Albert Hamilton
|
|
February 24, 2015, 09:39:59 PM |
|
I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.
I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.
Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug. WoW ! You actually relaunched !! I thought, you'll close down and move on... I'll definitely give it a try again.
|
|
|
|
GermanGiant
|
|
February 24, 2015, 10:56:39 PM |
|
The UI is great. This would probably play a crucial role to attract a lot of players...
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
February 24, 2015, 10:59:48 PM |
|
All ponzi will be scam one day, you must be carefully..
|
|
|
|
pandacoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2015, 11:00:34 PM |
|
I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.
|
|
|
|
GermanGiant
|
|
February 24, 2015, 11:10:51 PM |
|
I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.
After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not.
|
|
|
|
CrazyJoker (OP)
|
|
February 25, 2015, 12:24:17 PM |
|
I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.
After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not. Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening
|
|
|
|
arieq
|
|
February 25, 2015, 12:43:27 PM |
|
I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.
I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.
Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug. So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ?
|
|
|
|
CrazyJoker (OP)
|
|
February 25, 2015, 04:01:06 PM |
|
I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.
I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.
Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug. So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ? Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though.
|
|
|
|
TheGeorge
|
|
February 25, 2015, 04:53:55 PM |
|
I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.
I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.
Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug. So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ? Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though. Nice game. Will definitely give it a try. You might consider to create a signature campaign sort of a thing. Unique ponzi games are getting overshadowed by lots of crap around.
|
|
|
|
cazkooo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1013
|
|
February 25, 2015, 05:10:00 PM |
|
I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.
I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.
Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug. So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ? Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though. i dont get this, how do you mean by distributing loss among multiple investor?will the losing investor is choosen randomly?
|
|
|
|
CrazyJoker (OP)
|
|
February 25, 2015, 05:15:56 PM |
|
I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.
I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.
Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug. So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ? Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though. i dont get this, how do you mean by distributing loss among multiple investor?will the losing investor is choosen randomly? Oops... NO ! That statement was given in comparison to our previous rule where only the last investor was losing. Now, the losing invetors will be the group of last investors whose investment is not covered by other investors. There is no randomness in chosing the losing ones.
|
|
|
|
Albert Hamilton
|
|
February 25, 2015, 05:49:21 PM |
|
I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.
After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not. Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies.
|
|
|
|
elephantas1
|
|
February 25, 2015, 06:11:46 PM |
|
I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.
After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not. Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies. this one will fail after some time also so you shouldnt be so sure about this one
|
|
|
|
Albert Hamilton
|
|
February 25, 2015, 07:05:07 PM |
|
I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.
After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not. Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies. this one will fail after some time also so you shouldnt be so sure about this one I am not completely disagreeing with you. But, given the fact that this game has been developed from scratch in front of our eyes and it has a really appealing UI, I tend to believe that it will no evaporate like others. But, if it fails to draw attention to new players, then it is a sheer bad luck for OP.
|
|
|
|
TheGeorge
|
|
February 25, 2015, 07:57:57 PM |
|
I can't believe this "provably fair ponzi" thing discussion is still going on.
After the re-launch, by observing this current round, we will able to reach a conclusion, whether the discussion has been fruitful or not. Thanks to everyone's support. We have 30 players on board now. It is Happening I wish more people play this game rather than getting scammed by overnight script-kiddies. this one will fail after some time also so you shouldnt be so sure about this one I am not completely disagreeing with you. But, given the fact that this game has been developed from scratch in front of our eyes and it has a really appealing UI, I tend to believe that it will no evaporate like others. But, if it fails to draw attention to new players, then it is a sheer bad luck for OP. More players are joining in. That is a good sign in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Vicecity
Member
Offline
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
|
|
February 25, 2015, 08:30:43 PM |
|
no thanks.
|
|
|
|
RocketSingh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1662
Merit: 1050
|
|
February 25, 2015, 09:31:18 PM |
|
I'd suggest keeping odds of winning in your advertising, similar to odds provided by the lottery. You don't have to promise the return percentage (except the max) but letting people know there's a realistic chance of winning will earn you business...seriously.
I would play, but 190% return is scary. That's not safe for gamblers, because of how highly unsustainable it is. Try 120-130% this is a much more sustainable and allows you to last longer.
Thanks to all of you for the constructive suggestion. I have re-coded and re-launched the game. Hope, you'll like it this time. Fee free to report, if you find any bug. So, what's new in current running version ? have you changed the whole rule of the game and also the max return of investment ? Rules are now simple and straight forward. It is now working as a legacy Ponzi, i.e. loss is distributed among multiple investors unlike the single person loss in the previous version. People may invest whatever they want, i.e. system wont force anything onto them. There is no max return cap though. i dont get this, how do you mean by distributing loss among multiple investor?will the losing investor is choosen randomly? Oops... NO ! That statement was given in comparison to our previous rule where only the last investor was losing. Now, the losing invetors will be the group of last investors whose investment is not covered by other investors. There is no randomness in chosing the losing ones. I would suggest the minimum amount to deposit at 0.01 BTC from next round. 0.0005 BTC is too low to play a Ponzi Game.
|
|
|
|
onurakkas
|
|
February 26, 2015, 01:11:32 AM |
|
i will try
|
|
|
|
resya
|
|
February 26, 2015, 03:34:58 AM |
|
I dont like the way of investors listed in the table, especially the "type" column. You should change that to something simpler so that every investor only listed once in the table (except if he makes 2 or more investments)
For ex : torro35 invested 0.001
torro35 | 0.001 | invested
When torro35 got paid, it doesnt add a new entry into the table but it will simply update the status and the text color to green
torro35 | 0.001 | PAID 0.0014
Also it'd be cool to add date/time when the investments were made and paid
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
gkv9
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
!!! RiSe aBovE ThE StoRm !!!
|
|
February 26, 2015, 11:12:07 AM |
|
Is this site just an another one like nine9.ninja?? Is the structure same, except just the waiting time?
|
|
|
|
|