Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 10:58:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: You are in the Gambling section. You are likely to eventually lose any money that you gamble/"invest". Additionally, moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 »
  Print  
Author Topic: WeeklyPonzi.com 'v3' | 100% Automated | Secure | 130% Return | 700+ BTC Invested  (Read 115034 times)
Work2Work
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 11


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 01:12:07 AM
 #3621

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed... Huh
cheekychap
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 01:22:50 AM
 #3622

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed... Huh

Can't you see it was just a scam ?

padrino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000


https://www.bitworks.io


View Profile WWW
February 21, 2015, 01:27:37 AM
 #3623

Be careful, excalibur (cheako911) is playing double spend attack again, he's trying to recover his lost from previous weekly round

I smell tears getting closer

Those were false starts, they didn't show up in the game.

It looks like the attack was successful, thus this is the problem with going based on confirmed order.  Players can double spend if they don't get confirmed in the first block, thus we end up with a single block Ponzi.

Who are you?

Nasty computer hacker.

Or just someone that pays shit for TX fees and his payouts are missed like last week...

1CPi7VRihoF396gyYYcs2AdTEF8KQG2BCR
https://www.bitworks.io
arallmuus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1414



View Profile WWW
February 21, 2015, 02:34:22 AM
 #3624

Be careful, excalibur (cheako911) is playing double spend attack again, he's trying to recover his lost from previous weekly round

I smell tears getting closer

Those were false starts, they didn't show up in the game.

It looks like the attack was successful, thus this is the problem with going based on confirmed order.  Players can double spend if they don't get confirmed in the first block, thus we end up with a single block Ponzi.

Who are you?

Nasty computer hacker.

Or just someone that pays shit for TX fees and his payouts are missed like last week...

if someone keep on repeating this kind of cycle than this game isnt really a ponzi game anymore but instead a cheating game where someone keep on trying to do double spend and tried to cheat by depositting earlier every week, i wonder why people keep on playing in this nasty script

R


▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄
████████████████
▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████
████████▌███▐████
▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████
████████████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀
LLBIT
  CRYPTO   
FUTURES
 1,000x 
LEVERAGE
COMPETITIVE
    FEES    
 INSTANT 
EXECUTION
.
   TRADE NOW   
cheako911
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 02:53:16 AM
 #3625

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed... Huh

Can't you see it was just a scam ?

5BTC out of 14BTC hardly makes for a scam.  Though it's been a while with no movement.
Force.
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 02:54:37 AM
 #3626

I wish this site was as active as it used to be.
I remember the first day i made $100 profit.
cheako911
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 02:57:10 AM
 #3627

Be careful, excalibur (cheako911) is playing double spend attack again, he's trying to recover his lost from previous weekly round

I smell tears getting closer

Those were false starts, they didn't show up in the game.

It looks like the attack was successful, thus this is the problem with going based on confirmed order.  Players can double spend if they don't get confirmed in the first block, thus we end up with a single block Ponzi.

Who are you?

Nasty computer hacker.

Or just someone that pays shit for TX fees and his payouts are missed like last week...

if someone keep on repeating this kind of cycle than this game isnt really a ponzi game anymore but instead a cheating game where someone keep on trying to do double spend and tried to cheat by depositing earlier every week, i wonder why people keep on playing in this nasty script

One wonders how much is accidental, luck, scheming?
arieq
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 256


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 04:48:01 AM
 #3628

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed... Huh

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

fandango66
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 08:09:18 AM
 #3629

Quote
Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

https://blockchain.info/tx/bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878

hmm
brizio71
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 456
Merit: 250


Blockchain Just Entered The Real World


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 08:41:31 AM
 #3630

Quote
Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

https://blockchain.info/tx/bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878

hmm

That's the end !!!


....remember when will be release the version 4 !!!




   ▄▄███████▄▄       ▐█     █▌         ██          ▐██████▄▄       ▐██████▄          ██         ▐█▄        █▌    ███████▌
 ▄███▀▀   ▀▀███▄     ▐█     █▌        █▌▐█         ▐█   ▀▀██▄     ▐█   ▀█▌        █▌▐█        ▐███▄      █▌       █▌   
▐██▌        ▐██▌    ▐█     █▌       ██  ██        ▐█      ▐█▌    ▐█   ▄█▌       ██  ██       ▐█ ▀██▄    █▌       █▌   
███          ███    ▐█     █▌      ██   ██       ▐█       ██    ▐██████▀       ██   ██      ▐█   ▀██▄   █▌       █▌   
▐██▌   ██▄   ▐██▌    ▐█     █▌     ██████████      ▐█      ▐█▌    ▐█▀██▄        ██████████     ▐█    ▀██▄ █▌       █▌   
 ▀███▄▄ ▀██▄ ▀█▀     ▐█▄   ▄█▌    ██       ██     ▐█   ▄▄██▀     ▐█  ▀██▄     ██       ██    ▐█      ▀███▌       █▌   
   ▀▀█████▀██▄        ▀██████▀    ██         ██    ▐██████▀▀       ▐█   ▀█▌   ██         ██   ▐█        ▀█▌       █▌   
           ▀▀▀

