to cheat by depositing earlier every week, i wonder why people keep on playing in this nasty script

One wonders how much is accidental, luck, scheming?

[arieq]

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed...

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

[fandango66]

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

https://blockchain.info/tx/bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878

hmm

[brizio71]

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

https://blockchain.info/tx/bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878

hmm

That's the end !!!


....remember when will be release the version 4 !!!

[Petpowder]

I doubt it is scam, probably precautionary measures.
What is the point to steal 5 btc when you could steal 60 or 30?
All we have to do is wait.
BTW anywone wrote to OP about those 5 btc?

[sevenseas]

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed...

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

So who is next in the line for payment then?
Also 24hour script works fine.

[everlast25]

Blockchain will vanish all double spend transactions in around 30 hours and then it will be good time to SEND BACK THAT 5 BTC IN GAME

[Mcqueen44]

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

[cheako911]

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

[Mcqueen44]

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

[cheako911]

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

Well, remove the shit and it says...

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 1.0002002
Outputs: 0.99997 BTC 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good.  Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network.  A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC.  Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

However there is no proof included in the previous statements, they tell a good story, but are empty of any justification.  Don't be taken in by sweet talk, only trust the long strings of encoded data.  Without the data backing this Ponzi up, they truly would be just scamming everybody.

[sickhouse]

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

Well, remove the shit and it says...

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 1.0002002
Outputs: 0.99997 BTC 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good.  Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network.  A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC.  Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

However there is no proof included in the previous statements, they tell a good story, but are empty of any justification.  Don't be taken in by sweet talk, only trust the long strings of encoded data.  Without the data backing this Ponzi up, they truly would be just scamming everybody.

Thank god you aren't a journalist "THIS JUST IN: A SCAM THATS BEEN KNOWN FOR ALMOST 100 YEARS IS STILL A SCAM!"

[cheako911]

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good.  Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network.  A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC.  Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

Thank god you aren't a journalist

Seconded, I only write for perl(1) these days.

[prince_k]

Why owner of that ponzi took 5 btc from this week's round?