A Blueprint for Mapping Decentralized Data


Telegram             Twitter             Medium             LinkedIn
██
██
██
██
██
   
Data Stamping
Constellation Creation
Enriched data and services
██
██
██
██
██
   
With Quadrant, any form of

Data can be Authenticated.
Petpowder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 09:52:42 AM
 #3631

I doubt it is scam, probably precautionary measures.
What is the point to steal 5 btc when you could steal 60 or 30?
All we have to do is wait.
BTW anywone wrote to OP about those 5 btc?
sevenseas
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 10:41:41 AM
 #3632

Still dont get, why OP moved coins and when payments be processed... Huh

Payments are not processed because the bank has insufficient fund to pay out, current balance left is 0.9BTC, it should be 5.9BTC if OP didnt steal 5BTC from the bank

So who is next in the line for payment then?
Also 24hour script works fine.
everlast25
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 11:10:55 AM
 #3633

Blockchain will vanish all double spend transactions in around 30 hours and then it will be good time to SEND BACK THAT 5 BTC IN GAME
Mcqueen44
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 06:05:19 PM
 #3634

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.
cheako911
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 06:19:46 PM
 #3635

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

Mcqueen44
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 06:27:00 PM
 #3636

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )



What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.
cheako911
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 06:48:55 PM
 #3637

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )



What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

Well, remove the shit and it says...

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 1.0002002
Outputs: 0.99997 BTC 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good.  Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network.  A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC.  Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

However there is no proof included in the previous statements, they tell a good story, but are empty of any justification.  Don't be taken in by sweet talk, only trust the long strings of encoded data.  Without the data backing this Ponzi up, they truly would be just scamming everybody.
sickhouse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 06:59:06 PM
 #3638

So, what basically happened?
Normal people send btc as usual, faggots send double spend btc, that are not included in game (simply ignored). BUT instead of paying normal people with their normal BTC as every round, OP stole(?) that BTC to 1Fee wallet under "extra funds in wallet?" label (what does it mean, btw?) and think that people send their BTC again or what?
What the fuck is going on? I still don't get that OP's move.

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
7a31ee5c558bc91e437a897f0f248cdaccd39392ff653da88bbda8e9cbdb73b9
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 15PPVtQ25V4EUavNBs2BNbp4ZfjZ8XuVix (1.0002002 BTC - Output)
Outputs:
1Week8mnAJwgaW5xJoBZo1UfhE8LYVJYk - (Unspent) 0.99997 BTC
1Exca117ik6cR2mySwfpz4GGrUGRx5p3Eh - (Unspent) 0.0000002 BTC


The spend:
11ec73c7b6b2a65e2d6a99e6497abb0ab4bd565d152c40e8cedea79f09917cfb
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )


While the withdrawal is:
bfc64992ea4b5e18bb0f9edbcfc2a319a4b0dd7cf946558c52e050b2a6127878
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )



What is that shit means? Explain in normal human language.

Well, remove the shit and it says...

I think the order of events is wrong for this scenario.  The double spend came after the withdraw was confirmed twice.

Example double spend:
Fee: 0.00023 BTC - Size: 225 bytes
Time: 2015-02-21 00:00:00
Input: 1.0002002
Outputs: 0.99997 BTC 0.0000002 BTC

The spend:
Included In Blocks   344447 ( 2015-02-21 00:41:34 + 5 minutes )

While the withdrawal is:
Included In Block   344445 ( 2015-02-21 00:28:31 + 22 minutes )

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good.  Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network.  A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC.  Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

However there is no proof included in the previous statements, they tell a good story, but are empty of any justification.  Don't be taken in by sweet talk, only trust the long strings of encoded data.  Without the data backing this Ponzi up, they truly would be just scamming everybody.

Thank god you aren't a journalist Cheesy "THIS JUST IN: A SCAM THATS BEEN KNOWN FOR ALMOST 100 YEARS IS STILL A SCAM!"

Turn off the news and read. Watch Psywar, learn something important about our society and PR, why and how it got started and how it brainwashes you.
cheako911
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2015, 07:26:10 PM
 #3639

If I were a journalists, or just plain in love with the sound of my own voice, I'd write something like.

Along came Ponzi and it was good.  Though some deposits were not confirmed by the bitcoin network.  A withdrawal was made by the OP of 5BTC.  Then the non-confirmed transactions were spent else where.

Thank god you aren't a journalist Cheesy

Seconded, I only write for perl(1) these days.
prince_k
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 82
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 22, 2015, 10:09:25 AM
 #3640

Why owner of that ponzi took 5 btc from this week's round?
Pages: « 1 ... 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 [182] 183 184 185 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!